Why scooters and e-bikes are the newest travel hazard you didn't see coming
Morris, a tour guide from Seattle, lost control of her rental last year and wiped out.
"The handlebars came back at me and hit me square in the face, knocking me unconscious," she remembered. "I fell to the ground and slashed my chin and forehead open on the gravel."
The accident left her with 60 stitches to her head, a traumatic brain injury, and a new perspective on motorized scooters.
"Now, I have zero tolerance for them," she said.
Check out Elliott Confidential, the newsletter the travel industry doesn't want you to read. Each issue is filled with breaking news, deep insights, and exclusive strategies for becoming a better traveler. But don't tell anyone!
That's becoming a popular opinion. Many major tourist destinations, such as New York, Paris and Madrid, have either banned or strictly limited e-scooters. Many more are on the verge of going scooter-free.
I agree with Morris. I've traveled around the world, and there seems to be one constant: the ever-present motorized scooters and bikes on the sidewalks, weaving between pedestrians.
It's time to put an end to the madness.
"There are a lot of reasons travelers should remain very aware of their surroundings, but the popularity of e-bikes and scooters in tourist destinations definitely adds urgency to that," said John Gobbels, chief operating officer of Medjet, a membership program that provides air medical transport and travel security services.
Flying mistakes you'll wish you didn't make; from bad seat swaps to spilled drinks
How dangerous are e-bikes and scooters to tourists?
Medjet has seen an uptick in transport calls related to e-bike and scooter accidents from both sides – the rider getting hurt and someone who got hit by the e-bike or scooter.
A recent national study by the University of California at San Francisco found that accident rates were soaring in the United States, with e-bicycle injuries doubling every year from 2017 to 2022 and e-scooter injuries rising by 45% each year.
In rare cases, the incidents can seriously injure travelers. For example, a hit-and-run with a motorized scooter in West Hollywood left one woman with a fractured skull and brain swelling. And an American visiting Sydney was struck by an e-bike while crossing a path where cycling was not allowed, sending him to the hospital with a serious brain injury.
Rental companies are aware of the problems and say they are working to make their scooters safer. Lime, one of the largest scooter rental companies, told me that it's developing rider education and on-vehicle technology. It also shares its rider data with cities to determine where infrastructure improvements like protected bike lanes would be most valuable.
'Safety is at the core of our mission at Lime, and the foundation for successful micromobility programs," says Lime spokesman Jacob Tugendrajch. He noted that 99.99% of Lime trips end without any reported incident.
Yet most run-ins between visitors and these new mobility devices go unreported. Even if they're just close calls or clips, they can really affect the visitor experience in that they leave people stunned and frightened. And, to be fair, it's often tourists who do it to each other. They rent an e-scooter or bike for a few hours and race it around town, sometimes taking the vehicle for a joyride on the sidewalk.
What's the problem with scooters and e-bikes?
So what's wrong with these popular urban mobility vehicles? Nothing – and everything.
Nothing, in the sense that they are not inherently dangerous. A scooter or e-bike operated carefully in a dedicated bike lane can get you from point A to point B quickly and safely.
Problem is, a mobility lane isn't always available.
"In the street, e-scooter riders feel unsafe because of cars, which can easily kill an e-scooter rider," said Ralph Buehler, a professor of Urban Affairs and Planning at Virginia Tech. "On sidewalks, e-scooter riders feel that they are endangering pedestrians, and they can't move freely."
But that's not all. E-bikes are bulkier and faster than conventional bikes, and they can easily reach speeds of 30 miles per hour. And the newest e-scooters, though a bit slower, are built like a tank. In the wrong hands, they're a menace to pedestrians.
Tourists are afraid of e-bikes and scooters
Travelers don't really think about the safety of a pedestrian walkway until they're actually standing on it. But if you ask them about the threat of scooters, they're not shy about sharing their opinions.
Jenna Rose Robbins, a web consultant who lives in Los Angeles, said Miami is pretty awful when it comes to scooters.
"The scooters and e-bikes are a nuisance," she said. "I was nearly hit on numerous occasions, and there was a certain lawlessness to it all -- no signs saying not to ride them on sidewalks, piles of scooters on almost every corner."
