Matt Forde: Joanna Cherry 'best SNP leader they never had'
Political comedian Matt Forde (Image: David Monteith-Hodge)
They include his podcast the Political Party, where the former SNP MP will be one of his guests.
Earlier this year, Ms Cherry, a KC and critic of gender self-ID, demanded an apology from former first minister Nicola Sturgeon after the Supreme Court ruled that sex in the Equality Act refers to biological sex.
The SNP politician also called on John Swinney to respect the judgment and women's rights to single-sex spaces.
READ MORE:
Asked if they will discuss the current SNP leadership during the show, Mr Forde told The Herald's Unspun Live podcast: 'Oh, absolutely. Especially as, for a lot of people, she is the sort of best leader they never had.'
He added: 'There's a whole load of people in the Yes Movement who would love to see Joanna Cherry as the leader of it and who she probably more closely aligns with.
'Her assessment of the current SNP government and how it's doing and what its prospects are is absolutely high on the list [of questions to ask].
'Obviously, we know how she feels about Nicola Sturgeon and John Swinney, so I will definitely be asking her about that.'
Former SNP MP Joanna Cherry on the campaign trail with First Minister John Swinney (Image: Jane Barlow/ PA Wire)
Ms Cherry was defeated in the battle for Edinburgh South West in last year's general election by Labour's Scott Arthur, a former councillor and convener of the City of Edinburgh Council's transport committee.
She was one of 38 SNP MPs to lose their seat.
She recently criticised Mr Swinney for having no appetite for understanding why the SNP suffered such a huge defeat.
'Joanna is in a particular place with her relationship with the SNP at the moment which makes her fascinating,' Mr Forde told the podcast. 'She's also one of the most compelling guests I've ever interviewed.'
The comedian described Ms Cherry as 'talented, sharp and on the different side of a number of the debates to friends in the SNP.'
Asked if a party rebel like Ms Cherry makes for a better guest than someone toeing the party line, he said: 'When you've got someone who is a bit more rebellious or on a different side of a particular debate within a movement, I just think it's so much more interesting because it's really refreshing for the public to hear different voices from within the political parties and movements, particularly on issues like the ones Joanna has effectively been a rebel on.'
The comedian said he was keen to distinguish between two types of outspoken people in politics: those for whom rebellion is 'part of their DNA' and those who are forced to be.
For him, Ms Cherry is the latter.
'There are different types of rebellion,' he explained. 'There are people who are rebels by design. Someone like Jeremy Corbyn is always going to rebel. That's just who he is—it's part of his DNA.
'I don't necessarily think that is what Joanna is. I think she is someone who has probably been—and I can't speak for her—but my assessment is that she is someone who is in tune with public opinion on a whole range of social issues and has found it really difficult to be part of a party and a movement that has gone down a particular route.
'Had things been different I think she wouldn't have been a rebel. That is fairly obvious, but she is mainstream really—she's not a fringe politician whose rebellion is part of who she is. I think she has been driven to it.'
Ian Murray, Secretary of State for Scotland, will also appear alongside Mr Forde. He said he hopes to tease out the personal side of the UK minister onstage.
'He's a really good laugh,' the comedian said. 'So I think I'll sort of coax him out a bit.'
Ian Murray Secretary of State for Scotland arrives in Downing Street, London, for a Cabinet meeting in June this year. (Image: Gareth Fuller/ PA Wire)
The comedian and self-proclaimed 'political obsessive' said it is a difficult time for the Scottish Labour MP.
He explained Mr Murray currently has 'his foot in both camps' in trying to win over both Scottish and UK Labour: 'The change in his fortunes from being the only Labour MP in Scotland to all of a sudden being Secretary of State for it.
'He, more than any other member of that Cabinet, is tied to Scottish Labour in a way that none of the others are.'
He added: '[I want to] get a sense of how he has found that first year of trying to manage what Labour needs to do to win in Scotland without, effectively, trashing what Labour are doing at a UK level.'
Known for voicing Donald Trump, Boris Johnson and Keir Starmer on the satirical TV show Spitting Image, the comedian has also been brushing up his impersonations of Scottish politicians, namely Anas Sarwar and John Swinney, before he heads to the Fringe.
'I would say my Swinney is basically fine. I would say my Anas is better,' he said.
