Williamson ‘devastated' by Earps' England farewell but Wiegman quiet on talks
Leah Williamson says she is 'devastated' by Mary Earps's immediate retirement from international football while the England head coach, Sarina Wiegman, described the news as emotional but refused to be drawn on what conversations she had with the goalkeeper before the decision was made.
The Euro 2022 winner shocked women's football on Tuesday with her announcement and reports on the reasons behind her decision have differed; some have accused Earps of quitting after allegedly being told she had been dropped while the Guardian understands Earps had weighed up the move for more than a year.
Related: Mary Earps made indelible mark with England and leaves big gloves to fill | Suzanne Wrack
'Of course I had a couple of conversations which I don't want to share here because that's between us,' Wiegman said. 'I find it [this news] hard and it's hard for her at the same time. She has done such a great job for England. We've had an incredible journey. I really cherish that.
'It's emotional because we also have a relationship and we've had such a massive journey together with lots of highs and of course some lows too. But we have to move on and we don't have time now to celebrate because we have a game tomorrow.'
When asked if she tried to convince Earps to stay, Wiegman said: 'She knows I want her in the team, so of course, we talked about that.' Then asked specifically to clarify reports that Earps had told her she wanted to retire in April and Wiegman had asked her to reconsider, the Dutchwoman replied: 'As I said, we are in conversations all the time – I don't give any information about these private conversations we have.'
The England captain Williamson, reacting publicly to Earps's announcement for the first time, said: 'She's one of my closest friends in football in terms of what we've been through together, the journey that we've been on so I'm devastated just because I love her, I love being her teammate.
'I think the way that she wears the England shirt is an example to us all so I'm very sad, but for her, she thinks this is the best thing and I'll support her in that always. I know playing for a country meant everything to her. So for her to come to that decision, I will always respect that first, and I care about Mary as a human first before a footballer. But of course, we're a team and we want to win, and Mary in that team gives us a better chance of winning. I know that to be true.'
Earps and the Chelsea goalkeeper Hannah Hampton had been battling for England's No 1 jersey this season and Wiegman added: 'Hannah Hampton is now the No 1. I said before [in a press conference in April] that she is 'a little bit ahead'. But you can't look too far forward because things in football change very quickly.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
3 hours ago
- Business Upturn
Chelsea announce players for Club World Cup; these stars couldn't make it to the list
Chelsea have announced the list of players who are left out of Chelsea's squad for the upcoming Club World Cup 2025. By Ravi Kumar Jha Published on June 12, 2025, 08:30 IST Chelsea have announced the list of players who are left out of Chelsea's squad for the upcoming Club World Cup 2025. The new competition brings a lot of energy to the teams and Chelsea after winning Europa Conference League is also been named in one of the groups. Chelsea's 28-man squad for the upcoming FIFA Club World Cup in the USA was officially revealed on June 11, 2025. Following their UEFA Conference League triumph, the Blues are set to compete in Group D—alongside LA FC (Mexico), Flamengo (Brazil), and ES Tunis (Tunisia). However, the announcement was met with controversy as eight notable players were left out: João Félix Djordje Petrovic Axel Disasi Raheem Sterling Ben Chilwell Kendry Paez Renato Veiga Wesley Fofana (excluded due to hamstring injury) For many of those left out, especially Félix, Sterling, Petrovic, Disasi, and Chilwell, this exclusion appears to be more than a tournament decision; it's a clear signal of summer exits being planned. Moreso, Chelsea's focus is shifting toward youth, rejuvenation, and financial pragmatism as they look to reshape the squad after a mixed season. Ravi kumar jha is an undergraduate student in Bachelor of Arts in Multimedia and Mass Communication. A media enthusiast who has a strong hold on communication and he also has a genuine interest in sports. Ravi is currently working as a journalist at
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Reeves takes gamble on patience in an era of impatience
The hours, days, weeks and even months after a Spending Review can feel like peeling away the layers of an onion. First, there is the speech from the chancellor in the Commons: the political rhetoric and the numbers often designed to sound big but which are often incomprehensible. Then there are accompanying documents - in this instance in particular a blue-covered, 128-page tome crammed with words, numbers and graphs. The work of months, much of it conducted privately with intermittent blasts of authorised and unauthorised briefing, talking up and grumbling, then suddenly bursts out in public demanding digestion. But that takes time. And as the detail is pored over, elements that were not put up in lights by the chancellor become clearer. A good example is the expectation many, many people in England and Wales will be paying higher council tax to help fund the police - something not set out explicitly by Rachel Reeves at the dispatch box. More details on what is planned are expected in the coming weeks - with the government's infrastructure plans due to be set out shortly. But other elements could take much longer to play out: for example, an obscure budget in a particular department that was culled, only for an outcry in six months time. Or, conversely, a budget that hasn't been culled but is later determined to be a waste of money. Seven ways the Spending Review affects you Winners and losers: Who got what in the review? What has the chancellor has announced? The key points Watch: Where the money is being spent The government is seeking to badge this moment as a turning point. The prime minister told the Cabinet and has now written in the Guardian that "this week we bettered a new stage in the mission for national renewal. Last autumn we fixed the foundations. Today we showed Britain we will rebuild." Let's see. The curiosity here is the standard critique of political leaders is turned on its head with much of this Spending Review. So often the grumble is one of short-termism, the quick win, the lack of strategic long term thought. And yet the gamble the government has taken is a willingness for patience in an era of impatience. Long term, so called capital spending, can - the argument goes - transform the public realm and in so doing transform economic potential. But it doesn't happen quickly and day-to-day spending is limited, even cut in places. And this at a time of volatile politics and a restlessness among an electorate, many of whom feel squeezed and have done for years and years. The Chancellor Rachel Reeves acknowledged to me there was an impatience for change - the very thing Labour promised - and pointed to an expansion of entitlement to free school meals and breakfast clubs in England, for instance. The big bet though remains on economic growth - finding it and sustaining it. The lack of it is the shackle on so much within government and beyond: the national mood, taxes, you name it. And yes the prospect of more tax rises in the autumn will hang in the air all summer. But the big test of this Spending Review is the contribution it can make to delivering growth - and when. Key points at a glance from the Spending Review Reeves boosts NHS and housing as some budgets squeezed
The Verge
6 hours ago
- The Verge
Posted Jun 11, 2025 at 2:02 PM EDT
J Justine Calma Trump reportedly plans to sunset the main federal government website on climate change. will soon stop publishing new content after most of the people maintaining the website saw their contacts terminated, the Guardian reports. We don't know yet if the website will continue to be accessible to the public. The Trump administration has already faced — and lost — legal battles forcing it to restore other climate and health resources to federal websites. It has also removed climate information from FEMA's website. The Federal Environmental Web Tracker is documenting these kinds of changes. Major US climate website likely to be shut down after almost all staff fired [
