logo
Global AI gap widens as compute power divides nations, economies

Global AI gap widens as compute power divides nations, economies

By Adam Satariano and Paul Mozur Graphics by Karl Russell and June Kim
Last month, Sam Altman, the chief executive of the artificial intelligence company OpenAI, donned a helmet, work boots and a luminescent high-visibility vest to visit the construction site of the company's new data center project in Texas.
Bigger than New York's Central Park, the estimated $60 billion project, which has its own natural gas plant, will be one of the most powerful computing hubs ever created when completed as soon as next year.
Around the same time as Altman's visit to Texas, Nicolás Wolovick, a computer science professor at the National University of Córdoba in Argentina, was running what counts as one of his country's most advanced AI computing hubs. It was in a converted room at the university, where wires snaked between aging AI chips and server computers.
Artificial intelligence has created a new digital divide, fracturing the world between nations with the computing power for building cutting-edge AI systems and those without. The split is influencing geopolitics and global economics, creating new dependencies and prompting a desperate rush to not be excluded from a technology race that could reorder economies, drive scientific discovery and change the way that people live and work.
The biggest beneficiaries by far are the United States, China and the European Union. Those regions host more than half of the world's most powerful data centers, which are used for developing the most complex AI systems, according to data compiled by Oxford University researchers. Only 32 countries, or about 16 percent of nations, have these large facilities filled with microchips and computers, giving them what is known in industry parlance as 'compute power.'
The United States and China, which dominate the tech world, have particular influence. American and Chinese companies operate more than 90 percent of the data centers that other companies and institutions use for AI work, according to the Oxford data and other research.
In contrast, Africa and South America have almost no AI computing hubs, while India has at least five and Japan at least four, according to the Oxford data. More than 150 countries have nothing.
Today's AI data centers dwarf their predecessors, which powered simpler tasks like email and video streaming. Vast, power-hungry and packed with powerful chips, these hubs cost billions to build and require infrastructure that not every country can provide. With ownership concentrated among a few tech giants, the effects of the gap between those with such computing power and those without it are already playing out.
The world's most used AI systems, which power chatbots like OpenAI's ChatGPT, are more proficient and accurate in English and Chinese, languages spoken in the countries where the compute power is concentrated. Tech giants with access to the top equipment are using AI to process data, automate tasks and develop new services. Scientific breakthroughs, including drug discovery and gene editing, rely on powerful computers. AI-powered weapons are making their way onto battlefields.
Nations with little or no AI compute power are running into limits in scientific work, in the growth of young companies and in talent retention. Some officials have become alarmed by how the need for computing resources has made them beholden to foreign corporations and governments.
'Oil-producing countries have had an oversized influence on international affairs; in an AI-powered near future, compute producers could have something similar since they control access to a critical resource,' said Vili Lehdonvirta, an Oxford professor who conducted the research on AI data centers with his colleagues Zoe Jay Hawkins and Boxi Wu.
AI computing power is so precious that the components in data centers, such as microchips, have become a crucial part of foreign and trade policies for China and the United States, which are jockeying for influence in the Persian Gulf, in Southeast Asia and elsewhere. At the same time, some countries are beginning to pour public funds into AI infrastructure, aiming for more control over their technological futures.
The Oxford researchers mapped the world's AI data centers, information that companies and governments often keep secret. To create a representative sample, they went through the customer websites of nine of the world's biggest cloud-service providers to see what compute power was available and where their hubs were at the end of last year. The companies were the US firms Amazon, Google and Microsoft; China's Tencent, Alibaba and Huawei; and Europe's Exoscale, Hetzner and OVHcloud.
The research does not include every data center worldwide, but the trends were unmistakable. US companies operated 87 AI computing hubs, which can sometimes include multiple data centers, or almost two-thirds of the global total, compared with 39 operated by Chinese firms and six by Europeans, according to the research. Inside the data centers, most of the chips — the foundational components for making calculations — were from the US chipmaker Nvidia.