Matt Forde with Spitting Image puppet Boris Johnson (Image: contributed)
On impersonating Mr Swinney, he said: 'Obviously John's a lot more softly spoken. In fact, Jim Murphy was a wee bit like that. A lovely, whispery way like that.'
Having a go at the Scottish Labour leader's accent, Mr Forde said: 'I would say my Anas is a kind of cartoony, squeaky mix of that beautiful accent that he has got which is a mix of the Scottish Pakistani accents.
'I am dialling up the squeakiness of him but sometimes you have to caricature it a bit to get the vibe.'
The comedian, said he may resort to fan favourites, such as his Gordon Brown impersonation, to win over the Scottish audiences.
Mr Forde will also bring Sadiq Khan, the Mayor of London, and Scottish political broadcaster Kirsty Wark on to the stage.
He is keen to chat to Mr Khan about devolution and mayoral systems and discuss media coverage of Scottish politics with Ms Wark.
The Fringe is a particularly emotive place for Mr Forde, as he discovered he had cancer while performing at the festival a few years ago.
In his stand-up show, Defying Calamity, he will open up about this experience and how important it is to remain positive despite the current political climate and what life throws at you.
Mr Forde, who is now cancer-free, said: 'Even though I am frustrated at the state of politics and the state of the world, I still feel really good about life.
'I realise that's from a position of relative privilege. I realise I'm not living on the eastern border of Ukraine or in Gaza.
'When you are forced to really conclude that though, I feel so lucky that I had that experience.'
Matt Forde impersonating Donald Trump on his show Unspun (Image: contributed)
He also said he would share 'funny ailments' with the audience such as having a stoma, being incontinent and having erectile dysfunction.
'Surely all these are classic subjects for comedy alongside the political stuff?' he joked.
Mr Forde added: 'Life is about more than politics and you have to liberate yourself from it a bit.'
The comic said he was looking forward to coming back to the capital in August.
'It's just always the most exciting time of the year,' he said. 'I love Edinburgh as a city, I love the festival. I love being a part of it. I just think it's the most magical place.'
You can listen to the full interview with Matt Forde on The Herald's Unspun Live podcast on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
Matt Forde returns to the Edinburgh Festival Fringe with his new stand-up show Defying Calamity, running at the Pleasance Beyond from July 30 to August 24 at 8pm. He will also host four Political Party specials: Ian Murray (August 7), Joanna Cherry (August 13), Kirsty Wark (August 21) at the Gilded Balloon, all at 2.45pm; and Sadiq Khan (August 24) at McEwan Hall at 5.30pm. Tickets available at mattforde.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US Supreme Court poised to assess validity of key voting rights law
WASHINGTON, Aug 1 (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court signaled on Friday that it will assess the legality of a key component of a landmark federal voting rights law, potentially giving its conservative majority a chance to gut a provision enacted 60 years ago that was intended to prevent racial discrimination in voting. The brief order issued by the court raises the stakes in a case already pending before the justices involving a legal challenge to an electoral map passed by Louisiana's Republican-led legislature that raised the number of Black-majority U.S. congressional districts in the state from one to two. The justices said they will consider whether it violates the U.S. Constitution for states to create additional voting districts with populations that are majority Black, Hispanic or another minority as a way to remedy a judicial finding that a state's voting map likely violates the 1965 Voting Rights Act. The case, due to be heard by the justices in their next term that begins in October, sets the stage for a major ruling expected by the end of June 2026 that could affect the composition of electoral districts around the United States. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. The dispute strikes at tensions between the Voting Rights Act, passed by Congress during the U.S. civil rights era to bar racial discrimination in voting, and adhering to the constitutional principle of equal protection, which limits the application of race when the borders of electoral districts are redrawn. Boundaries of legislative districts across the country are reconfigured to reflect population changes every decade in a process called redistricting. The court previously heard arguments in the case in March. But in June, the justices declined to issue a ruling and indicated they would invite the parties to address additional questions. Rick Hasen, an election law expert at UCLA, called the stakes enormous, writing in a blog post that the court seems to be asking whether the section of the Voting Rights Act at issue "violates a colorblind understanding of the Constitution." The action follows a major ruling by the court in 2013 in a case involving Alabama's Shelby County that invalidated another core section of the Voting Rights Act that determined which states and locales with a history of racial discrimination need federal approval for voting rule changes affecting Black people and other minorities. "This Court is more conservative than the Court that in 2013 struck down the other main pillar of the Voting Rights Act in the Shelby County case," Hasen wrote. "This is a big, and dangerous, step toward knocking down the second pillar." The matter is being litigated at the Supreme Court at a time when Republican President Donald Trump is taking steps to eliminate programs related to diversity, equity and inclusion that aim to promote opportunities for minorities, women, LGBT people and others. In the Louisiana case, state officials and