CJI Gavai flags drift from ‘bail is rule & jail the exception'
Delivering the 11th Justice VR Krishna Iyer Memorial Law Lecture in Kochi, Justice Gavai expressed concern over the growing culture of prolonged incarceration of undertrials and the tendency of courts to prioritise custodial detention over bail.
'In the recent past, this principle (bail is the rule) was somewhat forgotten,' he said, referring to Justice Krishna Iyer's pioneering contributions to bail jurisprudence and humane criminal procedure. It was Justice Iyer who laid down this principle through his judgments and fiercely championed it.
'I am happy to state that I had the opportunity in the last year, 2024, to reiterate this legal principle in the cases of Prabir Purkayastha, Manish Sisodia, and Kavita Vs ED,' said the CJI, making a strong case for reviving the pro-liberty judicial stance that was once the hallmark of Indian courts.
Also Read | Supreme Court admin seeks removal of ex-CJI Chandrachud from official residence
In the cases of Prabir Purkayastha, Manish Sisodia, and Kavita, the Supreme Court, with Justice Gavai on the bench, underscored the centrality of personal liberty in the criminal justice system while ruling that the deprivation of liberty cannot be justified without strict adherence to legal safeguards. These rulings reflected a conscious effort by the apex court to breathe life into Justice Iyer's principle that bail should be the norm, not the exception, and that liberty cannot be held hostage to procedural expediency.
Quoting Justice Iyer's landmark ruling in Gudikanti Narasimhulu Vs State of Andhra Pradesh (1978), the CJI said: 'Heavy bail from poor man is obviously wrong. Poverty is society's malady and sympathy, not sternness, is the judicial response.' He added that Justice Iyer's jurisprudence reminded judges to consider factors such as the period spent in jail and the likelihood of delay in appeals while deciding bail pleas, instead of imposing onerous and exclusionary conditions.
Justice Gavai's remarks come amid increasing judicial and public scrutiny over delayed bail hearings, procedural rigidity, and the lack of a uniform, compassionate approach to undertrial detention -- issues that have seen the Supreme Court question both high courts and district judiciary in recent months.
The CJI, who will demit office in November, recalled that Justice Iyer's ideas continue to guide his own judicial reasoning, including in major decisions delivered last year. 'I relied on Justice Krishna Iyer's judicial philosophy in many cases, and I am still doing that,' he said.
Also Read | Why Chief Justice BR Gavai got emotional: 'His dream has come true'
In his speech, themed 'Role of Justice VR Krishna Iyer in Balancing the Fundamental Rights and Directive Principles of State Policy', Justice Gavai paid rich tribute to Justice Iyer's progressive blend of legal reasoning and social empathy. 'Justice Krishna Iyer stood up for the poor and the underprivileged, and remained a human rights champion, a crusader for social justice and the environment, and a doyen of civil liberties throughout his life,' he said.
Justice Gavai highlighted how Justice Iyer's judicial philosophy reshaped several areas of constitutional law, from prison reform to affirmative action, from the right to life under Article 21 to the abolition of the death penalty.
Justice Gavai also acknowedged Justice Iyer's seminal role in expanding the scope of Article 21 in Maneka Gandhi Vs Union of India (1978), where the latter observed: 'Personal liberty makes for the worth of the human person.' These words, he said, formed the bedrock for future judicial pronouncements that recognised rights such as access to clean water, food, shelter and healthcare as integral to the right to life.
Also Read | Interpretation of Constitution has to be pragmatic: CJI B R Gavai
The CJI concluded. 'Every time a bench prioritizes substantive justice over technicalities... every time the court upholds human dignity and social equity, Justice Krishna Iyer's legacy is not just honoured, but actively lived.'
