Pakistan's Controversial Detention Law In Balochistan, What It Means
New Delhi:
The Balochistan Assembly, on June 4, passed the Counter-Terrorism (Balochistan Amendment) Act 2025, a new law that gives sweeping powers to security forces operating in the province. The legislation has been met with strong criticism from rights groups, legal experts, and civil society, who warn it could further fuel repression and unrest in the region.
What Does The Law Say?
The legislation allows military and intelligence agencies, including the Pakistan Army and ISI, to detain individuals for up to 90 days without filing any formal charges or presenting them in court. This can be done purely on the basis of suspicion, with no requirement for judicial oversight.
Joint Investigation Teams (JITs), composed of police and intelligence operatives, have been handed expanded authority to issue detention orders, conduct ideological profiling, and carry out searches and seizures without prior judicial approval. Military personnel will now also have a formal role in civilian oversight panels.
Why Is It controversial?
Critics warn the law blurs the line between civil policing and military operations, paving the way for mass surveillance and state repression, particularly targeting the ethnic Baloch population.
Human rights organisations, including Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and local watchdogs, have slammed the legislation, calling it a clear violation of constitutional protections and international law, particularly Article 10 of Pakistan's Constitution and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
The Baloch Context
Enforced disappearances have haunted Balochistan for decades. Numerous families continue to search for missing loved ones, some unaccounted for after 15 to 20 years, allegedly abducted by state forces.
Activists argue that this new law effectively legitimises these practices, turning Balochistan into what they describe as a "legalised detention zone."
The Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC), a civil rights group, issued a sharp statement against the law, calling it a step toward the militarisation of civilian life.
"Such provisions constitute a grave violation of fundamental rights, including personal liberty, due process, and protection from arbitrary detention," the BYC said.
"This echoes the collective punishment tactics seen in some of the darkest chapters of modern history, including Nazi concentration camps and the internment of Uyghur Muslims in China," the group added.
What The Pakistan Government Says
The government has defended the law, arguing that it is necessary to strengthen counter-terrorism operations. A provincial spokesperson stated that the bill targets only those involved in anti-state activities and that law-abiding citizens have nothing to fear.
The law comes at a time of heightened tensions in Balochistan, where separatist insurgency, political alienation, and military crackdowns have fuelled long-standing unrest.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
5 hours ago
- Hans India
Pakistan Army Chief Rejects Indian Regional Dominance, Calls Water Treaty Suspension Unacceptable
Pakistan Army Chief Field Marshal Asim Munir has declared that his country will never accept Indian dominance in South Asia, while strongly condemning India's decision to suspend the Indus Water Treaty as crossing a fundamental boundary for Pakistan. Speaking to university officials and educators, Munir emphasized Pakistan's unwavering stance against what he characterized as Indian regional hegemony. His remarks came just weeks after both nations agreed to a ceasefire following several days of military confrontation that had escalated tensions across the subcontinent. The Pakistani military leader expressed particular concern over India's suspension of the Indus Water Treaty, describing water rights as an inviolable principle that directly impacts the lives of Pakistan's 240 million citizens. According to statements released by Pakistan's Inter-Services Public Relations, Munir categorized any compromise on water-related issues as completely unacceptable to his nation. India's decision to suspend the decades-old water-sharing agreement marked the first time such action had been taken since the treaty's establishment in 1960. The suspension followed a terrorist attack in Kashmir's Pahalgam region that claimed 26 tourist lives, prompting India's Cabinet Committee on Security, under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's leadership, to take this unprecedented step. The Indus Water Treaty governs the distribution and management of six major rivers flowing between India and Pakistan, including the Indus, Jhelum, Chenab, Ravi, Beas, and Sutlej. Under this agreement, India has not only shared water resources but also provided financial assistance to help Pakistan develop its water infrastructure systems over the decades. Anticipating Pakistan's reaction to the treaty suspension, India launched a comprehensive diplomatic initiative, deploying seven teams of parliamentarians from various political parties to different regions worldwide. This post-Operation Sindoor diplomatic campaign aimed to explain and justify India's position on the water treaty suspension to the international community. Beyond water disputes, Munir also addressed the escalating insurgency in Pakistan's Balochistan province, where rebel attacks have intensified against Pakistani security forces. The Army Chief alleged that Indian intelligence agencies were providing support to Baloch separatists, claiming that these insurgent groups were acting as proxies for foreign interests, particularly India. The situation in Balochistan has become increasingly volatile, with the provincial capital Quetta experiencing multiple attacks on Pakistani forces on May 8 alone. During the recent period of cross-border military action with India, Baloch rebels reportedly escalated their offensive operations, even replacing Pakistani flags with their own symbols in various locations. Munir disputed the authenticity of the Baloch insurgency, asserting that the individuals involved were not genuinely representing Baloch interests but were instead foreign-backed elements working against Pakistan's territorial integrity. The Pakistani military leader also made reference to divine intervention during the recent military conflict with India, expressing his belief that Pakistan had received spiritual assistance during the confrontation. This conflict began when India conducted precision strikes under Operation Sindoor on May 7, targeting what it described as terrorist infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir. Pakistan responded with attempted strikes on Indian military installations over the following three days, prompting what India characterized as a firm and decisive response. The military engagement concluded with both nations announcing a ceasefire agreement on May 10, temporarily ending the immediate crisis. The Army Chief's statements reflect Pakistan's continued resistance to accepting what it perceives as India's growing influence in South Asian affairs, while highlighting the complex web of disputes involving water rights, territorial conflicts, and regional security concerns that continue to define the relationship between these nuclear-armed neighbors.