civil rights groups appealed a lower court's ruling that found the map laying out the state's six U.S. House of Representatives districts - with two Black-majority districts, up from one previously - violated the constitutional promise of equal protection. A group of 12 Louisiana voters identifying themselves in court papers as "non-African American" sued to block the redrawn map. A lawyer for the plaintiffs did not respond to requests to provide the racial breakdown of the plaintiffs. The state and the rights groups are seeking to preserve the map. Black people comprise nearly a third of Louisiana's population. During the first round of arguments in the case in March, lawyers for Louisiana argued that the map was not drawn impermissibly by the legislature with race as the primary motivation, as the lower court found last year. The map's design, the Republican-governed state argued, also sought to protect Republican incumbents including House Speaker Mike Johnson and No. 2 House Republican Steve Scalise, who both represent districts in the state. Black voters tend to support Democratic candidates. Arguments in the case centered on Louisiana's response to U.S. District Judge Shelly Dick's June 2022 finding that an earlier map likely violated the Voting Rights Act and whether the state relied too heavily on race in devising the remedial map. Dick ruled that a map adopted earlier that year by the legislature that had contained only one Black-majority district unlawfully harmed Black voters. Dick ordered the addition of a second Black-majority district. The Supreme Court in 2023 left Dick's ruling in place, and it previously allowed the map at issue in the current case to be used in the 2024 election. A three-judge panel in a 2-1 ruling in April 2024 found that the map relied too heavily on race in the map's design in violation of the equal protection provision. The Constitution's 14th Amendment contains the equal protection language. Ratified in 1868 in the aftermath of the American Civil War, the amendment addressed issues relating to the rights of formerly enslaved Black people.
Scotsman
2 hours ago
- Scotsman
Edinburgh festivals diary: The X-rated Underbelly press launch and close-to-home Jason Byrne encounter
Sign up to our Arts and Culture newsletter, get the latest news and reviews from our specialist arts writers Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... The Edinburgh Festival Fringe has officially kicked off. But for me, it already feels like the city has been in full-on Fringe mode for a lot longer than that. The best of what is on offer at the major venues has been showcased in press galas this week, with everything from the renowned it-shouldn't-work-but-somehow-it-does Garry Starr show - where the comedian is naked from the waist down while performing all Penguin literary classics - to an impressive acrobatic circus such as Ten Thousand Hours, shown in short snippets. Underbelly goes X-rated Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Underbelly decided to take full advantage of the fact that Starr's let-it-all-hang-out appearance meant it had had to slap a 16+ rating on the event. The venue operator also opted to include a steamy performance from jaw-droppingly impressive and scantily-clad contortionist Soliana Ersie of Bernie Dieter' Club Kabarett, as well as live podcast show Brown Girls Do It Too, which saw hosts Poppy and Rubina discuss - and indeed sing about - their no-holds-barred attitudes to sex. The overall vibe was something of a contrast to the welcome address from Underbelly directors Charlie Wood and Ed Bartlam, who took the opportunity to read out their address books in what was presumably a work in progress for a surrealist piece of performance theatre I could see doing well next year. Poppy Jay and Rubina Pabani, hosts of Brown Girls Do it Too podcast and stage version Brown Girls Do It Too: Mama Told Me Not to Come. | Tilted Jason Byrne encounter hit close to home At Assembly, comedian and MC Jason Byrne targeted one woman in the audience who he spotted had left the show to take a phone call. He demanded her companion call her, took the phone from him - and a very public chat ensued, where the woman, Claire, explained in huge detail, with much hilarity from Byrne, the problems her friend was having in arriving in Edinburgh by train. I did think the woman's voice sounded vaguely familiar, but I didn't realise why, until at the Gilded Balloon gala two days later, I ran into Scotsman arts reviewer and my long-time colleague Claire Smith, who sheepishly admitted she had been the mysterious voice on the other end of the phone. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Mother-and-daughter team Karen and Katy Koren had an emotional moment at the Gilded Balloon launch, which is celebrating its 40th anniversary this year. A performance by Darby James included a song specially written as an ode to Gilded and the Fringe more generally. 'Get your hankies out,' Karen told the audience, after daughter Katy had already had a bit of a blub, talking about her childhood being 'brought up in Gilded'. Real life Louis One artist has recently had good news after a much-loved TV star agreed to lend his voice to a scene for her Fringe theatre show. Writer and performer Gaia Mondadori's Centre of the Universe at Summerhall includes a scene where the lead character, Mary, imagines being interviewed by documentary journalist Louis Theroux for a series called Driven Women. After reaching out to the broadcaster, he agreed to record the scene so that his actual voice is heard. The comedian is bringing his new show '1994' to the Darwen Library Theatre on February 8 | Show poster Sold out run for Connor Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad And finally, three cheers for local boy comedian Connor Burns, who sold out his entire month-long Gallus Fringe run days before the Fringe even began, joining stablemate (they share a producer) Daniel Sloss.
