logo
China's rare earths grip gives Xi leverage in US trade duel

China's rare earths grip gives Xi leverage in US trade duel

Business Times2 days ago

AFTER the US and China agreed in Geneva to lower tariffs from astronomical heights, tensions are now surging over access to chips and rare earths. And Beijing increasingly appears to have an edge.
US President Donald Trump on Friday (May 30) accused China of violating the agreement struck last month, and sought a call with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping to sort things out.
The main sticking point appears to be critical minerals, with US officials complaining Beijing had not sped up exports needed for cutting-edge electronics. The US has said the decision to reduce tariffs hinged on a Chinese agreement to lift export controls on some rare earths.
'It's going to require a discussion between the presidents of the two countries,' Deputy US Treasury Secretary Michael Faulkender said on Monday.
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday it was 'likely' the leaders would speak this week. The Chinese Embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Faulkender added the US and China 'continue to have conversations' and Trump administration officials are urging their counterparts 'to fulfil the obligations that they made in Geneva to unlock those exports.'
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
As China keeps constraints on metals critical to America's national security, Washington is ramping up its own tech restrictions. Over the past three weeks, the US has barred the shipping of critical jet engine parts to China, throttled Beijing's access to chip-design software and slapped fresh curbs on Huawei Technologies chips.
That's sparked anger in the world's second-largest economy. Chinese officials on Monday vowed to respond and accused the US of undermining the Geneva consensus, dimming the chance of a leaders call.
The dispute has the potential to endanger the fragile trade truce between Washington and Beijing. In theory, tariffs could snap back to more than 100 per cent after the 90-day negotiating period.
It's uncertain if the spat over export curbs will derail relations. Trump has the incentive to avoid that, after the US economy shrank at the start of the year and markets panicked under the weight of huge tariffs.
For years, Washington was believed to have the advantage over China in the fight for technological dominance thanks to its grip on semiconductor supply chains. Xi has shown he's ready to fight back, in part by tightening controls over critical minerals in a bid to force the US into easing its restrictions.
While the Trump administration has shown little sign of relenting on chip curbs, it has quickly discovered replacing China as a supplier of rare earths could take years and cause pain for key industries. The Asian nation produces almost 70 per cent of the world's metals crucial for making fighter jets, nuclear reactor control rods and other critical technology.
China is gaining ground in the standoff, according to Cory Combs, associate director at consultancy Trivium China who specialises in supply chains. Washington is still a decade away from securing rare earths independently from Beijing, while Chinese firms have developed capable alternatives to most US chips, he said.
'China's leverage is more durable than a lot of the US leverage at this stage,' he added. 'I'm not sure if this works out well for the US.'
Supply-chain warfare
As part of the agreement struck in Switzerland, China promised to remove or suspend 'non-tariff countermeasures taken against the United States' after Trump announced punitive duties in April. The Chinese government did not elaborate on what that entailed.
Rare-earth exporters must apply for permits from the Ministry of Commerce. That process is opaque and difficult to verify, allowing officials to turn it on and off again with little visibility from the outside world.
The paperwork involved has caused hold-ups, which are only now showing signs of easing. 'We are seeing some approvals come through – certainly slower than industry would like,' said Michael Hart, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in China. 'Some of the delay is related to China working through their new system.'
For some US firms, the metals cannot flow fast enough. Ford Motor temporarily shuttered a factory in Chicago last month because it ran short of rare earth components. At a long-running US defence aviation conference Combs recently attended, rare earths were a top talking point. Attendees took the threat 'very seriously', he said.
Such concerns show why export controls have become a central pillar of China's supply-chain warfare: They can hurt US industries while causing little harm at home. Tariffs, in comparison, can be costly both for Chinese manufacturers and consumers.
Giving Xi even greater leverage, the impact of China's rare earths controls are not limited to American importers.
India's largest electric scooter maker, Bajaj Auto, warned last week that the country's vehicle production will take a hit as early as July if China does not resume shipments. 'Supplies and stocks are getting depleted as we speak,' said the firm's executive director Rakesh Sharma.
Over 30 such applications have been made for shipping to Indian companies – and none have been approved so far, Sharma added. Companies from another large Asian importer only started getting permits last week, according to an official from the country who asked not to be named.
China's squeeze on all countries highlights another risk for Trump: Strategic US sectors, such as batteries and semiconductors, depend on South Korea and Japan for components. If Beijing cuts off those US allies from rare earths, American firms could face even more pain.
Japan's top trade negotiator Ryosei Akazawa called rare earths 'undoubtedly a critical theme for economic security', after emerging on Friday from his latest round of trade negotiations with US counterparts.
Next battleground
Critical minerals were flagged as the next battleground in US-China ties at the height of Trump's first trade war, when Xi visited one of his country's biggest permanent magnet producers – a trip widely seen as an implied threat.
In July 2023, Beijing followed through by slapping export curbs on gallium and germanium – minerals used to make semiconductors – after the US sought to restrict China's access to artificial intelligence chips.
Recognising the danger, the US Department of Defense has pledged to develop a complete mine-to-magnet rare earth supply chain for all domestic defence needs by 2027.
A lack of commercially viable natural reserves, few engineers trained in the extraction process and limited numbers of companies able to compete at the industry's thin price margins are just some of the challenges the department faces.
Catching up will also depend on how deeply Washington is willing to spend. Trump is already tapping foreign capital. During the president's trip last month to the Middle East, MP Materials – the sole US producer of rare earths – signed a deal with Saudi Arabia's top mining firm to develop a supply chain.
The US could also intensify cooperation with Australia's Lynas Rare Earths – the largest producer of separated rare earths outside of China, although that operation still sends some of its oxides to the Asian nation for refining. While capacity is building in Brazil, South Africa, Japan and Vietnam, they cannot offer an immediate fix for US firms.
Beijing has not exhausted its leverage. Restrictions so far have targeted medium- and heavy-rare earths, which are concentrated in defence applications. Weaponizing light rare earths – such as neodymium and praseodymium – could deal an even bigger blow to the US economy, as they are more widespread in consumer goods.
For now, Xi is unlikely to pursue the most extreme options as it could invite blowback from vulnerable industries, said Neil Thomas, a fellow for Chinese politics at the Asia Society Policy Institute's Center for China Analysis.
'Beijing's controls on rare earths are a warning against further escalation,' he added. 'But if US-China tensions worsen again, then Beijing may start to inflict real pain on US defence supply chains.' BLOOMBERG

