Israel issues forced displacement order in central Gaza in new campaign
Thousands of leaflets were dropped over Deir el-Balah on Sunday, telling displaced families living in tents in several densely populated parts of the city to leave immediately.
The Israeli military warned of imminent action against Hamas fighters in the area as it continued its deadly attacks on unarmed and starving civilians desperately looking for food, killing dozens of Palestinians on Sunday, at least 73 of them aid seekers in northern Gaza.
In a post on X, the military's Arabic-language spokesman Avichay Adraee said residents and displaced Palestinians sheltering in the Deir el-Balah area should leave immediately.
Israel was 'expanding its activities' around Deir el-Balah, including 'in an area where it has not operated before', Adraee said, telling Palestinians to 'move south towards the al-Mawasi area' on the Mediterranean coast 'for your safety'.
A video verified by Al Jazeera showed the Israeli army dropping vast amounts of leaflets over residential areas in Deir el-Balah, notifying Palestinians of the order.
'Nowhere else to go'
Al Jazeera's Hind Khoudary, reporting from Deir el-Balah, said the area targeted by Israel is densely populated and it would be 'impossible' for the affected residents to leave on short notice.
'Palestinians here are refusing to leave and say they are going to stay in their houses because even the areas designated as safe by the Israeli army have been targeted,' she said.
'Palestinians say they have nowhere else to go, and there is no space because most western areas or even al-Mawasi are full of people and tents with no more extra space for expansion. They are left with zero options.'
The Israeli military issued the warning as Israel and Hamas held indirect ceasefire talks in Qatar, but international mediators said there have been no breakthroughs.
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has repeatedly stressed that expanding Israeli military operations in Gaza will pressure Hamas to negotiate, but negotiations have been stalled for months.
This month, the Israeli military said it controlled more than 65 percent of the Gaza Strip.
Most of Gaza's population of more than two million people has been displaced at least once during the war, which is now in its 22nd month. Israel has repeatedly ordered Palestinians to leave or face attacks in large parts of the coastal enclave.
The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs said in January that more than 80 percent of the Gaza Strip was under unrevoked Israeli evacuation threats and many of their residents were living with starvation.
A 35-day-old baby in Gaza City and a four-month-old child in Deir el-Balah died of malnutrition at Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital this weekend.
On Saturday, at least 116 Palestinians were killed, many of them aid seekers trying to get food from distribution sites run by the Israeli- and United States-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF).
At least 900 Palestinians desperate to find food have been killed at the sites since the GHF began operating them in late May as an Israeli blockade has prevented food and other necessities from the UN and other aid groups from coming into Gaza.
The genocide has prompted Pope Leo XIV to denounce the 'barbarity' of the war as he urged against the 'indiscriminate use of force'.
'I once again ask for an immediate end to the barbarity of the war and for a peaceful resolution to the conflict,' Leo said during a prayer meeting near Rome on Sunday.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Jazeera
4 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Why is Taiwan holding a ‘Great Recall' vote?
Taiwan's opposition Kuomintang (KMT) party is in a moment of crisis as nearly two-thirds of its legislators risk losing their posts through a mass referendum. Starting this weekend, voters across 31 districts in Taiwan will weigh in on whether they want to keep or remove their members of parliament. The 'Great Recall', as it has been dubbed locally, is the largest vote of its kind in Taiwan's history and, depending on the results, could cost the KMT its majority coalition in the country's legislature. The outcome will set the tone for Taiwan's domestic politics for the next three years and also shape the ability of President William Lai Ching-te's government to act on key issues, such as defence spending. On Saturday, eligible voters can participate in recall votes for 24 KMT legislators, followed by a second round of voting for seven KMT legislators in late August. The recall has been called following a wave of successful petition campaigns earlier this year. Under Taiwan's election laws, organisers must secure signatures from 10 percent of a district's registered voters to hold a recall vote. For a recall vote to succeed, 25 percent of registered voters in each district must participate, and the recall must receive more votes in favour than against. If voters choose to recall a legislator, a by-election must be held within three months. The KMT's traditional stronghold is in the north of the country and notably around the capital city of Taipei, but recall votes will be held across Taiwan this weekend. The KMT won 52 out of 113 seats in the legislature in 2024, and with the Taiwan People's Party and two independent legislators, holds a 62-seat majority coalition. That coalition has been strong enough to block the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which holds 51 seats, and stall the agenda of the country's DPP President Lai during his first year in office. Taiwan typically has high voter turnout during major elections, but recall votes are much more of a wildcard, said Lev Nachman, an expert in Taiwanese politics at National Taiwan University. 