
DOGE Cuts to Cause 2 Million Extra Visits to Social Security Offices: Study
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Staffing cuts and office closures at the Social Security Administration (SSA), driven by Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), are estimated to force seniors to make nearly 2 million additional annual trips for necessary in-person assistance, according to a new study.
Newsweek reached out to the SSA for comment.
Why It Matters
Social Security provides vital support to nearly 69 million Americans each month, including retired workers and disabled individuals. Record backlogs and rising demand from an aging population, in addition to reduced staffing and cuts to long-held phone services, could hit rural seniors and disabled Americans the hardest—forcing beneficiaries, some with mobility issues or lack of technology access, into long lines at SSA offices or risking benefit interruptions.
What to Know
Researchers at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), in new data released Tuesday, say DOGE cuts plus revised SSA protocols are estimated to require people to make over 1.93 million additional trips annually to understaffed field offices each year—equating to more than 1 million wasted hours on unnecessary travel every year.
Data was accumulated by analyzing SSA field office maps, the OpenTimes travel times database, and the geographic distribution of seniors (people aged 65 and over) from the Census Bureau's 2023 American Community Survey.
"Our estimates are very conservative because when they're talking about the time, it's just the time literally to travel from one point to another and back," Devin O'Connor, a CBPP senior fellow and study co-author, told Newsweek. "It doesn't take into account traffic, time of day, other things that come into effect.
"But also, it doesn't take into account how long you might spend waiting in a field office or how hard it is to get an appointment to go to a field office in the first place."
The study estimates that nationally, assuming no traffic, half of all seniors must drive at least 33 minutes for a field office visit while nearly a quarter of seniors (roughly 13.5 million) live more than an hour's drive roundtrip from their nearest field office.
In 31 states, including Oregon and Missouri, more than 25 percent of seniors must travel over an hour to access their nearest office. In some states, like Arkansas and Wyoming, more than 40 percent of seniors must make long treks for services.
Initially, on April 14 and due to SSA changes, phone service was meant to no longer be an option for retirees and survivors applying for benefits, or for beneficiaries making direct deposit changes. In-office appearances were required.
The SSA quickly reversed its own policy on telephone applications, saying most applicants could still apply by phone. But as of last month, beneficiaries are no longer able to make direct deposit changes solely by phone and transactions require either a multifactor, multistep online identity authentication, or an in-person visit.
Kathleen Romig, director of Social Security and disability policy at CBPP, told Newsweek that beneficiaries for years were able to update their banking information over the phone. Now, they have to log into an online portal and get a custom PIN number, or go into a field office in person to authenticate their identities.
"First, you have to call wait on the phone. Then, you have to wait to get an appointment, and most people aren't able to get an appointment within a month's time, and then you have to drive into the field office," Romig said. "Those burdens accumulate on seniors and people with disabilities."
Travel becomes more difficult for those who live in rural areas or have transportation or mobility difficulties. It's estimated that over 6 million seniors in the U.S. don't drive, and another 8 million report a medical condition or disability that makes travel difficult.
Now-deleted figures released by SSA in April showed that nearly 2,000 SSA field office staffers took a voluntary separation incentive payment (VSIP, or buyout). That impacted dozens of field offices where greater than 25 of the workforce accepted buyouts, though offices vary in size and personnel.
"Almost 60 percent, six out of 10 people, are waiting more than four weeks to get into a field office, so there's no reason to think that a direct deposit change is going to be prioritized over a benefit claim," O'Connor said. "So, people who are no longer able to do this over the phone are going to be kept waiting and then have to make that travel."
In March, Senate Democrats warned that SSA would close 47 field offices and six of its 10 regional offices, eliminating up to 12 percent of its total staff. This downsizing, according to lawmakers, was projected to mean an extra 75,000 to 85,000 Americans will have to visit local offices in person every week.
Additional foot traffic may overwhelm the remaining offices, exacerbating case backlogs, increasing wait times, and delay benefit payments, according to the Wall Street Journal and employee unions.
"I was thinking about as like my 70-year-old mom, but also my 90-year-old great aunt—those are two different levels of Internet fluency and they need to be able to serve both populations," O'Connor said. "By moving to this kind of process, there's just going to be a lot of people who are not able to complete this process and they are creating this burden to attack what to date is a very, very small amount of fraud and the primary source originating fraud risk.
"It just feels like the cost-benefit analysis has not occurred. The fraud reductions burden trade-off has not been meaningfully engaged with."
What People Are Saying
Martin O'Malley, former Social Security Commissioner said: "Ultimately, you're going to see the system collapse and an interruption of benefits. I believe you will see that within the next 30 to 90 days." (Senate Democrats, March 25, 2025).
Rich Couture, spokesperson for the American Federation of Government Employees' Social Security Administration general committee said: "What's being served by that by a loss of 7,000 jobs? How does any of that supposedly makes this operation more efficient? How does it improve service? How does it improve productivity? Our position is that losing 7,000 people doesn't do any of those things."
