Power of AI brings Urdu books to life
KARACHI:
Engineers at NED University of Engineering and Technology claim to have developed an Artificial Intelligence-powered application that brings Urdu books to life.
The app can convert printed Urdu text from images or fonts into editable digital files. The text is then transformed into speech, creating an audiobook from any Urdu text. "The beta version of the app is expected to be released within the next three months," the project lead, Associate Professor Dr Majida Kazmi, told The Express Tribune.
The app is capable of adjusting font sizes ranging from 8 to 40, while also offering 135 different script styles, she said, adding that the app will allow users to quickly translate websites from various languages, including English, into Urdu, making content more accessible. The project has been supported by the Anjuman Tarqi Urdu.
Despite Urdu being the 10th most spoken language in the world, its digital footprint has been limited, Dr Kazmi said. The project aims to address this gap by making Urdu texts - whether from books, articles, or other sources - machine-readable.
One of the project's features is its ability to convert Urdu text to speech, providing a synthetic voice with clear and accurate pronunciation. This ensures that users can listen to the content with an authentic Urdu accent. The technology has even been tested with older newspapers, proving its versatility in handling diverse types of written Urdu.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
4 days ago
- Express Tribune
TikTok, YouTube rack up views of AI-generated Pope sermons
AI-generated videos and audios of Pope Leo XIV are populating rapidly online, racking up views as platforms struggle to police them. An AFP investigation identified dozens of YouTube and TikTok pages that have been churning out AI-generated messages delivered in the pope's voice or otherwise attributed to him since he took charge of the Catholic Church last month. The hundreds of fabricated sermons and speeches, in English and Spanish, underscore how easily hoaxes created using artificial intelligence can elude detection and dupe viewers. "There's natural interest in what the new pope has to say, and people don't yet know his stance and style," said University of Washington professor emeritus Oren Etzioni, founder of a nonprofit focused on fighting deepfakes. "A perfect opportunity to sow mischief with AI-generated misinformation." After AFP presented YouTube with 26 channels posting predominantly AI-generated pope content, the platform terminated 16 of them for violating its policies against spam, deceptive practices and scams, and another for violating YouTube's terms of service. "We terminated several channels flagged to us by AFP for violating our Spam policies and Terms of Service," spokesperson Jack Malon said. TikTok similarly removed 11 accounts that AFP pointed out – with over 1.3 million combined followers – citing the platform's policies against impersonation, harmful misinformation and misleading AI-generated content of public figures. With names such as "Pope Leo XIV Vision," the social media pages portrayed the pontiff supposedly offering a flurry of warnings and lessons he never preached. But disclaimers annotating their use of AI were often hard to find – and sometimes nonexistent. On YouTube, a label demarcating "altered or synthetic content" is required for material that makes someone appear to say something they did not. But such disclosures only show up toward the bottom of each video's click-to-open description. A YouTube spokesperson said the company has since applied a more prominent label to some videos on the channels flagged by AFP that were not found to have violated the platform's guidelines. TikTok also requires creators to label posts sharing realistic AI-generated content, though several pope-centric videos went unmarked. A TikTok spokesperson said the company proactively removes policy-violating content and uses verified badges to signal authentic accounts. Brian Patrick Green, director of technology ethics at Santa Clara University, said the moderation difficulties are the result of rapid AI developments inspiring "chaotic uses of the technology." The AI-generated sermons not only "corrode the pope's moral authority" and "make whatever he actually says less believable," Green said, but could be harnessed "to build up trust around your channel before having the pope say something outrageous or politically expedient." afp
Business Recorder
6 days ago
- Business Recorder
Microsoft says to step up AI-powered European cybersecurity
PARIS: US tech giant Microsoft said Wednesday that it would step up its cooperation with European governments against cyber threats, including by deploying AI-powered intelligence gathering. Its new European Security Program 'puts AI at the center of our work as a tool to protect traditional cybersecurity needs,' Microsoft Vice Chairman Brad Smith wrote in a blog post. Aiming to deliver real-time intelligence about cyber threats to governments, the scheme will extend to the '27 EU member states, as well as EU accession countries, members of the European Free Trade Association (EFTA), the UK, Monaco, and the Vatican,' he added. Microsoft accused the governments of Russia, China, Iran and North Korea of being behind infiltration of European computer networks for espionage and other purposes. Meanwhile cybercriminals are expanding attacks using tools such as ransomware, which encrypts data on