logo
UN meets to urge support for two-state solution but US, Israel boycott

UN meets to urge support for two-state solution but US, Israel boycott

Reuters2 days ago
UNITED NATIONS, July 28 (Reuters) - Dozens of ministers gathered at a United Nations conference on Monday to urge that the world work toward a two-state solution between Israel and the Palestinians, but the U.S. and Israel boycotted the event.
The 193-member U.N. General Assembly decided in September last year that such a conference would be held in 2025. Hosted by France and Saudi Arabia, the conference was postponed in June after Israel attacked Iran.
Addressing the conference, Saudi Foreign Minister Faisal bin Farhan Al-Saud urged all countries support the conference goal of a roadmap laying out the parameters to a Palestinian state while ensuring Israel's security.
"We must ensure that it does not become another exercise in well-meaning rhetoric," United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said in opening remarks.
"It can and must serve as a decisive turning point - one that catalyzes irreversible progress towards ending the occupation and realizing our shared aspiration for a viable two-state solution."
French Foreign Minister Jean-Noel Barrot told the conference: "We must work on the ways and means to go from the end of the war in Gaza to the end of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, at a time when this war is jeopardizing the stability and security of the entire region."
Barrot told newspaper La Tribune Dimanche in an interview published on Sunday that he will use the conference this week to push other countries to join France in recognizing a Palestinian state.
France intends to recognize a Palestinian state in September at the annual gathering of world leaders at the United Nations General Assembly, President Emmanuel Macron said last week.
Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Mustafa - an official with the Palestinian Authority which exercises limited self-rule in the West Bank under Israeli occupation - called on all countries to 'recognize the state of Palestine without delay,' adding: 'The path to peace starts with recognizing the state of Palestine and preserving it from destruction.'
'The rights of all peoples must be respected, the sovereignty of all states must be ensured. Palestine, and its people can no longer be the exception,' he told the conference.
The war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza still rages after nearly 22 months. The war was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Palestinian Hamas fighters killed 1,200 people in southern Israel and took some 250 hostages, according to Israeli tallies. Since then, Israel's military campaign has killed nearly 60,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza health authorities.
The U.S. will not attend the conference at the United Nations, said a State Department spokesperson, describing it as "a gift to Hamas, which continues to reject ceasefire proposals accepted by Israel that would lead to the release of hostages and bring calm in Gaza."
The State Department spokesperson added that Washington voted against the General Assembly last year calling for the conference and would "not support actions that jeopardize the prospect for a long-term, peaceful resolution to the conflict."
Israel is also not taking part in the conference.
Israel's U.N. Ambassador Danny Danon said on Monday: "This conference does not promote a solution, but rather deepens the illusion. Instead of demanding the release of the hostages and working to dismantle Hamas's reign of terror, the conference organizers are engaging in discussions and plenaries that are disconnected from reality."
The U.N. has long endorsed a vision of two states living side by side within secure and recognized borders. Palestinians want a state in the West Bank, East Jerusalem and the Gaza Strip, all territory captured by Israel in the 1967 war with neighboring Arab states.
The U.N. General Assembly in May last year overwhelmingly backed a Palestinian bid to become a full U.N. member by recognizing it as qualified to join and recommending the U.N. Security Council "reconsider the matter favorably." The resolution garnered 143 votes in favor and nine against.
The General Assembly vote was a global survey of support for the Palestinian bid to become a full U.N. member - a move that would effectively recognize a Palestinian state - after the U.S. vetoed it in the U.N. Security Council several weeks earlier.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

White House to end US tariff exemption for all low-value overseas packages
White House to end US tariff exemption for all low-value overseas packages

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

White House to end US tariff exemption for all low-value overseas packages

The United States is suspending a 'de minimis' exemption that allowed low-value commercial shipments to be shipped to the United States without facing tariffs, the White House said on Wednesday. Under an executive order signed by Donald Trump on Wednesday, packages valued at or under $800 sent to the US outside of the international postal network will now face 'all applicable duties' starting on 29 August, the White House said. The US president earlier targeted packages from China and Hong Kong, and the White House said the recently signed tax and spending bill repealed the legal basis for the de minimis exemption worldwide starting on 1 July 2027. 'Trump is acting more quickly to suspend the de minimis exemption than the OBBBA requires, to deal with national emergencies and save American lives and businesses now,' the White House said in a fact sheet, referring to the bill known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act. Goods shipped through the postal system will face one of two tariffs: either an 'ad valorem duty' equal to the effective tariff rate of the package's country of origin or, for six months, a specific tariff of $80 to $200 depending on the country of origin's tariff rate.