Morris, the tour guide from Seattle, told me her "zero tolerance" attitude toward e-bikes and scooters wasn't just the result of her collision. Her experience of showing visitors Seattle cemented her position.
"I've personally been clipped multiple times just walking down the sidewalk," she said. "Riders often don't realize that walking tours stop, move, and change direction, which leads to frequent close calls."
What should you do about the dangerous streets?
I'm currently in Christchurch, New Zealand, where pedestrians have to be extra careful. In fact, I just returned from a walk through town and counted three close calls – one e-bike, two scooters. They were all on the sidewalk.
I asked Chris Davlantes, an emergency room physician, what to do about this problem. Davlantes, a concussion expert and senior medical director for Abbott's point of care diagnostics business, has some firsthand experience. He was recently riding an e-scooter and collided with a pedestrian who wandered into the bike lane. The pedestrian was fine, but Davlantes went airborne and suffered a concussion, bilateral nasal bone fractures, two broken bones in his right wrist and a broken finger on his left hand.
"Always be attentive," he said. "Especially when crossing the street at an intersection – and even if you have the right of way."
Read between the lines: Stay off your phone and watch where you're going. Never step into the bike lane unless you first look both ways. And be aware that e-bikes and scooters are fast and heavy – and very quiet.
He added that if you're in an accident and hit your head, you should get checked out even if you feel OK.
"When it comes to concussions, it's never best to wait and see," he warned. "For your best chance at a full recovery, seek professional medical help immediately."
The sidewalk should be off-limits to e-bikes and scooters
But what about the problem of e-bikes and scooters on the sidewalk? If you're traveling anywhere this summer, you should assume that you'll be sharing the pedestrian walkway with fast-moving vehicles, and they won't always be on their best behavior.
This is not a difficult problem, and it's not a controversial solution. These vehicles should never be allowed on the sidewalk, ever. And e-bikes should probably be on the road, since they are practically mopeds, anyway.
I used to think pickpockets and tourist traps were the biggest threats to visitors, but those are usually easy to avoid. E-bikes and scooters, not so much. Be careful out there.
Christopher Elliott is an author, consumer advocate, and journalist. He founded Elliott Advocacy, a nonprofit organization that helps solve consumer problems. He publishes Elliott Confidential, a travel newsletter, and the Elliott Report, a news site about customer service. If you need help with a consumer problem, you can reach him here or email him at chris@elliott.org.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
San Francisco Chronicle
an hour ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
The last frontier isn't as far away from San Francisco as you imagine
The wind was blowing in from the ocean, and even though it was winter, we were thinking of summer. We heard the call of the sea and the call of the wild. So the Sailor Girl, my companion in small adventures, signed us up for a cruise from San Francisco to Alaska and back. Eleven days at sea aboard a big white cruise ship. Adventure is where you find it: hull down on a schooner in the far Pacific, huge ocean swells off Cape Horn, an Atlantic crossing. It's an adventure just getting underway from the Sausalito dock in our own dream boat. So why not pay somebody else to provide a nice warm cabin, three meals a day, a balcony on the sea world, and a steward to make the bunk? It's easy to sail away if San Francisco is your home port. On a good day you can be aboard a ship and unpacking your stuff in less than an hour after leaving your doorstep. It's still light when the Farallones are abeam, wild, gray and windswept. Course northwesterly to Alaska. We were aboard the Ruby Princess, 16 decks of easy living, 951 feet long, 113,000 tons, so big you can hardly feel the ship move. But still, that's the North Pacific Ocean just over the rail, and for two days there is no land in sight. No ships, no birds either. A different world. On the third morning — Alaska. Even the name is something special. It makes you think of snowy mountains, ice, forests, bears, tundra, cold, the last frontier. Just thinking about Alaska makes you want to put on a warm sweater. Of course, passengers on cruise ships see only a small part of the largest American state, just the coast, but not the vast interior. It's something to dream about. Alaska can be frustrating and annoying — overcrowded, commercial, soggy, gray, a bit disappointing. But it's also full of wild stories, unexpected surprises and small towns. It's so beautiful it can take your breath away — something you notice on a sharp, cold day. Ketchikan is one