Why Chewy Stock Was Diving This Week
A badly received quarterly earnings report was the major news item exerting gravity on Chewy (NYSE: CHWY) stock over the past few days. As a result, according to data compiled by S&P Global Market Intelligence, the company's share price had slumped by almost 15% week-to-date as of Thursday evening.
Investors didn't like the latest milk bone
That sell-off happened even though Chewy actually topped analyst estimates for revenue and profitability, albeit not by vast amounts.
In its first quarter, the company managed to grow its net sales by more than 8% year over year to $3.1 billion, while its non- GAAP (adjusted) net income improved at a slightly higher rate to just under $149 million ($0.35 per share). Analysts had collectively been modeling a bit below $3.1 billion on the top line and $0.32 per share for adjusted profitability.
While those aren't bad numbers at first glance, Chewy is an expensive stock to own; even after the post-earnings sell-off it was trading at a rich forward P/E of almost 36. For more than a few investors, that's awfully pricey for a company posting single-digit percentage improvements, and at thin profit margins to boot.
Tepid reactions
Meanwhile, as analysts tracking a stock often do, several pundits following Chewy adjusted their takes on the stock. Most of these adjusters raised their price targets, but there were several less bullish updates, too. One was published by Mizuho 's David Bellinger, who now feels Chewy is worth $44 per share, down from his previous $47. He maintained his neutral recommendation on the stock.
It's hard to ignore how pricey this stock is at the moment, and to some degree that's a shame. Chewy has been posting good results from its Autoship program lately, a feature that still has plenty of potential to boost valuable recurring revenue. I'm not necessarily hot on this stock, but there might be some upside to it if it can post more convincing quarterly earnings beats.
Should you invest $1,000 in Chewy right now?
Before you buy stock in Chewy, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Chewy wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to174%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor.
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
3 Must-Know Facts About Five Below You'll Want to Check Out Before Buying the Stock
Shares of Five Below (NASDAQ: FIVE) are trading 48% below their peak (as of June 10), which was established in August 2021. Clearly, the company has a long way to go to get back to its former glory. However, shares are surging recently, up 102% just in the past two months. The market is building up the momentum for Five Below, taking a more bullish stance. And this might be a compelling reason to consider adding the shares to your portfolio. If you're looking to buy this retail stock, take the time to learn these three things first. Where to invest $1,000 right now? Our analyst team just revealed what they believe are the 10 best stocks to buy right now. Continue » Expanding at a brisk pace The rise of online shopping in the past couple of decades has been widely publicized. This is clear when looking at successful tech-driven enterprises like Amazon and Shopify that have helped support adoption of online shopping. However, consumers still like to shop in person; 84% of retail spending in the U.S. still takes place in a brick-and-mortar setting. And this has benefited a company like Five Below, which has rapidly expanded over the years. As of May 3, it had 1,826 stores scattered across the U.S. That figure is up nearly fivefold from 385 exactly a decade ago. Management has huge ambitions. "We still believe that there's an opportunity here for 3,500 stores," Chief Operating Officer Kenneth Bull said on the fiscal Q4 2024 earnings call in March. You'd probably struggle to find other retailers that are trying to grow their physical presence like this. But it makes sense why. Five Below's unit economics appear to be in good shape. A new location costs about $500,000 to open, but it can generate on average $2.2 million in revenue and $500,000 in earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) in the first year. There remains sizable opportunity to expand in very populated states like California, Texas, Florida, New York, and Pennsylvania. Should Five Below reach this target, its revenue base should be much higher than it is today. Success in a tough industry There might be no industry more competitive than the retail sector. Consumers have unlimited choices on where to spend their money. There is no lock-in that retailers can benefit from. Margins are typically already thin. Consumers have ever-changing preferences and expectations. And there are low barriers to entry. That's why it's impressive to see the momentum Five Below has right now. During the first quarter of fiscal 2025 (ended May 3), the company reported 19.5% year-over-year revenue growth. This gain was driven by a 7.1% jump in same-store sales (SSS), which benefited from strong foot traffic. Management expects SSS to increase by 3% to 5% for the full fiscal year. While this indicates there will be a slowdown in the near term, it's encouraging to see this key performance metric growing. That's especially true in the current economic environment that could force consumers to be more critical about their spending habits. Valuation matters to investors Five