Who Is Gabrielle Cuccia? Pro-MAGA Journalist Fired for Criticizing Pete Hegseth's Treatment of Press at Pentagon After Signal Scandal
A pro-MAGA reporter was has been fired her job after criticizing Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth over the way he handled the media at the Pentagon. Gabrielle Cuccia, a self-described 'MAGA girl' and longtime supporter of President Donald Trump, has never shied away from expressing her admiration for him.
However, during her time as the chief Pentagon correspondent for the pro-Trump network One America News, Cuccia published a tell-all article on her personal Substack, highlighting the shortcomings of Hegseth's leadership, which eventually led to her getting fired. "If you want the best case study for the death of the MAGA movement — look no further than the Department of Defense," she wrote.
Infuriating Hegseth
"People sleep on the Pentagon. They don't realize what's been simmering at the bottom for weeks, months, sometimes even years." Cuccia raised concerns that Hegseth began restricting media access following his Signal app controversy, where a journalist was mistakenly included in a group chat in which Hegseth shared sensitive details about an upcoming strike on Houthi targets in Yemen.
According to Cuccia, after the incident, Hegseth took steps to cut off important lines of communication between the media and his team in an attempt to "reduce the opportunity for in-person inadvertent or unauthorized disclosures."
"Think of every time you hear a journalist reference a source as "Defense Official" or something abstract... a lot of times, it's coming from these guys," she revealed about the Pentagon press office.
"And they are always there to provide additional context, field questions, and relay the reality of ops in an unclassified manner."
Cuccia's article was published on Monday, and by Thursday, she was asked by her employer to return her Pentagon access badge. The following day, she was fired, she told CNN.
In her piece, Cuccia criticized Hegseth for his lack of openness, accusing him of avoiding press briefings and claiming that his staff intentionally withheld details of his schedule until it was too late for journalists to attend.
"Over at the White House, the Administration understands the freedom of the press, and keeps the door open anyway," she said. "They would certainly not field questions *before* said press briefing."
Too Harsh a Punishment
Cuccia claimed that during one press briefing, members of Hegseth's team contacted her to find out what question she planned to ask if given the chance to speak at the conference. Believing they just wanted to be well-prepared for their first briefing and provide thorough answers, she shared her question. "Unfortunately, that was not the case," she said.
"This article isn't to serve as a tearing down of the SecDef," she wrote. "This is me wanting to keep MAGA alive. Despite my loyalty to this movement, we are killing ourselves."
Cuccia said the power behind the MAGA movement was sparked in 2015, when "America woke up" with a collective understanding that citizens would no longer treat the government's word as unquestionable truth.
However, she noted that since those early days, the movement has noticeably drifted away from its original principles.
"Somewhere along the way, we as a collective decided — if anyone ever questioned a policy or person within the MAGA movement — that they weren't MAGA enough.
"I will always be MAGA, but consider this a love letter to what we have lost, what we must regain, and my final plea to Love Your Country, Not Your Government."
Cuccia spoke out publicly for about her firing on Saturday, posting on Instagram: "I was once told that a former peer feared I was too MAGA for the job. I guess I was. I guess I am."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump says Iran deal would not allow ‘any' uranium enrichment
US President Donald Trump ruled out allowing Iran to enrich uranium under any nuclear deal between the foes. PHOTO: REUTERS Trump says Iran deal would not allow 'any' uranium enrichment WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump on June 2 ruled out allowing Iran to enrich uranium under any nuclear deal between the foes – as Tehran defended what it said was its 'peaceful' pursuit of fuel for power generation. Uranium enrichment has remained a key point of contention in five rounds of talks since April to ink a new accord to replace the deal with major powers that Mr Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. 'Under our potential Agreement - WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!' Mr Trump said on his Truth Social network after the Axios news outlet said Washington's offer would let Tehran enrich some of the nuclear fuel. Republican Trump also blamed predecessor Joe Biden for the impasse, saying the Democrat 'should have stopped Iran a long time ago from 'enriching.'' Axios said the latest proposal that Washington had sent Tehran on May 31 would allow limited low-level uranium enrichment on Iranian soil, for an amount of time that has yet to be determined. Iran has insisted that Iran has 'nothing to hide' on its nuclear programme. Speaking in Cairo, where he met the UN nuclear watchdog's chief Rafael Grossi, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said: 'If the goal is to deprive Iran of its peaceful activities, then certainly no agreement will be reached.' The remarks came after Mr Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on June 2 called for more transparency from Iran following a leaked report that showed Tehran had stepped up uranium enrichment. The IAEA report showed that Iran has ramped up production of uranium enriched up to 60 per cent – close to the roughly 90 per cent level needed for atomic weapons. 'There is a need for more transparency – this is very, very clear – in Iran, and nothing will bring us to this confidence (besides) full explanations of a number of activities,' Mr Grossi said ahead of meeting Mr Araghchi. Mr Grossi added that some of the report's findings 'may be uncomfortable for some, and we are... used to being criticised'. Iran has rejected the report, warning it would retaliate if European powers that have threatened to reimpose nuclear sanctions 'exploit' it. 