of the rainiest small cities in the world — 149.54 inches a year. It was raining steadily when we got there, then rain turned to mist, then back to hard rain, then to damp. There were five big cruise ships there that morning. Thousands of tourists crowding the narrow sidewalks. The shops all open, selling diamonds, watches, T-shirts, totem poles, rain slickers. Juneau was next, a small city nearly drowning in cruise ships. This season Juneau has scheduled 600 cruise ship calls, well over a million visitors in a five-month season. There were five ships at Juneau the day the Ruby Princess was there, the next day six ships, the day after that seven. So there were lines for everything in Juneau. Despite that, Juneau has a kind of offbeat charm. It's the state capital, so the town has another life. Juneau is both a city and a borough, with about 30,000 people, spread out so much between the mountains and the water that the borough of Juneau is bigger than Delaware. Juneau has lots of cars and trucks and buses, but only 18 miles of roads, which lead, essentially, nowhere. Everything comes to town by plane or boat: cars, refrigerators, furniture, groceries, the hops to make Alaskan Amber beer, the whiskey they serve at the Red Dog Saloon. The Red Dog Saloon is a particularly raucous and noisy tourist trap. Fun, too. Juneau made national news a few days after we stopped there when an overflow lake that takes meltwater from the Mendenhall Glacier, about a dozen miles from downtown, spilled over the rim like a bathtub overflowing. The water roared down a small river and into the edge of town. Luckily, the city and borough had just built a levee of special sandbags, so a flood was averted. But it was a lesson: The power of nature is never very far away in Alaska. We saw that the next day when the Ruby Princess called at the small town of Haines, not far from Skagway. Haines has only 1,657 permanent residents, and the Ruby Princess was the only ship in town that summer Tuesday, so we felt more like visitors than tourists. Haines has had booms and busts, a fish cannery, an Army post, a paved road into Canada and good prospects. In season, the woods are full of bald eagles and the waterways full of salmon. We took a trip up the Chilkat River, a big, wide, fast stream on the edge of wilderness. In Ketchikan we saw the Loyal Order of Moose lodge on the main street. On the river we saw a moose. We saved best for nearly last — a long, slow voyage on the big ship up the Endicott Arm, a fjord that extends 30 miles from Holkham Bay east toward the Canadian ice fields. The water is deep and dark, sometimes cobalt blue and sometimes green. Small and occasionally larger pieces of ice float on the surface, small bergs and growlers, drifting down the water. The pieces of ice are brilliant white when the sun hits them. Sailing up Endicott Arm is like sailing up Yosemite Valley thousands of years ago in the ice age, when Yosemite was a deep lake fed by glaciers. The walls of Endicott Arm are steep sheer cliffs and rounded domes — 'Sublime Yosemite cliffs,' John Muir wrote of the place. He and the Rev. S. Hall Young were the first outsiders to see Endicott Arm in 1880. The native Tlingit people took them there. Muir explored nearby Tracy Arm and Glacier Bay in 1879 and 1880 at a time when much of Alaska was unknown to the outside world. At the end of Endicott Arm is the wall of the Dawes Glacier, 600 feet high and half a mile wide, a river of ice thousands of years old extending into Canada. The ship turned at the face of the glacier and moved slowly out; we passed another ship with room to spare. This time, facing south in the afternoon sun, it was possible to see up the canyons and dozens of waterfalls and cascades, some hundreds of feet high. The streams rise from high mountains and empty faraway valleys, not a house, not a sign humans were ever there. True wilderness. The Dawes Glacier and the Sawyer Glacier in nearby Tracy Arm have been melting, moving back. In Muir's time they were much larger; in 23 years ending in 2013, the bigger of the two receded by nearly 2 miles. Yet there is plenty of beauty left. Still, you can stand at the rail of a luxurious ship and look up past the face of the cliff, up a steep slope lined with trees and brush toward a high ridge and wonder what might be on the other side. Maybe an adventure. Three days after the Ruby Princess left Endicott Arm, a series of small earthquakes rattled the area. They triggered a massive rock slide in Tracy Arm just after dawn. It was huge, the biggest slide in 10 years. The slide went into the water and set off a wall of water 10 feet high. No one was hurt; because the country was nearly empty, no ships in either waterway. We sailed back, of course, stopping in Victoria, British Columbia, for a day, two days at sea and the Golden Gate on a foggy dawn. It was a Monday morning, and San Francisco was just waking. You could tell. The first sound from the city was the Pier 39 sea lions barking.
