logo
Most Americans support corporate LGBTQ+ Pride efforts despite pull-back by major brands: report

Most Americans support corporate LGBTQ+ Pride efforts despite pull-back by major brands: report

Yahoo23-05-2025

As some companies scale back their public LGBTQ+ engagement under political pressure, a new GLAAD-Ipsos survey released Thursday paints a far more supportive picture of American consumer sentiment. According to the data, 70 percent of Americans say that knowing a company offers LGBTQ+ Pride merchandise either positively affects or does not impact their purchasing decisions. An even greater share—71 percent—believe companies should be free to support Pride Month if they choose.
Keep up with the latest in + news and politics.
'The big headline is that Americans think it's important to be inclusive, to include LGBTQ people, and to include all people,' GLAAD President and CEO Sarah Kate Ellis told The Advocate in an interview. 'When they see companies do that, they think they run a good company. They take care of their employees, and they take care of their consumers.'
According to Ellis, the findings challenge the portrayal that supporting Pride has become too risky for business. In recent months, several high-profile brands—including Target and Bud Light—have scaled back LGBTQ+ visibility in the face of organized right-wing backlash. PR Daily and Gravity Research report that 39 percent of Fortune 500 and Global 1000 executives say they plan to decrease Pride participation this year. Notably, none said they plan to increase it. Nearly 20 percent said they still hadn't decided, even with Pride just weeks away.
Related: Ditching DEI hurt Target's sales in first quarter
In New York, the effect is already visible. This week, the New York Times reports that about 25 percent of corporate donors to New York City Pride have either canceled or scaled back their support, citing economic concerns and fear of retaliation from the Trump administration. That includes past top sponsors such as Mastercard, Target, Nissan, and Garnier. Now donating as a 'silent partner,' Target has opted out of public recognition. On its earnings call this week, Target reported a 3.7 percent drop in same-store sales and pointed to backlash over its retreat from diversity initiatives as one of the factors dragging down performance.
Despite those corporate anxieties, GLAAD's findings show that the public hasn't turned away. Among Black respondents, 64 percent said they are comfortable with brands publicly supporting LGBTQ+ organizations. That number was 55 percent among Hispanic respondents and 60 percent among Americans ages 18 to 34. GLAAD also found that 85 percent of Americans believe CEOs are responsible for speaking out on issues that matter, and 81 percent say freedom means all people should be able to live and express themselves as they choose, so long as they're not hurting others.
Tristan Marra, who leads research efforts at GLAAD, said that the organization's Accelerating Acceptance data reveals even deeper connections between personal relationships and public support. 'If someone were to tell a non-LGBTQ+ person that they were trans or nonbinary, more than 70 percent would support them,' Marra said. 'That's the power of knowing someone. And in terms of media, 78 percent of non-LGBTQ+ Americans say everyone deserves to feel represented in media, including movies and TV shows, and even gaming.' She stressed that the work ahead lies in ensuring those personal connections and representative stories reach the public, especially those in the 'movable middle.'
Related: Booz Allen Hamilton drops sponsorship of WorldPride, cites Donald Trump's anti-DEI order
Ellis underlined that corporate retreat is driven not by consumer sentiment but by political pressure, particularly from the Trump administration and its allies. 'There is intimidation happening by this administration,' she said. 'We're all tricking ourselves if we think that CEOs are not ultimately about their bottom line. But the smart ones understand how it's all intricately connected.'
The survey's release comes as brands navigate mounting scrutiny from conservative activists and LGBTQ+ advocates. Some companies have tried to split the difference, quietly maintaining internal Pride celebrations while stepping back from public-facing campaigns. But Ellis warned that approach often backfires. 'Target is trying to play the middle,' she said. 'They're trying to play both sides, and it's like—there aren't sides to this. There's only one way here, and that's to be inclusive.'
Ellis also pointed to the unique cultural and economic influence of LGBTQ+ Americans and their allies, especially among the fastest-growing consumer groups. 'Companies that bow to opponents of inclusion will miss out on key growth segments,' she said. That warning is backed by economic data cited in GLAAD's release: the purchasing power of LGBTQ+ consumers was estimated at 1.4 trillion dollars in 2022. The buying power of Black consumers is expected to reach 1.7 trillion dollars by 2030, and the Hispanic population has grown by 85 percent since 2000.
The research also emphasizes the importance of representation—especially for transgender people, who remain disproportionately targeted and misunderstood. Ellis noted that most Americans still say they don't personally know someone who is transgender. 'Until we get that number inverse from 70 percent of people saying they know someone who's trans, we're going to face all the problems we're facing—whether it's on the field, in the locker room, in school, in the boardroom,' she said. She pointed to the struggle for gay and lesbian people to be accepted through shows like Will & Grace in the early 2000s.
Related: WorldPride 2025 expects huge 'visibility' march & rally in D.C. amid Trump's anti-LGBTQ+ agenda
GLAAD is responding by expanding its media strategy, monitoring podcasts and digital platforms for LGBTQ+ mentions, and proactively placing trans voices in those ecosystems. 'We were asleep on it all,' Ellis admitted of progressive activists in the 2024 election. 'On the influencer and podcast spaces, we just didn't see the value.' But now, she said, GLAAD is 'all over that,' guided by new research into media consumption habits and effective messaging to reach the movable middle.
Despite the challenges, Ellis remains optimistic. 'Pride is a celebration. It is joy, and that is resistance right now,' she said. 'It is also always a protest. I never know when we're not protesting and pushing the world to be a better place for everyone.'
She added that the fundamentals have not changed even in this polarized moment. 'We haven't lost Americans' [views] on our community. And they're the ones that always end up at the end having the last word.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Forget tariffs, here's why CEOs worry about a looming recession
Forget tariffs, here's why CEOs worry about a looming recession

