Quebec legislators vote to cut ties with British monarchy after King's visit
QUEBEC — On the same day King Charles III delivered a throne speech in Ottawa heaping praise on Canada, the National Assembly Tuesday adopted a motion calling on Quebec to abolish all ties with the monarchy.
Article content
Article content
Presented by Parti Québécois leader Paul St-Pierre Plamondon, the motion states that Quebec is the only custodian of the democratic expression of the Quebec people.
Article content
It notes a majority of Quebecers feel no attachment to the British monarchy and that 'the National Assembly agrees to abolish the link between the Quebec state and the British monarchy.'
Article content
The motion was adopted without debate. The vote was unanimous with 106 MNAs from the Coalition Avenir Québec government and the other two opposition parties, the Liberals and Québec solidaire, voting in favour of the PQ motion.
Article content
The vote came on the same day as King Charles III delivered a historic address in the Senate Chamber in Ottawa, quoting the words of the Canadian national anthem.
Article content
'The True North is indeed strong and free,' he said to the applause of MPs, Senators and number guests.
Article content
But at the legislature in Quebec City, the speech was greeted with a mix of indifference and ridicule.
Article content
'I didn't listen to it,' Premier François Legault said on his way out of question period in the afternoon. 'I was in meetings.'
Article content
Simon-Jolin Barrette, the Minister Responsible for Canadian Relations, said the same thing, adding he would listen to it later.
Article content
But the opposition parties had plenty of opinions on the presence of King Charles III and Queen Camilla on Canadian soil.
Article content
'What a bizarre country Canada is,' Québec solidaire co-spokesperson Ruba Ghazal said at a news conference. 'To affirm its sovereignty, it believes it is important to bring the monarch of a foreign country here to talk about its priorities.'
Article content
QS was the first party to propose the abolition of the oath to the monarch MNAs used to have to swear before taking their place in the legislature. In December 2022 a law was adopted making the oath optional after PQ MNAs were briefly barred from sitting because they refused to take the oath.
Article content
Now QS wants to go further, calling on the CAQ government to put an end to the funding Quebec provides for lieutenant-governor — the king's representative at the legislature — to pay for things like office space, staff and a car and driver.
Article content
The Quebec budget this year included $758,000 to pay those costs. The salary of the lieutenant-governor is paid by Ottawa. The post is currently occupied by Manon Jeannotte.
Article content
The day after she was named in December 2023, the National Assembly adopted a motion calling for the post to be abolished. Nothing has happened as a result of that motion because, in reality, the government can't do much about the post in the short term.
Article content
While much of the job is ceremonial, Quebec laws do not become legal unless they have the royal sanction, which is Jeannotte's job.
Article content
QS has argued the lieutenant-governor's legal functions could be replaced by an administrator, a move that would require the support of the federal government and the other provinces.
Article content
Asked about the obstacles ahead, Ghazal insisted the first step is to at least start talking about it.
Article content
'People said abolishing the oath would be impossible and yet we got it abolished,' Ghazal said.
Article content
QS says in the meantime Quebec, on its own, could stop funding the lieutenant-governor's office, a message she recently delivered to Jolin-Barrette who, she said, has taken note of the idea.
Article content
The CAQ's own 2015 platform called for elimination of the post of lieutenant-governor.
Article content
St-Pierre Plamondon started into the theme at his morning news conference, laughing off the idea that U.S. President Donald Trump will somehow be influenced by the presence of the king who came to Canada on the invitation of Prime Minister Mark Carney.
Article content
'(Carney's) best card is Charles III, a monarch from another country based on a colonial tradition that is oppressive to francophones and First Nations?' St-Pierre Plamondon told reporters. 'It's out there. It's so abnormal. And, of course, from a Quebec standpoint, it's not acceptable.
Article content
'If you think or anyone else here thinks that Donald Trump will stop saying things that are either random or hostile to Canada because Charles III was giving a speech today, I don't know what game we're playing right now. It just doesn't make sense.'