Justice Iyer served as a Supreme Court judge from 1973 to 1980, leaving an indelible mark through his activist jurisprudence and deep empathy for the marginalised. He passed away on December 4, 2014, at the age of 100.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Print
42 minutes ago
- The Print
Bihar is ripe for civil disobedience over electoral roll revision. 50 yrs ago, JP showed the way
As it is, there are serious suspicions about India's election system being weaponised to facilitate easy stealing of people's mandate. This has led to calls for 'civil disobedience,' publicly aired by a sitting MP from West Bengal, Mahua Moitra. It won't be long before this call catches up and reverberates across the country. As India commemorates the 50th anniversary of Emergency, Bihar — the land of Jayaprakash Narayan, the 'realis causa' of that dark era — is in turmoil. And for very good reasons. Around 30 to 40 percent of the state's voting population faces 'disenfranchisement' due to the hasty, arbitrary, and whimsical special intensive revision of the electoral rolls ordered by the Election Commission of India. Writing the 'foreword' for historian Dharampal's 1971 book, Civil Disobedience in India Tradition, JP wrote: 'There had developed in the course of Indian history an understanding between the ruled and the ruler as to their respective rights and responsibilities. Whenever this traditional pattern of relationship was disturbed by an autocratic ruler, the people were entitled to offer resistance in the customary manner, that is, by peaceful non-cooperation and civil disobedience. It also appears that in the event of such action, the response of the ruling authority was not to treat it as unlawful defiance, rebellion, or disloyalty that had to be put down at any cost before the issue in dispute could be taken up, but as rightful action that called for speedy negotiated settlement.' Also read: The mystery of JP's kidney failure continues. There was a purpose behind it JP's civil disobedience movement JP virtually kickstarted the civil disobedience movement from Patna on 5 June 1974 with these stentorian words: 'This is a revolution, friends! We are not here merely to see the Vidhan Sabha dissolved. That is only one milestone on our journey. But we have a long way to go… After 27 years of freedom, the people of this country are wracked by hunger, rising prices, corruption… oppressed by every kind of injustice… it is a Total Revolution we want, nothing less!' This launched the 'JP Movement', which was a coalition of organisations and individuals with very diverse beliefs, preoccupations, life circumstances, and objectives. Though 'Total Revolution' was the ultimate objective, the JP Movement commenced with civil disobedience, peaceful resistance, and non-cooperation. This was because JP took inspiration from the old idiom 'aim for the sky and you'll reach the stars' that encourages ambitious goal-setting and striving for great things. As per the template, on 7 June 1974, a non-violent satyagraha was initiated. JP called for the closure of all colleges and universities for a year. He also encouraged people not to pay tax and launched related campaigns to paralyse the government. In the following days, several people were arrested while picketing and offering dharna before the Assembly gates. Even when the Assembly session concluded on 13 July, there was no let-up in the demands and agitations for its dissolution. JP's call for the boycott of classes and exams elicited a mixed response. The first phase of the agitation concluded in the third week of July. The second and more intense phase began on 1 August, with the commencement of no-tax campaigns. Farmers were advised to withhold the state levy on food grains meant for the public distribution system. Wine and country liquor shops were picketed. There was complete mayhem. Exceptions were made only for departments like post and telegraph, hospitals, courts, railways, banks, and ration shops. JP directed students to hold ten to fifteen meetings in each assembly constituency to turn public opinion against non-performing MLAs. Addressing a public meeting in Jamshedpur, JP urged the police to disobey orders that their conscience told them were improper. He also warned, for the present, the call is on Gandhian lines and should not be mistaken for a call for rebellion. But a stage will come when he would call for total rebellion. By October, a certain fatigue seemed to have set in, even as there were increased incidences of violence and coercion in implementing the civil disobedience programme. Largely restricted to urban areas, the protests were failing to draw in poor peasants, agricultural workers, and casual labourers. To energise the movement and expand its base, JP announced a new plan of action, which included the intensification of the struggle from 2 October. A three-day bandh was organised between 3 and 5 October. Leading the bandh, JP marched through the streets of Patna on 3 October with his followers. People lined the streets to support him. He ended his march at the gate of the secretariat and sat in dharna, surrounded by supporters, curious onlookers, the media, and sections of the bureaucracy. Following the success of the bandh, JP posed another direct challenge to state power. Students and Jana Sangharsh Samiti (People's Struggle Committee) volunteers were directed to move in strength to block, subdivision, and district offices to paralyse their work and set up parallel, revolutionary people's governments or Janata sarkars. These micro-organs of people's power were expected to adjudicate disputes, ensure the sale of essential commodities at fair prices, organise redistribution of ceiling-surplus land amongst the landless, prevent black market activities and hoarding, and fight against caste oppression. They were also expected to gradually bring about a shift in people's consciousness and make them reject untouchability, casteism and its symbols like the donning of the sacred