logo
YouTuber MrBeast In Trouble Over Ancient Mexican Temple Video. Here's Why

YouTuber MrBeast In Trouble Over Ancient Mexican Temple Video. Here's Why

NDTV15-05-2025
New Delhi:
MrBeast, the world's most subscribed YouTuber, is in trouble again, this time with the Mexican authorities over a video shot at multiple federally protected archaeological sites such as Calakmul, Chichen Itza, and Balamcanche
The YouTuber, whose real name is Jimmy Donaldson, released a video titled "I Survived 100 Hours in an Ancient Temple," on May 10, and it received over 55 million views in no time, as per CNN. The video has MrBeast and his group exploring historic sites, swimming in cenotes, eating Maya-style food, and reportedly spending the night in a temple.
The Temple of Kukulkan pyramid, called El Castillo, is one of the seven wonders of the world and is located in the state of Yucatan's Chichen Itza.
"It's unbelievable that the government is allowing us to do this. It's truly crazy. Not even archaeologists are allowed in here," MrBeast is heard saying in the video.
The video drew condemnation from the public, archaeologists, and Mexican officials, whose primary concern was that MrBeast got access to places often restricted to the public and regarded as sacred to Mexico's pre-Hispanic cultures.
The Ministry of Culture in Mexico said it would impose sanctions and take legal action against the YouTuber for allegedly misrepresenting events and violating the intended use of cultural heritage sites, according to a report in local media.
Among other things that came under criticism were a drone image that appears to show what's inside the temple atop El Castillo in Chichen Itza. There were also visuals of MrBeast descending by helicopter to the archaeological sites or holding a pre-Hispanic mask.
According to the Mexican Ministry of Culture, Mr Beast will face penalties and legal action for allegedly fabricating events and going against the intended usage of cultural heritage places.
The Mexican government's Ministry of Culture's National Institute of Anthropology and History (INAH) responded to the controversy by stating that the visit and the recording were conducted in response to "formal requests."
In a public statement, INAH said their staff was present during the shoot to guarantee site safety and adherence to preservation guidelines.
The institute confirmed that the filming was done in accordance with the law. But it emphasised that several scenes, including the claimed helicopter landing, drone flights inside the Kukulkan pyramid, and the usage of an old mask, were made up in post-production.
On Wednesday, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum said the "broadcast" was permitted, but she asked the INAH to report "under what conditions this permit was granted."
MrBeast has more than 394 million subscribers on YouTube, making him the most popular content creator in the world.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Shaad Randhawa Exclusive: On Saiyaara, Aashiqui 2, Mohit Suri, Ahaan Panday, Awarapan, Mumtaz
Shaad Randhawa Exclusive: On Saiyaara, Aashiqui 2, Mohit Suri, Ahaan Panday, Awarapan, Mumtaz

News18

time9 minutes ago

  • News18

Shaad Randhawa Exclusive: On Saiyaara, Aashiqui 2, Mohit Suri, Ahaan Panday, Awarapan, Mumtaz

From Woh Lamhe to Saiyaara, Shaad Randhawa's friendship with Mohit Suri is no secret. In an exclusive chat with CNN-News18 Showsha's Titas Chowdhury, Shaad gets candid about the success of Saiyaara and his first impressions of Ahaan Panday and Aneet Padda. He recalls meeting Mohit on the sets of Tumsa Nahin Dekha for the first time, how they fight over creative differences, being away from films for three years after Dhoom Dhadaka flopped and foraying into diamonds. He also talks about his aunt Mumtaz and uncle Dara Singh and how they impacted him. Shaad revisits Awarapan, Aashiqui 2 and reveals how these films gave him two of his closest friends - Emraan Hashmi and Aditya Roy Kapur.

Is the Ukraine summitry all reality TV, zero substance?
Is the Ukraine summitry all reality TV, zero substance?

Economic Times

time37 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Is the Ukraine summitry all reality TV, zero substance?