'We have a computing divide at the heart of the AI revolution,' said Lacina Koné, the director general of Smart Africa, which coordinates digital policy across the continent. He added: 'It's not merely a hardware problem. It's the sovereignty of our digital future.'
'Sometimes I Want to Cry'
There has long been a tech gap between rich and developing countries. Over the past decade, cheap smartphones, expanding internet coverage and flourishing app-based businesses led some experts to conclude that the divide was diminishing. Last year, 68 percent of the world's population used the internet, up from 33 percent in 2012, according to the International Telecommunication Union, a United Nations agency.
With a computer and knowledge of coding, getting a company off the ground became cheaper and easier. That lifted tech industries across the world, be they mobile payments in Africa or ride hailing in Southeast Asia.
But in April, the U.N. warned that the digital gap would widen without action on AI Just 100 companies, mostly in the United States and China, were behind 40 percent of global investment in the technology, the U.N. said. The biggest tech companies, it added, were 'gaining control over the technology's future.'
The gap stems partly from a component everyone wants: a microchip known as a graphics processing unit, or GPU. The chips require multibillion-dollar factories to produce. Packed into data centers by the thousands and mostly made by Nvidia, GPUs provide the computing power for creating and delivering cutting-edge AI models.
Obtaining these pieces of silicon is difficult. As demand has increased, prices for the chips have soared, and everyone wants to be at the front of the line for orders. Adding to the challenges, these chips then need to be corralled into giant data centers that guzzle up dizzying amounts of power and water.
Many wealthy nations have access to the chips in data centers, but other countries are being left behind, according to interviews with more than two dozen tech executives and experts across 20 countries. Renting computing power from faraway data centers is common but can lead to challenges, including high costs, slower connection speeds, compliance with different laws, and vulnerability to the whims of American and Chinese companies.
Qhala, a start-up in Kenya, illustrates the issues. The company, founded by a former Google engineer, is building an AI system known as a large language model that is based on African languages. But Qhala has no nearby computing power and rents from data centers outside Africa. Employees cram their work into the morning, when most American programmers are sleeping, so there is less traffic and faster speeds to transfer data across the world.
'Proximity is essential,' said Shikoh Gitau, 44, Qhala's founder.
'If you don't have the resources for compute to process the data and to build your AI models, then you can't go anywhere,' said Kate Kallot, a former Nvidia executive and the founder of Amini, another AI start-up in Kenya.
In the United States, by contrast, Amazon, Microsoft, Google, Meta and OpenAI have pledged to spend more than $300 billion this year, much of it on AI infrastructure. The expenditure approaches Canada's national budget. Harvard's Kempner Institute, which focuses on AI, has more computing power than all African-owned facilities on that continent combined, according to one survey of the world's largest supercomputers.
Brad Smith, Microsoft's president, said many countries wanted more computing infrastructure as a form of sovereignty. But closing the gap will be difficult, particularly in Africa, where many places do not have reliable electricity, he said. Microsoft, which is building a data center in Kenya with a company in the United Arab Emirates, G42, chooses data center locations based largely on market need, electricity and skilled labor.
'The AI era runs the risk of leaving Africa even further behind,' Smith said.
Jay Puri, Nvidia's executive vice president for global business, said the company was also working with various countries to build out their AI offerings.
'It is absolutely a challenge,' he said.
Chris Lehane, OpenAI's vice president of global affairs, said the company had started a program to adapt its products for local needs and languages. A risk of the AI divide, he said, is that 'the benefits don't get broadly distributed, they don't get democratized.'
Tencent, Alibaba, Huawei, Google, Amazon, Hetzner and OVHcloud declined to comment.
The gap has led to brain drains. In Argentina, Dr. Wolovick, 51, the computer science professor, cannot offer much compute power. His top students regularly leave for the United States or Europe, where they can get access to GPUs, he said.
'Sometimes I want to cry, but I don't give up,' he said. 'I keep talking to people and saying: 'I need more GPUs. I need more GPUs.''
