logo
Culture That Carries: Leadership Lessons From India's Living Tapestry

Culture That Carries: Leadership Lessons From India's Living Tapestry

Forbes3 days ago
Organizations often treat alignment like a strategy. Get people to believe in the vision. Get teams to live the values. Build a culture where purpose sits at the center and everyone moves in the same direction.
But in many companies, what looks like unity is just a performance — a tightly managed choreography of sameness.
When culture starts performing alignment instead of living it, most companies reach for fixes: tighter messaging, new values, more playbooks.
Yet real culture isn't smooth. It isn't clean. The best ones aren't flawless — they're tapestries, woven from memory, contradiction, and the messy grace of how people actually work together.
The inspiration for that might not come from another framework. Maybe it comes from something older. More lived-in. Less built, more endured.
Ideas, Not Edifices
While classical civilizations like Greece and Rome left behind cathedrals of stone, ancient India left behind cathedrals of thought. Her legacy isn't monuments. It's metaphors. Not walls but worldviews.
Concepts like zero, karma, ahimsa, non-duality, and moksha shaped not just her identity but how the world understands selfhood, suffering, time, and truth. India didn't export uniformity. She exported inquiry. Ideas traveled along trade routes and storylines. They were debated, retold, absorbed.
That influence spread far. I spent a large part of my career living in Thailand and Singapore. In Thailand, I watched a traditional puppet show based on the Ramakien — the local retelling of the Ramayana. In Yogyakarta, I stood before ninth-century temples filled with Indian deities carved into stone. Their names and faces were different. Yet their stories followed a familiar arc.
Culture doesn't ask for permission. It travels when invited. And once it arrives, it adapts. It blends. It stays. That kind of transmission isn't accidental. It happens when culture leaves space for others to bring their own color.
A company's purpose should work the same way. Vision statements and culture values aren't diktats. They are invitations. The more people can interpret them personally, the more powerfully they hold.
The Exile's Clarity
Even though I'm Indian, I've lived outside the country for more years than within. That distance hasn't dulled my connection. It has sharpened it. You begin to see with two lenses — one that remembers, one that reconsiders.
This is what I've come to think of as the Exile's Clarity — the insight that comes not in immersion, but in separation. When you are both of a place and away from it, you see it more completely. You become a third-person witness to your own origin story. You notice what it permits, protects, and quietly overlooks.
James Baldwin, the renowned writer and civil rights activist, captured this feeling from Paris when he wrote, 'It comes as a great shock… to discover that the flag to which you have pledged allegiance… has not pledged allegiance to you.'
From afar, contradictions become clearer. And so does love. Not blind love but one anchored in truth.
So this isn't a celebration of India's perfection. Far from it. My home country is messy, contradictory, evolving. But maybe that's the point. What holds isn't a finished structure but a space that allows others to begin. That might be the truest form of inclusion — not a fixed identity but an unfinished one.
As leaders, try seeing your organization from the outside in — free from the constraints and barriers you notice when looking from the inside out. View it through the eyes of your customers, your suppliers, your partners, the common man. That perspective doesn't narrow your purpose. It broadens it.
A Place For Contradictions
India has never been one thing. She's been shaped by migrations, conquests, philosophies, and rebellions. And yet, she held. Not by force but by absorption.
As historian William Dalrymple wrote, 'India has always had a strange way with her conquerors. In defeat, she beckons them in, then slowly seduces, assimilates and transforms them.' The Mughals came as invaders and left behind poetry, cuisine, architecture. The British arrived as colonizers and left behind bureaucracy, cricket, and a parliament. Of course, they also took back her food and made it their own — national dish no less.
Nothing remained untouched. But nothing stayed untouched for long. Even the sacred stories bend. The Ramayana has hundreds of versions — across states, dialects, castes. The gods change shape. The villains shift motive. But the deeper truth stays.
India's cultural resilience wasn't crafted by elites alone. It was shaped in kitchens, temples, street corners, songs. By people who lived it, carried it, changed it. That's what made it hold.
You might believe your organization is unified. But urging people to 'embrace your values,' while important, can't succeed until you acknowledge the contradictions that shape most organizations. There are microcultures, tribes, and groups defined (and inspired) by their own identities. Your task as a leader isn't to stamp your identity over them, but to honor and uphold these distinct values and contradictions — even as you work to unite the organization around a shared purpose and core values.
Culture That Carries
That idea of multiplicity isn't just old — it's alive. You see it in modern India's multilingual film culture. Blockbusters are released in five or six languages at once. Each version carries a different rhythm, accent, and sensibility but tells the same story. It's not about one dominant language. It's about honoring many voices.
The same applies to organizational culture. When inclusion is real, people don't just hear the message — they hear themselves in it.
Let's say a large, globally dispersed company notices a gap between its stated values and how people behave day-to-day. Instead of issuing a uniform rollout, leaders ask each region to define what those values look like in practice. In one market, 'ownership' might mean transparent escalation. In another, it might mean peer coaching. The words change. The intent deepens. What emerges isn't uniform. It's shared understanding.
Performative Culture Vs. Lived Culture
In India, rituals matter. But the meaning behind them matters more.
Years ago, in a small town in Tamil Nadu, I stood in the middle of a festival where processions from different temples wound through the same streets. Each honored a different god. The drumming clashed, the chants overlapped, the air hung heavy with incense — and yet no one was confused. They weren't reciting the same line. They were singing the same truth.
In organizations, the same principle applies. Real culture doesn't require everyone to use the same words. It asks that the meaning behind them be clear. Without that, ceremonies risk becoming empty.
Now imagine a mid-sized organization in the healthcare space. Each year, it holds an 'Integrity Day.' Leaders give speeches. Employees receive awards. There's a sense of ceremony and pride. But when someone raises concerns about questionable billing practices, the issue is quietly set aside and the person is moved to another role. The celebration and the culture are two different things. Employees don't believe what's said. They believe what's backed.
Clarity In Crisis
Real unity doesn't come from asking everyone to play the same role. It comes from letting them define meaning for themselves.
Let's say a fast-growing startup uncovers toxic behavior in one of its most critical teams. Instead of repeating slogans, the CEO pauses expansion plans and calls a company-wide session to rework the values with employee input. 'Respect' shifts from being a poster word to a set of concrete, observable actions.
The culture doesn't harden. It matures.
This is where Indian history offers a parallel. In times of rupture — war, reform, famine — India turned to clarity. But it never held that clarity too tightly. It set direction, then left space for people to adapt.
Culture should do the same. Hold when it matters. Flex when it must.
Let Go Of The Perfect
India's culture — ancient, old, and new — isn't neat. It improvises. It adapts. It survives. It rarely moves in straight lines. It makes room for the pothole, the workaround, the side route.
This isn't dysfunction. It's reality. What doesn't work is reimagined. What isn't available is recreated. Jugaad — improvisation or frugal innovation— has been studied in Ivy League schools and published in the Harvard Business Review.
It's the same resourcefulness that powered India's Mars Orbiter Mission — a feat accomplished on a fraction of the budget of many space programs, even at a lower budget than the Hollywood movie 'Gravity'. The point isn't frugality. It's adaptability. A culture endures not by asking people to erase themselves, but by leaving room for them to expand into it.
That's the shift leaders must embrace. Culture is fabric — and must be woven, rewoven, stretched. When we design for perfect culture, we flatten what makes it human. But when we invite people to make meaning inside it, culture becomes a place, not a policy. A tapestry, not a uniform.
Lasting Cultures Are Carried
A final thought. Nalanda — one of the world's first residential universities — drew scholars from Tibet, China, and Central Asia. They didn't come to be told what to think. They came to be invited to think with others.
That's the leader's role now. Not to recite values, but to create the space where others can live them. India shows us this — contradiction doesn't dissolve identity. It deepens it. Culture that holds isn't the one most loudly declared. It's the one most quietly carried.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Goldman's Kostin Says S&P 500 Earnings Surge Past Expectations
Goldman's Kostin Says S&P 500 Earnings Surge Past Expectations