Reuters U.S. President Donald Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy and French President Emmanuel Macron. So much has happened in recent days, it's easy to overlook how little has happened. To wit: Nothing material. Not when it comes to matters of war and peace in Ukraine, where Russian President Vladimir Putin continues to bomb civilians, to detain children (for which he is wanted by the International Criminal Court) and more generally to terrorize a sovereign nation that he considers an errant satrapy. That, however, is not the impression you may have formed if, like me, you've been following the summitry and pageantry on YouTube, TikTok, X, Truth Social or your medium of choice. In the endless scroll of our screens, one meme chases another while all orbit around the bright yellow-orange star of the show, Donald Trump. The medium is the message, the philosopher Marshall McLuhan observed six decades ago. And the message today is that this US president — for better or worse — is shaping world affairs. Here is Trump applauding Putin as the Russian leader approaches on a red carpet in Alaska. There he is again, receiving the rehearsed gratitude of the Ukrainian president and seven European allies, who rushed impromptu to the White House to contain whatever damage the KGB-trained Putin may have wreaked in Trump's mind. There he'll soon be again, if and when Trump gets both Putin and his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelenskiy, into the same room, in what would be a 'trilat' made for Reality TV — and specifically The Apprentice — was of course the medium that, starting in 2004, catapulted Trump from relative obscurity onto the memetic platform from which he ultimately stepped into the Oval Office not once, but twice. Like so much in our zeitgeist, everything about this medium is sort of real and sort of not, kind of jocular and kind of serious, not quite substantive but always is a universe in which Trump's meeting in the Oval Office with Zelenskiy in February — when the American host berated and humiliated the Ukrainian guest — counted within the White House as a success because, as the president put it, it made for 'great television.' Trump ran that script again during another visit to the Oval Office, when he trapped South Africa's president in an ambush as devastating as it was riveting. A virtuoso of the craft, Trump also incorporates voluntary or involuntary extras, bit players and cameos into his show. He mused about whether or not he would bomb Iran's nuclear facilities not at the Resolute Desk but on the White House lawn, where a work crew was erecting a flagpole and unexpectedly became the supporting cast in this particular episode. When weighing air strikes, or anything, Trump's first question to his advisers isn't about his options or strategic consequences. It is: 'How is it playing?'None of this would have surprised McLuhan, who analyzed (without judging) the role of media in the creation of reality, and did so when print and radio were old and television was new. Content, he understood, was subservient to the vectors in which it reaches human brains. A text-based culture rewards linear and logical thinking. Video (already in McLuhan's time) instead turns politics into theater, shortens attention spans and favors appearance over media change accelerated in the 1980s and 90s — during Trump's formative years — other theorists elaborated on McLuhan. Jean Baudrillard, a French sociologist, saw that the media increasingly reflected not reality but what he called hyperreality, a world of 'simulacra,' or copies without originals. In one memorable phrase, he said that 'the map precedes the territory,' by which he meant that narratives trump (sorry) truth. That popped into my mind this week as Trump presented Zelenskiy with a map of Ukrainian territories now apparently up for writing before the rise of Fox News or TikTok, the American media theorist Neil Postman came closest to predicting the moment we are in today. In Amusing Ourselves to Death , he argued that the new media would increasingly turn everything — from news to politics and war — into mere entertainment and spectacle. He foresaw a dystopia not unlike Brave New World , in which Aldous Huxley's Soma takes the form of Insta feeds or Trump's Truth here we are, with two summits down and several more to go. We parse things such as, say, wardrobes. In the Oval Office in February, Zelenskiy was roasted for wearing the military-style garb he has donned since Russia invaded; this time he showed up in all black, and Trump agreed that he looked 'fabulous.' A positive sign? Days earlier, the Russian foreign minister arrived at his Alaskan hotel with a sweatshirt that, in Cyrillic, advertised the 'USSR.' Code for Putin's imperialist treachery?And all the while a tragedy is unfolding for those who dare to see it. The reality — yes, there still is one — includes these facts: The war that Trump once promised to end in 24 hours rages on. Trump keeps toggling between blaming Putin and Zelenskiy for it. By being ambiguous about US support, he has hurt Ukraine's effort to defend itself. By ending Putin's diplomatic isolation, Trump has made the Russian side stronger than it would be. And by giving Putin a deadline for a ceasefire, then letting it expire without the 'severe consequences' he promised just a week ago, Trump forfeited the pressure he needs to exert new is that there are suddenly lots of meetings about meetings. What remains is that people are bleeding, crying and dying, all because of the decisions made by one man, Putin. In the minds of Trump and most of us in our brave new world, the map may seem to precede the territory. But that is not a luxury which people have, say, in Luhansk or Donetsk. Ukrainians and their friends are right to turn off their phones for a while, in the sad knowledge that nothing meaningful has changed.

How Much Money Does Bharti Singh Earn From YouTube? She Says, 'I Have So Much...'
How Much Money Does Bharti Singh Earn From YouTube? She Says, 'I Have So Much...'

News18

timean hour ago

  • News18

How Much Money Does Bharti Singh Earn From YouTube? She Says, 'I Have So Much...'

Last Updated: Bharti Singh said it was her husband, Haarsh, who convinced her to start a YouTube channel. After conquering the world of television with her comedy and hosting skills, Bharti Singh ventured into the realm of YouTube vlogging. Bharti started posting clips with her family and gave fans a glimpse into her personal life. Bharti struck a chord with her fans, and she now has 7 million subscribers on YouTube. But how much money does Bharti earn from YouTube? In a recent chat with Raj Shamani, Bharti said, 'I make 60% of my income via television work, and 40% from YouTube. I can't believe it. If you'd told me that I would get paid for doing something as basic as cleaning a microphone and posting it… It was Haarsh (husband Haarsh Limbachiya) who told me that TV isn't going to last, and that I should focus on YouTube." 'At first, I didn't quite understand it. But then, I started enjoying it. And then, I started making money, which was even better. I've learned one thing: if you're dedicated and hard-working, YouTube will be just as dedicated to you," she said. Bharti mentioned, 'Sometimes, I feel like putting out four vlogs in a day. I have so much content, way more than 12 minutes can accommodate. I started YouTube a little over two years ago, and now I have over 7 million subscribers." She added, 'I used to upload one vlog a week earlier. But the money is good; still, it's not as good as TV. I can earn on TV in one day what I make on YouTube in a month. I love both mediums. Now, I feel strange when I don't share a vlog." While Bharti has become famous now and has earned a lot of money, she insists she is still connected to her roots. 'Yes, I travel business class and stay at five-star hotels, but I still eat with my hands. That will never change. I haven't changed. I still crave Amritsar. But I haven't been able to visit in three years. That's the thing about Mumbai; if you're a hard worker, this city won't let you leave. Whenever I make a plan to visit Amritsar, I get some new work," Bharti concluded. First Published: August 20, 2025, 15:41 IST Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Loading comments...

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store