The uneven distribution of AI computing power has split the world into two camps: nations that rely on China and those that depend on the United States.
The two countries not only control the most data centers but are set to build more than others by far. And they have wielded their tech advantage to exert influence. The Biden and Trump administrations have used trade restrictions to control which countries can buy powerful AI chips, allowing the United States to pick winners. China has used state-backed loans to encourage sales of its companies' networking equipment and data centers.
The effects are evident in Southeast Asia and the Middle East.
In the 2010s, Chinese companies made inroads into the tech infrastructure of Saudi Arabia and the Emirates, which are key American partners, with official visits and generous financing. The United States sought to use its AI lead to push back. In one deal with the Biden administration, an Emirati company promised to keep out Chinese technology in exchange for access to AI technology from Nvidia and Microsoft.
In May, President Trump signed additional deals to give Saudi Arabia and the Emirates even more access to American chips.
A similar jostling is taking place in Southeast Asia. Chinese and US companies like Amazon, Alibaba, Nvidia, Google and ByteDance, the owner of TikTok, are building data centers in Singapore and Malaysia to deliver services across Asia.
Globally, the United States has the lead, with American companies building 63 A.I computing hubs outside the country's borders, compared with 19 by China, according to the Oxford data. All but three of the data centers operated by Chinese firms outside their home country use chips from Nvidia, despite efforts by China to produce competing chips. Chinese firms were able to buy Nvidia chips before US government restrictions.
Even US-friendly countries have been left out of the AI race by trade limits. Last year, William Ruto, Kenya's president, visited Washington for a state dinner hosted by President Joseph R. Biden Jr. Several months later, Kenya was omitted from a list of countries that had open access to needed semiconductors.
That has given China an opening, even though experts consider the country's AI chips to be less advanced. In Africa, policymakers are talking with Huawei, which is developing its own AI chips, about converting existing data centers to include Chinese-made chips, said Koné of Smart Africa.
'Africa will strike a deal with whoever can give access to GPUs,' he said.
Alarmed by the concentration of AI power, many countries and regions are trying to close the gap. They are providing access to land and cheaper energy, fast-tracking development permits and using public funds and other resources to acquire chips and construct data centers. The goal is to create 'sovereign AI' available to local businesses and institutions.
In India, the government is subsidizing compute power and the creation of an AI model proficient in the country's languages. In Africa, governments are discussing collaborating on regional compute hubs. Brazil has pledged $4 billion on AI projects.
'Instead of waiting for AI to come from China, the US, South Korea, Japan, why not have our own?' Brazil's president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, said last year when he proposed the investment plan.
Even in Europe, there is growing concern that American companies control most of the data centers. In February, the European Union outlined plans to invest 200 billion euros for AI projects, including new data centers across the 27-nation bloc.
Mathias Nobauer, the chief executive of Exoscale, a cloud computing provider in Switzerland, said many European businesses want to reduce their reliance on US tech companies. Such a change will take time and 'doesn't happen overnight,' he said.
Still, closing the divide is likely to require help from the United States or China.
Cassava, a tech company founded by a Zimbabwean billionaire, Strive Masiyiwa, is scheduled to open one of Africa's most advanced data centers this summer. The plans, three years in the making, culminated in an October meeting in California between Cassava executives and Jensen Huang, Nvidia's chief executive, to buy hundreds of his company's chips. Google is also one of Cassava's investors.
The data center is part of a $500 million effort to build five such facilities across Africa. Even so, Cassava expects it to address only 10 percent to 20 percent of the region's demand for AI At least 3,000 start-ups have expressed interest in using the computing systems.
'I don't think Africa can afford to outsource this AI sovereignty to others,' said Hardy Pemhiwa, Cassava's chief executive. 'We absolutely have to focus on and ensure that we don't get left behind.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US immigration rules are blocking Indian talent, say tech leaders
US immigration rules are blocking Indian talent, say tech leaders