Anonymous SSA employee and military veteran told The Guardian: "They have these 'concepts of plans' that they're hoping are sticking but in reality, are really hurting American people."
What Happens Next
The Social Security Administration is moving forward with office closures and service changes, with unions, advocates and Congress watching closely. Official timelines for further closures and restructuring remain pending.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chris Hayes: GOP civil war erupts as Musk ratchets up attacks on Trump's 'Big, Beautiful Bill'
This is an adapted excerpt from the June 4 episode of 'All In with Chris Hayes.' There's a civil war brewing in the Republican Party and it's threatening the centerpiece of Donald Trump's legislative agenda: his one big, beautiful, disgusting abomination of a bill, which the Congressional Budget Office says will add almost $2.5 trillion to the deficit, while depriving more than 11 million Americans of health care coverage in the next decade. That bill is now meeting new resistance from far-right members of Congress, thanks to the actions of Trump's one-time wingman, Elon Musk. Shortly after his DOGE days in the White House ended in embarrassing fashion, with a literal black eye and reports left and right about alleged drug use and other weird behavior, Musk started this week off by declaring war on Trump's legislation. (Musk has denied the reported drug use.) 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk posted on his social media platform, X, on Tuesday. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' To say this leaves the Republican caucus in disarray would be an understatement. Just days ago, House Speaker Mike Johnson, who is shepherding the spending bill through Congress, posted a photo of himself riding in style with Musk and Trump. But on Wednesday, he said he couldn't even get Musk on the phone. 'We've gotta get it done, and I think Elon understands the weight of that,' Johnson told reporters. 'I hope he comes around, and I'd love to talk to him this week, and I hope he calls me back today.' (As of Thursday morning, Johnsons told reporters they were still playing phone tag.) Hours after that Wednesday news conference, Musk posted a call to action against the Trump legislation on X: 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.' (In case that was too subtle, eight minutes later, he also posted a movie poster for the film 'Kill Bill.') But this is more than just a food fight. Remember, Musk threatened to primary Republicans who won't toe the MAGA line. Now, the threat seems to be that he could primary Republicans who pass Trump's bill. And so some of those Republicans are tying themselves in knots to try to keep both Trump and Musk happy. When Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene of Georgia was asked about Musk's criticism, she told reporters, 'Well, you know I have to agree with him on one hand. I always love it when Americans are angry at the federal government and express it … And so, do I like the price tag of the bill? No. But I want to get off the Biden and Democrat CR that this government is currently funding on.' At one level, this is a story of two people with enormous egos who were never going to be content as co-presidents. But the deeper story here calls into question the entire Trump enterprise and what Trump was using Musk for, which was to make really unpopular cuts across the government. Cuts that followed the Project 2025 playbook and appealed to the most hardcore anti-government extremists in the Republican base and far-right members of Congress, like the House Freedom Caucus, who want a government small enough to drown in a bathtub. But as a policy, that approach is substantively disastrous and politically unpopular. It is not even popular with Trump, who has no qualms about running up massive budget deficits. He told everyone he's not going to touch Social Security or Medicare. But he has to worry about pro-austerity Republicans, so he outsourced the austerity to Musk and DOGE. That way, Trump could say to the anti-government vanguard in Congress, 'Oh, don't worry about the deficit and the debt or spending, because I've got Musk going to town over there. He's just going to cut all the stuff you don't like, and no one in Congress is going to have to take hard votes.' But this was always a dubious play. First, because what DOGE was doing was illegal, as many courts have found. Second, Musk wasn't actually making a dent in federal spending. He decimated our international aid budget, but that was never where the big government spending was, contrary to all the lies and false conspiracy theories Musk spread. Most importantly, Musk's activities were so unpopular that the American people's outrage blew back on Trump and the Republicans. In town hall after town hall, it became clear that Trump's play for plausible deniability was a failure. That's why I believe the White House didn't keep Musk on and why he's freelancing now. Trump's special weapon against party division has always been his cult of personality. When it comes to voting for their own beliefs or voting for Trump, Republican lawmakers almost always vote for Trump. That was enough to get the bill through the House. But there are Republicans, particularly in the Senate, folks such as Sens. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama, Rand Paul of Kentucky and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, who are being very vocal about wanting to scale back Trump's legislation drastically, to pull it apart or to kill it. And now, thanks to political cover from Musk, senators such as Tuberville, Paul and Johnson may be even more emboldened to resist Trump. This is the Frankenstein's monster that Trump helped create: A guy who has virtually unlimited funds to primary politicians he doesn't like. Musk is giving these Republicans cover to rail in the way that they are politically comfortable with — and he has a massive social media platform that he can use to supercharge the debate, just as he used it to spread totally ridiculous stories and false numbers about what DOGE has been up to. That points to a real danger here: Musk's propaganda machine now rivals Fox News in its ability to influence and target the right wing of the Republican Party. It seems Trump is discovering that his oligarchy would be great … if it weren't for the oligarchs. This article was originally published on
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Merz gets warm welcome from Trump at the Oval Office
