Nigel Farage speaks for voters on net zero. Here's how we know
It may sound bizarre now, but only a few weeks ago, many political analysts were convinced that Nigel Farage's opposition to net zero would cost him lots of votes. One polling expert even declared that it could be Reform's Achilles' heel.
Frankly, that strikes me as a touch improbable. In reality, I suspect the opposite is true: Mr Farage speaks for voters on net zero. And here's how we know.
This week, a new polling firm called Merlin Strategy asked voters for their views on tackling climate change. But here's the crucial thing, it didn't merely ask them: 'Do you support net zero?' Instead, it asked them which was more important: action to achieve net zero, or cutting the cost of living. And guess what they said? Almost 60 per cent chose cutting the cost of living, while a mere 13 per cent chose net zero.
A telling outcome. Asked, in isolation, whether they back urgent action on climate change, voters may say yes. When they're asked whether they would prioritise it over their own personal finances, however, it's a different story.
There's more to it than that, though. In my view, this result doesn't just show that the overwhelming majority of people think the cost of living is more pressing than net zero. It shows that they don't really believe in net zero full stop.
After all, if they did genuinely believe in it, they would prioritise it ahead of literally any other issue. Because they'd be shrieking: 'Never mind about the price of the weekly shop! Or the economy, NHS, crime, schools or potholes! We absolutely have to put net zero first – otherwise we'll soon be facing climate catastrophe, the collapse of civilisation, and the end of life on Earth as we know it! And then it won't matter how expensive our grocery bills are – because we'll all be dead!'
Evidently, however, most voters hold no such fears. So next time Ed Miliband claims that the public supports net zero, perhaps someone could politely explain this to him.
In a way, the situation reminds me of Labour during the Jeremy Corbyn years. Mr Corbyn's fans used to get terribly excited because, in isolation, his policies actually tended to poll very well. When it came to the crunch, however, most voters clearly decided they had greater priorities. At the election of 2019, for example, they proved to be rather more interested in getting Brexit done than in, say, nationalising broadband, or free bus travel for the under-25s.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
26 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Minister dismisses US fears about China's London 'super embassy' as White House warns against letting Beijing build near sensitive City sites
A senior minister today dismissed US misgivings about controversial plans for a Chinese 'super embassy' near the City of London today. The Trump administration has urged Downing Street to block the proposed development close to London financial centres amid fears that it will be used to tap into commercial information. It is the latest warning to be presented to ministers about the site at Royal Mint Court, close to the Tower of London, which is near a sensitive hub of essential communication cables. But Technology Secretary Peter Kyle said the UK would offer a 'fulsome response' to any security concerns raised. He told Sunday Morning With Trevor Phillips on Sky News: 'These issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process. 'But just to reassure people, we deal with embassies and these sorts of infrastructure issues all the time. 'We are very experienced of it, and we are very aware of these sorts of issues constantly, not just when new buildings are being done, but all the time.' However, shadow home secretary Chris Philp told the same programme: 'It is a security risk - it is likely to become a base for their (China's) pan-European espionage activities.' The suggested site is also situated between several major financial hubs in Canary Wharf and the City as well as three crucial data centres. It is understood US President Donald Trump has warned Sir Keir Starmer against giving the embassy the go-ahead. The matter is believed to have been discussed during trade talks, as Britain and its Atlantic ally discuss how they will implement a trade deal to avoid UK steel producers being lumbered with 50 percent import tariffs by July 9. According to The Times, US diplomats would be trepidatious about sharing intelligence with Britain if the embassy went ahead. A senior US official told the publication: 'The United States is deeply concerned about providing China with potential access to the sensitive communications of one of our closest allies.' It comes after claims 'dark cabling' running beneath the proposed site 'feeds the City of London' were given in a memo to the United States' National Security Council by members of the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China (Ipac). John Moolenaar, the Republican head of the House of Representatives' China committee said if these reports were 'accurate' the site would 'pose an unacceptable risk' to both the UK and US. 'The Chinese Communist Party has a clear track record of targeting critical infrastructure.' he said. 