'Some countries are trying to abuse this agency to pave the way for escalation with Iran. I hope that this agency does not fall into this trap,' Mr Araghchi said of the IAEA. Iran meanwhile pushed for the United States to drop sanctions that have crippled its economy as a condition for a nuclear agreement with Mr Trump's administration. Mr Araghchi said on May 31 that he had received 'elements' of the US proposal for a nuclear deal following the five rounds of talks, mediated by Oman. 'With or without a deal' Both Mr Araghchi and Mr Grossi met Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, who praised the US-Iran talks and called for 'de-escalation in order to prevent a slide into a full-fledged regional war'. On June 2, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told a news conference: 'We want to guarantee that the sanctions are effectively lifted.' 'So far, the American side has not wanted to clarify this issue,' he said. The US envoy in the nuclear talks said in May that Trump's administration would oppose any Iranian enrichment. 'An enrichment programme can never exist in the state of Iran ever again. That's our red line. No enrichment,' Mr Steve Witkoff told Breitbart News. Following a phone call with Mr Witkoff the day before about the ongoing nuclear talks, Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty urged a peaceful solution and a nuclear-weapon-free Middle East, saying in a June 2 press conference that 'the region is already experiencing enough problems and crises'. He warned that military confrontation would create 'a state of chaos from which no one will be spared'. Iran has vowed to keep enriching uranium 'with or without a deal' on its nuclear programme. The United States has sent Iran a proposal for a nuclear deal that the White House called 'acceptable' and in Tehran's 'best interest' to accept, US media reported on May 31. The New York Times, citing officials familiar with the diplomatic exchanges, said the proposal calls on Iran to stop all enrichment and suggests creating a regional grouping to produce nuclear power. AFP Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Harvard seeks end to US funding cuts, says national security, public health research in peril
FILE PHOTO: Students walk on the campus of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S., May 23, 2025. REUTERS/Faith Ninivaggi/File Photo Harvard seeks end to US funding cuts, says national security, public health research in peril WILMINGTON, Delaware - Harvard University asked a federal judge on Monday to issue a summary judgment ruling to unfreeze $2.5 billion in funding blocked by President Donald Trump's administration, which Harvard said was illegal. Harvard's filing in the U.S. District Court in Boston said that it had received 957 orders since April 14 to freeze funding for research pertaining to national security threats, cancer and infectious diseases and more since the country's oldest and wealthiest school rejected a White House list of demands. Trump has said he is trying to force change at Harvard - and other top-level universities across the U.S. - because in his view they have been captured by leftist "woke" thought and become bastions of antisemitism. The Trump administration did not immediately respond to a request for comment. U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs has set arguments for July 21 on Harvard's motion for summary judgment, which is a request for a judge to decide a dispute without a trial to determine material facts. Harvard sued the Trump administration in April, alleging the funding freeze violated the school's right to free speech and was arbitrary and capricious. In Monday's court filing, Harvard detailed the terminated grants, including $88 million for research into pediatric HIV, $12 million for increasing Defense Department awareness of emerging biological threats and $8 million to better understand dark energy. The school said ending the funding would destroy ongoing research into cancer treatments, infectious disease and Parkinson's. The Trump administration has opened numerous investigations into Harvard. Some are looking at threats against Jewish students and faculty after pro-Palestinian protests broke out following the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas attack on Israel and subsequent Israeli military actions in Gaza. Other investigations are probing whether Harvard discriminates based on sex and gender, along with the school's ties to foreign governments and international students. The Trump administration revoked Harvard's ability to enroll international students last month, which a judge temporarily blocked after Harvard sued in a separate case. Harvard and other universities say Trump's attacks are threats to freedom of speech and freedom of academics, as well as threats to the schools' very existence. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
China's rare earths grip gives Xi leverage in US trade duel
AFTER the US and China agreed in Geneva to lower tariffs from astronomical heights, tensions are now surging over access to chips and rare earths. And Beijing increasingly appears to have an edge. US President Donald Trump on Friday (May 30) accused China of violating the agreement struck last month, and sought a call with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping to sort things out. The main sticking point appears to be critical minerals, with US officials complaining Beijing had not sped up exports needed for cutting-edge electronics. The US has said the decision to reduce tariffs hinged on a Chinese agreement to lift export controls on some rare earths. 'It's going to require a discussion between the presidents of the two countries,' Deputy US Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender said on Monday. