DORA's Asian Fintech Reckoning Begins
The EU's DORA regulations are proving to be even more costly than expected.
When the European Union's Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA) became fully applicable on 17 January 2025, the measure simultaneously closed the last loopholes of regulatory arbitrage and opened an expensive new era of 'operational-excellence or bust.' The law blankets more than 22,000 banks, insurers, exchanges, asset managers and ICT vendors operating in the bloc, transforming cyber-resilience from a box-tick into a board-level KPI overnight. Official EU documents show the European Systemic Risk Board calling those 22,000 firms a potential single point of systemic failure—hence the bloc's hard line.
Sticker Shock: Budgets Up 10× as the Clock Runs Down
A McKinsey survey of European financial institutions found that 'typical' implementation budgets of €5-15 million are ballooning to five-to-ten times that range. One universal bank now projects nearly €100 million of end-to-end spend. Seven in ten respondents expect permanently higher run-rates once DORA goes live, yet barely one-third are confident they can make the deadline.
Board-room risk is rising in parallel. Under DORA, individual executives face personal fines of up to €1 million for serious compliance failures, according to a PwC legal brief. That prospect is forcing Asian fintechs with European aspirations to revisit their capital-allocation models—and quickly.
Asia's Exposure Is Deeper Than It Looks
Some of Asia's biggest digital-payments players already sit squarely in DORA's blast radius:
No Safety Net from Home Regulators
Asian supervisors have issued high-level resilience frameworks—MAS's Technology Risk Management Guidelines in Singapore, and the HKMA's Operational Resilience (OR-2) module in Hong Kong, but neither provides the granular technical standards that European regulators demand. That leaves Asian fintechs to build parallel, EU-specific compliance stacks or risk losing euro-zone clients that now must evidence resilience across their entire supply chains.
Critical-Third-Party Roulette
The European Supervisory Authorities will publish the first list of Critical Third-Party Providers (CTPPs) by July 2025, triggering 12-month localisation, audit and reporting duties for whomever ends up on it. Cloud-native payments processors, API aggregators and even super-apps could find themselves thrust into a quasi-SIFI regime overnight—complete with EU on-site inspections.
The New Arms Race: RegTech at Scale
RegTech vendors are licking their chops. Juniper Research expects global RegTech spend to hit US $207 billion by 2028, more than double 2023 levels, with DORA a primary catalyst Juniper. Competitive fintechs are already:
Integrated suites can shave up to 40 percent off total compliance costs versus siloed tools, according to McKinsey's scenario analysis—an efficiency gap large enough to decide M&A valuations.
Winners, Losers and the M&A Clock
The cost curve is already sorting leaders from laggards. With only 31 percent of surveyed organisations confident they would be DORA-ready on time, early-compliant fintechs are marketing resilience as a premium service. Institutional clients and private-equity investors are rewarding that posture with better terms and higher multiples.
Conversely, fintechs unable to fund full-stack compliance are drifting into the acquisition cross-hairs of larger platforms seeking scale economies. Expect an uptick in Asia-EU tie-ups as mid-tier firms trade equity for regulatory cover.
Four Strategic Plays for Asian Boards
Why the Pain Is Worth the Prize
DORA is the template for global convergence. The UK's Operational Resilience regime has been in force since 31 March 2022 with a final remediation deadline of 2025 FCA. US regulators are crafting parallel standards, and Asia-Pacific watchdogs—from MAS to Japan's FSA—are already cross-referencing DORA terminology in consultation papers. Asian fintechs that clear Europe's bar today will find tomorrow's rule-books far less daunting.