victims' computers and demands they fork over cash to unlock it again. Microsoft to invest $400 million in Switzerland on AI, cloud computing 'We see 600 million attacks on our customers every single day,' Smith told reporters in a briefing ahead of the blog post's release, calling cyberdefence a 'multi-billion-dollar expense for customers across Europe'. AI systems can help detect and identify new forms of attack, Smith wrote in his blog post. But Microsoft has seen malicious actors using the technology for everything from researching targets to writing code and 'social engineering' – or convincing human employees to facilitate access by hackers. And 'influence operations' by nation-states 'are increasingly using AI to mislead and deceive' including with convincing 'deepfake' images, audio and video, Smith added. The company itself 'tracks any malicious use of new AI models we release and proactively prevents known threat actors from using' them, he wrote. Microsoft last month helped police across Europe take down large swathes of digital infrastructure supporting an 'infostealing' network, Lumma, that had been gathering sensitive information like passwords and crypto wallets from victims' devices. In future, members of the company's Digital Crimes Unit will be embedded with Europol's cybercrime specialists in The Hague, Smith wrote, part of a broader increase in collaboration with European security forces. Microsoft's cybersecurity effort is part of a wider push to increase its operations in Europe. The drive comes as trade tensions simmer between the EU and the Trump administration in the US, with many voices questioning European firms' strategic dependence on American-made technology.
Express Tribune
28-05-2025
- Express Tribune
CIA sounds alarm over China's tech rise
US paranoia with China undermines global stability as America seeks to maintain unipolar world The drums of a technological Cold War are growing deafening, with the CIA leading the chorus of alarm over China's 'existential threat' to American supremacy – even as experts warn that Washington's containment gambit is stirring the pot in Asia, and Pakistan's recent strikingly successful deployment of Chinese arms fuels long-simmering anxieties about Beijing's rising prowess. In an interview with Axios, CIA Deputy Director Michael Ellis laid the cards bare. Unlike the Soviet Union, China's challenge to the United States unfolds primarily along economic, technological and ideological lines, precisely the domains where America once claimed undisputed hegemony. Artificial intelligence, quantum computing, biotechnology, semiconductors and energy storage, these, he said, are the battlegrounds of the 21st century. However, experts warn that his worry, however, says more about American vulnerability than Chinese aggression. A European source— a long-time interlocutor between Brussels and Beijing—told The Express Tribune on the condition of anonymity that the so-called 'China threat' was, in essence, the fear that Chinese innovation and standards could undermine American might. The source characterised remarks by Ellis and other US officials as provocative and dangerous, reflecting Washington's growing anxiety over China's technological ascent. He noted that the unease surrounding not just China's technological rise but also its growing military prowess has been building for years. That, he added, was also 'proved' by Pakistan's military after it effectively validated those concerns by deploying Chinese J-10C fighter jets and PL-15 missiles in the May War with India, marking the first real-time combat use of cutting-edge Chinese hardware. For Western observers, it was a stark wake-up call. The source said even as the CIA expands its 'elite workforce' of engineers and scientists, Donald Trump has gutted the National Security Council's China team, reportedly firing or sidelining nearly all of its members, save Ivan Kanapathy. However, experts say the descent into anti-China hysteria is not new. Trump's pick for CIA Director had already declared in January that the agency must become more 'aggressive' in its covert actions and human intelligence. The man who would soon direct the CIA said plainly: 'We will conduct covert actions at the direction of the president, going places no one else can go and doing things no one else can do.' The ambition came into sharp relief on May 1, when the CIA posted two Mandarin-language recruitment videos on social media, offering disillusioned Chinese government employees an 'exit plan'. Beijing responded swiftly. 'A naked political provocation,' the Ministry of Foreign Affairs retorted. Meanwhile, even as Washington accuses China of cyber-espionage and intellectual theft, it openly solicits espionage within Chinese institutions. Ironically, while the US tries to spy on China, it remains terrified that others are spying on it. Beijing, for its part, appears to be shoring up its internal defences. China's Ministry of State Security recently warned former state employees with access to sensitive information against leaking secrets, citing a case in which an ex-employee, lured by a foreign agency, was sentenced for espionage. 'Containment strategy' Einar Tangen, Senior Fellow of the Taihe Institute and Chair of Asia Narratives Substack, told The Express Tribune, the US frames China as a security threat due to its military, technological, and economic rise. 