Netanyahu claims Hamas rejected proposed deal, insists on remaining in Gaza
'We want a deal, but not one that allows Hamas to repeat the crimes it committed,' Netanyahu reportedly told 'Israeli' media, insisting that any agreement must involve dismantling Hamas's military capabilities and preventing its rearmament.
He added that 'Israel' remains committed to bringing home the captives, but said this must go hand-in-hand with what he described as the destruction of Hamas.
Netanyahu rejected accusations from 'Israeli' media that he is obstructing negotiations, claiming they are 'echoing Hamas propaganda.' He also dismissed recent polls showing strong public support for a deal, calling them 'engineered surveys.'
Netanyahu defended his recent four-day visit to Washington, which many reports say failed to yield a ceasefire announcement, calling it 'very successful' and accusing media outlets of misrepresenting both his intentions and public sentiment.
'We accepted the deal, the [US envoy Steve] Witkoff framework, and even the modified version suggested by the mediators. Hamas refused it,' he claimed, referring to ongoing talks in Doha.
He alleged that Hamas's goal is to remain in Gaza, rearm, and continue launching attacks, stating: 'I won't accept that.'
Netanyahu also dismissed polling data showing widespread support for a deal, arguing that the questions fail to present the full picture. 'These are manipulated polls… They don't ask: Do you want a deal that leaves Hamas in place so it can commit murder, rape, and kidnappings again?'
Reiterating his position, Netanyahu said: 'We must insist on releasing the hostages and on the other war objective: eliminating Hamas and ensuring Gaza can no longer threaten Israel. That's what I'm doing.'
In response, 'Israel's' Channel 12 clarified that its survey, showing 74 percent support for a deal, including 60 percent of Netanyahu coalition voters, asked whether respondents supported releasing all captives in exchange for ending the war in Gaza.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ammon
3 hours ago
- Ammon
Cooling Gaza, heating the region: The return to 'Open Fronts'
President Donald Trump's recent remarks suggesting an imminent ceasefire in Gaza gave the impression that a resolution to the conflict may be within reach. However, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's statement that the war could end immediately—if Hamas were to surrender its weapons—reveals that the core of the crisis hinges on a single, deliberate condition. Netanyahu understands this well and uses it skilfully. Even if consensus is reached on most issues, a single point of contention can derail the entire process. Meanwhile, Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz's proposal to establish a so-called "humanitarian city" atop the ruins of Rafah in southern Gaza—relocating its population there—underscores that Israel's maneuvering continues unabated. At its core, this plan appears to be an attempt at forced population transfer, regardless of the language used to frame it, whether 'Riviera' or 'humanitarian zone.' This aligns with Netanyahu's own remarks to Trump suggesting that Gazans should be given the freedom to stay—or to leave. As Netanyahu concluded his recent visit to the White House and Katz followed with his own trip to Washington, signs point toward a potential new phase of escalation. Israel has left many fronts open, unresolved, and strategically ambiguous. Since October 7, lowering the intensity of one front has consistently meant raising the pressure on another. Lebanon may now be the next flashpoint. The growing focus on disarming Hezbollah, coupled with the likely failure to do so, could push the situation toward explosion. At the same time, increasing tensions along the Lebanon-Syria axis represent an additional layer of volatility. The two countries may be heading toward direct confrontation—something Lebanon, already reeling from the recent war with Israel, can hardly afford. Internally, the threat of terrorism is resurging, as signs of active ISIS cells continue to emerge. Although the recent flare-up between Iran and Israel has temporarily cooled, it remains unresolved. The front is still active, even if not in open warfare. Israel is unlikely to abandon its operations in Iranian skies—or on the ground—until it achieves a clear strategic breakthrough. The rapid pace of Israeli rearmament, combined with U.S. signals of providing Israel with bunker-busting bombs, suggests that the option of military escalation remains very much alive. Tehran knows this well. With few tools left at its disposal, Iran seems to be leaning once again on its regional proxies. The Houthis, for instance, have shifted from sporadic rocket launches toward Israel to targeting international maritime shipping more directly—attacking, seizing, or even sinking vessels and detaining their crews. This tactical evolution is aimed at heightening international pressure and sending a message: this confrontation stems from tensions with Iran, not merely from the war in Gaza, as the Houthis previously claimed. Iraq may soon find itself pulled back into the regional escalation as well. Recent movements targeting the Kurdistan region could spill over into attacks on U.S. interests—be they military installations or private companies. This trajectory could escalate further in the coming days, positioning Iraq as a new axis in the broader map of potential flashpoints. While international discourse focuses on the possibility of a ceasefire in Gaza, the reality on the ground may be leading elsewhere. For Israel, the next phase may be marked by a return to "open arenas"—from Lebanon to Yemen and Iraq. Yet perhaps the most significant arena will be Iran itself, should negotiations fail to restart. Unlike the brief 12-day war that shaped the earlier phase of confrontation, any future conflict may take a very different form. Israel is likely to focus on destabilizing Iran from within and neutralizing its ability to broaden the scope of regional confrontation. Surprise and intelligence-led operations may become the defining features of Israel's next moves.
Ammon
4 hours ago
- Ammon
Palestinian killed in Israeli drone bombing on tent in Gaza
Ammon News - A Palestinian was killed and several others were injured on Monday morning when an Israeli drone bombed a tent housing displaced persons west of Khan Yunis, south of the Gaza Strip. The death toll from the Israeli aggression on the Gaza Strip since October 7, 2023, has risen to 58,026 and 138,520 wounded. There are also victims trapped under the rubble and on the streets, with ambulances and rescue crews unable to reach them. WAFA
Al Bawaba
4 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
Elmo's X account got hacked: demands Trump to release Epstein files, calls to 'kill all Jews'
ALBAWABA - Elmo's official account on X (formerly known as Twitter) went viral after it was allegedly hacked and used to post an anti-Semitic rant demanding that Trump release the Epstein files, following the US President's meltdown on Truth Social. Elmo wrote on X, "RELEASE THE FILES [Donald Trump] CHILD F***ER" and several other posts calling for the death of Jews over their "control" of the world. Additionally, the hacked social media account accused Trump of being Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's puppet, claiming further that the US President is in the Epstein files, which prevents him from releasing them to the public. The hacking incident caused a flood of comments and posts from social media users on the same platform. An X user wrote, "Elmo isn't wrong about tr*mp though." Another added, "Elmo is done playing games." Reports about Jeffrey Epstein were reignited by the US Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) after they revealed that he committed suicide during his prison sentence and didn't have a client list for his notorious island. In addition to its official claims, the DOJ released a video that captured Esptein in his cell alone during the night he died, revealing no foul play or an external factor. However, the closure of years of speculation, conspiracy theories, and political tensions didn't sit well with many individuals, sparking more debate and rumors on social media.