Bottom line: Operational resilience has become the new passport to the world's deepest capital pools and most demanding clients. Asian fintechs that invest early—absorbing the cost curve shock and mastering DORA's playbook—won't just stay in the European game; they'll define the next phase of global fintech leadership.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Inside The Week That Split The Creator Economy In Two
CANNES, FRANCE - JUNE 17: Atmosphere at Spotify Beach during Cannes Lions 2025 on June 17, 2025 in ... More Cannes, France. (Photo byfor Spotify) Last week, the creator economy faced a pivotal moment, not because of a new algorithm, platform or monetization model, but because of a calendar clash. Cannes Lions and VidCon, now under the same parent company, unfolded during the same week for the second time in three years. And while they were meant to celebrate creativity in all forms, what they revealed instead was a growing split in the industry itself. As creators increasingly move from the margins to the center of brand strategy, this week underscored a truth that marketers and media can no longer ignore: creators are no longer the next big thing - they are the thing. A Split Screen for the Creator Economy Cannes Lions has long been the playground of legacy brands, creative agencies and media powerhouses. This year, it leaned further into its identity as the pinnacle of polished, brand-driven storytelling. VidCon, on the other hand, remained a grassroots, creator-first gathering defined by high energy, direct fan engagement and chaotic innovation. While both events celebrated creators, the paths they charted for the future of influence diverged significantly. Who Went Where and Why The overlapping schedule highlighted a strategic fork in the road. Creators and companies had to choose: high-concept panels and yacht-side brainstorms at Cannes, or poolside networking and creator-led activations at VidCon. Only a select few managed to brave the jet lag and bridge both worlds. For creators whose brand partnerships, agency ties, or corporate sponsors aligned more with global campaigns and marketing strategy, Cannes was the natural fit. These individuals were drawn by the opportunity to sit alongside CMOs, speak on main stages and get facetime with the biggest names in advertising and tech. Creators making waves on connected TV or pioneering AI integrations had a strong presence here. Meanwhile, creators focused on building community, testing new monetization tools, and cultivating their audience relationships were more likely to choose VidCon. The Anaheim event provided a space for emerging and mid-tier creators to engage deeply with fans, discover new tech platforms and make IRL connections that rarely happen online. VidCon also served as a proving ground for innovation at the grassroots level. This divide not only exposed the contrasting nature of the two events but also underscored the broader segmentation within the creator economy itself: scale vs. intimacy, polish vs. presence, spectacle vs. spontaneity. VidCon Demonstrated The Chaos of Creativity VidCon 2025 saw a shift in tone under new leadership. Gone was the Creator Hotel, and in its place, creators spilled across Anaheim's Marriott and surrounding venues. The unstructured setting led to organic conversations, spontaneous collaborations and authentic relationship building. One standout was Viewws' Dink + Smash pickleball activation, which perfectly captured the event's ethos: creator-first, participatory and wildly engaging. Among the creators making waves were Dhar Mann and VidCon co-founder Hank Green, both of whom exemplified the event's commitment to accessible, grassroots creativity. Creators engaged with fans, brands and each other on a human level. Yet, despite these strengths, there were murmurs that VidCon's influence may be waning in some circles, with fewer brand booths and less corporate luster. Cannes Was The Theatre of Brand Power Meanwhile, Cannes Lions delivered its usual spectacle. From AI-driven installations to glittering panels on future creativity, it was a showcase of brand investment and storytelling prowess. What stood out in 2025 was the increasing role of creators as core participants. Notable figures like Amelia Dimoldenberg, Steven Bartlett and Grace Beverly brought sharp cultural insight and strategic depth to panels and conversations, cementing their roles as vital players in brand storytelling. YouTube's 20th anniversary celebration exemplified this shift, with creators headlining discussions on format innovation, fandom culture and AI-powered content. AI was the buzzword of the week, but the most resonant message was about synergy: human creativity amplified by technology. Panels underscored that brands succeeding today are those embracing authenticity and building trust through creator-led narratives. Two Sides of the Same Coin Despite the differences, both events showcased the critical role creators now play. VidCon focused on the day-to-day realities of creators: monetization, burnout and business strategy. Cannes emphasized creators as cultural architects, capable of steering brand identity and global conversation. VidCon offered lessons in community and hustle; Cannes in vision and scale. Together, they painted a picture of an economy maturing into two distinct but complementary modes: one rooted in connection, the other in prestige. What This Means for the Industry Across both Cannes and VidCon, creators shaped the themes, challenged norms and drove engagement in ways no other stakeholder group could match. Their influence is no longer limited to follower counts or short-form content; they are shaping business models, cultural narratives and future media formats. The rise of creators as thought leaders, collaborators and innovators means that future industry conversations, whether they take place on yachts or in convention halls, will be incomplete without them.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The $16 Trillion War Chest: How Private Equity Could Dominate Europe's Defense Boom