Scots MP branded 'despicable' over sickening insult to Israeli hostages in Gaza
Scots MP branded 'despicable' over sickening insult to Israeli hostages in Gaza

Daily Mail​

timean hour ago

  • Daily Mail​

Scots MP branded 'despicable' over sickening insult to Israeli hostages in Gaza

A Scottish MP has been condemned for 'despicable' comments justifying Hamas holding innocent Israelis hostage as it's 'the only bargaining power' the terror group has left. Angus MacDonald provoked outrage after claiming if the terror group released the hostages they seized in 2023 then Israel would 'obliterate' Palestine. The Liberal Democrats are now facing calls to suspend the MP for his 'vile moral bankruptcy' about the innocent victims of Hamas. Anti-Semitism campaigners joined political opponents in condemning the remarks, made in response to one of his constituents on social media site Facebook. Mr MacDonald, who represents Inverness, Skye and West Ross-shire, last night refused to issue an apology to the families of innocent Israeli hostages and the Scottish Lib Dems defended the comments and claimed he was not justifying or defending hostage-taking. Sammy Stein, chairman of the Glasgow Friends of Israel group, said: 'I believe it is particularly despicable of Angus MacDonald MP to defend the right of Hamas, an internationally proscribed terrorist organisation, to kidnap and hold innocent Israelis, including women, kids, babies and the elderly, most of whom were kidnapped from their homes on October 7 MacDonald 'There is absolutely no doubt that if Hamas released the hostages, the fighting would stop. MacDonald is delusional if he believes that continuing to hold them would persuade Israel to agree to a ceasefire. 'As long as the fighting continues, more innocent civilians are likely to be killed. The reason Hamas is not releasing the hostages is that they want to see more civilians killed, thus provoking more criticism from the world against Israel. 'I would like to think that most reasonable and thoughtful people will see him for the fool he is.' Mr MacDonald, who was elected for the first time in last year's general election, had initially posted on Facebook about his support for the UK recognising Palestine as a separate state. When asked by one of his constituents, Facebook user Billy Rodgers, if he had written to Hamas to ask them to release the remaining hostages, Mr MacDonald replied: 'If they release the hostages then Israel will completely obliterate any of Palestine left, it's the only bargaining power they have left.' Mr Rodgers replied: 'So you support the use of hostages taking as a legitimate strategy. I know who I won't be voting for in the next election to serve as my local MP.' A spokesman for the Campaign Against Antisemitisim said: 'To refer to hostages as a 'bargaining chip' is vile moral bankruptcy. 'These are innocent human beings who were violently abducted amid the worst massacre of Jews since the Holocaust. They have been held in inhumane, terrifying conditions for nearly two years. 'Dehumanising them in this way not only erases their suffering but also plays directly into the hands of their captors, Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad. The Liberal Democrats must suspend Angus MacDonald pending a full investigation.' Jamie Halcro Johnston, Conservative MSP for the Highlands and Islands region, said: 'It is astonishing and deplorable that Angus MacDonald is apparently trying to justify Hamas terrorists continuing to hold innocent Israelis hostage nearly two years on from the barbaric October 7 attack. 'His comments are not just grossly offensive, they're naïve. 'We all want to see an end to the awful scenes in the Middle East, particularly the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza - and the release of all remaining hostages would strengthen the hand of international leaders in pushing for a permanent ceasefire.' The comments remained on Facebook last night after Mr MacDonald and the Scottish Liberal Democrats were approached by the Mail about them and he was asked whether he would apologise to the families of Israeli hostages. A Scottish Liberal Democrat spokesman said: 'Angus wasn't defending or justifying hostage taking - he was describing the widely accepted view that Hamas is very regrettably using the hostages as leverage against Israel. 'Angus and the Scottish Liberal Democrats have been completely clear that Hamas should release the hostages immediately and unconditionally - and that there is no place for the terror group in the future of Gaza. 'Angus has used his position as an MP to campaign for the release of the hostages, and has made clear, on the parliamentary record, his disgust at Hamas's treatment of the hostages.'