Yahoo

time7 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Goldman's Kostin Says S&P 500 Earnings Surge Past Expectations

(Bloomberg) -- S&P 500 companies trounced expectations this earnings season after they found ways to blunt the impact of tariffs and benefitted from a weaker dollar, according to strategists at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. As the second-quarter reporting season draws to a close, aggregate S&P 500 earnings per share are up 11% over the previous year, far exceeding the 4% consensus expectation, according to the strategists. With 92% of S&P 500 companies having reported, 60% have beaten earnings per share forecasts by more than a standard deviation of estimates, they added. The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider A Photographer's Pipe Dream: Capturing New York's Vast Water System Festivals and Parades Are Canceled Amid US Immigration Anxiety A London Apartment Tower With Echoes of Victorian Rail and Ancient Rome Princeton Plans New Budget Cuts as Pressure From Trump Builds 'The quarter has been marked by one of the greatest frequency of earnings beats on record,' David Kostin, chief US equity strategist at Goldman Sachs, wrote in a note. The profit margins of US firms held up better than expected in the face of tariffs because companies were able to negotiate with suppliers, adjust supply chains, slash costs and pass price hikes to consumers, according to the strategists. Companies also benefitted from low expectations after analysts slashed earnings estimates during the spring as President Donald Trump announced new tariffs. In June, a team led by Kostin warned that margins would be under pressure if companies were forced to 'swallow a larger-than-expected share' of the cost from levies. A weaker dollar helped drive an acceleration in S&P 500 sales growth during the second quarter, according to the Goldman strategists. They warned, however, that sales growth appears more at risk for smaller companies, which enjoy less of a tailwind from dollar weakness. --With assistance from Sagarika Jaisinghani. What Declining Cardboard Box Sales Tell Us About the US Economy Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates Living With 12 Strangers to Ease a Housing Crunch How Syrian Immigrants Are Boosting Germany's Economy Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