Carlyle Group (NASDAQ:CG) is sounding the alarmand the opportunity bell. In a new report released ahead of this week's NATO summit in The Hague, the private equity giant says Europe could pour up to 14 trillion ($16 trillion) into defense and infrastructure over the next decade if member states align with proposed 5% GDP targets. That's more than triple the current estimate of 4 trillion. With geopolitical heat rising from both Putin and a potential Trump return, defense budgets are primed to swell. Jeff Currie, Carlyle's chief strategy officer for energy pathways, flagged a critical capital shortfall: There's going to be a big increase in the demand for capital to start getting these projects up and going. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Signs with CG. And that's exactly where Carlyle (with $453 billion AUM and a long history in aerospace and defense) wants in. The firm is pushing for a public-private partnership modelwhere governments set the goals, and private equity handles the messy middle: supply chains, standardized hardware components (think Lego-like drone parts), and efficient execution across borders. The logic? Just like Silicon Valley was born out of U.S. military R&D spending, Europe's security push could ignite a new wave of innovationif the capital is deployed smartly. Carlyle sees itself not just as a financier, but as the glue that holds this fragmented ecosystem together. Still, the payoff isn't guaranteed. Bloomberg Economics warns that unless Europe raises productivity across its defense apparatus, the upside could be muted. Worse, if conflict breaks out on NATO's eastern flank, the global economy could take a $1.5 trillion hit in year one aloneroughly matching the shock from Russia's Ukraine invasion. Bottom line: the window for private capital to shape Europe's future defense backbone is wide open. But if it's not done right, the costsfinancial and strategiccould outweigh the hype. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Forbes
2 hours ago
- Forbes
Motorica Raises $5.4 Million To Replace Mocap With Generative AI
Every action a character can take must be animated beforehand. Motion capture has long been one of the most expensive and labor-intensive parts of AAA game development. From booking studio time to cleaning data, the process can take weeks and cost studios tens of millions of dollars for a AAA game. A Stockholm-based startup, Motorica, wants to change that. Emerging from stealth today with €5 million ($5.4 million) in seed funding, the company offers a generative AI platform that dramatically accelerates character animation, allowing studios to bypass traditional mocap without sacrificing quality or control. Founder Willem Demmers. 'Studios today spend millions creating realistic animation—and still often only fully animate one character,' said CEO Willem Demmers. 'With our tech, they can animate a hundred.' Demmers, a serial founder in creative tech, partnered with generative AI researcher Gustav Henter and mocap veteran Simon Alexanderson to bring the company's 2019 research prototype to market. The result is what Motorica calls 'motion synthesis': a transformer-based AI model trained on thousands of hours of proprietary motion capture, capable of generating high-fidelity character animation at scale. According to the company, studios using the platform have reported animation workflows running up to 200 times faster than traditional mocap pipelines, with cost reductions exceeding 90 percent. FEATURED | Frase ByForbes™ Unscramble The Anagram To Reveal The Phrase Pinpoint By Linkedin Guess The Category Queens By Linkedin Crown Each Region Crossclimb By Linkedin Unlock A Trivia Ladder David Peterson, partner at Angular Ventures, which led the round, said, 'We invested in Motorica because they're building foundational technology for the next wave of digital experiences—from games and virtual worlds to robotics and XR. Their platform solves a massive production bottleneck.' That bottleneck is well known in the industry. Red Dead Redemption 2 reportedly required more than 300,000 unique animations and cost an estimated $300 million to develop. Developers commonly cite animation as one of the most time-consuming and expensive parts of production. For large open-world games, animation alone can represent 10 to 30 percent of the total budget. Mocap the old fashioned way. Veteran animator Maxi Keller, whose credits include The Last of Us Part II and Call of Duty: WWII, called Motorica 'the best tool out there for locomotion and motion matching.' He emphasized the platform's ability to give creators precise control over speed, acceleration, and expressive nuance, key requirements in gameplay animation. Demmers is careful to position the tool as augmentative rather than disruptive. 'We're not replacing animators or actors,' he said. 'We're replacing their chores.' According to the company, traditional workflows allocate 70 percent of animation time to technical tasks like keyframing and filler cycles. Motorica flips that ratio, allowing artists to focus on narrative, character, and creative polish. The funding round includes participation from Luminar Ventures and angel investors in the gaming space, including founders of major Swedish studios Avalon and Fatshark. The company, which now has 21 employees—over half of them AI researchers—plans to expand rapidly. Roadmap priorities include SDKs for deeper engine integration, new datasets for stylized and non-humanoid motion, and strategic partnerships with virtual production studios and simulation platforms.
