Our Changing World: Tauranga's living sea wall
Photo:
Tauranga City Council
Follow Our Changing World on
Apple
,
Spotify
,
iHeartRadio
or wherever you listen to your podcasts
Coastal critters have new
habitat options along the Tauranga waterfront
, thanks to the installation of 100 'sea pods' or 'living boulders' in May 2024.
Weighing up to 1.2 tonnes each, the sea pods are indented with holes and crevices that mimic rocky tide pools, providing space for tiny organisms from
shrimp to anemones
to find a home.
One year on, researchers are monitoring the manmade rockpools to find out what species have moved in.
Marine scientist David Culliford and students Tiff Cooper and Taylor Rabbitt are monitoring the marine life found in the sea pods over time.
Photo:
Justine Murray / RNZ
Constructed as part of Tauranga City Council's long-term strategy to redevelop the harbour, the sea pods aim to bring back biodiversity often lost in urban coastal areas.
David Culliford, marine scientist at Toi Ohomai Institute of Technology, says urban modification over time has impacted marine life.
"There's a tapas bar over there and if you look next to that there's some old piles which were part of the original harbour structure, and they're probably about 150 metres back from where we are right now," he says.
The 'sea pods' are designed to encourage marine life back into highly modified urban shorelines.
Photo:
Tauranga City Council
Tauranga Harbour, like many other city harbours, sits on reclaimed land. Rockpools and other coastal microhabitats have been covered up to make way for manmade constructions like sea walls or wharves.
A 'living sea wall' provides ideal real estate for many shoreline-dwelling species, encouraging biodiversity to recolonise the urban waterfront.
The idea of a living sea wall was developed in Sydney, Australia, through 30 years of research. The approach combines engineering and ecological concepts to create designs for pilings, panels and other modules that meet both human construction requirements, and wildlife habitat needs.
Specially designed panels were installed on a North Sydney sea wall in 2018. Monitoring the biodiversity over time, researchers found a 36 percent increase in the number of different species living on the sea wall, compared to a sea wall with no modifications.
"So we're re-introducing habitat, we're re-introducing habitat variety and so we can increase biodiveristy," says Dr Aria Lee, marine ecologist at Living Seawalls, a programme of the Sydney Institute of Marine Science.
A living sea wall in Tauranga comprising artificial rockpools called 'sea pods'.
Photo:
Tauranga City Council
There are now 20 Living Seawall installations across Sydney Harbour, and around 1000 around the world in the UK, USA, Europe, Asia, Peru and, of course, Tauranga.
Tauranga's 'sea pods' were designed by Living Seawalls in Sydney. But rather than ship tonnes of concrete across the ocean, silicone moulds were cast and sent to New Zealand for local manufacturing with concrete and recycled materials.
Ongoing monitoring is tracking the changing biodiversity as the seasons, weather and tides shift.
Monitoring work of the seapods along the Tauranga harbour.
Photo:
Tauranga City Council
Tiff Cooper and Taylor Rabbitt, marine science students from Toi Ohomai Institute of Technology, conduct surveys to record the abundance of different organisms and measure algae cover and growth.
Together with David and collaborators from the University of Waikato, they have documented branching algae, colourful sea slugs, and dancing flatworms, as well as "heaps of shrimp", says David. "They seem to be like little shrimp hotels, we find loads of them in here."
They even found possible signs of the harbour's unique
sneezing sponge
colonising the sea pods.
This blue 'sneezing sponge' is thought to be unique to Tauranga Harbour. Pictured here with two nudibranchs (sea slugs).
Photo:
Sam McCormack / iNaturalist NZ (CC BY-NC 4.0)
David plans to install GoPro cameras to see what marine organisms take up refuge in the sea pods when they're covered with water at high tide.
Plus, the eye-catching structures often elicit questions from curious members of the public.
"We always get lots of enthusiasm while we're down here, it's cool," says David.