Time of India

time38 minutes ago

  • Time of India

US immigration rules are blocking Indian talent, say tech leaders

Hyderabad: As the global tech race accelerates, US companies say they are losing their edge—not because of a talent shortage, but because of immigration roadblocks. A growing number of American tech executives warn that restrictive immigration policies are shutting out high-skilled Indian professionals, especially in fast-moving sectors like AI, software development, and semiconductor engineering. The result, they say, is a bottleneck that's strangling innovation and weakening the country's competitive edge. In a recent survey by US-based legal firm Manifest Law, over 500 senior leaders in the tech industry pointed to a range of immigration challenges—from capped visa quotas and intensified scrutiny to surging govt fees and falling H-1B registrations. A striking 78% of respondents said that current immigration restrictions are affecting their ability to hire global talent, with Indian professionals being the most affected. 'The roles most impacted are STEM-related—software engineers, AI professionals, hardware specialists, and even startup founders,' said Nicole Gunara, principal immigration lawyer at Manifest Law. 'These aren't just workers. They are innovators. And companies are struggling to get them through the door,' he explained. The rising cost of hiring international talent emerged as a key obstacle. The US Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) recently implemented a 70% hike in the base H-1B petition fee for large employers, and the initial registration fee for the H-1B visa lottery skyrocketed from $10 to $215 for fiscal year 2025. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like San Pedro I: Scholarships You Can Apply For (Start Now) College Scholarship | Google Search Search Now Undo Visa delays and escalating legal fees have only added to the burden. Indian professionals, in particular, are bearing the brunt of these changes. From 2022–2023, 72.3% of all H-1B visas were granted to Indian nationals, and nearly half of all science, technology, engineering, and mathematics optional practical training (STEM OPT) applicants in the US were from India, according to Manifest Law. 'Indian nationals fill a massive part of the US STEM talent gap,' Gunara noted. 'The US simply doesn't have the domestic pipeline to keep up. At some point, policymakers will have to recognize that bringing in highly skilled immigrants is the fastest and most effective solution,' he said. The survey revealed significant support for targeted immigration reforms. About 56% of tech leaders support raising the H-1B cap, while the same number back the creation of a new visa specifically for venture-backed startups. Other suggestions include industry-specific visa programmes (62%) and clearer pathways from student visas to green cards (64%). But the consequences of current policies may go beyond the hiring crunch. Orn Bodvarsson, a senior economist and academic, warned that the long-term appeal of the US is eroding for Indian students and professionals alike. 'They are facing fewer opportunities, higher risks, and lower returns on education investments. Over time, that means reduced demand for US university admissions and job offers. The bottom line is short- and long-term Indian immigration will fall,' he cautioned. As the US strives to lead in next-generation technologies, experts say its success may depend not just on funding and infrastructure—but on whether it welcomes the global talent needed to build the future.

Customer service AI startup Decagon raises $131 million
Customer service AI startup Decagon raises $131 million

Economic Times

time43 minutes ago

  • Economic Times

Customer service AI startup Decagon raises $131 million

Decagon, a startup providing customer service solutions powered by artificial intelligence, said on Monday it had raised $131 million in a funding round that valued it at $1.5 billion. The San Francisco company's Series C round was led by venture capital firms Accel and Andreessen Horowitz, with existing investors A*, Bain Capital Ventures and BOND participating. Avra, Forerunner and Ribbit Capital also took part in the round. The fundraise comes less than a year after a Series B round, when it raised $65 million at a $650 million valuation. The funding establishes Decagon as one of the most highly valued AI startups providing AI customer support solutions. Its competitors include giants like Salesforce and startups like Sierra, helmed by OpenAI board chairman and former Salesforce co-CEO Bret Taylor. In October, Sierra raised $175 million in a funding round giving it a $4.5 billion valuation. Since OpenAI's ChatGPT burst on the scene, investor interest in funding AI technology has gradually shifted from expensive foundation models to applications that generate steady revenue. Decagon serves clients such as Hertz, Duolingo, Eventbrite and Chime. The company will use its funding to grow the team and sell into more enterprises, its CEO Jesse Zhang told Reuters. Financial services company Chime saw a 60% reduction in contact center costs from using Decagon and a doubling of its net promoter score, a measure of customer satisfaction, Zhang said. "When AI can take action and solve things, customers can get what they want much faster and more consistently," he said. The company provides both text-based AI customer support solutions like chat and email as well as AI voice agents that are capable of end-to-end customer support calls. Decagon's software tools also allow companies to create their own AI customer support solutions, Zhang said.

Oil crashes 6% after Iran strikes U.S. military base in Qatar — Trump warns ‘Don't play into enemy's hands' as gas price fears grow
Oil crashes 6% after Iran strikes U.S. military base in Qatar — Trump warns ‘Don't play into enemy's hands' as gas price fears grow

Time of India

timean hour ago

  • Time of India

Oil crashes 6% after Iran strikes U.S. military base in Qatar — Trump warns ‘Don't play into enemy's hands' as gas price fears grow