'Our prior experience should tell us that these should not pass. However, we've never seen mobilisation work like this at recalls before,' he told Al Jazeera, citing the widespread involvement of common people. 'We are in a bit of unprecedented times.' Ho Chih-yung, KMT member and former party spokesperson, told Al Jazeera the recall campaign had created a 'national election-like atmosphere' that would test the mobilisation and engagement of Taiwan's major political parties. The weather could also tip the scales, he said, as a tropical storm is passing north of Taiwan, and the bad weather may discourage the KMT's older voter base from going out to vote. The vote will determine if Lai will be a lame-duck president for the next three years, and whether he has the ability to carry out key defence and foreign policy initiatives, Nachman said. 'Unfortunately, it's a really big deal because every question that foreign policy people have is contingent upon whether these recalls are successful or not successful,' he said. The issue carries global significance due to Taiwan's contested political status and the threat of a future conflict involving China in the Taiwan Strait. 'The classic Taiwan problem is that it's not just that society is split, it's that society is split, and the clock is ticking about whether or not there's going to be a war over this place,' he added. 'Everything here is infinitely more existential.' Despite its success in the last election, picking up 14 seats, the KMT has angered voters and even alienated traditional supporters by trying to expand legislative powers and targeting President Lai's budget. The KMT majority in the legislature was able to freeze or cut 207.5 billion New Taiwan dollars (then worth $6.3bn) from Lai's 2025 budget – impacting everything from Taiwan's submarine and drone programmes to its Council of Indigenous Peoples. The budget fight was headline news across Taiwan, but it piqued international interest when the KMT targeted $3.1bn in defence spending. Brian Hoie, a non-resident fellow at the University of Nottingham's Taiwan Research Hub and a frequent commentator on Taiwanese politics, said some of the cuts angered a cross-section of voters and groups traditionally aligned with the KMT, such as farmers and Indigenous voters. 'The KMT has done very badly and angered all these random demographics by cutting the budget,' he said. 'That was just very unstrategic,' he added. The KMT is one of the oldest political parties in Asia, but a generational divide over Taiwan's relationship with China is challenging its longstanding position in Taiwanese politics. Some voters believe that the party has been co-opted by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in Beijing. The CCP has threatened to one day annex Taiwan by peace or by force, and Taiwan's two main political parties offer different approaches for how to respond to Beijing's threat. President Lai's DPP has taken a more outspoken approach by advocating for Taiwan on the international stage and ramping up defence spending, while the KMT follows a more conciliatory approach that favours ongoing dialogue with China. Fears surrounding China have in the past unseated some of the KMT's most prominent members, such as party whip Fu Kun-chi, who controversially led a delegation of lawmakers to Beijing last year at a time of significant political tension in the Taiwan Strait. Party member and former KMT spokesperson Ho said the recall supporters were abusing a system designed to remove individuals deemed unfit for holding their posts for serious reasons, such as corruption. 'This 'mass recall' campaign is not driven by the individual performance of KMT legislators, but is instead a blanket attempt to unseat opposition lawmakers across the board,' Ho said. 'To advance this effort, the DPP has deliberately framed the KMT as 'pro-China' and accused it of 'selling out Taiwan', a tactic designed to inflame ideological divisions and mobilise its base through fear and hostility, thereby increasing the likelihood that the recall votes will pass,' he said. A senior KMT party member also told Al Jazeera that voters may be looking for an outlet for their frustrations amid a rising cost of living and the economic stress resulting from United States President Donald Trump's trade war and threat of tariffs on Taiwan. Trump has threatened to impose tariffs of up to 32 percent on the island-nation's export-driven economy. Over the past six months, the New Taiwan dollar has appreciated 11 percent, impacting the bottom line of thousands of small and medium domestic manufacturers who must compete with foreign goods becoming cheaper for Taiwan's consumers as their dollars go further in terms of spending power.