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday it was 'likely' the leaders would speak this week. The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Faulkender added the US and China 'continue to have conversations' and Trump administration officials are urging their counterparts 'to fulfil the obligations that they made in Geneva to unlock those exports.' BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up As China keeps constraints on metals critical to America's national security, Washington is ramping up its own tech restrictions. Over the past three weeks, the US has barred the shipping of critical jet engine parts to China, throttled Beijing's access to chip-design software and slapped fresh curbs on Huawei Technologies chips. That's sparked anger in the world's second-largest economy. Chinese officials on Monday vowed to respond and accused the US of undermining the Geneva consensus, dimming the chance of a leaders call. The dispute has the potential to endanger the fragile trade truce between Washington and Beijing. In theory, tariffs could snap back to more than 100 per cent after the 90-day negotiating period. It's uncertain if the spat over export curbs will derail relations. Trump has the incentive to avoid that, after the US economy shrank at the start of the year and markets panicked under the weight of huge tariffs. For years, Washington was believed to have the advantage over China in the fight for technological dominance thanks to its grip on semiconductor supply chains. Xi has shown he's ready to fight back, in part by tightening controls over critical minerals in a bid to force the US into easing its restrictions. While the Trump administration has shown little sign of relenting on chip curbs, it has quickly discovered replacing China as a supplier of rare earths could take years and cause pain for key industries. The Asian nation produces almost 70 per cent of the world's metals crucial for making fighter jets, nuclear reactor control rods and other critical technology. China is gaining ground in the standoff, according to Cory Combs, associate director at consultancy Trivium China who specialises in supply chains. Washington is still a decade away from securing rare earths independently from Beijing, while Chinese firms have developed capable alternatives to most US chips, he said. 'China's leverage is more durable than a lot of the US leverage at this stage,' he added. 'I'm not sure if this works out well for the US.' Supply-chain warfare As part of the agreement struck in Switzerland, China promised to remove or suspend 'non-tariff countermeasures taken against the United States' after Trump announced punitive duties in April. The Chinese government did not elaborate on what that entailed. Rare-earth exporters must apply for permits from the Ministry of Commerce. That process is opaque and difficult to verify, allowing officials to turn it on and off again with little visibility from the outside world. The paperwork involved has caused hold-ups, which are only now showing signs of easing. 'We are seeing some approvals come through – certainly slower than industry would like,' said Michael Hart, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in China. 'Some of the delay is related to China working through their new system.' For some US firms, the metals cannot flow fast enough. Ford Motor temporarily shuttered a factory in Chicago last month because it ran short of rare earth components. At a long-running US defence aviation conference Combs recently attended, rare earths were a top talking point. Attendees took the threat 'very seriously', he said. Such concerns show why export controls have become a central pillar of China's supply-chain warfare: They can hurt US industries while causing little harm at home. Tariffs, in comparison, can be costly both for Chinese manufacturers and consumers. Giving Xi even greater leverage, the impact of China's rare earths controls are not limited to American importers. India's largest electric scooter maker, Bajaj Auto, warned last week that the country's vehicle production will take a hit as early as July if China does not resume shipments. 'Supplies and stocks are getting depleted as we speak,' said the firm's executive director Rakesh Sharma. Over 30 such applications have been made for shipping to Indian companies – and none have been approved so far, Sharma added. Companies from another large Asian importer only started getting permits last week, according to an official from the country who asked not to be named. China's squeeze on all countries highlights another risk for Trump: Strategic US sectors, such as batteries and semiconductors, depend on South Korea and Japan for components. If Beijing cuts off those US allies from rare earths, American firms could face even more pain. Japan's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa called rare earths 'undoubtedly a critical theme for economic security', after emerging on Friday from his latest round of trade negotiations with US counterparts. Next battleground Critical minerals were flagged as the next battleground in US-China ties at the height of Trump's first trade war, when Xi visited one of his country's biggest permanent magnet producers – a trip widely seen as an implied threat. In July 2023, Beijing followed through by slapping export curbs on gallium and germanium – minerals used to make semiconductors – after the US sought to restrict China's access to artificial intelligence chips. Recognising the danger, the US Department of Defense has pledged to develop a complete mine-to-magnet rare earth supply chain for all domestic defence needs by 2027. A lack of commercially viable natural reserves, few engineers trained in the extraction process and limited numbers of companies able to compete at the industry's thin price margins are just some of the challenges the department faces. Catching up will also depend on how deeply Washington is willing to spend. Trump is already tapping foreign capital. During the president's trip last month to the Middle East, MP Materials – the sole US producer of rare earths – signed a deal with Saudi Arabia's top mining firm to develop a supply chain. The US could also intensify cooperation with Australia's Lynas Rare Earths – the largest producer of separated rare earths outside of China, although that operation still sends some of its oxides to the Asian nation for refining. While capacity is building in Brazil, South Africa, Japan and Vietnam, they cannot offer an immediate fix for US firms. Beijing has not exhausted its leverage. Restrictions so far have targeted medium- and heavy-rare earths, which are concentrated in defence applications. Weaponizing light rare earths – such as neodymium and praseodymium – could deal an even bigger blow to the US economy, as they are more widespread in consumer goods. For now, Xi is unlikely to pursue the most extreme options as it could invite blowback from vulnerable industries, said Neil Thomas, a fellow for Chinese politics at the Asia Society Policy Institute's Center for China Analysis. 'Beijing's controls on rare earths are a warning against further escalation,' he added. 'But if US-China tensions worsen again, then Beijing may start to inflict real pain on US defence supply chains.' BLOOMBERG