'This rhetoric, fuelled by competition in trade and technology, is used to support a containment strategy.' "The US exaggerates China's rise to justify containment rather than reflect on its own mistakes,' he pointed out. "Calling China a 'threat' is 'red meat' for US politicians." Tangen noted that America believed stirring up problems in and around China would aid America, but it only destabilises and adds to the uncertainty that is hurting the world. "Competition shouldn't overshadow the need for global cooperation,' he stressed. China's growth in tech and manufacturing increases yuan usage in global trade, potentially reducing the dollar's dominance. 'China's innovation serves global demand, it is not aimed at undermining the USD, that is being done by Washington through ham-handed bully tactics. China's digital advances are boosting global growth. It's what America should be doing rather than trying to resurrect its hegemony." "The dollar weakened due to US economic choices, and it's time for America to review those choices and start competing rather than complaining,' he added. Interference in Asia via alliances Regarding the Pakistan-India conflict, Wang Yiwei, a professor at the School of International Relations at Renmin University of China, pointed the finger at the United States, drawing a line from US Vice President JD Vance's visit to India to the deadly Pahalgam attack and subsequent Indian aggression against Pakistan. 'Everyone knows the US needs India to stir trouble near China's borders, particularly involving China and Pakistan as part of its strategy to balance policies, influence and peace in South Asia,' he said. He added that the American strategy appears to be losing steam in the region. Weighing in on regional tensions and US involvement, Einar Tangen said India was balancing security concerns about China with its economic ties. While US interference has created friction, it hasn't permanently damaged relations. He clarified that India's independence isn't a threat to China, but it is to the U.S, which frames the world in terms of 'you're either with us or against us'. "China and India as neighbours must prioritise dialogue to create stability." "Western interference worsens regional tensions." He warned Western military alliances were disrupting Asia, with only a perceived, not a real, benefit to Washington. 'A lesson that should have been learned from America's policies and actions in South America, Africa, the Middle East, Central Asia, and Southeast Asia." The scholar further cautioned that India's partnerships with the US risked increasing regional tensions, shifting the power balance, and sparking proxy conflicts. "India-US military ties will only escalate regional instability." "Balanced relations, not alliances, ensure peace,' he emphasised. He stressed that China and India should focus on trade, not conflict. "QUAD and AUKUS provoke tensions instead of cooperation." Key differences However, to portray the unfolding rivalry merely as a security standoff would be to miss the deeper currents. As economist and Marxist thinker David Harvey has argued, US capitalism thrives on the chaos of the market, whereas China's strength lies in state-led investment and long-term planning. It is precisely this divergence that makes the contest so asymmetrical. According to Professor Wang, the United States has always been a political system dominated by private capital. The so-called "China threat" is essentially a threat posed by China to America's dominance in high technology and in setting global standards. 'It [US] has effectively colonised its allies and digital systems like Swiss online infrastructure, creating what can be called digital colonies. While claiming to provide global public goods, the US has simultaneously hijacked the international currency order.' Scholars argue that America's current dilemma is largely self-inflicted. Through decades of deindustrialisation, market fundamentalism and Wall Street-first policies, the US hollowed out its own manufacturing core. China, by contrast, pursued a sui generis path: merging Marxist-Leninist party control with market dynamics and rigorous industrial policy. The result is what some call 'techno-industrial sovereignty', a model that Washington cannot replicate without abandoning its ideological dogmas. 'The US prioritises private capital and a market-driven economy, while China focuses on state-led development and long-term planning. The US maintains a strong dollar to finance debt and benefit Wall Street, making manufacturing less competitive,' Tangen explained. The US, he noted, chased short-term profits, while China invested in long-term benefits. 'China continues to focus on the high-margin digital economy, while the US focuses on low-margin capital-intensive reindustrialisation.' "America's strong dollar was an own goal that eviscerated its manufacturing competitiveness so Washington could borrow cheaply and Wall Street could grow exponentially." "China's planning fuels economic and tech growth. Trump's does the opposite,' the scholar pointed out, adding that Trump's tariff plan was also flawed as it taxed consumers and, if successful, would reduce tariff collections. Observers have long noted that while America's elite chased short-term profits, China treated AI, green energy, and quantum computing as national priorities, funding them accordingly. If the last Cold War was about nukes and proxies, the new one is about who sets the rules for 5G, EVs, and digital currencies. Right now, Beijing is taking the lead. The moment calls for nuance over paranoia.