Trump backs Israel and rebukes Starmer over Palestinian state recognition
Trump backs Israel and rebukes Starmer over Palestinian state recognition

The Guardian

timean hour ago

  • The Guardian

Trump backs Israel and rebukes Starmer over Palestinian state recognition

Donald Trump has doubled down on his backing for Israel after having appeared to give a green light to the British prime minister, Keir Starmer, to recognize a Palestinian state. Amid signs of mounting opposition among his Maga base to Israel's military operation in Gaza, Trump criticized Starmer's plan to grant recognition as 'rewarding Hamas' even after having not taken issue with it when the pair met in Scotland this week. Talking to journalists on board Air Force One on his return to Washington, Trump said the US was 'not in that camp', referring to Starmer's pledge, which followed a similar declaration by Emmanuel Macron, the French president, days earlier that France would formally recognize Palestinian statehood. 'We never did discuss it,' Trump said, in reference to Starmer's announcement. He added: 'You're rewarding Hamas if you do that. I don't think they should be rewarded.' His comments were in line with the US state department, whose spokesperson, Tammy Bruce, called the recognition decision 'a slap in the face' to victims of Hamas's deadly 7 October 2023 attack on Israel, which triggered the current war. But they contrasted with his restrained stance when he and Starmer met at Turnberry in Scotland on Monday, after the UK premier said Britain would give recognition by September unless Israel met certain conditions, including allowing for a ceasefire in Gaza and allowing UN food aid to enter the territory to feed its population. 'I'm not going to take a position, I don't mind him taking a position,' Trump told reporters when asked if he objected to Starmer's move. The US president's response to Starmer seemed markedly softer than his riposte after Macron's statehood announcement last week, which angered Israel and its supporters. 'What he says doesn't matter,' Trump told reporters at the White House. 'He's a very good guy. I like him, but that statement doesn't carry weight.' The initial softer public posture toward Starmer came as Trump publicly contradicted Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, over conditions in Gaza, which numerous international aid agencies have described as famine. Netanyahu had said that, in contrast to the aid group assessments and searing images of hungry children, no one was starving in Gaza. Asked if he agreed, Trump said: 'Based on television, I would say 'not particularly', because those children look pretty hungry to me. There's real starvation, you can't fake that.' Some of Trump's most prominent supporters have become increasingly vocal in their criticism of Israel's conduct, amid polling evidence that Americans generally are losing sympathy for a country that has traditionally been viewed as one of the US's closest allies. Steve Bannon, Trump's former adviser and still one of his leading cheerleaders with his War Room podcast, told Politico that the president's condemnation of the food situation in Gaza would hasten Israel's loss of support among his base. 'It seems that for the under-30-year-old Maga base, Israel has almost no support, and Netanyahu's attempt to save himself politically by dragging America in deeper to another Middle East war has turned off a large swath of older Maga diehards,' Bannon said. 'Now President Trump's public repudiation of one of the central tenets of [Netanyahu's] Gaza strategy – 'starving' Palestinians – will only hasten a collapse of support.' Another Trump supporter, the far-right Georgia representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, became the latest – and perhaps most surprising – public figure to label Israel's actions in Gaza 'genocide'. 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct 7th in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' she posted on X. The comments came as a new Gallup poll showed support among Americans for Israel's actions in Gaza down to 32%, the lowest since the organization began asking the question in November 2023 – a month after the murderous Hamas raid that killed 1,200 mostly Israeli civilians and led to another 250 to be taken hostage. Israel's military response has led to around 60,000 Palestinians being killed, according to the Gaza health ministry. While Gallup's poll showed support for Israel's offensive still high, at 71%, among Republicans, Thom Tillis, a GOP senator for North Carolina who plans to step down at the next election, said Gaza could be a political problem for Trump, the Hill reported. 'I think that the American people at the end of the day are a kind people. They don't like seeing suffering, nor do I think the president does,' Tillis said. 'If you see starvation, you try to fix it.' Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, told Fox News that Trump's backing for Netanyahu remained unshaken. 'Let me assure you that there is no break between the prime minister of Israel and the president,' he told Fox News. 'Their relationship, I think, [is] stronger than it's ever been, and I think the relationship between the U.S. and Israel is as strong as it's ever been.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store