'This development would raise serious concerns in the United States and could be viewed as an act of strategic overreach by Beijing and a curious error in judgment by London.' The executive director of IPAC, Luke de Pulford dubbed the matter as a 'flashpoint' in US-UK trade talks, adding it was 'staggering' the White House had to corroborate the cabling risk to 'defend its own financial system'. 'It's time to send Xi Jinping a clear message: no matter the pressure or coercion, the UK and US won't trade away national security, and this embassy isn't happening,' he said. China has been attempting to revise plans for the Royal Mint building, which neighbours the Tower of London, since it was purchased in 2018. The matter is believed to have been discussed during trade talks regarding steel production It is believed the Chinese foreign minister, Wang Yi, brought up the matter with foreign secretary, David Lammy, while visiting London last year. According to The Times, President Xi had also discussed the same issue with the Prime Minister in a phone conversation. The proposal for the embassy, which would be China's largest in Europe, was previously rejected by Tower Hamlets council in 2022. But two weeks after Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves came back from a visit to China earlier this year, both the council's and Scotland Yard's objections were dropped. Priti Patel, the shadow foreign secretary, described China as a 'dangerous threat to the national and economic security of our country'. She said the Conservative party continued to stand 'firmly' against the embassy proposals, stating her party would never put the UK's 'financial centre or country at risk.' Next Monday, three of Trump's aides are scheduled to meet with their Chinese peers in London for discussions in a bid to solve the current trade war between the two economic powerhouses. The Treasury secretary Scott Bessent, the commerce secretary Howard Lutnick and the trade representative Jamieson Greer will act as representatives for the US, Trump has declared on Truth Social. Yesterday, China 's foreign ministry confirmed vice-premier He Lifeng will be on British shores from June 8 until June 13, adding that talks would with the US would take place. Previously, a Chinese embassy spokesperson has quashed spy allegations, stating: 'Anti-China elements are always keen on slandering and attacking China.' A government spokesman said: 'Applications for a new Chinese embassy in Tower Hamlets have been called in for ministers to decide. A final decision will be made in due course.'
BBC News
27 minutes ago
- BBC News
Laura Kuenssberg to grill technology secretary ahead of Spending Review
Update: Date: 08:55 BST Title: Resignation, return and a new role: Reform UK's Zia Yusuf's week in a nutshell Content: Aside from the upcoming Spending Review, Reform UK's internal drama has been making headlines this week. On Thursday, Zia Yusuf resigned as Reform UK chairman. Yesterday, he announced his return to the party in a new role. Yusuf will lead what the party calls its "Doge team" – which is modelled on the Department of Government Efficiency set up by US President Donald Trump. On Saturday, Reform leader Nigel Farage told the BBC he was "delighted" Yusuf had returned to the party. In a post on X, Yusuf said he had received a large number of messages urging him to reconsider leaving the party and explained why he quit two days ago. "After 11 months of working as a volunteer to build a political party from scratch, with barely a single day off, my tweet was a decision born of exhaustion," he wrote about his resignation announcement shared on X. Other parties have criticised Reform over Yusuf's reappointment. Labour described it as "humiliating hokey-cokey" and the Liberal Democrats called it a game of "musical chairman". This morning, Reform UK's deputy leader Richard Tice will be appearing on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg, stay with us. Update: Date: 08:53 BST Title: Spending Review: Massive cheques, but what do the totals hide? Content: Laura KuenssbergPresenter, Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg With five days to go before next week's Spending Review, I've been passed some of the information that will be in Chancellor Rachel Reeves' pages. One crucial chart that will be in the huge bundle of documents heading to the printing presses on Tuesday night shows what's called TDEL – the Total Departmental Expenditure Limit. In other words, the total that government spends, including the day-to-day costs of running public services and long-term spending on big projects. The chart spans 2010 to 2030, so takes in the coalition years, where you can see the total sliding down, then the Conservative years when spending starts rising after the Brexit referendum, then leaps up during Covid. And then, when Labour took charge, the red line going up steeply at first, then more slowly towards the end of this parliamentary term. The total real-terms spending by 2029-30? More than £650bn – roughly £100bn more than when Labour took office. The government's political opponents may look at that red line as it climbs steeply upwards and say: "See, public spending is ballooning out of control." This chart does illustrate very significant rises in public spending. But be careful. What this