Article content
Interim Liberal leader Marc Tanguay, who said he is no fan of the monarchy, noted that abolishing the post requires a Constitutional amendment, which is no small order.
Article content
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
4 minutes ago
- Globe and Mail
Quebec says Bill 21 opponents are trying to overturn established law
The Quebec government says legal opponents challenging its secularism law at the Supreme Court of Canada are merely rehashing old, failed arguments in an effort to overturn established legal precedent. On Tuesday, Quebec filed 100 pages of legal arguments to the Supreme Court ahead of a hearing in which it will defend Bill 21 in court for a third time. The province won two previous decisions in the lower courts in Quebec, which led to the current appeal at the Supreme Court. Quebec's Bill 21, enacted in 2019, bans public sector workers, including teachers, from wearing religious symbols such as hijabs on the job. The province's goal is to promote secularism in Quebec, but critics argue it is an attack on minority rights. Record number of groups to speak at Supreme Court case against Quebec secularism law Quebec has won two court battles for overriding Charter rights to implement its secularism law. Now the fight hits the Supreme Court The Bill 21 case represents a landmark hearing at the Supreme Court, where the country's top court will consider governments' ability to override the rights and freedoms of Canadians in detail for the first time in almost four decades. The provincial government used Section 33 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the notwithstanding clause, to shield the secularism law from constitutional challenges on the basis of freedom of religion and other rights. The province's Tuesday filing says opponents are trying to circumvent its proper use of Section 33. In French, the filing says such arguments are asking the Supreme Court 'to amend established law.' Quebec further said its opponents are using legal arguments that have previously failed and that the challengers have not exposed errors in last year's Quebec Court of Appeal decision on Bill 21, which broadly upheld the provincial government's actions. The appeal court, Quebec said in its filing, 'conducted a detailed and meticulous analysis of all the arguments raised by the appellants and rightly dismissed them.' The key precedent is a 1988 case called Ford, where the Supreme Court considered Section 33 on a narrow legal basis but didn't delve in deeper questions about the notwithstanding clause. The Supreme Court at the time said the 'essential requirement' is for a government that uses Section 33 to name the Charter sections it aims to override. The basis of Quebec's Bill 21 argument is that the Ford decision is a precedent that should not be reconsidered. In Bill 21, Quebec stated it was using Section 33 to override the 10 sections of the Charter to which the notwithstanding clause can apply. But in the decades since Ford, and especially in recent years as more provincial governments have used Section 33 to shield laws, legal academics and others have argued there may be more for the top court to say about the notwithstanding clause. That includes whether it can be invoked pre-emptively, as Quebec did with Bill 21, or whether a court can declare rights have been violated even if a law is allowed to continue to operate because of Section 33. This week, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal said there is room for such judicial declarations. Last year, the Quebec appeal court came to the opposite conclusion. Six groups are appealing last year's Quebec Court of Appeal decision. They filed their legal arguments in mid-April. The appellants want the Supreme Court to overturn Bill 21. Among the arguments is a call to reconsider the 1988 Ford precedent. Further arguments include looking at other parts of the Charter, the Constitution, Canada's history and the limits of provincial powers to question the validity of Quebec's use of Section 33 in Bill 21. In Quebec's arguments filed Tuesday, the province said the Bill 21 case 'does not raise any new issues distinct from those considered in Ford.' Quebec then suggested that two of the appellants are effectively trying to rewrite Section 33 of the Charter 'to add conditions that are not found there.' A Bill 21 hearing has not been scheduled, but it could happen this winter. Supreme Court Chief Justice Richard Wagner has said it could be heard over three days. Most Supreme Court hearings take one day; rare cases occupy two days. The landmark Bill 21 case has attracted a record number of intervenors, as 38 outside groups will present written legal arguments to the court by mid-September. The federal government is also set to file its legal arguments at the same time, alongside six provincial attorneys-general, including Ontario, British Columbia and Alberta. Ottawa has previously expressed concern about provincial governments pre-emptively invoking Section 33.