Below might be trading well off its peak. However, the fact that the stock has rocketed higher since early April creates a more difficult setup for prospective investors. The best opportunities come when shares are priced attractively. I don't believe this is the case here. Investors can buy the stock at a price-to-earnings ratio of 25.9. This represents a notable discount to the trailing three-year average. But it's a slight premium to the overall S&P 500 index. This provides no margin of safety, in my view. That's because Wall Street consensus analyst estimates call for earnings per share to rise at just a 6% compound annual rate between fiscal 2024 and fiscal 2027. That weak forecast won't necessarily bode well for the stock price. If the valuation comes down, interested investors have a better understanding of Five Below's growth outlook, as well as its recent fundamental momentum, to make an informed decision. Should you invest $1,000 in Five Below right now? Before you buy stock in Five Below, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and Five Below wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to174%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Carney sets out foreign policy shift as G7 convenes under the shadow of Trump's trade war
The audacity: Prime Minister Mark Carney is set to host U.S. President Donald Trump at the G7 summit, and in his first big foreign and defence policy speech on Monday he declared that the U.S.'s predominance on the world stage is 'a thing of the past.' But Mr. Carney wasn't trolling Mr. Trump. He wasn't delivering a morality tale for Americans as he spoke about rising threats from hostile powers and rogue actors. It was a stark recognition that the world, and Canada's place in it, is in a period of disruption. The diagnosis is not unique. The U.S. is withdrawing from its global role as backbone of economic systems and security guarantor. It is, in Mr. Carney's words, 'beginning to monetize its hegemony,' charging tariffs for access to its market and threatening to withdraw its security umbrella. When Mr. Carney hosts leaders of the G7 group of nations this weekend in Kananaskis, Alta., the leaders of Britain, France, Germany, Japan and Italy will come with questions about that disruptive change on their minds. How much of the old U.S.-led world will be preserved? How much will their countries have to change to meet the new one? There's no shortage of dangers. On Friday, G7 countries scrambled to co-ordinate, and urge de-escalation, after Israel launched a series of strikes on Iran – and the volatile Mr. Trump posted dark warnings to Tehran on social media. There are deadly conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. China's rising power has raised nerves in Taiwan and across East Asia. For G7 leaders, immense global challenges weigh on agenda overshadowed by Trump At the G7, the trade war will be everywhere but on the agenda The whole world is facing a shakeup – first and foremost the closest U.S. partners, the countries that have relied on the superpower for stability, security and prosperity. Canada, tied to the U.S. by trade and geography, is on the front lines of a global reset. 'It feels like the first moment since the fall of the Iron Curtain when we may be going into an interregnum between the end of one international order and emergence of another,' said Patrick Travers, who served as foreign policy to former prime minister Justin Trudeau. For Mr. Carney, the G7 summit is not simply a début as host to a group that, including non-G7 invitees, now counts the leaders of 15 countries plus the heads of the European Commission, World Bank and NATO. The rookie Prime Minister has no shortage of confidence, including in his ability to steer a global meeting. Yet this one means moderating between the unpredictable Mr. Trump and Canada's other close allies, ensuring there's no blow-up. A wider rift can leave Canada more alone. A tantrum from Mr. Trump might even jeopardize bilateral talks on trade. Kananaskis will be just the start of Mr. Carney's summer sprint through summits: In a week, he will travel to Europe for a Canada-European Union summit where he promises to make a deal of military procurement, and a North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit where the alliance's members are under pressure to commit to a massive expansion of military spending. On foreign policy, Mr. Carney is already marking a sharp turn. That speech he gave about the changing world on Monday wasn't just a rationale for his sudden announcement of a $9.3-billion increase in defence spending. It laid the underpinnings for a sharply different Canadian foreign policy. For so long, Canadians felt safe, surrounded by three oceans and a friendly superpower, prosperously situated next to the world's largest market. For decades, spending more on defence was deemed unrealistic. Politicians – Liberal and Conservative – found voters didn't care about foreign policy, so Canada didn't really have one. Now the world is crashing in on Canada. Mr. Trump's tariffs threaten entire industries, most notably the auto sector. Demands for far greater defence spending, if fully adopted, would force tough choices about Canada's social spending. Now Mr. Carney is proposing to meet what he called a 'hinge moment' by embracing a harder-nosed foreign policy. At the heart of it is the Big Hedge. Mr. Carney is proposing to