Sign up to the Our Changing World monthly
newsletter
for episode backstories, science analysis and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
18 hours ago
- RNZ News
Space, spies, stalking, and extra sittings
National MP Judith Collins speaking during the initial Privileges Committee debate regarding the Te Pāti Māori protest haka. Photo: VNP/Phil Smith The House took urgency on Tuesday evening which extended Tuesday's sitting until lunchtime Wednesday, then it returned on Thursday morning - that time as an extended sitting. As a result, most select committees are not meeting this week. Some have had to cancel their plans or squeeze some work in at lunchtime. With a few exceptions - and excepting bills that committees are given special permission to consider outside normal rules - Select Committees and the House cannot sit at the same time. Spare a thought for submitters and those who schedule them, who have had their plans upended again by urgency. The opposition did ask the Leader of the House last Thursday whether there would be urgency this week but was told to "wait and see". Last minute reveals of urgency are not unusual. Extended sittings (like Thursday morning) are signposted a week or two in advance, but usually little warning is given for urgency. Tuesday's urgency was aimed at two bills - one relating to space and the other about international crime cooperation. The Outer Space and High-altitude Activities Amendment Bill isn't so much about space as it is about the ground bases for satellites or other extra-terrestrial objects. The Minister for Space, Judith Collins was the bill's sponsor. "This bill introduces a new authorisation regime for ground-based space infrastructure. Until now, these activities have not been subject to a dedicated regulatory framework." The reason for the bill, revealed in the second reading debate, upped the interest. "During the past five years, there have been several deceptive efforts by foreign actors to establish and/or use ground-based space infrastructure in New Zealand to harm our national security. They have deliberately disguised their affiliations to foreign militaries and misrepresented their intentions. To date, these risks have been managed through non-regulatory measures, including relying on the goodwill of ground-based infrastructure operators. These measures are no longer enough." That sounds like the pitch for a thriller just begging to be written. This was a bill that the parties largely agreed on. They even agreed that urgency was reasonable, but opposition speakers complained about the push-push pace of urgency after the Committee Stage, as governing-party MPs worked to abbreviate what Labour's Rachel Brooking called "very civil, thoughtful debates." The pace really started to drag once the Budapest Convention and Related Matters Legislation Amendment Bill was the focus. Its sponsor, Minister of Justice, Paul Goldsmith said the bill "aligns New Zealand's laws with the requirements of the Council of Europe Convention on Cybercrime, also known as the Budapest Convention. The Budapest Convention is the first binding international treaty on cyber-crime, and it aligns members' national laws relating to computer-related offences, improves investigative techniques, and streamlines evidence sharing." Labour supported the bill but played hardball in the Committee Stage, concerned about the possibility of the convention leading to New Zealand accidentally helping countries that don't share our values control their citizens. Duncan Webb put it like this. "We need to be vigilant that we are not being unwittingly used to further either political ends or to allow a foreign state to pursue a proceeding against something that might be a crime in a foreign nation, but it certainly isn't a crime in New Zealand and shouldn't be something for which criminal sanction follows." The opposition made the Committee Stage of the Budapest bill last through most of the rest of Wednesday. The government's original plan was to pass it through all remaining stages, but late on Wednesday evening, they abandoned it after the Committee Stage and moved on to their other priorities. The Budapest Convention Bill was left with just a third reading to complete. Those were not the only interesting bills under discussion this week. Three other bills are of particular interest, relating to Health, Secondary Legislation, and Stalking. Tuesday saw the first reading of the Healthy Futures (Pae Ora) Amendment Bill which will now be considered by the Health Select Committee. Among its measures, that bill enacts health targets, and also alters or removes Māori consultation and obligations from the health administration. The Minister of Health, Simeon Brown described his bill succinctly. "This bill is about cutting through bureaucracy, restoring accountability, and most importantly, putting patients first." Opposition MPs had numerous gripes including this one from Dr. Tracey McLellan, regarding bringing Health New Zealand under the public service obligation for staff neutrality. "That is a chilling thing to do. Frontline health workers who have a professional obligation, an ethical and a legal obligation to call out things that they see in their professional practice. It is not political, it is professional, and they should not, in any way, shape, or form, have this hanging over them, this concept of-the misuse of-public service neutrality." Also on Tuesday, the Legislation Amendment Bill had a first reading and now heads to the Justice Committee for public feedback. The Legislation Amendment Bill has been in development for a few years, and among its aims are making secondary