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz sought to strengthen ties with the United States during a meeting with US President Donald Trump at the White House on Thursday. "We are having so much in common our history. We owe the Americans a lot. We will never forget that," Merz said during a press briefing with Trump in the Oval Office in Washington, referring in part to Trump's German heritage. Trump flattered his guest, calling him a "very respected man." "We're going to have a great relationship with your country," the US president said. A different tone from previous visits Trump adopted a notably friendly tone during the meeting - a major contrast to two previous visits. When Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa were in the Oval Office earlier this year, Trump berated his guests. On key issues such as Ukraine and defence spending, Trump struck conciliatory notes. The Republican remarked that Merz had won "a great election" and joked that Merz could be a "difficult." "You wouldn't want me to say you're easy, right?" the president quipped. " negotiator. Trump joked that Merz was "difficult" but called him a great representative of Germany. The usually combative US president, known for provocative or dismissive remarks about his counterparts, presented himself as particularly mild-mannered. Trump even praised Germany's defence efforts, which he had previously sharply criticized sharply - and also complimented the chancellor on his English. Allegations from Vice President JD Vance that Germany restricts freedom of expression and marginalizes parties like the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) were not raised - even though Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio were at the event. Merz had been prepared to refute them. "You speak such good English. Is it as good as your German would you say? Trump asked. That provoked some laughs from both Merz and the reporters in the room. "No, it's not my mother tongue, but I try to to understand almost everything, and yeah, to speak as good as I can, the chancellor replied. How well do Trump and Merz know each other? The two had only briefly met once many years ago in New York. Since Merz took office four weeks ago, they have spoken multiple times on the phone – both one-on-one and in larger groups about the war in Ukraine. According to German sources, Merz now has the US president's mobile number, exchanges text messages with him regularly, and addresses him by his first name. Until now, Trump has primarily relied on French President Emmanuel Macron and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni as his main European contacts. Merz now aims to step into a leadership role, hoping his phone number will become Europe's go-to one. Merz spoke surprisingly openly about their first one-on-one phone call during the WDR Europe Forum a few days ago. The two reportedly discussed topics such as the American pope and the US city of Chicago, which both have a fondness for. Merz knows the United States well and once worked for the US investment firm, BlackRock. His private-sector background is something he shares with Trump, who was a real estate entrepreneur. Controversial topics avoided At the Oval Office press encounter, Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio stood alongside Trump. These are the same government members who recently accused Germany and other European allies of restricting freedom of expression and marginalizing parties like the AfD. Before his visit to Washington, Merz had made it clear that he considered the criticism from the US over how the German government is dealing with the AFD "overreaching" but that topic was absent in the Oval Office. A journalist attempted to ask about it but was unable to get through. Around 50 media representatives were present in the Oval Office. Merz appeared at the White House without an interpreter – a gesture to build trust. However, the chancellor had sought advice in advance from several heads of state and government who had already met Trump, including Zelensky, Ramaphosa, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Støre, and Finnish President Alexander Stubb. What was the top topic of the visit? Efforts to end the war in Ukraine were the main focus. Merz has positioned himself among the leading Europeans on this issue but has recently expressed frustration over the lack of progress. Trump sees Merz as an ally on the matter. Like him, Merz would like to see the fighting stop, Trump said. Both are unhappy that this does not currently seem likely. However, Trump expressed optimism, saying that at some point the "bloodshed" would come to an end. Once again, he left open the question of whether he was prepared to impose new sanctions on Russia - but also did not rule out sanctions on both parties. "It could be on both countries – it takes two to tango," Trump said. Merz, however, was clear that Russia is the agressor and instigator of the conflict, while Trump was not so unequivacal. "We are on the side of Ukraine," Merz said, adding that Germany and the European Union are "trying to make them stronger and stronger." Later in the press conference German Chancellor Friedrich Merz did not stress the differences. "We both agree on this war and how terrible this war is going on and we are both looking for ways to stop it very soon." Senate bill on US sanctions on Russia Trump said he hadn't read the Senate bill on US sanctions, drafted by Lindsey Graham, a Republican and Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat, but said "they'll be guided by me. That's the way it's supposed to be." The US has a three-body form of government, which includes the judiciary, the legislative and executive branches - with each supposed to check each other, though Trump critics have warned that he, as chief exectuive, he is usurping power from the other branches. Trump said he would have the Russia-Ukraine war stopped before he took office and had then claimed he could end it within 24 hours.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What 12 countries are part of President Trump's travel ban? Here's the new list
President Donald Trump issued a decree this week that suspends and limits the ability of nationals of 12 countries to enter the United States. 'President Trump is fulfilling his promise to protect Americans from dangerous foreign actors that want to come to our country and cause us harm,' White House deputy press secretary Abigail Jackson wrote on X. 'These commonsense restrictions are country-specific and include places that lack proper vetting, exhibit high visa overstay rates, or fail to share identity and threat information.' Here are the 12 countries with full restrictions: Seven countries have partial restrictions: This article originally appeared on The List Wire: Citizens from these 12 countries have been banned from entering U.S.