Miami Herald

time35 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

Forget tariffs, here's why CEOs worry about a looming recession

Tariffs are on the tip of many Americans' tongues, thanks to the multifaceted trade war in which U.S. President Donald Trump has used foreign taxes as a key negotiating tactic against foreign economic rivals. While Trump says he loves everything about tariffs, including the word itself, the rest of the world's business leaders don't share his affinity. Global stock markets certainly hate the trade war. Every time a new tariff is announced, foreign and domestic markets fall. Every time Trump announces a deal has been reached, markets rise, even if no concrete deals are ever made. Related: Tariff repeal couldn't come at a better time for US businesses Even moreso than investors, Trump's tariffs place business leaders in a most awkward position. Businesses love predictability. Knowing what to expect and when to expect it allows them to plan for the future and forecast expectations. However, Trump's on-again, off-again tariffs have had the opposite effect, casting doubt on what businesses will have to pay their suppliers quarterly, monthly, or even weekly. This environment has, understandably, had an adverse effect on CEO confidence, as reflected in the latest survey data from The Conference Board. Image source: Nikhinson - Pool/Getty Images Every quarter, The Conference Board releases its Measure of CEO Confidence in collaboration wth The Business Council. Over 130 CEOs participated in the Q2 survey between May 5 and May 19, and the results are concerning. A reading below 50 indicates a negative outlook. The confidence index fell by 26 points to 34, the lowest level recorded since Q4 2022. "All components of the Measure weakened into pessimism territory," said Conference Board's Senior Economist of Global Indicators Stephanie Guichard. Related: New car prices are rising; here's where to get the best deal "Expectations for the future also plummeted, with more than half of CEOs now expecting conditions to worsen over the next six months, both for the economy overall and in their own industries." The overwhelming majority of CEOs (83%) said they expect a recession in the next 12 to 18 months, nearly matching the rate reached in late 2022 and early 2023. While tariffs and trade issues were near the top of the list of concerns, geopolitical concerns were the number one concern. Geopolitical instability surpassed cybersecurity, "which dominated CEOs' concerns over the past two years," but dropped to fourth this year. However, the forecast from the top 1% isn't all doom and gloom. Most CEOs anticipate no change in the size of their workforce over the next 12 months. So while they expect hiring to be stagnant, they aren't anticipating any layoffs. The share of CEOs expecting to expand their workforce fell slightly to 28% from 32% in Q1. The share of CEOs planning to reduce their workforce rose 1% to 28%. "Still, consistent with more pessimism about the outlook in their own industries, the share of CEOs expecting to revise down investment plans doubled in Q2 to 26%, while the share expecting to upgrade investment plans dropped 14 ppts to 19%," said Business Council Vice Chairman Roger W. Ferguson. Part of the reason employers are confident in the labor market is that they currently aren't having trouble finding qualified candidates. Since there's less competition, the share of CEOs planning to raise wages by 3% or more over the next year dropped to 5% from 71% in Q1. While the future is murky for many CEOs, the present is almost equally disorienting. The percentage of CEOs who say that economic conditions are worse now than they were six months ago jumped 11% to 82% in Q2. Only 2% of respondents felt economic conditions were better. This change in sentiment is also reflected in the 69% of CEOs who said conditions in their own industries were worse than six months ago, a dramatic increase from 22% in Q1. Only 7% said conditions improved in their industries, and there was also a significant drop from 37% in Q1. Related: Wall Street's TACO trade gains momentum amid stock market rally The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.