CTV News
4 minutes ago
- CTV News
Yukon, Alaska sign agreement to address missing and murdered Indigenous people
The coat of arms of Yukon is seen on the outside of the Yukon Legislative Building, in Whitehorse, on Wednesday, July 23, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck WHITEHORSE — WHITEHORSE — The Yukon has signed an agreement with the state of Alaska to address the crisis of missing and murdered Indigenous people. The territorial government says the memorandum of understanding was initiated in April 2024 and was signed in Whitehorse on Tuesday. It says in a news release that the document marks a 'significant milestone' that will strengthen cross-border collaboration. The territory says it will unite efforts and enhance communication to improve safety and better respond to gender-based violence in northern communities. It says the agreement fulfils a milestone under the Yukon's strategy for responding to the National Inquiry into Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women and Girls. The territory says Yukon and American officials met after the signing ceremony to exchange expertise. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 12, 2025.
CTV News
4 minutes ago
- CTV News
Former CEO facing legal action from company over allegedly misusing funds
The Manitoba Law Courts building in Winnipeg on Wednesday, May 8, 2024. THE CANADIAN PRESS/John Woods A Winnipeg-based business that helps nonprofits fundraise with online raffles has filed a lawsuit against its co-founder, alleging he misused funds being held in trust for charities and other organizations. Nicholas Tenszen, who served as the CEO and president of Funding Change from June 1, 2021, to July 8, 2024, is facing legal action for an unspecified amount, including punitive damages, according to a statement of claim filed in Manitoba's Court of King's Bench earlier this month. The lawsuit alleges that Tenszen, 'who had complete access and control over Funding Change's finances and operations, including control over the trust funds and payroll,' processed payments directly to himself without the knowledge or consent of its board of directors from August 2022 to July 2024. The court filing says Tenszen used the trust funds to pay operational expenses of Funding Change, breaching the company's trust obligations and the terms and conditions of its licence issued by the Liquor, Gaming and Cannabis Authority of Manitoba (LGCA). This resulted in 'Funding Change being unable to pay charities raffle proceeds in a timely matter, or at all,' according to the lawsuit. The lawsuit claims that Tenszen also used funds belonging to Funding Change to pay for personal expenses and failed to pay company liabilities to the Canada Revenue Agency. A Winnipeg Police Service spokesperson said that no criminal investigation is ongoing and that no report has been received regarding the incident. The lawsuit says that after Funding Change discovered 'significant financial and other improprieties,' it disclosed the findings to the LGCA which prompted 'emergency financing in order to maintain the integrity of its obligations to charities and liquidity of its operations.' The company also revoked Tenszen's signing authority and he was removed as a director of Funding Change, according to the lawsuit. The court filing says he later resigned as its CEO and president. The lawsuit says the LGCA conducted an investigation into Funding Change from July 2024 to November 2024, concluding that the company made 'inaccurate and untimely payments of the trust funds' during the period in which the finances and operations were controlled by Tenszen. Funding Change's licence with LGCA was ultimately renewed, though it included 'special terms and conditions, including that (Tenszen) could not be responsible for financial decisions or for the management or operation of Funding Change's business,' per the statement of claim. '(Tenszen's) foregoing conduct was malicious, deliberate, in bad faith, for improper purposes, and was in wanton disregard of (Funding Change)'s rights and ought to offend the community's sense of fair play,' says the lawsuit. Tenszen could not be reached for comment. Funding Change's website said it has completed over 2,300 raffles with a wide range of organizations—such as sports teams, schools, parent councils, festivals and health foundations—with total raffle sales over $19 million. 'Funding Change is stronger than ever': chair In a statement obtained through the company's lawyer, Funding Change chair David Asper said the company is 'stronger than ever' following changes to its leadership and finances. 'We moved quickly to refinance the business so that no partner would be negatively affected, and we immediately resolved outstanding matters with the CRA and other creditors,' said Asper. Asper said Funding Change has also engaged with an accounting firm to complete a thorough and independent audit. Jamie Gowryluk has been appointed as the company's new president and chief operating officer. No statement of defence has been filed and the allegations have not been proven in court.