legislation (e.g. regulations) more easily accessible and more likely to be pruned once obsolete. Secondary legislation includes all of the various kinds of laws that don't come directly from a piece of legislation but from power that legislation delegates to ministers, ministries, agencies, councils etc. There is much more secondary legislation than primary legislation but it isn't as easy to search or access. Primary legislation is all stored on a legislation website managed by the Parliamentary Counsel Office (PCO); currently secondary legislation is not. In debate, Labour's Camilla Belich observed that, "the main big change will be the single point of access that it will allow to secondary legislation. The point of the work that we do is to try and make sure that when either primary legislation or secondary legislation has an impact on people's lives, they have access to that. It shouldn't be something which is hidden away and it shouldn't be something which is difficult to find." Don't confuse the Legislation Amendment Bill with ACT's Regulatory Standards Bill which is also going through parliament and which appears to be trying to do something rather different. The Regulatory Standards Bill has influenced the shape of the Legislation Amendment Bill though, which Opposition MPs were unhappy with in debate, despite supporting the wider effort. The Crimes Legislation (Stalking and Harassment) Amendment Bill had its second reading late on Wednesday. It creates a new offence specific to stalking and harassment and the myriad forms that these can take. It includes indirect harassment like undermining reputation, opportunities or relationships. The bill itself is a fascinating read as an example of how much cleverness is required to effectively draft law for crime that is, by definition, quite nebulous. Policy staff at Justice and legal drafters at PCO may have taken to heart the idiom 'to catch a criminal, you have to think like one'. National minister Erica Stanford outlined changes made to the bill as a result of public feedback to the Select Committee. "To be convicted of the new offence, the prosecution will need to prove the person engaged in a pattern of behaviour towards their victim. The committee recommended a broader definition for the pattern of behaviour. The offence will now require two specified acts within two years, rather than three specified acts within one year. This broadens the pattern of behaviour by capturing fewer acts across a longer time frame. I agree that this change will better address strategies such as anniversary-based stalking..." "A further recommendation made by the committee was to add doxing to the list of "specified act". Doxing is the publication of personal information such as addresses or contact details, including whether a stalker claims to be their victim. It encourages third parties to contact, threaten, and intimidate the victim…" "The committee also added two further important amendments to the bill. Firstly, to allow the courts to order the destruction of intimate visual to allow a court to make restraining [orders], firearm prohibition [orders], and Harmful Digital Communications Act orders, where a defendant is discharged without convictions." There are other bills of note on the Order Paper that the government would have hoped to progress, but progress this week has been slow. Opposition MPs have taken their time working through bills in the committee of the whole House, whether they support them or not. This will likely annoy the government, but thoroughly testing bills is the job of all MPs in the House. That sluggish pace meant the second reading of the Parliament Bill also slipped down the Order Paper (along with the third reading of the Budapest Convention Bill). One bill the House may reach is worth noting. The Crimes (Countering Foreign Interference) Amendment Bill would be a second espionage-related bill for the week. This one hopes to plug gaps in the law around things like treason, espionage and even incitement to mutiny. *RNZ's The House, with insights into Parliament, legislation and issues, is made with funding from Parliament's Office of the Clerk. Enjoy our articles or podcast at RNZ. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
The University Of Auckland steps into Space
Last month the University Of Auckland launched it's own satellite TPA1. About the size of a loaf of bread it's now whizzing around the globe 500Km up - 15 times a day. The satellite will be available for staff and students to use in their projects. Dr Ben Taylor is a Senior Research Fellow at the University of Auckland's Space Institute Photo: University Of Auckland
RNZ News
a day ago
- RNZ News
Kids and smartphones
Owning a smartphone before age 13 is associated with poorer mind health and wellbeing in early adulthood, according to a global study of more than 100,000 young people. The study was published earlier this week in the peer-reviewed Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, and found that 18- to 24-year-olds who had received their first smartphone at age 12 or younger were more likely to report suicidal thoughts, aggression, detachment from reality, poorer emotional regulation, and low self-worth. OECD data in 2018 showed that New Zealand youth used digital devices 42 hours per week on average, compared to 35 hours globally, and studies have shown that children's screen use has increased since then. So how can parents and caregivers manage screen time? Kathryn speaks with Jackie Riach, psychologist and country lead for Triple P New Zealand which provides parenting programmes nationwide. To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