hedge against U.S. influence over Canada. Part of it is doing more at home, by expanding the military, building a domestic defence industry and also strategic industries such as critical minerals. But a lot of it is aggressively courting relationships with other countries, including a defence-industry partnership with the European Union. If that sounds very similar to the economic policy Mr. Carney propounded during and since the election campaign – building the domestic economy with national projects and diversifying trade – it is because both are aspects of the same strategy, driven by the same urgent external pressures. Fearing Trump's anger, non-U.S. G7 members will pursue low-bar victories in Kananaskis 'I think he understands that foreign policy and domestic policy, in the world we're living in, are two sides of the same coin,' said Carleton University international affairs professor Fen Hampson. Mr. Carney argued Monday that more defence spending is necessary for Canada to protect itself, promising submarines, drones and long-range rockets to rebuild Canada's depleted military. But he was also pitching that as a driver for the domestic economy, and as a lever to diversify trade. And Mr. Carney was also rushing to finally meet the long-standing NATO target of spending 2 per cent of GDP on defence, before the G7, in the midst of talks on tariffs with Mr. Trump – who links trade deficits and military underfunding together into one big claim that the U.S. subsidizes Canada. But Mr. Carney's speech signalled it is part of a more tough-minded approach. He deliberately departed from the preachy tone and talk of promoting values that had been a staple of Canadian diplomatic rhetoric. 'Canadian leadership will be defined not just by the strength of our values, but also by the value of our strength,' he said. The list of non-G7 leaders invited for 'outreach' sessions included reaching out to leaders that Mr. Trudeau would not have chosen – leaders with whom Canada has had clashes of principle, but who are substantial economic and geopolitical players. Saudi Prince Mohammed bin Salman won't attend, but Mr. Carney had invited him to thaw relations chilled since 2018 because of Canadian complaints about his country's human rights record. India's Prime Minister Narendra Modi will come – over objections of Sikh-Canadian organizations and some Liberal MPs – even though Canada accused Indian agents of organizing the 2023 assassination of Hardeep Singh Nijjar. 'I think it's realpolitik, in a lot of respects,' said Vincent Rigby, a former national security and intelligence adviser to Mr. Trudeau, and now a professor at McGill University's Max Bell School of Public Policy. 'I think he is going to be a hard-headed realist.' Mr. Rigby noted that also means Mr. Carney has to recognize the limit of a hedging strategy. Canada can try to diversify its defence relationships, perhaps using procurements of needed equipment like a fleet of diesel submarines to build a strategic alliance with a European supplier. But just as Canada can't replace trade with the U.S. overnight, it still must co-operate with the U.S. on North American defence. Mr. Carney has indicated he is considering joining Mr. Trump's proposed Golden Dome ballistic missile defence system. He has also put the purchase of additional U.S.-made F-35 fighters under review. 'The foreign policy is very much about strategic autonomy. But how do you define it? How much autonomy is enough?' Mr. Rigby said. 'With the United States it's all about finding the sweet spot.' The search for that sweet spot is also the preoccupation of all the other traditional U.S. allies in the G7 coming to Kananaskis. In March, the European Union loosened rules for national deficits to allow for more defence spending, in a plan called ReArm Europe. Japan has embarked on a massive military build-up. In May, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer struck a new trade and security deal with the European Union, closing some of the distance created by Brexit. European countries are working on various forms of hedging. 'I'd like to say it's hedging, but I'm more inclined to say it's a bit of thrashing around. Hedging would imply that there is a clear view that stands behind a collective European position. There isn't,' said University of Kent professor Richard Whitman, an expert on British and European foreign and defence policy. Some European countries still hope to ride out Mr. Trump's term, while others want to act, he said. 'Some European governments are in a difficult place, because their head tells them one thing but their heart, and probably their pocketbook, tells them something else − which is that we're not quite ready to take on all of these burdens.' For Europeans, the reckoning has been different. Canada has been confronted with tariffs that threaten its economy and Mr. Trump's talk of making it the 51st state. In Europe, the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine was a shockwave that brought a new urgency to domestic military spending and energy security. Mr. Trump's re-election, and his ambivalence and sometimes hostility, toward supporting Ukraine has been a second shock. That will be a potential fault line in Kananaskis. The last time Donald Trump came to Canada for a G7 summit he had kiboshed a common trade initiative before it started and tried to blow it up as he left. In 2018, the G7 co-ordinators