thread by Brahmins, patriarchy, and its manifestation in early marriage and dowry. Also read: Modi govt's assault on democracy is more sinister than the Emergency. Look at the differences Why people followed JP's call for action Even though JP repeatedly said that the movement was democratic and non-violent, the agitations were not entirely free of coercive violence. Shopkeepers were forced to pull down their shutters. Trains and buses were arbitrarily stopped. At Bhabua, Sasaram, Samastipur, Sitamarhi, Muzaffarpur, and Danapur stations, young children blocked railway tracks. The police retaliated with ruthless brutality. Hundreds of students were beaten up and arrested including several women and girls. They were incarcerated in the jails of Hazaribagh, Bhagalpur, Muzaffarpur, Darbhanga, Samastipur, Arrah, Bankipur, and Patna. Between 2 and 5 October, the police opened fire at many places, resulting in a number of deaths. In a single incident in Patna City, twenty-two rounds were fired, and unofficial sources reported seventy-five deaths. However, JP did not backtrack because he agreed with the rationale of Howard Zinn (1970): 'Civil disobedience is not our problem. Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem is that people all over the world have obeyed the dictates of leaders…and millions have been killed because of this obedience… Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity and war and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves…(and) the grand thieves are running the country. That's our problem.' How true is this today even after half a century of 'practicing' democracy. At the 25 June 1975 rally at Ramlila Grounds, Delhi, following the disqualification of Indira Gandhi as a Member of Parliament, JP formally declared civil disobedience: 'Friends, this civil disobedience will be of varied types. A time may come when, if these people do not listen, it may be necessary to de-recognise the government. They have no moral, legal, or constitutional right to govern; therefore, we would de-recognise them; we would not cooperate with them; not a paise of tax shall be given to them.' What followed is now history. An introspection of the movement would reveal that JP's involvement was the main factor that enabled the disparate non-Congress forces to come together for political action. While these parties, organisations, and sectors were no more diverse than the factions within Congress, they did not have a cause and a leader to unite them until the opposition to Congress rule intensified, and JP emerged for them to rally behind. The reason JP was able to perform this role was because of his public stature. He had a reputation for honesty and incorruptibility, for moral and physical courage (the latter derived from his bold exploits during the freedom struggle), for his deep concern for the fate of the Indian people, and perhaps most importantly, for his refusal to take up positions of power. In Indian tradition, there is the figure of the rishi (seer) who does not hold power, but instead exercises moral authority over those who do. Gandhi was considered such a person, and people came to see JP in the same light. Today, JP's cause for people's action not only survives, but has grown stronger. The true patriot has already paved the way. [Portions of the article are from the writer's recent Book 'Emergency and Neo-Emergency: Who will Defend Democracy?', The Browser, Chandigarh] M.G. Devasahayam is a retired IAS officer and chairman of People-First. He also served in the Indian Army. As the District Magistrate of Chandigarh, he was the custodian of JP in jail. He had a ringside view of Emergency and has written a book titled Emergency and Neo-Emergency: Who will defend Democracy?. Views are personal. Views are personal. (Edited by Prashant)
Economic Times
42 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Clean tech revolution: Key role of critical minerals in Atmanirbhar Bharat
AP India currently relies on importing more than 90% of its lithium and cobalt. In 2010, a quiet but strategic event took place which would later alter the world's relationship with critical minerals. Following a maritime dispute with Japan, China implemented a temporary ban on rare earth element exports to Japan. The ban sent ripple effects down supply chains across the world - especially the automotive sector in Japan. Prices skyrocketed overnight. The world experienced perhaps for the first time in a meaningful way, that critical minerals like lithium and cobalt were not simply technical inputs; they were the new oil. They were a geopolitical asset that could wreck entire industries - clean energy, consumer electronics, defense, automotive, etc. As India strides toward becoming an economic powerhouse, the vision of Atmanirbhar Bharat (Self-Reliant India) hinges not just on manufacturing capacity or policy frameworks, but also on control over critical minerals. Lithium, cobalt, nickel, graphite, and rare earths, all needed to create the batteries, motors and devices that will fuel the India of the future. But therein lies the dilemma—India has global aspirations, yet has little domestic access to the majority of these resources. The Backbone of the Clean Tech RevolutionLithium-ion batteries form the backbone of electric vehicles (EVs), grid-scale energy storage and portable electronics. According to IEA's Global EV Outlook 2024, global EV sales surpassed 14 million units in 2023, and the Indian EV market is forecasted to reach USD 152 billion by 2030. This entails a need for exponential growth in the number of batteries produced and, consequently, demand for critical India currently relies on importing more than 90% of its lithium and cobalt. Supply is reportedly from China, Chile, and the Democrat Republic of Congo, creating a situation of over-reliance on a limited number of countries. There are risks with such over-reliance--not only in regard to cost and supply support, but also from a national security and industrial sovereignty