Al Jazeera
5 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
France's move to recognise Palestinian state condemned by US, Israel
United States Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said Washington 'strongly rejects' French President Emmanuel Macron's plan to recognise a Palestinian state, as the administration of President Donald Trump announced it would not attend an upcoming United Nations conference seeking a two-state solution for Palestinians. Posting on X late on Thursday, Rubio criticised Macron's 'reckless decision', which he said 'only serves Hamas propaganda and sets back peace'. Earlier, Macron had said he would formalise France's decision to officially recognise a Palestinian state at the UN's General Assembly in September. 'In keeping with its historic commitment to a just and lasting peace in the Middle East, I have decided that France will recognise the State of Palestine,' Macron wrote on X. At least 142 countries out of the 193 members of the UN currently recognise or plan to recognise a Palestinian state. But several powerful Western countries – including the US, the United Kingdom and Germany – have refused to do so. Fellow European Union members Norway, Ireland and Spain indicated in May that they had begun the process to recognise a Palestinian state. But Macron's decision would make France – one of Israel's closest allies and a G7 member – the largest and arguably most influential country in Europe to make the move. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu condemned the decision, saying such a move 'rewards terror and risks creating another Iranian proxy'. 'A Palestinian state in these conditions would be a launch pad to annihilate Israel – not to live in peace beside it,' he said in a post on X. 'Let's be clear: the Palestinians do not seek a state alongside Israel; they seek a state instead of Israel,' Netanyahu added. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz also described the move as 'a disgrace and a surrender to terrorism'. He added that Israel would not allow the establishment of a 'Palestinian entity that would harm our security, endanger our existence'. While supporting a two-state solution remains the long-held official stance of the US, President Donald Trump has himself expressed doubts about its viability. Since returning to the White House in January, Trump suggested the US could 'take over' Gaza, displace the territory's more than two million Palestinian population, and transform it into the 'Riviera of the Middle East'. Trump's plan has been condemned by rights groups, Arab states, Palestinians and the UN as tantamount to 'ethnic cleansing'. In June, Washington's ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, also said he did not think an independent Palestinian state remained a US foreign policy goal. His comments prompted Department of State spokesperson Tammy Bruce to say Huckabee 'speaks for himself' and policy-making is a matter for Trump and the White House. On Thursday, State Department deputy spokesperson Tommy Pigott said the US will not attend an upcoming conference set to be held at the UN on the two-state solution. The conference – co-chaired by France and Saudi Arabia, and scheduled to take place between July 28-30 – seeks to chart a roadmap to end the decades-long conflict and recognise a Palestinian state. Speaking to reporters, Pigott said there was 'nothing further' to say about the issue other than that Washington 'will not be in attendance'. There is mounting pressure on Israel to end its deadly war on Gaza, waged in the wake of the Hamas-led October 7, 2023, attacks on southern Israel, which saw some 1,139 people killed and more than 200 captives taken to the Palestinian enclave. Israel's subsequent 21-month assault on Gaza has resulted in almost 60,000 Palestinians being killed, with a further 144,000 wounded. Months-long ceasefire negotiations – brokered by the US, Egypt and Qatar – have so far failed to yield a breakthrough. On Monday, 28 countries – including the UK, Japan and numerous European nations – issued a joint statement telling Israel the war on Gaza 'must end now'. The joint statement also condemned 'the drip feeding of aid and the inhumane killing of civilians, including children, seeking to meet their most basic needs of water and food'.
Al Jazeera
10 hours ago
- Al Jazeera
Could Israel be planning a second war on Iran?