Hegseth challenges China in its own backyard
Hegseth challenges China in its own backyard

The Hill

time39 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Hegseth challenges China in its own backyard

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Saturday in Singapore attempted to woo Asian defense leaders to Washington's side as he warned of the 'imminent' threat China poses to the Indo-Pacific region. Hegseth, who took the stage at the Shangri-La Dialogue, sought to seize on a gap China created in declining to send its own defense minister to the major annual gathering of diplomats, military officials and business leaders — an opportunity for the U.S. to make inroads with Asian countries. 'Here in the Indo-Pacific, our futures are bound together,' Hegseth told attendees. 'We share your vision of peace and stability, of prosperity and security. And we are here to stay.' 'And as a matter of fact, we are here this morning, somebody else isn't,' he added. Hegseth's trip to Singapore — his second visit to the region as Pentagon chief — takes place amid the backdrop of heightened rhetoric between Washington and Beijing, which President Trump accused Friday of violating a temporary trade deal. European and Indo-Pacific countries have found themselves at a crossroads as of late, increasingly pulled between the competing interests of the U.S. and China as both struggle for dominance. There's also uncertainty in the region over the U.S.'s commitment to the defense of Taiwan, which China has threatened to overtake, a potential reality Hegseth played into. 'There's no reason to sugarcoat it. The threat China poses is real, and it could be imminent,' he said, adding that any move on Taipei by Beijing 'would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world.' In an attempt to sway Indo-Pacific nations, Hegseth promised continued American partnership and support to those wary of the Trump administration's commitment to the region. But the pledges came with a caveat repeated in Europe, Africa and elsewhere in the world: a call for an increase in defense spending. 'We ask, and indeed we insist, that our allies and partners do their part on defense,' he said. 'Sometimes that means having uncomfortable and tough conversations.' The Shangri-La Dialogue, put on by the International Institute for Strategic Studies, traditionally gives U.S. defense leaders a soapbox to lay out America's strategy in the Indo-Pacific, with an audience of senior officials from across the globe. China, instead of sending its defense minister, sent only an academic delegation to the gathering. Hegseth took advantage of this absence and delivered the Trump administration's most concrete stance on U.S. security policy in the region since the president took office in January, pledging American support for allies while painting China as the common enemy. 'We do not seek conflict with communist China. … But we will not be pushed out of this critical region, and we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated,' Hegseth said. 'It has to be clear to all that Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo Pacific,' he continued. While China has not sought war with any nation, it has flexed its military and economic might in the seas around East and South East Asia, attempting to dominate vital shipping lanes via its powerful navy and man-made islands laden with military equipment. Beijing has also built up its nuclear and conventional arsenals, amassing vessels for a navy that now outstrips the U.S. Navy in number of ships. And an ever looming presence is China's firm eye on Taiwan, which it views as its own territory and has vowed to 'reunify' with the island, using force if necessary. To that end, Beijing has increased war games around Taiwan and stepped up political pressure. The