Homeowners owed $1B have just days left to claim payout... check if YOU qualify
The deadline to submit a claim for a share of a $1 billion realtor settlement payout is weeks away.
Homeowners have until May 9 to submit a claim, which can be done online through the official settlement website.
The real estate industry was hit by its biggest shakeup in a century in August, when the agent commission system was overturned after a series of lawsuits against major brokerages.
Before August 17, an agent working on behalf of a seller would charge their client a fee of around 5 to 6 percent, which would then be shared with the buyer's agent.
These fees became baked into house prices, helping to inflate values, and some realtors would push buyers toward homes with larger commissions.
The lawsuits argued the practice violated antitrust laws by allowing brokers to collude in order to raise commission prices, and the brokerages agreed to settle.
Anyone who sold a home during a specific date range and paid commission to a real estate agent is eligible for a payout.
When Americans file a claim through the official website, they must enter their personal details, and whether they wish to be paid via debit card, check, Zelle or Venmo.
There are five main settling parties, according to the official settlement website, which each encompass various brokerages.
The largest settlement, which amounts to $418 million, is with the National Association of Realtors (NAR) and HomeServices.
There is also a $110 million settlement with firms including Compass, Real Brokerage and Redfin, and a settlement with Anywhere, RE/MAX and Keller Williams.
There are also smaller settlements with firms such as Keyes and Real Estate One amounting to $8 million, and companies such as Side and Seven Gables amounting to $11.4 million.
The deadline to be excluded from any of the settlements passed in 2024, but Americans have until May 9 to submit a claim.
There are three criteria you have to meet in order to be eligible to claim a part of any of the settlements. It is not known how much each claimant could receive.
You must have sold a home during the eligible date range and paid a commission to any real estate brokerage in connection with the sale of the home.
Details of eligible date ranges for all settlements can be found here.
Americans must have also listed the home that was sold on a multiple listing service (MLS) anywhere in the US.
An MLS is a platform that real estate agents use to list properties for sale and find homes for buyers.
There are hundreds of different multiple listing services across the country, and real estate agents pay a fee to belong to them.
In exchange for membership, agents can post listings of the properties their clients are selling and view other agents' listings.
Traditionally, listing agents and buyer's agents participating in a MLS agreed to share commissions, with the buyer's agent's compensation included as part of the listing.
Consumers, however, cannot see this part of the listing. In theory, this system enables agents to 'steer' buyers to houses on which the commission is higher so they can profit more from a sale.
Under the new rules brought in following the landmark settlements, commissions for buyer's agents can no longer be listed on an MLS.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
2 hours ago
- New Statesman
Will Labour's winter fuel U-turn work?
Winston Churchill believed that 'the Americans can always be counted on to do the right thing, once all other possibilities have been exhausted'. The same, one minister tells me, is true of Rachel Reeves and winter fuel payments. Two days before her first Spending Review (which I preview here), Reeves has announced that winter fuel payments will be restored to three-quarters of pensioners (or all those earning below £35,000). The Chancellor wants to use the event to tell a story of pro-growth investment and dispel accusations of austerity – hence this advance U-turn. As I reported last August, plenty inside government always feared that the original £11,500 earnings threshold – above which the £200-£300 benefit was withdrawn – was too brutal. So it proved. MPs began referring to the policy as Labour's 'original sin' and it was blamed for the party's dismal performance in the local elections and its defeat to Reform in the Runcorn by-election. Though Reeves long defended the measure as an emblem of fiscal discipline, the Chancellor herself came to conclude that it was untenable (cabinet colleagues such as Ed Miliband and Liz Kendall had doubts from the start). Reeves is now making the argument that some new Labour MPs wanted her to deliver from the start: that it is 'fair' to withdraw the benefit from the 'wealthiest' pensioners (two million earn over £35,000). Such a framing could have opened up a conversation around generational inequality but the policy was instead justified as a response to the Conservatives' '£22bn black hole'. Even now, some inside government fear that an opportunity has been missed to make a values-based argument. Here, for instance, is how Gordon Brown explained his U-turn over the abolition of the 10p income tax rate in 2008. 'It really hurt that suddenly people felt I wasn't on the side of people on middle and modest incomes – because on the side of hard-working families is the only place I've ever wanted to be,' he said. 'And from now on it's the only place I ever will be.' But Reeves avoided such a moral narrative today, leaving Labour open to the charge that it has merely U-turned out of political expediency. In recent weeks she and Starmer have also sought to tie the move to an improving economy – growth of 0.7 per cent in the first quarter – yet this creates an additional headache: renewed pressure to reverse other measures (such as the health and disability benefit cuts) even as debt continues to rise. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe The winter fuel episode ultimately left Labour looking both unfair and weak, a deadly combination for any government. For Reeves, the test is whether she can now escape from her own history and use this moment to reset her Chancellorship. Related
The Guardian
a day ago
- The Guardian
