Malaysia urges global shift towards action-based urban cooperation
In a statement today, the Housing and Local Government Ministry said its minister Nga Kor Ming, in his capacity as the UN-Habitat Assembly (UNHA) president, made the call in his special address during the World Cities Summit (WCS) 2025, which is being held in Vienna.
Nga, in addressing over 75 mayors and city leaders from around the world, underscored the urgency for city-level action rooted in local implementation and backed by innovation.
"Collaboration must lead to projects that solve real urban challenges.
"We must institutionalise knowledge-sharing and back our intentions with innovation funding, technical hubs and measurable outcomes," he said.
Nga outlined a forward-looking approach that encourages cities to work together through mechanisms such as joint innovation funding, regional coordination on shared urban concerns, and standardised urban metrics to track the effectiveness of their initiatives.
He stressed that these are not mere theoretical but tested strategies grounded in Malaysia's own experience.
"Through platforms such as the Malaysia SDG Cities Roadmap, the Asean Smart Cities Network, and the Asia-Pacific New Urban Agenda Platform, we actively promote knowledge exchange and scalable solutions for sustainable urban development," he added.
In reinforcing his call, Nga highlighted transformative urban models from around the world, including Barcelona's Superblocks, Yokohama's Zero Waste policy, and Curitiba's Bus Rapid Transit, describing them as examples of urban innovation that achieved global impact through networked learning.
According to the statement, Kuala Lumpur Mayor and Advisor on Sustainable Urbanisation Datuk Seri Dr Maimunah Mohd Sharif also shared several key insights on delivering affordable housing during her intervention speech at the Mayors Forum yesterday.
She highlighted that affordable housing is more than a development target, it is a reflection of the government's social compact with the people.
"Real affordability takes more than policy, it demands shared conviction... a truly inclusive city is one that listens, adapts, and responds in order to build a genuine sense of belonging with its people," she said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
11 hours ago
- The Sun
Bangladesh lawyers challenge ex-PM Hasina's murder trial charges
DHAKA: State-appointed defence lawyers for Bangladesh's former prime minister Sheikh Hasina have moved to dismiss the charges against her in an ongoing crimes against humanity trial. The case stems from a violent crackdown on protesters last year, which reportedly left up to 1,400 dead. Sheikh Hasina, 77, fled to India following a student-led uprising in August 2024 and has refused to return to Dhaka for the trial, which began in absentia on June 1. Defence lawyer Md Amir Hossain argued that the charges were 'false, fabricated and politically motivated,' though he admitted he had not communicated directly with the former leader. Prosecutors allege Hasina bore command responsibility for the violence, filing five charges including failure to prevent mass murder, which qualify as crimes against humanity under Bangladeshi law. The trial is set to resume on July 10. This development follows Hasina's recent six-month sentence for contempt of court in a separate case on July 2. The UN has documented the deaths during last year's unrest, adding international scrutiny to the proceedings. - AFP
Free Malaysia Today
11 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
July 16 hearing on lawyer's bid to challenge JAC's constitutionality
The KL High Court has to determine whether the questions posed crossed the threshold of Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 for it to send the case to the apex court, which is the 'guardian of the Federal Constitution'. KUALA LUMPUR : The High Court will hear on July 16 a lawyer's application to refer several legal questions to the Federal Court regarding the constitutionality of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) and its authority to propose candidates for judicial appointments. Counsel Daniel Annamalai, who is appearing for Syed Amir Syakib Arsalan Syed Ibrahim, said the court notified the parties about the matter via e-mail last week. That date was fixed in May by Justice Amarjeet Singh to hear Syed Amir's originating summons on the same subject matter. Syed Amir withdrew his stay application to suspend JAC activities and instead filed 16 questions of law on June 25 for the determination of the Federal Court. Amarjeet has to now determine whether the questions crossed the threshold of Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 for him to send the case to the apex court, which is the 'guardian of the Federal Constitution'. Syed Amir has named the government and JAC as defendants. Annamalai said the Bar Council would remain as an intervener in the latest application. Syed Amir is seeking a ruling on whether the JAC Act 2009 contravenes the constitution and is therefore unconstitutional, and whether judicial appointments made under the Act are rendered void as a result. He also questions whether the establishment of the JAC – without an express constitutional amendment and without consultation with the Conference of Rulers as required under Article 38(4) – invalidates the Act. In the originating summons filed in early April, Syed Amir argues that the powers vested in the nine-member JAC violate the doctrine of separation of powers and the basic structure of the constitution. He is seeking a mandamus order to compel the prime minister and the government to strictly adhere to the judicial appointment process prescribed under Article 122B of the Federal Constitution. He further claims that the JAC Act is inconsistent with Article 4, which declares the written constitution as the supreme law of the land. Under the JAC Act, the commission is tasked with proposing nominees for judicial appointments to the High Court, the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. It also recommends candidates for the positions of chief justice, the president of the Court of Appeal, the chief judge of Malaya, and the chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak when vacancies arise. Syed Amir asserts that the questions were neither academic nor hypothetical but directly affect the validity of all judicial appointments made in Malaysia since 2009. He also maintains that Article 122B of the Federal Constitution grants the prime minister absolute discretion to advise the Yang di-Pertuan Agong on judicial appointments.
Free Malaysia Today
11 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Sarawak govt tables bill to raise number of state seats to 99
Sarawak assembly speaker Asfia Awang Nassar said all three readings of the bill will be done on the same day. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : Sarawak has tabled a bill to increase the number of elected representatives in its state assembly from 82 to 99. Tourism, creative industry and performing arts minister Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah, who tabled the Dewan Undangan Negeri (Composition of Membership) Bill 2025, said the proposed increase was necessary to reflect Sarawak's demographic shifts and urban growth, as well as the rising demand for equitable representation. 'The state assembly must remain dynamic and responsive to the evolving needs of our people,' he said during a special sitting today, reported The Borneo Post. On Saturday, Sarawak assembly speaker Asfia Awang Nassar said all three readings of the bill would be done on the same day.