chart doesn't give us is any idea of how those massive totals break down. A Treasury document shared with the BBC Read Laura's full story: Spending Review: Massive cheques from the chancellor for some - but what do totals hide? Update: Date: 08:48 BST Title: What we know about the Spending Review Content: Dearbail JordanBusiness reporter Chancellor Rachel Reeves is facing some difficult choices in the upcoming Spending Review, which sets the budgets for all government departments over the next few years. The review will confirm how much taxpayers' money will be spent on the NHS and other public services used by millions, as well as how much money the government plans to invest in projects like new public transport schemes. The Spending Review will be delivered by Reeves on Wednesday, 11 June. In October she set department budgets for 2025-26, and will now confirm spending allocations for the following three to four years. Reeves has already set out what is known as the "spending envelope" - how much total government spending will rise by over the period. On Wednesday this will be broken down by department. Update: Date: 08:45 BST Title: Kuenssberg to grill politicians ahead of upcoming Spending Review Content: Matt SpiveyLive editor Welcome to another Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg. This morning, Technology Secretary Peter Kyle, Reform UK deputy leader Richard Tice and shadow home secretary Chris Philp will be put under the spotlight. They're likely to face questions about the Spending Review, which will be delivered by Chancellor Rachel Reeves on Wednesday, 11 June. "Sources suggest she has three aspects in mind: security for the country, the health of the nation - that does what it says on the tin, and "investing", all that cash for long-term projects," Kuenssberg writes. Actor and activist Arnold Schwarzenegger will also join the programme to talk about what the US government should do about climate change. We won't be posting regular text updates during the show, but you can follow along live right here from 09:00 BST. Just click Watch live.
BBC News
28 minutes ago
- BBC News
Spending Review to include £86bn for science and tech
An £86bn package for the science and technology sector will help fund research into drug treatments and longer-lasting batteries, the government has said ahead of Wednesday's Spending package also includes up to £500m for regions across the UK with local leaders having a say on how it is spent, the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology (DSIT) Rachel Reeves, whose review will outline day-to-day departmental and investment budgets over the next few years, said investing in the sector would create jobs and boost research backers have warned that the government needs to do more to secure the UK's reputation for science on the world stage. Reeves will set out departmental spending plans on Wednesday, with the package for science and technology expected to be worth more than £22.5 billion-a-year by said "every corner of the country" would benefit, with communities able to direct funding to expertise specific to their Liverpool, which has a long history in biotech, funding will be used to speed up drug discovery. Northern Ireland will receive money to develop defence equipment, while south Wales will use the money to design microchips used to power mobile phones and electric chancellor said: "Britain is the home of science and technology. Through the plan for change, we are investing in Britain's renewal to create jobs, protect our security against foreign threats and make working families better off." Tony McBride, director of policy and public affairs at the Institute of Physics, welcomed the funding but said the government would need to commit to a decade-long plan to train workers."This must include a plan for the skilled workforce we need to deliver this vision, starting with teachers and addressing every educational stage, to underpin the industrial strategy," he Rottingen, chief executive of Britain's biggest non-governmental research funder Wellcome, warned that visa costs for scientists from overseas, financial challenges at universities and a budget that was not adjusted for inflation could hamper the government's ambitions. "The UK should be aiming to lead the G7 in research intensity, to bring about economic growth and the advances in health, science and technology that benefit us all." Earlier this week, Reeves admitted that not every government department would "get everything they want" in Wednesday's review, saying she had turned down requests from ministers and argued a squeeze on funding was a "product of economic reality".Reeves said her fiscal rules on borrowing to pay for public services were "non-negotiable" and insisted they were necessary because of "Conservative maltreatment" of the Treasury said earlier this year that the chancellor's fiscal rules would ensure day-to-day spending was matched by tax revenues, meaning the government would only borrow to chunks will go to favoured departments, with suggestions of an extra £30 billion for the NHS over three insiders have told the BBC they expect the spending review will be "ugly", and that ministers have been fighting over winning small amounts of cash for their respective departments.