perspective. The Case for Urban Mining While traditional mining faces environmental, social, and logistical hurdles, India sits on an untapped urban mine of immense potential: its electronic waste and spent lithium-ion produced a total of 1.751 million e-waste last year, according to data presented by the Minister of State for Union Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs. And lithium-ion batteries account for a growing share of this total. This is expected to touch 200,000 metric tonnes per year by the opportunityEvery tonne of spent lithium-ion batteries contains approximately 100 kg of valuable metals, including lithium, cobalt, and nickel. When recovered using advanced recycling techniques, these metals can be used to produce new batteries thus reducing reliance on imports, lowering environmental impact, and creating a domestic circular economy. We believe this is the frontier India must embrace. The Economic & Strategic Rationale Establishing a critical minerals strategy isn't just an environmental or industrial goal, it's an economic imperative. According to the World Bank, the demand for critical minerals could rise by 500% by 2050 in order to meet the targets of the Paris Agreement. If India can create domestic sourcing pathways through urban mining, closed-loop supply chains, and end-of-life battery recovery, it can save billions in import bills, reduce geopolitical risks, and create high-value green jobs in the clean-tech sector. The Indian government launched the National Critical Minerals Mission, announced in Budget 2025, with ₹34,300 crore allocated to identify and develop domestic resources. Lithium reserves in Jammu & Kashmir and exploration efforts in Karnataka and Chhattisgarh are steps toward reducing dependence on mineral-rich countries like China, Chile, and the Democratic Republic of Congo. Furthermore, while the government's Battery Waste Management Rules (2022) and the Production Linked Incentive (PLI) scheme for ACC battery manufacturing are commendable steps forward, it is now essential to expand both the depth and breadth of our efforts. The Way Forward: A National Critical Mineral Strategy India Energy Storage Alliance's launch of the India Reuse and Recycling Council (IRRC) marks a significant step toward fostering a strong ecosystem for battery recycling and second-life applications. However, to truly achieve Atmanirbharta in the critical minerals sector, we need more than policy intent; we need a national integrated strategy. We must start with a focused urban mining infrastructure program. India is forecasted to produce more than 200,000 metric tonnes of lithium-ion battery waste annually by 2030 (CPCB), and we will need regionally distributed recycling capabilities coupled with local partners especially in Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, and Karnataka, states with lots of EV penetration. By developing a local partner that can leverage technology as well as other financial incentives to process large volumes of materials where sustainable recovery of critical materials is possible. Having a mandated collection and reverse logistics systems is just as important as the recycling infrastructure. OEMs should be held accountable for the lifecycle of their batteries via Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) norms, including systems to specify shipment norms, and clearly defined and measurable targets. The key component of any take-back system is a reliable ecosystem to ensure that retired batteries are not discarded, unrecycled into the landfill, or left untethered in the informal the same time, government support needs to be stepped up in terms of research and development for advanced recycling technologies, efficient extraction of rare-earth elements from shipping dispute between China and Japan was a wake-up call for the world. It made one thing clear: in the 21st century, minerals can move markets, unsettle economies, and shift the axis of power. That lesson is still relevant, perhaps even more so today and India must not fall behind in realising it. The author is co-Founder & CEO of MiniMines Cleantech Solutions
United News of India
an hour ago
- United News of India
PM hails inclusion of Maratha military landscapes in UNESCO World Heritage list
New Delhi, July 12 (UNI) Prime Minister Narendra Modi today expressed pride and joy over the inclusion of the Maratha military landscapes of India in the UNESCO World Heritage List. He also urged the citizens to visit the inscribed heritage of 12 historic forts,11 located in Maharashtra and one in Tamil Nadu. In a statement, the Prime Minister highlighted the enduring legacy of the Maratha empire, describing it as synonymous with good governance, military prowess, cultural pride, and a deep commitment to social welfare. 'Great rulers inspire us with their refusal to bow to any injustice,' he remarked. Urging citizens to visit these forts, the Prime Minister emphasised the importance of engaging with India's rich historical and cultural heritage. Modi also recalled his 2014 visit to Raigad Fort, sharing a photograph in which he paid tribute to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. He described the visit as a cherished memory. Responding to a social media post by UNESCO announcing the inscription, the Prime Minister stated: 'Every Indian is elated with this recognition. These 'Maratha Military Landscapes' include 12 majestic forts, 11 of which are in Maharashtra and one in Tamil Nadu. When we speak of the glorious Maratha empire, we associate it with good governance, military strength, cultural pride, and emphasis on social welfare. The great rulers inspire us with their refusal to bow to any injustice. I call upon everyone to go visit these forts and learn about the rich history of the Maratha empire.' He shared photographs from his visit to Raigad Fort, noting, 'Had the opportunity to bow to Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. Will always cherish that visit.' UNI AJ AAB PRS