The Hill
4 hours ago
- The Hill
Behind the scenes of Trump's historic summit with Putin
JOINT BASE ELMENDORF-RICHARDSON, Alaska – When a door swung open to the small room where President Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin were holding an historic sit-down meeting, I had barely caught my breath. I had just run from a van about 100 yards away to the building where Trump and Putin were set to hold high stakes talks on the war in Ukraine. White House staff urged us to hurry into the room because Trump and Putin were already inside. Indeed, it was a madhouse as the American and Russian press jockeyed for photos and shouted questions that would go unanswered. 'Thank you very much, everybody,' Trump said, signaling he was ready for the press to leave. I flew aboard Air Force One as part of the group of reporters, known as the traveling press pool, who document the president's movements for those who can't be with him on such trips. The day began around 6 a.m. Friday and ended just after 3 a.m. early Saturday morning with the president essentially making a day trip to the Last Frontier state. I witnessed the carefully choreographed greeting between the two leaders. I was in the room for the frenetic opening moments of their sit-down summit, and I watched as members of the press were stunned to see Trump and Putin walk off stage without taking a single question at what was billed as a joint press conference. The entire trip had an unpredictable pace to it, which can often be the case when part of the travel pool. Long stretches of waiting for a presidential movement are punctuated by rapid developments that force reporters to be at the ready on a moment's notice. I have traveled with Trump several times before, but no trip was as consequential as Friday's summit in Alaska. Witnessing the meeting with Putin first-hand revealed and reinforced certain characteristics about who Trump is as a leader. Trump at his core is a showman, and that was on full display during Friday's summit. Upon exiting Air Force One in Anchorage, I watched as officials unfurled a literal red carpet so that it rolled right up to where Putin would step off his plane. I saw staff put the finishing touches on 'ALASKA 2025' block letters that would serve as the foreground of an initial photo op for Trump and Putin. And my ears rattled as the roar of a B-2 bomber and other military aircraft flew overhead as Trump and Putin stepped onto a riser, part of an elaborate bit of planning from the White House intended to create maximum dramatic effect. The mere act of hosting Putin on U.S. soil was something of a made for TV moment. The coverage was breathless, critics suggested the event's existence was a win for Putin, and European leaders held out hope that Trump could make headway in bringing an end to the fighting that started in 2022 when Russia invaded Ukraine. It was notable to watch Putin face questions from U.S. reporters about whether he would stop killing civilians. He reacted with a shrug. There were indications on the ground that Friday's meeting did not go entirely as planned. Trump and Putin rode together in the presidential limousine for the short drive from the tarmac to the meeting site. A U.S. official confirmed to me that no interpreter or other staff were present for the brief trip, and photos and video footage captured Putin laughing in the backseat. A planned one-on-one meeting between Trump and Putin turned into a three-on-three meeting, with Secretary of State Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff joining Trump for what ended up being a roughly three-hour discussion. While that played out, American reporters and Russian reporters gathered in the same media tent, divided by a rope line to keep the two sides mostly separate. Unless of course you needed a bathroom, then all reporters used a row of port-a-potties that had been set up outside.) Plans for an expanded bilateral meeting with a wider delegation of officials never materialized. Instead, we were rushed into an auditorium for a planned joint press conference right after the summit, somehow ahead of schedule. The press conference turned out to be a 12-minute appearance by the two leaders in which they each gave remarks: First Putin, then Trump, an unusual maneuver considering the U.S. was the host country. Putin used a lot of his time speaking about Russian history and then flattered Trump with comments about how he would not have invaded Ukraine if it were Trump in office in 2022, and not former President Biden. He gave no indication as to why he thought that. And Trump would not answer follow-up questions about why Putin agreed with him on that notion in an interview with Fox News' Sean Hannity that aired after the press conference. Trump only spoke for three minutes, offering few specifics about what, if anything, had been agreed upon at Friday's summit. The abrupt ending to the press conference left many reporters wondering whether Trump was frustrated by the summit. The Hannity interview before departing Alaska only added to those questions. On the way to Alaska, Trump came to the back of the plane to speak to reporters roughly 20 minutes after taking off for the seven hour flight from Joint Base Andrews in Maryland. He fielded questions ahead of his summit with Putin about what he was expecting. But the typically talkative Trump was apparently no longer interested in taking questions once he arrived in Alaska. He did not respond to questions shouted by this reporter and others during various photo ops with Putin, nor did he take any questions at what had been billed as a joint press conference with the Russian leader. The president did not speak to the traveling pool during the roughly six-hour return flight to Washington, D.C., though we learned that he did speak with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European allies. Those calls set the stage for a Monday meeting in Washington with Zelensky, and perhaps for a future trilateral meeting involving Trump, Zelensky and Putin. As for where that meeting will take Trump and the traveling press pool, the president has suggested another trip to Alaska could be an option. On Friday, Putin had another idea.