We still aren't sure what's going on with tariffs and inflation — or what will happen next
We still aren't sure what's going on with tariffs and inflation — or what will happen next

Yahoo

time15 hours ago

  • Yahoo

We still aren't sure what's going on with tariffs and inflation — or what will happen next

Recent economic data continue to give mixed signals on how much tariffs are affecting prices, leaving Wall Street conflicted on who is paying for what. While companies may be absorbing much of the tariff costs for now, it's not clear how much longer they can keep it up and how much consumers will be able to shoulder later. Months after President Donald Trump launched his trade war, economic data continue to give mixed signals on how much tariffs are affecting prices in the U.S. While the consumer price index has ticked higher, it has also consistently come in below forecasts, though the latest reading on producer prices surprised to the upside. Certain sectors heavily exposed to tariffs have seen spikes, but July data showed less upward price pressure on some goods prices and more pressure on some services. 'Despite this firmness, the tariff pass-through effect on consumer prices arguably has been less bad than expected so far,' JPMorgan economists led by Michael Feroli said in a note on Friday. According to the bank, one potential explanation for the muted inflation numbers is that firms are eating the tariff cost at the expense of their profit margins, which are currently wide by historical standards and can accommodate the added costs without harming capital or operating budgets. Other explanations include the delayed effects of duties on prices as companies draw down pre-tariff inventories, the seasonality of prices as inflation during the summer tends to be softer than in the winter, and tariff costs being passed though more via services rather than goods, JPMorgan added. Yet another explanation could be that the tariff rates importers are actually paying are far below the headline numbers. A recent Barclays report found that the weighted-average levy in May was just 9% versus the bank's estimate for 12%. That's because demand shifted away from countries with higher tariffs while more than half of U.S. imports that month were duty-free. Despite higher rates on Canada, for example, they don't apply to goods covered under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada trade agreement. 'The real surprise in the U.S. economy's resilience lies not in its reaction to tariffs but that the rise in the effective tariff rate has been more modest than commonly thought,' the report said. To be sure, Barclays said the weighted-average rate has edged up to 10% today and predicted it will eventually settle at around 15%, as more products like pharmaceuticals are expected to get hit with levies and as loopholes close. Businesses vs. consumers Citi Research still doesn't see much evidence of broad-based price pressure from tariffs and attributed the recent uptick in services to one-time anomalies, such as the 5.8% jump in portfolio management fees due to the rally in asset prices. Citi also doesn't expect consumers to get hit with big price hikes in the future, even as more levies are expected to roll out. 'Softer demand means firms will have difficulty passing tariff costs on to consumers,' chief US economist Andrew Hollenhorst said in a note. 'While some firms might still attempt to slowly increase prices in coming months, the experience so far suggests these increases will be modest in size. This should reduce concerns about upside risk to inflation and increase concerns that decreased profit margins will cause firms to pullback on hiring.' By contrast, Goldman Sachs predicted consumers will pay most of the tariff costs. As of June, they had absorbed 22%, but that figure should jump to 67% by October if the pattern seen in early rounds of Trump's trade actions continues. For businesses, the burden will shrink from 64% down to 8%, while foreign suppliers will see an uptick from 14% to 25% of the tariff impact. Unraveling the mystery over what tariffs are doing—or not doing—to inflation has major implications for the Federal Reserve, which is trying to balance both sides of its dual mandate. Tariffs have kept inflation stubbornly above the Fed's 2% target, causing policymakers to hold off on rate cuts. But weakness in jobs data have raised alarms on employment, fueling demands for easing. 'The evidence so far is that almost all of the costs of tariffs are being born by domestic firms,' Citi's Hollenhorst wrote. 'The lack of pass-through should reduce lingering Fed official inflation concerns and allow for a series of rate cuts beginning in September. If anything markets are underpricing the potential for faster and/or deeper cuts.' This story was originally featured on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store