logo
UK on alert over rise in drug-resistant bacterial infections in Ukraine

UK on alert over rise in drug-resistant bacterial infections in Ukraine

Independent28-01-2025

The number of drug-resistant infections is rapidly rising in Ukraine, according to reports - with the UK's government agency for health security on alert over a risk of case numbers increasing.
The antimicrobial resistance (AMR) infections occur when bacteria evolves to learn how to defend itself against common antibiotic and other medicines, making treatment ineffective.
Overuse of antibiotics is the main cause of the so-called 'silent pandemic' of AMR infections, with a type of infection called Klebsiella pneumoniae now becoming a major issue for hospitals near Ukraine's frontline.
Last week, the BBC reported on a sharp rise in cases faced by clinicians in Ukraine. While globally, 1.4m people died from AMR infections in 2023. In the same year, 58,000 people had AMR infections in the UK.
The UK Health Security Agency has called it a global crisis with the agency calling for action to drive down infections around the world.
Here, The Independent asks what is helping drive the increase in Ukraine and what can be done about it?
'Conflict and infectious diseases go hand in hand'
Dr Andrew Edwards, lecturer in molecular microbiology at Imperial College London, said reports of a rapid increase in AMR in Ukraine were 'not at all surprising'.
'Conflict and infectious diseases go hand in hand because service personnel are often injured in ways that enable bacteria to get deep into tissues and establish infection,' he said.
'These infections are particularly troublesome when they involve bones and joints because these often involve plastic or metal prosthetics that bacteria can stick to and form protective structures known as biofilms that can resist antibiotics and the immune system.'
Matthew Upton, professor of medical microbiology at the University of Plymouth, said poorer infection control conditions can also increase the spread of infections that are resistant to treatment.
'Conditions are likely to be less clean/hygienic than is usually expected, which increases rates of infection. Mobilisation of populations during war can increase transmission of infections too,' he said.
Professor Adam Roberts from the Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine said those factors alone would lead to a rise in both drug-resistant and susceptible infections.
Prof Roberts, who is also a member of Applied Microbiology International's One Health Advisory Group, added: 'When you combine this with likely supply chain issues for important antibiotics and medicines then you have a situation where resistant bacteria will be able to spread faster from person to person and from hospital to hospital.'
What's the risk to the UK?
While the reasons for its rapid spread in Ukraine appear to be war-related, and infection control protocols in the NHS are 'excellent', University of Birmingham Professor in microbial evolutionary genomics Alan McNally said the risk was not zero.
'Antimicrobial-resistant bacteria are no different from other pathogens – they spread,' Prof McNally said. 'At the moment the primary concern is for Ukraine and Ukraine's health system, but we should all avoid complacency around antimicrobial-resistant infections.'
Ukraine aside, Prof Roberts said it was a problem on the rise in the UK.
He pointed to a 2023 government report that estimated more than 58,000 people in England had an antibiotic-resistant infection in 2022, a 4 per cent increase on 2021.
'Antimicrobial resistance is an increasing problem in the UK,' he said.
Dr Edwards said it was most worrying in intensive care units and other hospital wards which use the highest quantities of antibiotics.
He added: 'However, it's also a concern in the community, where relatively simple infections such as those of the urinary tract sometimes need to be treated with second or third-choice antibiotics due to resistance. These second choices may not be as effective, prolonging the time needed to cure the patient.'
The UKHSA said it was alert to the risk of increased AMR bugs, both locally and abroad.
The agency's deputy director Dr Colin Brown said: 'Klebsiella pneumoniae is not confined to war zones and our recent surveillance of resistant bloodstream infections in England shows that in 2023, 14 per cent were due to Klebsiella pneumoniae.
'Antimicrobial resistance is not a crisis of the future, but one that is with us right now causing over a million deaths globally each year. Unless action is taken, the availability of life saving treatments will fall and our ability to drive down infections will decrease.'
What can be done to combat the drug-resistant bacteria?
Governments can help by funding more research and development into new antibiotics, and then those new drugs need to be sent to low-income countries which have the biggest issue with the spread of AMR infections, Prof Upton said.
'Funding the development of additional approaches to preventing infection like increased use of vaccines will also help,' he said.
Prof McNally said vaccines help not by fighting the antimicrobial-resistant bacteria itself, but by helping to reduce severe cases of infectious diseases that can lead to serious infections.
There is also work being done at Imperial College with funding from the Scar Free Foundation to help prevent those infections when treating bone and joint injuries, Prof Edwards said. Led by Professor Julian Jones, British Army surgeons, bioengineers and microbiologists are developing materials that will help bones heal while also killing drug-resistant bacteria at the site of combat injuries.
Prof Roberts said fighting antimicrobial resistance required a global response.
'No one country will be able to manage it on their own, AMR pathogens travel as much as we do so they can be anywhere within a day as we carry them around with us,' he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