from each country, dubbed sherpas, were working on co-operation to curtail Chinese dumping of low-cost steel on foreign markets. Six weeks before the summit in Charlevoix, Que., Gary Cohn, the director of Mr. Trump's National Economic Council, phoned Senator Peter Boehm, then the sherpa for Mr. Trudeau, to say the whole thing was off. Mr. Trump had instead decided to impose 25-per-cent tariffs on steel – including on the other members of the G7. At the end of the summit, Mr. Trump, more consumed by his imminent meeting with North Korean dictator Kim Jong-un, left the summit early – and tweeted angrily from Air Force One when Mr. Trudeau, responding to Mr. Trump's comments on trade negotiations, said Canadians are polite but won't be 'pushed around.' The President tried to unapprove G7 communiqués that had already been issued. In between, however, the Charlevoix summit wasn't full of conflict, Mr. Boehm said. At the time, a widely circulated photograph from inside the summit – with leaders standing across from and around a seated Mr. Trump with arms folded across his chest – was seen as evidence the summit had been a tense gang-up on an obstinate president. In fact, Mr. Boehm was debating communiqué wording with then-U.S. national security adviser John Bolton, and Mr. Trump had commented, 'Game on.' 'It was a little bit more jovial than the picture might indicate,' Mr. Boehm said. That is part and parcel of the famously mercurial behaviour of Mr. Trump, who welcomes foreign leaders to the Oval Office for visits that can be love-ins or ambushes. 'Unlike normal times you're preparing for unpredictability,' Mr. Travers said. 'Everyone's aware that things might emerge at this summit. The United States might put new things on the table.' There are ways to smooth things, Mr. Boehm said. In Charlevoix, Mr. Trudeau followed the tradition of asking the U.S. president to open a discussion on the economy by talking about his 2018 tax cuts, and he warmed to the talk. But his interest waned in long talks with many speakers. Mr. Trump didn't care for talk about the rules-based international order. This year, Mr. Carney's team has trimmed the agenda into narrow topics. Instead of butting heads on climate change, for example, leaders will talk about combatting wildfires. Sherpas are expecting to agree on specific 'outcome' statements, not a broad final communiqué. Tariffs aren't officially on the agenda, though they will be on every leader's mind. Mr. Carney has invited Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum, so there will certainly be discussions about North American trade on the sidelines. Defence spending is more a topic for the NATO summit a week later, but will certainly come up, too. 'There is a distinction between collective outcomes and what's discussed at the table. And both matter,' Mr. Travers said. 'In the G7 they have real conversations around the table as peers. It's a huge opportunity to speak to and influence the President.' There are scheduled discussions on global security, which will now almost certainly be dominated by Israel's strikes on Iran and the fear the conflict will escalate to full-scale war. One specific topic on the formal agenda – Ukraine – has the potential to spark disagreement. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky is invited, but there has been a split between Mr. Carney and European leaders, staunch backers of Ukraine, and Mr. Trump, who has pushed Ukraine to make concessions to Russia to end the war and has threatened to slash military support. A disagreement, a failure to find some bridge between them, could lead to a rift that flows into the NATO summit the following week. 'This is probably the nightmare for everybody that is preparing for the summit,' Mr. Whitman said. For Mr. Carney, that could be a nightmare scenario, too. A bigger rift between the U.S. and the rest of the G7 could leave Canada in the middle, and more alone. Mr. Carney's foreign policy hedging rests on building stronger ties with other countries. Mr. Carney has an interest in ensuring that Europeans don't apply their own hedging strategy by turning inward to each other in a way that leaves out Canada. He also doesn't want a confrontation within the G7 to leak into his so-far warm relations with Mr. Trump, possibly scuttling his trade and security talks with Mr. Trump. He certainly remembers that the 2018 Charlevoix summit marked the break in Mr. Trump's personal relationship with Mr. Trudeau. Underlying those summit risks is the broader unpredictability in the group of democratic nations – the G7, the EU, and others such as South Korea and Australia – that now question what kind of ally and partner the U.S. is becoming. And how fast the change will be upon them. The U.S. retreat, motivated in part by its high debt and competition with China, started before Mr. Trump and could endure after. Certainly, Mr. Carney appears to be working on the assumption that it is a lasting paradigm shift. That means a different kind of foreign policy. Canadians aren't used to the calls for sacrifice to pay for the military that Mr. Carney made in his recent speech. The extent of the sacrifice, the scale of the potential shift to be mooted in a matter of weeks, hasn't really entered the public consciousness. Andrew Coyne: Twenty years late, Canada hits the old NATO target, just in time to fall short of the new one At the NATO summit that opens in The Hague on June 24, NATO leaders are expected to commit to ramping up defence spending steeply, to the equivalent of 3.5 per cent of their GDP. In current terms, that would amount to an increase of nearly $50-billion per year for Canada, over and above the increase Mr. Carney announced. Spending that much more on the military – adding about 10 per cent to all federal spending – would almost certainly force tough choices on cutting social spending. Yet there has been a remarkable shift in public opinion. For decades, Canadian prime ministers found no constituency for increasing defence spending to the 2-per-cent NATO target. In March, Nanos Research found three-quarters of Canadians are in favour. But the potential future sacrifices haven't yet been counted. 