The Guardian
3 hours ago
- The Guardian
US appeals court indiciates it might declare Trump's birthright citizenship order unconstitutional
Donald Trump's order restricting birthright citizenship appeared on Friday to be headed toward being declared unconstitutional by a second federal appeals court, as judges expressed deep skepticism about a key piece of the US president's hardline immigration agenda. A three-judge panel of the Boston-based first US circuit court of appeals sharply questioned a lawyer with the federal justice department as to why they should overturn two lower-court judges who blocked the order from taking effect. Those lower-court judges include one in Boston who last week reaffirmed his prior decision to block the order's enforcement nationally, even after the US supreme court in June curbed the power of judges to broadly enjoin that and other policies. The San Francisco-based ninth US circuit court of appeals last week became the first federal appeals court to hold Trump's order as unconstitutional. Its ultimate fate will likely be determined by the supreme court. Eric McArthur, a justice department attorney, said on Friday that the citizenship clause of the US constitution's 14th amendment, which was ratified in 1868 after the US civil war, rightly extended citizenship to the children of newly-freed enslaved Black people. 'It did not extend birthright citizenship as a matter of constitutional right' to the children of people in the US without documentation, he said. But the judges questioned how that argument was consistent with the supreme court's 1898 ruling interpreting the clause in United States v Wong Kim Ark, long understood as guaranteeing American citizenship to children born in the US to non-citizen parents. 'We have an opinion by the supreme court that we aren't free to disregard,' said David Barron, the chief US circuit judge who like his two colleagues was appointed by a Democratic president. Trump's executive order, issued on the Republican's first day back in the Oval Office on 20 January, directs agencies to refuse to recognize the citizenship of US-born children who do not have at least one parent who is a US citizen or lawful permanent resident, also known as a 'green card' holder. Every court to consider the order's merits has declared it unconstitutional, including the three judges who halted the order's enforcement nationally. Those judges included Leo Sorokin, a US district judge in Boston, who ruled in favor of 18 Democratic-led states and the District of Columbia, who had swiftly challenged Trump's policy in court. 'The supreme court has repeatedly recognized children born to individuals who are here unlawfully or who are here on a temporary basis are nonetheless birthright citizens,' Shankar Duraiswamy, a lawyer for New Jersey, argued Friday. The 6-3 conservative majority US supreme court on 27 June sided with the administration in the litigation by restricting the ability of judges to issue so-called universal injunctions and directing lower courts that had blocked Trump's policy nationally to reconsider the scope of their orders. Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion But the ruling contained exceptions, allowing federal judges in Massachusetts and New Hampshire and the ninth circuit to issue new decisions stopping Trump's order from taking effect nationally. The rulings on appeal to the first circuit were issued by Sorokin and the New Hampshire judge, who originally issued a narrow injunction but more recently issued a new decision in a recently-filed class action blocking Trump's order nationwide. Separately, in an immigration-related ruling on Friday, US district Judge Jia Cobb in Washington DC blocked the Trump administration from fast-tracking the deportation of potentially hundreds of thousands of immigrants who were paroled into the country under humanitarian programs during Joe Biden's presidency. Cobb said it served the public interest to put on hold the Department of Homeland Security's expedited removals for those who entered with temporary parole rather than cause irreparable harm to immigrants by allowing them.