BBC Newsreader eye-rolls and refuses to say 'pregnant people' instead of women
BBC Newsreader eye-rolls and refuses to say 'pregnant people' instead of women

Metro

time10 hours ago

  • Metro

BBC Newsreader eye-rolls and refuses to say 'pregnant people' instead of women

BBC newsreader Martine Croxall appeared to roll her eyes as she switched 'pregnant people' for 'women' during a news report. The 56-year-old news host was presenting a segment on new research about the number of heat-related deaths expected amid Britain's current heatwave when the moment occured. Initially quoting the phrasing used in the research, Croxall said: 'Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, said the aged, pregnant people… women… and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions.' 'I have a new favourite BBC presenter,' Harry Potter author J.K Rowling, who has faced backlash for her views on the transgender community and trans-inclusive langage, posted on X. Rowling has previously taken issue with phrases such as 'people who mensturate'. After one commenter on X said they 'hope you don't get hauled before the BBC News beak,' the Celebrity mastermind winner said she was 'braced'. The national broadcaster currently has no specific policy of saying pregnant people. Last year, Croxall notably returned to the BBC after taking legal action against the broadcaster. She claimed that she was one of a group of BBC employees kept off-air during a rebrand and returned to her place behind the newsdesk after an employment tribunal. The use of gender-neutral language within maternity care has been a topic of fierce debate in recent years. In 2021 a Brighton hospital faced backlash for rolling out a 'gender-includive language policy'. Elsewhere a maternity bill in the UK changed the word 'person' to 'mothers and 'expecting mothers' after complaints. The trans rights movement has faced intense scrutiny with figures like Rowling stoking debate such as her support of the superme court ruling around the definition of a woman. Sir Stephen Fry, who has previously defended the writer, appeared to change his stance in recent comments saying she has been 'radicalised'. 'She has been radicalised, I fear, and it may be she has been radicalised by TERFs, but also by the vitriol that is thrown at her. More Trending 'It is unhelpful and only hardens her and will only continue to harden her, I am afraid.' He added that she is a 'lost cause for us'. 'I am not saying that she should not be called out when she says things that are really cruel, wrong and mocking,' he said at a live event. Metro has reached out to BBC for comment. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. View More » MORE: Dame Prue Leith's son blasted after saying she doesn't 'see sense' in debate MORE: Dragons' Den star reveals their strict rule children's friends must follow MORE: Disgraced Strictly star slams 'double standards' at BBC after Naga Munchetty 'sex jibe'

JK Rowling praises BBC presenter for ‘pregnant women' correction
JK Rowling praises BBC presenter for ‘pregnant women' correction