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mexico seen renewing its approval for Nippon Steel-US Steel tie-up Thursday, sources say
Mexico seen renewing its approval for Nippon Steel-US Steel tie-up Thursday, sources say

CNA

time38 minutes ago

  • CNA

Mexico seen renewing its approval for Nippon Steel-US Steel tie-up Thursday, sources say

WASHINGTON/MEXICO CITY : Mexico's antitrust watchdog is expected to renew its approval of Nippon Steel's fraught $14.9-billion bid for U.S. Steel as soon as Thursday, according to three people familiar with the matter, removing one of the last remaining hurdles to the tie-up. Cofece, as the regulator is known, gave the merger a green light previously, the people said, declining to be named as the matter was not public. Mexican approval of the proposed acquisition, first announced in December 2023, has since expired and must be renewed for the merger to proceed. Cofece did not immediately respond to requests for comment. U.S. Steel and Nippon Steel declined to comment. The news, which has not been previously reported, comes as investors wait anxiously for President Donald Trump to give final approval of an agreement to assuage any U.S. national security concerns. Trump technically has until Thursday to sign it. The tie-up faced obstacles from the start, with both former President Joe Biden and Trump asserting last year that U.S. Steel should remain U.S.-owned, as they sought to woo voters ahead of the presidential election in Pennsylvania, where the company is headquartered. Biden blocked the deal in January on national security grounds, prompting lawsuits by the companies, which argued the national security review they received was biased. The Biden White House disputed the charge. The steel companies saw a new opportunity in the Trump administration, which began on January 20 and opened a fresh 45-day national security review into the proposed merger in April. But Trump's public comments, ranging from welcoming a simple "investment" in U.S. Steel by the Japanese firm to floating a minority stake for Nippon Steel, spurred confusion. On Friday, at a rally in Pennsylvania, Trump lauded an agreement between the companies and said Nippon Steel would make a "great partner" for U.S. Steel. But he later told reporters the deal still lacked his final approval, leaving unresolved whether he would allow Nippon Steel to take ownership.