NDTV
6 hours ago
- NDTV
Pakistan's Controversial Detention Law In Balochistan, What It Means
New Delhi: The Balochistan Assembly, on June 4, passed the Counter-Terrorism (Balochistan Amendment) Act 2025, a new law that gives sweeping powers to security forces operating in the province. The legislation has been met with strong criticism from rights groups, legal experts, and civil society, who warn it could further fuel repression and unrest in the region. What Does The Law Say? The legislation allows military and intelligence agencies, including the Pakistan Army and ISI, to detain individuals for up to 90 days without filing any formal charges or presenting them in court. This can be done purely on the basis of suspicion, with no requirement for judicial oversight. Joint Investigation Teams (JITs), composed of police and intelligence operatives, have been handed expanded authority to issue detention orders, conduct ideological profiling, and carry out searches and seizures without prior judicial approval. Military personnel will now also have a formal role in civilian oversight panels. Why Is It controversial? Critics warn the law blurs the line between civil policing and military operations, paving the way for mass surveillance and state repression, particularly targeting the ethnic Baloch population. Human rights organisations, including Human Rights Commission of Pakistan (HRCP) Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and local watchdogs, have slammed the legislation, calling it a clear violation of constitutional protections and international law, particularly Article 10 of Pakistan's Constitution and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). The Baloch Context Enforced disappearances have haunted Balochistan for decades. Numerous families continue to search for missing loved ones, some unaccounted for after 15 to 20 years, allegedly abducted by state forces. Activists argue that this new law effectively legitimises these practices, turning Balochistan into what they describe as a "legalised detention zone." The Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC), a civil rights group, issued a sharp statement against the law, calling it a step toward the militarisation of civilian life. "Such provisions constitute a grave violation of fundamental rights, including personal liberty, due process, and protection from arbitrary detention," the BYC said. "This echoes the collective punishment tactics seen in some of the darkest chapters of modern history, including Nazi concentration camps and the internment of Uyghur Muslims in China," the group added. What The Pakistan Government Says The government has defended the law, arguing that it is necessary to strengthen counter-terrorism operations. A provincial spokesperson stated that the bill targets only those involved in anti-state activities and that law-abiding citizens have nothing to fear. The law comes at a time of heightened tensions in Balochistan, where separatist insurgency, political alienation, and military crackdowns have fuelled long-standing unrest.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 hours ago
- First Post
Pakistan gets law to arrest Baloch citizens for 90 days only on suspicion
The Pakistani-administered Balochistan Assembly passed a law that allows security forces to detain Baloch civilians for 90 days without any judicial recourse. Activists compare it to laws in Nazi Germany. read more Earlier this week, the Balochistan Assembly passed the Counter-Terrorism (Balochistan Amendment) Act 2025, prompting a widespread alarm among human rights groups and Baloch civil society . What makes the law controversial is the fact that it allows Pakistan's military and intelligence agencies to detain individuals, especially Baloch civilians, for up to 90 days without charge. The authorities are allowed to detain them solely on suspicion. Shortly after the law was passed in the Balochistan Assembly, legal experts and human rights activists warned that the legislation bypasses judicial safeguards and effectively legalises the atrocities and practices already being committed by the Pakistani security forces in the shadows. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Under the Act, Pakistan's Joint Investigation Teams (JITs) can now operate with expanded powers. They can issue detention orders and conduct ideological profiling of the suspects. Not only this, but military officials will now be sitting on the oversight panel, eroding civilians' control over law enforcement. Why is it concerning? Apart from this, law enforcement agencies are also granted increased authority to search, arrest and seize property without any form of prior judicial approval. With these provisions, activists are now arguing that the law paves the way for widespread abuse and mass surveillance. It is pertinent to note that enforced disappearances have been a persistent issue in Balochistan, where families have waited for decades to get any information about their loved ones. The Baloch activists insisted that the new law effectively codifies these practices, placing entire communities under constant fear of state violence. 'This Act transforms Balochistan into a legalised detention zone,' the Baloch Yakjehti Committee (BYC) said in a statement after the legislation passed. The group condemned the legislation, calling it a step towards full militarisation of civilian lives. Not only this, the group compared the tactics authorised by the Act to those used in Nazi Germany and the modern-day Xinjiang region . What makes it more concerning is the fact that the law violates Article 10 of Pakistan's Constitution, as well as Pakistan's obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). In its statement, BYC called on the United Nations, international human rights organisations, and global civil society to intervene and pressure Islamabad to repeal the law. 'Silence now is complicity,' the group averred. With inputs from ANI.
