SC rejects convicts' plea against 2-judge bench hearing Godhra train burning appeals
The Supreme Court has dismissed the plea that a two-judge bench cannot hear appeals against convictions in the 2002 Godhra train burning case, where 11 accused were initially given the death penalty. The court clarified that a three-judge bench is only required when a High Court confirms or awards a death sentence.
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
The Supreme Court on Tuesday rejected the vehement submissions of few convicts that a two-judge bench cannot hear their appeals against conviction as the matter pertained to the award of death penalty to 11 accused in the 2002 Godhra train burning case. Senior advocate Sanjay Hegde, appearing for two convicts, told a bench comprising Justices J K Maheshwari and Aravind Kumar that it has been held in the Red Fort terror attack case, in which Mohammad Arif alias Ashfaq was handed down the death penalty, that a three-judge bench has to hear cases pertaining to award of the capital punishment."Suppose, this bench of two judges decides to award death penalty to some accused then it has to be re-argued before another bench of three judges," the senior lawyer said.A Constitution bench of the apex court had in its September 2014 judgement concluded that in all cases in which death sentence was awarded by the high court, such matters be listed before a bench of three judges.Dismissing the submissions, the bench referred to relevant Supreme Court rules and the judgement, and said a three-judge bench has to hear appeals in cases where the high courts have either confirmed death penalty or awarded it after hearing the appeals of parties."The Gujarat High Court , in the present case, commuted the death penalty of 11 convicts into life imprisonment and did not award the death penalty...The trial court had awarded the death penalty in this case," Justice Maheshwari said, adding the rule and the apex court judgement did not bar hearing of the appeals in the present case by a two-judge bench."The objection is repelled," the bench said and commenced the final hearing in the case.Earlier on April 24, the top court said it will commence final hearing on May 6 and 7 on the appeals filed by the Gujarat government and several other convicts in the 2002 Godhra train burning case.On February 27, 2002, 59 people were killed when the S-6 coach of the Sabarmati Express was burnt at Gujarat's Godhra, triggering riots in the state.Several appeals have been filed in the apex court challenging the October 2017 verdict of the Gujarat High Court which had upheld the conviction of several convicts and commuted the death penalties of 11 people to life term.The high court had upheld the 31 convictions in the case and commuted the death penalties of the 11 convicts to life term, the counsel had said.While the state has appealed against the commutation of death penalty to life term for the 11 convicts, several convicts have challenged the high court's verdict upholding their convictions in the case.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
38 minutes ago
- NDTV
Siddaramaiah, DK Shivakumar To Brief Congress High Command On Stampede Incident
Bengaluru: Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah and Deputy Chief Minister DK Shivakumar will meet the Congress high command in New Delhi on Tuesday to discuss various developments, including June 4 stampede in Bengaluru that killed 11 people. The Congress government in the state has come under sharp criticism in the wake of the incident, with opposition BJP and JD(S) holding both CM and Deputy CM directly responsible and demanding their resignation. 'Siddaramaiah will meet party leadership in Delhi and will brief them on the latest developments,' the Chief Minister's office said in a statement. Mr Shivakumar, who had returned from Delhi after visiting Delhi Muncipal Corporation regarding Muncipal Governance and Solid Waste Management along with Officers of Greater Benagluru Authority (GBA), is heading back to Delhi, according to his office. Mr Shivakumar is also the state Congress President. The stampede occurred on June 4 evening in front of the Chinnaswamy stadium here, where a large number of people thronged to participate in the RCB team's IPL victory celebrations. Eleven people died and 56 were injured in the incident. Siddaramaiah had on Sunday denied reports that the Congress high command had sought information from him regarding the stampede incident. According to sources, the four names recommended to the Governor for nominations to the Legislative Council, but reportedly withheld after directions from the party high command, is also likely to come up for discussions.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Power bill demand of Rs 1.91 crore ‘wholly unnatural and arbitrary', Allahabad High Court gives relief to Sambhal MP, directs that electricity supply be restored
The Allahabad High Court has directed the Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd (UPPCL) to restore power supply at the house of Sambhal Member of Parliament, Zia Ur Rehman Barq. In a significant relief to the Samajwadi Party MP, the Allahabad High Court also stayed the operation of an electricity bill demand of Rs 1.91 crore raised by the UPPCL, terming it 'wholly unnatural and arbitrary', in its June 4 order. The matter was heard by a division bench comprising Justices Saumitra Dayal Singh and Sandeep Jain. The court was hearing a writ petition filed by the Sambhal MP challenging the assessment order dated May 15, 2025. The court also directed the restoration of the electricity connection, subject to a deposit of Rs 6 lakh and timely payment of future bills. 'Subject to the petitioner depositing Rs.6 lakhs within a period of two weeks from Wednesday, the effect and operation of order dated 15.05.2025, shall remain stayed and the electricity connection of the petitioner, that may have been temporarily disconnected, may be restored forthwith and be maintained subject to timely payment of future bills,' read the court order. Barq was represented by advocates Bidhan Chandra Rai and Stuti Rai, who argued that the UPPCL lacked jurisdiction to assess electricity usage for 'a period of 12 years', asserting that the maximum permissible assessment period under the law is one year. 'Submission is that even if the inspection report and adverse facts allegedly found therein are accepted, no jurisdiction arose with the respondent authorities to make assessment for a period of 12 years,' the court order read. The order further said that the maximum period for which assessment may have been made could not exceed one year. 'By breaching the statutory period of assessment, wholly unnatural and arbitrary demand of Rs.1 crore 91 lacs has been raised. The petitioner cannot be made to deposit 50% of such illegal demand to maintain an appeal,' said the order passed on June 4. The court granted three weeks to the UPPCL to respond and fixed the date of next hearing as July 2, 2025. The fine was imposed on the MP after allegations of power theft at his residence, on December 19. On the same day, he was charged with large scale electricity theft and the power supply to his residence was disconnected.