Israel's leadership views its 12-day war with Iran last month as a success – several Iranian military leaders were killed, Iran's defensive military capabilities were weakened, and the United States was convinced to take part in a raid on the Iranian nuclear site at Fordow. But while Israeli leaders were quick to claim victory, they emphasised that they were ready to attack again if necessary, with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu saying he had 'no intention of easing off the gas pedal'. And Israel is already looking for the next opportunity to wage another devastating conflict aimed at bringing down the Islamic Republic in Iran, analysts told Al Jazeera. However, to do so, it would require the 'permission' of the US, which may not be willing to give it. Back in mid-June, a surprise Israeli attack led to the war, in which more than 1,000 Iranians and 29 Israelis were killed. Israel justified the war by claiming that it was acting preemptively and in 'self-defence' to take out Iran's nuclear programme, which Tehran has long said is for civilian purposes. Speaking to Al Jazeera earlier this week, Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian expressed doubt over how long the current ceasefire will remain in place. 'We are fully prepared for any new Israeli military move, and our armed forces are ready to strike deep inside Israel again,' he said. Cause for war Despite Israel's emphasis that it was targeting Iran's nuclear facilities, it mainly assassinated high-ranking government and military officials, indicating a clear attempt to weaken and possibly bring down the regime. Trita Parsi, an expert on Iran and the cofounder and executive vice president of the Quincy Institute, a left-wing US think tank, believes Netanyahu is looking for an opportunity to resume that mission. 'The reason the Israelis want to attack again … is because they want to make sure they turn Iran into the next Syria or Lebanon – countries Israel can attack anytime with impunity,' he told Al Jazeera. Israel's next opportunity to muster up a pretext for a war could come after European countries reimpose debilitating sanctions on Iran. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is reported to have held a call with his counterparts from Germany, France and the United Kingdom earlier in July, in which they agreed that United Nations Security Council sanctions would be reimposed if a new nuclear deal was not agreed upon by the end of August. The sanctions had been lifted when Iran and several Western countries agreed on a nuclear deal in 2015. The US pulled out of that deal two years into President Donald Trump's first term in 2018 and restored sanctions as part of a maximum pressure campaign. Now, European parties to the deal could do the same, and that could prompt Iran to walk out of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty, warned Parsi. 'That would provide [Israel] with a political window to [attack again],' he told Al Jazeera. Meir Javedanfar, Iran lecturer at Israel's Reichman University, added that Israel would nevertheless have to muster up or present credible intelligence that suggests Iran is rebuilding or repairing its nuclear programme. He warned that, 'to launch such an attack, Israel would need the agreement of the United States and its President Trump', permission he regarded as less likely in light of US concern over Israeli attacks on Syria. Israeli operations While Israeli strikes on Iran may not be imminent, a report in The New York Times on Wednesday suggests that it is carrying out covert operations responsible for sudden explosions and fires across the country. The paper cited three informed officials and a European diplomat who attributed the apparently random fires and explosions at apartment complexes, oil refineries, near an airport and a shoe factory, to acts of sabotage likely carried out by Israel. 'I think Benjamin Netanyahu has found a formula where it is able to attack Iran with impunity despite pushback from Donald Trump,' said Negar Mortazavi, an expert on Iran with the Center for International Policy (CIP), a think tank based in Washington, DC. Any ongoing covert operations are a result of Israel's extensive infiltration of Iranian security and infrastructure that became apparent during the early stages of the June conflict, with individuals targeted through what was presumed to be teams of local intelligence operatives and drones launched against Iranian targets from within Iranian territory. There was no evidence to suggest that Israel's network within Iran had ended with the war, analyst and Iran expert Ori Goldberg said. 'Israel has built a robust [security] system within Iran and, like all such systems, its muscles need flexing occasionally,' he said from Tel Aviv. 'Sometimes this isn't for strategic reasons, so much as tactical ones. As soon as you have infrastructure or people in place within another country, you have a limited time to use them, so if that's setting fires or setting detonations, it's a way of keeping them active and letting Iran know they're there.' Likelihood of new war Few could have predicted the complete absence of restraint with which Netanyahu, previously a figure considered to be somewhat averse to conflict, has attacked neighbouring states, Syria and Lebanon, as well as regional actors, such as Yemen and Iran, while maintaining his brutal assault upon Gaza. But while a renewed offensive upon Israel's historical bogeyman, Iran, might prove popular in the face of growing internal division over Israel's war on Gaza, how well received it might be by his principal ally remains to be seen. 'Trump is a concern and Israel will want to keep on the right side of whatever line he's drawn [on its actions],' Goldberg said. 'But Iran is a consensus issue within Israel. People might argue about Gaza, but never Iran. If Netanyahu feels himself under threat, he's going to want to crack the Iranian whip and unify people behind him.' Iran, for its part, won't be caught flat-footed a second time, say analysts. Mortazavi told Al Jazeera that Iran is expecting Israel to continue its aggression, even as it still holds out hope to reach a deal on its nuclear programme through diplomacy. 'I think they know that a deal will reduce the chances of an Israeli attack,' she said.