Times

time11 hours ago

  • Times

JK Rowling praises BBC presenter for ‘pregnant women' correction

JK Rowling has praised a BBC presenter who corrected the term 'pregnant people' to 'women' during a live news broadcast in an apparent rejection of gender-neutral language. Martine Croxall was citing a heart-related study about protecting vulnerable people against extreme weather when she appeared to roll her eyes at the phrase. 'London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine has released research which says that nearly 600 heat-related deaths are expected in the UK,' she read. 'Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, says that the aged, pregnant people … women … and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions.' The original wording came from the study's authors rather than the BBC, it is understood. Responding to Saturday's incident, Rowling, the gender-critical author, wrote on X: 'I have a new favourite BBC presenter.' The BBC does not have specific guidelines on the use of gender-neutral terms such as 'pregnant people', which has become more frequent in the wake of calls to remove gender from discussions of pregnancy and childbirth. JK Rowling DAVE J HOGAN/GETTY IMAGES The BBC News style guide does, however, encourage 'appropriate language' when reporting on a person's gender, including using whichever gender pronouns are 'preferred by the person in question, unless there are editorial reasons not to do so'. In April, the Supreme Court ruled that the legal definition of a woman was based on biological sex. In a previous statement, the BBC said that it was assessing how to implement the ruling into its editorial guidelines. A spokesman said: 'In our news reporting, we always aim to deal with issues fairly and impartially, and this is informed by our editorial guidelines. BBC News are assessing the ruling to consider any updates which might need to be made to the style guide as a result.' The BBC has been approached for comment.

Martine Croxall has just struck a dazzling blow for common sense
Martine Croxall has just struck a dazzling blow for common sense

Telegraph

time13 hours ago

  • Telegraph

Martine Croxall has just struck a dazzling blow for common sense

A rebellion can take many forms. Sometimes it's an uprising in the streets. Sometimes it's a ballot-box revolt against the status quo. And sometimes – as BBC newsreader Martine Croxall has brilliantly shown – it's just a droll, one-word aside. Croxall struck a dazzling blow for common sense this week by daring to say the unsayable, by giving voice to a word that's become bizarrely verboten in certain circles. What blasphemous term did she utter? Women. It was during an item on the heatwave. Croxall was talking about new research on the number of heat-related deaths Britain might see as the temperature rises. She read the following from her autocue: 'Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, said the aged, pregnant people…'. Then she stopped. Pregnant people? What in the politically correct hell is this? She mutinied against her teleprompter and told the truth. 'WOMEN', she said, with excellent exasperation. Then she carried on. The elderly, pregnant women and people with pre-existing health conditions 'need to take precautions' in the heat, she said. Post-truth baloney put in its place by a woman who's clearly had enough – you love to see it. 'Pregnant people' is one of those Newspeak phrases that is said to be 'trans-inclusive' but which in truth just erases women. The idea is that if we say 'pregnant people', we won't offend that infinitesimally small chunk of womankind that identifies as male. That 'pregnant people' is offensive to many women – not to mention to science and reason – seems not to matter. Let's be honest – 'pregnant people' is a lunatic term. Every single human being who has ever fallen pregnant has been a woman. They can call themselves Tom, Dick or Harry if they like and ask their woke pals to refer to them as 'he'. But they're women, and it isn't offensive to say so. Other 'trans-inclusive' terms include 'chest-feeding' (what we used to call breastfeeding) and 'birthing bodies' – or 'WOMEN!', as Croxall might say, with that righteous irritation shared by many of us. The memory-holing of the word 'woman' to appease the trans lobby is an outrage. It adds up to a sexist scrubbing from the public record of half of humankind. This is why Croxall's quiet vexation and gentle eye-roll as she said the W-word has chimed with so many: because we are sick of seeing the rights of women and the very language of womanhood be sacrificed at the altar of a dumb and dangerous fad. 'I have a new favourite BBC presenter', said JK Rowling. Same, Joanne. Croxall's rage against the autocue, her one-woman, one-word insurrection against correct-think, was as refreshing as a breeze in this heatwave. Some are now worried the BBC might haul her in for a telling-off. They wouldn't dare. Millions of decent folk will seethe if the public broadcaster even thinks about rapping a woman's knuckles for telling the truth.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store