The Print
2 hours ago
- The Print
India's myopic view on tax policy hurts FDI. Fix it before it breaks the camel's back
For emerging markets like India, FDI holds the promise of technology transfer, job creation, and overall economic development. The Manmohan Singh government in 2008 relaxed FDI norms by allowing greater foreign investment in sectors such as telecom, defence, and insurance through the automatic route, which improved investor sentiment and resulted in an FDI surge. However inaction on urgent banking sector reforms eventually led to a dip in sentiment and inflows. Investor confidence and FDI inflows surged again in 2014 and 2019 on the back of the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government's ease of doing business, but enthusiasm has petered out over the last few years. The court's rejection of AGR waiver requests leaves telecom operators with over Rs 80,000 crore in outstanding payments. Similarly, the application of dual taxation will now allow state governments to levy entertainment tax on DTH broadcasters (service tax is already charged by the Central Government as a part of GST). At a time when private investments are already at decadal lows in the domestic market, a myopic view on tax policy may be the last straw that breaks the camel's back. India's net foreign direct investment inflows fell from $10.58 billion in 2023 to $ 0.4 billion in 2024, the sharpest drop in two decades. This reflects global uncertainty, as well as deficiencies in the country's business climate. The Supreme Court's recent rulings dismissing the waiver of interest and penalty pending on the Adjusted Gross Revenue from telecom operators, and judicial sanction to dual taxation on Direct-to-Home services , may further dampen investor sentiment. Tax policies are an important determinant of sentiment, because investors seek stable and predictable tax regimes. In the AGR case, the Supreme Court's retrospective tax compliance requirements have generated significant financial repercussions for telecom companies, potentially even risking bankruptcy for certain operators. Similarly, the imposition of dual taxation and license fee demands on DTH broadcasting creates an added burden on service providers, challenging the industry's viability and potentially leading to higher costs for consumers. These decisions also throw light on the need to review the judiciary's role in economic regulation. Also read: Ease of Doing Business: If World Bank sees beyond Delhi & Mumbai, India will do better In search of tax certainty Despite economic liberalisation, India continues to struggle to develop a consistent tax policy approach for trade and commerce. The United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government's decision to amend the Income Tax Act in 2012 and retrospectively apply it to indirect transfers is a prime example. Besides dampening investor sentiment, the decision also attracted a slew of lawsuits by companies such as the Cairn Group and Vodafone in international courts and the Permanent Court of Arbitration. The NDA government promised reform in its 2014 manifesto, and a full seven years later, passed the Taxation Laws (Amendment) Bill 2021, which nullified the 2012 amendment. Tax reform, then, seems always to follow from sharp economic pains. It is time for more proactive thinking on tax policy, which can no longer be guided only by the limited objective of revenue maximisation or hawkish enforcement to meet steep internal targets. This approach does little to encourage innovation, domestic value generation, or investment, and there is much evidence on offer. The retrospective application of 28 per cent GST on online real-money games in 2024 has already eroded billions of rupees in market value, and generated uncertainty and ambiguity within a high-growth digital market segment. Also read: India's record net FDI plunge reveals a troubling trend—outward FDI beats investing at home A two-step approach to reform As per the International Monetary Fund (IMF)'s Handbook on Tax Law Design and Drafting, the executive should primarily interpret tax laws. This is the case in countries like the United States, where the Internal Revenue Service issues detailed rules, regulations and procedures to interpret the legislation passed by the Congress. However, in the case of India, flawed policy modelling has led to growing judicial intervention in clarifying and settling tax controversies. While courts play a vital role in resolving disputes, they should exercise caution in intervening and correcting market failures in dynamic and competitive markets. Judges must recognise the unique characteristics of these industries and exercise restraint, ensuring their actions support rather than hinder progress. A measured judicial approach is necessary to foster a thriving environment that benefits both industry players and the wider public. Simultaneously, India needs a clear guidance for commercial tax policy, to sustain economic growth. The introduction of the Direct Tax Code is a step in the right direction. But the government should go further. The new wave of capital and technology intensive industries need a new tax compact; one that is pro-growth and sensitive to their needs. This can be achieved by encoding well-known tax principles as the touchstone for both rule-making and enforcement. A well-crafted charter for commercial taxation can lay the foundation for a fairer, more efficient system. Such a charter should ensure that taxation does not distort business decisions or market behaviour by grounding itself in the principle of neutrality – so that decisions are made on economic merits alone. It should prioritise clarity and simplicity, reducing the complexity of tax obligations and making compliance more straightforward. Certainty and stability are equally vital but often ignored. Finally, the charter must be designed to keep pace with modern economic realities, adapting to digital business models that sometimes operate on wafer thin margins but produce outsize economic impact. Samrridhi Kumar and Anugya Singh are analysts at Koan Advisory Group. Views are personal. This article is part of ThePrint-Koan Advisory series that analyses emerging policies, laws and regulations in India's technology sector. Read all the articles here. (Edited by Zoya Bhatti)