Oil prices plunged nearly 6% on Monday, but it wasn't the drop that had President Trump sounding the alarm — it was the fear of what comes next. Taking to Truth Social, the president posted a fiery message to his energy department: 'To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!! EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!' So, what's behind this oil market rollercoaster — and is the panic justified? Oil prices took a sharp hit on Monday, falling nearly 6%, after Iran launched missiles at a U.S. air base in Qatar in retaliation for American airstrikes on its nuclear sites. Despite the tensions, the attack spared key oil infrastructure and shipping lanes, calming fears of an immediate energy crisis and leading to a noticeable drop in crude prices. Both major benchmarks saw steep losses: Brent crude fell to $72 per barrel, down 6.3% West Texas Intermediate (WTI) dropped below $70 per barrel, sliding 6.5% This steep decline came as markets absorbed Iran's calculated response — military retaliation without disrupting the flow of global oil. Analysts now believe Iran may be trying to send a message without escalating the conflict further — at least for now. Live Events Why did oil prices drop even after a missile strike? The key reason oil prices fell was Iran's decision to avoid hitting oil facilities or transport routes, especially the Strait of Hormuz — the world's most important chokepoint for crude oil shipments. According to JPMorgan's Natasha Kaneva, 'The main reason for this stability is that energy infrastructure has largely been spared.' She pointed out that tanker movement through the Strait of Hormuz has continued without major interruption, keeping supply chains stable despite the rising military tensions. Earlier fears that Iran would block or attack the Strait had sent markets higher over the weekend. But Monday's restraint shifted sentiment fast, leading to a sudden drop in oil futures. What led to this new round of military tension between Iran and the US? Over the weekend, President Donald Trump ordered airstrikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities, a move that significantly escalated tensions in the region. In response, Iran's state media announced a missile strike on a U.S. base in Qatar, matching the number of U.S. bombs dropped, suggesting a "bomb-for-bomb" strategy. While the military retaliation was real, the lack of damage to oil infrastructure showed a potential desire from Iran to avoid a broader regional conflict — at least for now. Analysts believe this calculated move could be Iran's way of showing strength without endangering its own strategic position in global energy markets. President Trump, however, didn't hide his frustration with the global oil situation. He posted a blunt message on Truth Social: 'To The Department of Energy: DRILL, BABY, DRILL!!! And I mean NOW!!! EVERYONE, KEEP OIL PRICES DOWN. I'M WATCHING! YOU'RE PLAYING RIGHT INTO THE HANDS OF THE ENEMY. DON'T DO IT!' His urgency reflects concern that any further tension — especially involving oil supply — could quickly drive prices up again, hitting U.S. consumers hard. Could oil prices spike again if the Strait of Hormuz closes? That's the big question. While Iran's parliament voted on Sunday to close the Strait of Hormuz, the final say rests with Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and the Supreme National Security Council. If Iran moves forward with the closure, global oil prices could skyrocket. JPMorgan currently estimates a 1-in-5 chance of a serious disruption in energy flows from the Gulf. If that happens, crude could jump to $120–$130 per barrel — a scenario that would ripple through every economy in the world. What would this mean for American consumers at the pump? A spike to $130 oil would be bad news for drivers across the U.S. According to Andy Lipow of Lipow Oil Associates, we could see: A rise in gasoline prices by $1.25 per gallon National average prices reaching $4.50 per gallon Prices in California climbing as high as $6.00 per gallon This kind of inflation could pressure the economy, hurt consumer confidence, and reshape the political landscape as voters feel the pinch ahead of the next election cycle. How are analysts looking at the oil market now? Even with the ongoing conflict, some experts believe the worst-case scenario isn't guaranteed. JPMorgan's Kaneva noted that global oil supply is still strong, and despite high geopolitical risks, the actual balance of supply and demand doesn't show signs of a major shortage. Still, she warned that Iran has limited options and rising risks if it decides to escalate further. Other potential actions could include supporting Houthi rebels in Yemen, encouraging attacks on commercial shipping, or even targeting energy facilities in nearby Gulf states. Bottom line? Oil prices may be down now, but the Middle East is still a powder keg. If Iran decides to hit oil where it hurts, prices could spike again — fast. For now, markets are watching, the White House is clearly nervous, and the next move in this geopolitical chess game could reshape global energy overnight. FAQs: Q: Why did oil prices fall after Iran's missile strike? Because Iran avoided hitting key oil facilities, calming fears of a supply crisis. Q: What did Trump say after the oil market reacted? He posted 'Drill, baby, drill!' urging U.S. energy officials to boost oil output.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store