USA Today
6 hours ago
- USA Today
Air Canada strike grounds most flights, stranding thousands
Most Air Canada flights are grounded as the carrier's flight attendants have begun an indefinite strike. According to FlightAware, 63% of Air Canada's Saturday schedule is canceled, as well as 65% of Air Canada Rouge's schedule as of 7:30 a.m. ET. The airline began winding down its operations on Wednesday in preparation for the walk-off and warned in a statement that it expects about 130,000 passengers worldwide to be affected each day of the strike. Flight attendants walked off the job after their union negotiators reached an impasse with the airline management over wages and compensation. Air Canada is offering a waiver to passengers whose flights might be affected, allowing travelers who booked their flight by Aug. 14 to move their tickets to travel between Aug. 21 and Sept. 12 without paying a fee or fare difference. More information about the waiver is available on Air Canada's website. AirAdvisor, a consumer airline refund website, suggests that as many as 27,000 U.S passengers per day could be affected. While Air Canada is not a major carrier within the U.S., it is a key link across the border and a popular choice for connecting flights to Europe and Asia for American travelers. According to AirAdvisor, Air Canada has up to 135 flights a day from the U.S. to its hubs in Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver, with New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, Seattle and Miami seeing the most service. The airline operates some flights from the U.S. to other non-hub destinations in Canada as well. Flights operated by Air Canada's regional partners, Jazz and PAL, will continue operating during the strike, so some services booked through Air Canada will continue, but the airline noted in its statement that those affiliates operate only around 20% of its services. The airline warned that it is trying to get passengers reaccommodated on other carriers, but that seat availability is limited. "Customers whose flights are cancelled will be notified and they will be eligible for a full refund, which can be obtained online at or through the Air Canada mobile app. The company has made arrangements with other Canadian and foreign carriers to provide customers alternative travel options to the extent possible," Air Canada's statement said. "Customers will be notified of alternative travel options that are identified for them. However, given other carriers are already very full due to the summer travel peak, securing such capacity will take time and, in many cases, will not be immediately possible." As a major United Airlines partner, thanks to both carriers' membership in the Star Alliance, United Airlines is likely to see the most overflow for rebookings among carriers in the U.S. What is Air Canada? Air Canada is the flag carrier and largest airline in Canada. As a member of Star Alliance, its partners include United Airlines, Lufthansa, All Nippon Airways and a number of other global carriers. How big is Air Canada in the US? Air Canada is the biggest airline connecting Canadian markets to U.S. destinations, and also a major option for those looking to connect from the U.S. to Europe or Asia. 'What makes this strike particularly disruptive is its timing and scope. We're in the peak summer travel window, when planes are already running at 85-90% capacity and last-minute alternatives are scarce," Anton Radchenko, AirAdvisor's founder, said in a statement. "Air Canada isn't just another carrier; it's the primary connector between the US and Canada, handling thousands of passengers daily across leisure, business, and essential travel. When its network seizes up, the ripple effect touches every major US hub, from JFK and LAX to Seattle and Miami." He said northern U.S. airline hubs are likely to see increased traffic as Air Canada passengers to and from overseas destinations get rebooked through American markets. U.S. passengers heading to Europe via Toronto or Montreal, or to Asia via Vancouver, are also likely to encounter issues during the strike. Zach Wichter is a travel reporter and writes the Cruising Altitude column for USA TODAY. He is based in New York and you can reach him at zwichter@