Players union condemns MLS's $1m Club World Cup prize money offer
Major League Soccer has submitted a new proposal to its players concerning how bonuses for the Club World Cup will be paid out to the players on clubs participating in the tournament, according to a source familiar with negotiations between the parties who spoke to the Guardian and other outlets on the condition of anonymity to protect their relationships within the game. The MLS Players' Association, the union representing MLS players, later confirmed they had received a proposal. According to the source, the league's offer would see players earn 20% of a team's performance-based prize money at each stage of the tournament with no agreed-upon cap on maximum payout. This means each group of MLS players competing in the tournament would collectively receive $200,000 for a group stage win (from a total prize of $1m), $400,000 for a group stage win (from a total prize of $2m per team, per win), $1.5m for making the Round of 16 (from a total prize of $7.5m) and so on. The players' current bonus structure, outlined in the MLSPA's collective bargaining agreement (CBA) with the league, allows MLS players to receive half of any prize or participation money awarded to a team participating in an outside tournament, but with a hard cap of $1m. With the Club World Cup's $9.5m participation prize given to MLS teams, players had already maxed out their maximum payout and would have not been entitled to any more money for progress in the tournament. Under the proposed terms, in the unlikely event an MLS team wins the Club World Cup, players on that team would be entitled to split a prize pool that would total up to $23.9m. In their own statement, the MLSPA confirmed that the proposal had been delivered but said that the 20% payout is 'below the international standard,' and also said that the league has attempted to 'strong-arm' the players into CBA waivers that do not regard the Club World Cup. The prize money structure was the subject of protest by the Seattle Sounders last weekend, with the squad wearing T-shirts in the warmup reading 'Club World Cup Cash Grab.' The MLSPA later said in a statement that the league had 'failed to bring forward a reasonable proposal.' The source said that MLS had originally planned to propose the 20% arrangement on the following Monday, but then elected to delay delivering the proposal until Friday. Sign up to Soccer with Jonathan Wilson Jonathan Wilson brings expert analysis on the biggest stories from European soccer after newsletter promotion The Club World Cup kicks off on 16 June in cities across the United States. The Seattle Sounders, Inter Miami and Los Angeles FC are the three MLS clubs participating in the tournament.
NBC News
a day ago
- NBC News
Sen. Cory Booker says he won't accept campaign donations from Elon Musk
Sen. Cory Booker on Sunday said that he would not accept campaign donations from tech mogul Elon Musk but urged the former Trump advisor to "get involved right now in a more substantive way" in Democrats' push against the sweeping GOP-backed spending bill. "This bill is disastrous for our long-term economy," Booker told NBC News' "Meet the Press." "This is an American issue, and I welcome Elon Musk not to my campaign. I welcome him right now, not to sit back and just fire off tweets, get involved right now in a more substantive way, in putting pressure on Congress people and senators to not do this." Asked directly whether he would ever accept campaign funding from Musk, Booker said, "I would not accept money from Elon Musk for my campaign, but I would be supportive of anybody, including Elon Musk, putting resources forward right now to let more Americans know," about the bill. Booker's remarks come as other Democrats, like California Rep. Ro Khanna, have floated welcoming Musk into the Democratic party after a feud between President Donald Trump and the Tesla and SpaceX CEO exploded into public view last week. "We should ultimately be trying to convince him that the Democratic Party has more of the values that he agrees with,' Khanna told Politico last week after Musk and Trump fired off a series of social media posts online criticizing each other. The falling out started after Musk called the budget bill a "disgusting abomniation" in a post on X. In subsequent posts on Truth Social, the president accused Musk of "wearing thin" and said "he just went crazy." Musk later accused Trump of " ingratitude" in another post on X after he spent $250 million boosting Trump's campaign in 2024 and accused Trump of links to deceased sex offender Jeff Epstein in a now-deleted post. On Saturday, in a phone call with NBC News, Trump said he has no desire to repair his relationship with Musk after their public spat. The president also responded to a direct question about what might happen if Musk decided to financially support Democrats in the 2026 midterm elections, days after Musk wrote in a post on X,"In November next year, we fire all politicians who betrayed the American people," appearing to refer to Republicans who voted for the GOP-backed spending bill in the House. 'If he does, he'll have to pay the consequences for that,' Trump told NBC News, adding that there could be "serious consequences." In May, House Republicans passed a sweeping domestic policy bill called the "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" that extends tax cuts passed in the first Trump administration, increases funding for border security and eliminates federal taxes on tips and overtime pay. The bill has also drawn scrutiny from Democrats for slashing funding for Medicaid and some food stamps while implementing work requirements for Medicaid, which provides healthcare for low income Americans. Musk and some Senate Republicans have blasted the bill for estimated effects it could have on the federal debt and deficit, though Trump and House Republicans have downplayed those concerns. "More Americans have to understand that if this bill passes, average Americans are going to see their costs skyrocket as this president again pushes legislation that is indicative of his chaos, corruption and cruelty towards Americans," Booker said on Sunday.