U.S. has made clear, however, that it will not be pushed from the region, with tens of thousands of troops based in Japan and South Korea, and several U.S. owned or maintained military bases in Australia, the Philippines and Papua New Guinea. Hegseth affirmed the U.S. alliance in the region when he visited the Philippines and Japan in March. The Pentagon also announced the development of a new defense strategy in May centered on 'deterring' China in the region and 'increasing burden-sharing' with international partners. But in Saturday's speech Hegseth expanded on Washington's plan, which includes improving U.S. forward force posture, rebuilding defense industrial bases, and helping allies and partners strengthen their defense capabilities. The pledges came, however, with an all-too-expected push for countries to ramp up their own defense spending, something the U.S. has already pushed its European allies to do. 'It doesn't make sense for countries in Europe to [spend more] while key allies in Asia spend less on defense in the face of an even more formidable threat — I've mentioned North Korea,' Hegseth said. While he didn't mention any specific spending goal, it is speculated that Hegseth will push Asian nations to increase defense spending to 5 percent of gross domestic product (GDP)— the new spending goal for NATO members in Europe. Pentagon policy chief Elbridge Colby hinted as much when he posted to the social media platform X on Wednesday that 5 percent 'is the new standard for our allies around the world, especially Asia.' Asian countries spent an average of 1.5 percent of GDP on defense in 2024 — a figure that has stayed constant over the last decade — but spending on weapons is spiking amid a darkening security outlook, according to a study released Wednesday by the International Institute for Strategic Studies. To nudge things along, Hegseth suggested on Saturday that European allies focus on security on their own continent, freeing up the U.S. to zero in on Chinese aggression in the Indo-Pacific. 'We would much prefer that the overwhelming balance of European investment be on that continent, so that as we partner there, which we will continue to do, we're able to use our comparative advantage as an Indo-Pacific nation to support our partners here,' he said during a Q&A portion after his speech. Hegseth's comments mark a turning point in his usual messaging, which has heavily centered around domestic issues such as protecting the U.S. southern border, restoring the 'warrior ethos,' and countering so-called 'woke' initiatives, including diversity, equity and inclusion programs, in the military. He still mentioned those issues, but played to a more international audience on Saturday. 'We are not here to pressure other countries to embrace or adopt our politics or ideology. We are not here to preach to you about climate change or cultural issues,' Hegseth said. 'We respect you, your traditions and your militaries. And we want to work with you where our shared interests align.' It's unclear how Hegseth's message was met by allies in the region, but China was certainly rankled, calling his comments 'steeped in provocations and instigation.' 'Mr. Hegseth repeatedly smeared and attacked China and relentlessly played up the so-called 'China threat,'' the Chinese embassy in Singapore wrote on its Facebook page. 'As a matter of fact, the U.S. itself is the biggest 'troublemaker' for regional peace and stability.'

Blake Lively's Hair Care And Booze Reportedly Suffer Massive Sales Decline As Legal Battle Drags On
Blake Lively's Hair Care And Booze Reportedly Suffer Massive Sales Decline As Legal Battle Drags On

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Blake Lively's Hair Care And Booze Reportedly Suffer Massive Sales Decline As Legal Battle Drags On