'Do you support more defence spending if you are going to get less health care, you're going to get less housing, less transfers to the provinces?' Mr. Rigby said. 'That's a slightly different question.' For now, such questions haven't slowed the sudden change in Canada's foreign policy. Mr. Trump's tariffs, his threats, the 51st state talk – all jolted Canadians to see that a more risky world is now here. And their country is more alone. Mr. Carney has embraced a harder-nosed approach to a world facing an unpredictable interregnum.
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Will GameStop's Bitcoin Swing Be a Home Run or an Epic Fail?
Video game retailer GameStop 's (NYSE: GME) business has been struggling for years, as more of the gaming market continues to shift to digital downloads. However, the stock was the subject of massive investor attention during the meme stock frenzy of 2020 and 2021, with a renewed spike in interest last year -- during which the company raised quite a bit of capital. These days, GameStop has roughly $6.4 billion in cash and equivalents on its balance sheet, a lot considering its $10 billion market cap. And more recently, GameStop is gradually diversifying its business, including its newest strategy of investing substantial sums of money in Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC). GameStop's Bitcoin bet There are a couple of different components of GameStop's Bitcoin investment that are important for investors to know. First, investors learned on May 28 through a company press release that GameStop had purchased 4,710 Bitcoins, which means that the company invested approximately $500 million in the digital asset. More recently, GameStop announced plans to buy even more Bitcoin, and that it would complete a $1.75 billion convertible note offering to do it. The short version is that a convertible note is a type of debt security, and the holders have the option to convert the debt into common stock at a certain price. The company then decided to up its offering to $2.25 billion. The convertible notes, which mature in June 2032 unless converted or redeemed, will have an initial conversion price of $28.91 per share. With GameStop stock trading for about $22.50 as I'm writing this, that means that the stock would need to rise about 28% for conversion to become worthwhile. Notably, the convertible notes don't pay interest -- so for the time being, GameStop isn't adding any ongoing interest expense. Why is GameStop buying Bitcoin? GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen said that the company is investing heavily in Bitcoin to protect against macroeconomic worries. After all, Bitcoin's fixed supply and non-governmental nature have historically made the digital currency appealing to many investors. This certainly isn't a unique philosophy. Strategy, formerly known as MicroStrategy, has been accumulating Bitcoin for several years -- and has used some convertible debt to do it. And it's tough to argue with management's decision. Since August 2020, when the company first started buying Bitcoin, Strategy's stock price is up by more than 2,900%. Truth Social parent company Trump Media & Technology Group has also announced a plan to buy billions in Bitcoin. Investors don't seem convinced Judging by the market's reaction to the news, it doesn't seem that investors are convinced that holding massive quantities of Bitcoin is the best strategy, especially when some of it will be purchased with debt. Looking at the chart below, we can see that there were two major drops in GameStop's stock price over the past month -- one after each Bitcoin-related news item was announced. Overall, GameStop is down by about 20% over the past month, with the larger of the two declines coming after the convertible debt plan was revealed. GME data by YCharts The bottom line To be sure, I have absolutely no clue what the price of Bitcoin will do over the next few months or years. If Bitcoin continues to appreciate in value, GameStop's move could look like a stroke of genius in a few years. But if it falls, it could end up being a poor capital allocation decision. Should you invest $1,000 in GameStop right now? Before you buy stock in GameStop, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the 10 best stocks for investors to buy now… and GameStop wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $655,255!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $888,780!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor 's total average return is999% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to174%for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 9, 2025