Trump says he spoke to Putin about Ukraine drone attacks, Iran
Trump says he spoke to Putin about Ukraine drone attacks, Iran

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Trump says he spoke to Putin about Ukraine drone attacks, Iran

US President Donald Trump (left) had a phone conversation with Russian leader Vladimir Putin on June 4. PHOTO: AFP Trump says he spoke to Putin about Ukraine drone attacks, Iran WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump said on June 4 that he discussed the recent drone attacks by Ukraine on Russia and developments concerning Iran in a telephone conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin. During the conversation, Mr Putin told Mr Trump that Russia will have to respond to the Ukrainian drone attacks, the US president said. "It was a good conversation, but not a conversation that will lead to immediate Peace," he said, in a Truth Social post. "I stated to President Putin that Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon and, on this, I believe that we were in agreement." REUTERS US President Donald Trump said he had enjoyed a 'good conversation' with his Russian counterpart, but not one that would lead to immediate peace in Ukraine. SCREENSHOT: X Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

US House plans quick action on Trump cuts to foreign aid spending
US House plans quick action on Trump cuts to foreign aid spending

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

US House plans quick action on Trump cuts to foreign aid spending

FILE PHOTO: House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA) speaks with members of the media, on the day of a closed House Republican Conference meeting on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C., U.S., May 20, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno/File Photo WASHINGTON - Republican leaders of the U.S. House of Representatives said on Wednesday they would act quickly on President Donald Trump's request to slash $9.4 billion in spending on foreign aid and public broadcasting, hoping to file a bill as soon as Thursday. "Yesterday the White House sent the rescissions package. It's the first, maybe, of many. We are now putting that in bill format. We'll file that bill, hopefully by tomorrow, and then bring it up to the floor quickly," Representative Steve Scalise, the No. 2 House Republican, told a news conference. Scalise spoke a day after Trump sent Congress his formal "rescissions" memo requesting the elimination of $9.4 billion in spending already approved by lawmakers, opening a 45-day window for lawmakers to decide whether to back Trump in overturning spending plans many of them voted for in the past. House Speaker Mike Johnson, Scalise and other Republican House leaders issued a statement encouraging House members to support the measure, saying it would eliminate wasteful spending. Presidential rescissions packages have not passed in years, because previous Congresses have not wanted to give up their constitutionally mandated control of government spending. For example, lawmakers rejected Trump's request to revoke $15 billion in spending in 2018, during his first term. However, the current Republican leaders of the House and Senate have shown little appetite for opposing Trump, even those who in the past have been strong advocates for foreign aid. The rescissions package can pass with a simple majority in both chambers, so it would not need Democratic votes. Codifying the cuts into law will lessen the chances that reductions in government spending, which have been led by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) this year, will face legal challenges. Trump began slashing foreign assistance programs as soon as he began his second term on January 20, in his drive to ensure all government spending is in line with his America First policies, eliminate waste and stamp out "diversity, equity and inclusion" efforts. Critics have said the deep cuts in funding by the United States, the world's largest single donor, mean people around the world will die of starvation and from preventable diseases, undermine American leadership, and leave a vacuum for adversaries like Russia and China to fill. Trump himself said last month his administration's cuts to the U.S. Agency for International Development have been "devastating." The cuts include rescinding $496 million of the $4 billion Congress approved for international disaster assistance, $460 million appropriated to assist former communist countries in Europe, Eurasia and Central Asia; $400 million of $6 billion for global health programs like fighting HIV/AIDS, and $142 million designated for UNICEF, the United Nations' children's fund. The package also includes $1.1 billion in cuts to funding for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store