New reports claim that Blake Lively's products are suffering a notable drop in sales amid the controversy surrounding her legal dispute with actor Justin Baldoni. The businesses reportedly affected include Lively's haircare brand, Blake Brown, and her alcoholic beverage line, Betty Booze. Blake Brown allegedly saw a decline of up to 78% around the time she filed her sexual harassment lawsuit against Baldoni. Sales have reportedly declined even further since then, amid claims that Taylor Swift's fans, known as Swifties, are no longer interested in Blake Lively and her products. As the lawsuit between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni continues to make headlines, the ripple effects appear to be taking a toll on Lively's entrepreneurial ventures. According to NewsNation, Lively previously stated in her original lawsuit against her "It Ends With Us" co-star that her haircare brand, Blake Brown, suffered "depressed retail sales by 56–78 percent." Those numbers have reportedly dropped even further recently, particularly at Target, the retail chain with which Lively is partnered. A Puck report claims the brand is projected to make "less than $15 million" in total sales in 2025, a steep decline from the $100 million it was reportedly worth. And while the initial decline was attributed to Lively's claim that Baldoni orchestrated a social media smear campaign against her, the recent downturn follows accusations from Baldoni's legal team that the actress attempted to "essentially blackmail" the pop star into publicly supporting her. Swift fans have reportedly viewed Lively's alleged actions as a reason to boycott her products, including her Betty Booze line. Besides Swifies distancing themselves from Lively's business ventures, Swift herself has also halted her relationship with her former best pal. "Their friendship has halted," a source told People Magazine earlier in the month. "Taylor wants no part in this drama." This comes after previous claims that the ongoing legal feud between Lively and Baldoni has not only left Swift "completely floored" but also "very upset." The singer's anger is also said to be fueled by her realization that Lively has been using her name to boost her own standing, and this has been happening for quite some time. "Taylor has been aware that Blake has been exploiting her name for a while now, but this subpoena takes it to a whole new level," a source told the Daily Mail. Amid the legal feud, other high-profile people within Lively and Swift's circle have distanced themselves from the actress. "No one that is close friends with Taylor continues to be in contact with Blake," an insider told the Daily Mail. Topping the list is Gigi Hadid, whose actions have reportedly been followed by British stars Cara Delevingne and Sophie Turner. "Cara is no longer friends with Blake, but there was no big fight or anything like that," the insider further remarked. "She hasn't talked to her in months and has no plans to, or to hang out." As for Turner, another insider shared that she and Lively were "never all that close," and even if they were, "no one in Taylor's crew has anything to do" with the actress anymore. "Taylor's friends, Sophie included, are so set on keeping in Taylor's good graces that they have no problem whatsoever on cutting ties with anyone who does Taylor dirty," the source said. Recently, Swift was subpoenaed by Justin Baldoni's legal team in connection with claims tied to his $400 million defamation countersuit against Lively. But before a deposition date could be set, Baldoni's lawyers withdrew the subpoena, freeing Swift from the obligation. Sources later claimed that the decision was made because the legal team had already obtained what they wanted from Swift. Allegedly, someone in Swift's inner circle handed over proof that Lively's legal team had "threatened to leak" private messages between the actress and Swift if the singer didn't publicly support her. That whistleblower was reportedly revealed to be Scott Swift, the singer's 73-year-old father. "Scott Swift did not want his daughter to be dragged into this any further, and he voluntarily gave up this information as part of a deal that would include [Baldoni's team] withdrawing their subpoena for Taylor," the insider informed the Daily Mail. Earlier this month, Lively made an appearance on Seth Meyers' late-night show, where she opened up about the emotional toll she has seemingly endured this year amid her court battle with Baldoni. Alluding to her ongoing legal battle, Lively told Meyers: "What I can say without going too into it is that this year has been the highest of highs and the lowest of lows in my life and I see so many women around afraid to speak, especially right now, afraid to share their experiences, and fear is by design." She continued, "It's what keeps us silent. But I also acknowledge that many people don't have the opportunity to speak." "So I do feel fortunate that I've been able to, and as a woman, you have the ability to use your voice - that's kept me strong and helped me in my belief and my fight for the world to be safer for women and girls. It's a pretty simple thing," Lively added, per the Daily Mail. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store