Senators propose $15-per-hour federal minimum wage
June 10 (UPI) -- The federal minimum wage would rise to $15 per hour, with annual cost-of-living increases based on inflation, in a proposed bipartisan measure.
Sens. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., and Peter Welch, D-Vt., co-sponsored the bill that they have named the "Higher Wages for American Workers Act" and would increase the federal minimum wage from its current $7.25 per hour for non-exempt workers.
"For decades, working Americans have seen their wages flatline," Hawley said on Tuesday in a joint press release with Welch.
"One major culprit of this is the failure of the federal minimum wage to keep up with the economic reality facing hardworking Americans every day," Hawley added.
Welch said inflation and rising costs are making it too hard for families to afford basic necessities.
"We're in the midst of a severe affordability crisis, with families in red and blue states alike struggling to afford necessities like housing and groceries," Welch said.
"A stagnant federal minimum wage only adds fuel to the fire," he continued. "Every hardworking American deserves a living wage that helps put a roof over their head and food on the table -- $7.25 an hour doesn't even come close."
"Times have changed, and working families deserve a wage that reflects today's financial reality," Welch added.
Hawley said the current federal minimum wage is less than what a worker earned in 1940 when adjusted for inflation.
If the proposed federal minimum wage increase is passed into law, it would take effect on Jan. 1 and allow cost-of-living increases that match inflation in subsequent years.
Many states have respective minimum wage laws that exceed the current and proposed federal minimum wage, but a dozen still were at the federal minimum wage in 2024.
Many large employers also have higher minimum wages, including Walmart, which has paid its workers at least $14 an hour and often more since 2023.
President Joe Biden in 2021 ordered the federal government to pay contract workers at least $15 an hour.
California lawmakers in 2022 raised the state's minimum wage for many fast-food workers to up to $22 an hour.
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil Curve Shift Shows Fears of Protracted Mideast Conflict
(Bloomberg) -- The oil futures curve is strengthening on concerns that Israel's latest strike on Iran could have severe and long-lasting repercussions. Shuttered NY College Has Alumni Fighting Over Its Future Trump's Military Parade Has Washington Bracing for Tanks and Weaponry NYC Renters Brace for Price Hikes After Broker-Fee Ban Do World's Fairs Still Matter? NY Long Island Rail Service Resumes After Grand Central Fire Front-month Brent prices have spiked by as much as 13%, but there's also movement for contracts further out with timespreads rallying. The so-called smile or hockey stick pattern that's characterized the shape of the futures curve for months — featuring a contango structure and signaling loose balances in the long term — has now all but disappeared. The widely watched spread between the two nearest December contracts for Brent, a favorite marker for traders pricing in oil's long-term prospects, was around $2.30 a barrel in backwardation late morning in Singapore, with the shorter-dated contract at a premium over the later one. It's flipped sharply from the contango it's been in over the last two months. Other timespreads are also rallying, with Brent's prompt spread, the gap between the two nearest months, rising to as wide as $4 a barrel to reach the highest since 2022 on an intraday basis. The three-month and six-month spreads are all also stronger. That's been accompanied by volumes that are a lot higher than usual in the Asian session. Meanwhile, oil options are also at their most bullish in years, although that could change as the Asia session gives way to London and New York trading hours. A gauge of implied volatility was also higher. 'In a scenario where we see continued escalation, there's the potential for disruptions to shipping through the Strait of Hormuz,' which is an extreme case but could leave the roughly 14 million barrels a day of oil that flows through it at risk, said Warren Patterson, head of commodities strategy at ING Groep NV in Singapore. 'A significant disruption to these flows would be enough to push prices to $120 a barrel.' Brent futures were last trading near $75 a barrel. (Updates with chart) American Mid: Hampton Inn's Good-Enough Formula for World Domination New Grads Join Worst Entry-Level Job Market in Years The Spying Scandal Rocking the World of HR Software US Tariffs Threaten to Derail Vietnam's Historic Industrial Boom As Companies Abandon Climate Pledges, Is There a Silver Lining? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
36 minutes ago
- Yahoo
‘High price': Grim warning after AUKUS move
Australia will have 'a very high price to pay if AUKUS fails', opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor says. The warning came after the US Department of Defence launched a review of the trilateral pact with Australia and the UK to ensure it aligned with Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda. The Albanese government has brushed off concerns the move signals waning US support for the alliance with Canberra, with Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles saying it was 'natural that the (Trump) administration would want to examine this major undertaking'. But with AUKUS the centrepiece of Australia's defence strategy over the first half of this century, it has offered little reassurance. 'This is an incredibly important alliance,' Mr Taylor said on Friday. 'It's an incredibly important capability, both in terms of the submarine capability and the technology capability … and this must be a top priority of the government.' He said the Albanese government had 'many questions to answer'. 'What discussions has Richard Marles already had? To what extent is our lack of defence spending a driver of this review? When will the Prime Minister meet with the President to actually discuss this face-to-face?' he queried. 'These are questions we need answers to, and they're questions that go to the heart of making sure that AUKUS is a success and that we ensure that we have peace through deterrence in our region.' NewsWire understands Anthony Albanese was set to meet the US President on the sidelines of the upcoming G7. But US State Department sources said a time had not been set and the situation was 'fluid'. 'No submarines' Canberra has already spent billions laying the groundwork to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines and train personnel to crew them under AUKUS. Washington has committed to supply up to five Virginia-class submarines starting in 2032. But sluggish submarine production has put the US on track to face a shortage early next decade. To help bolster production, Australia has agreed to inject $4.6bn into the US defence industrial base. Mr Marles said on Thursday he was 'confident' the production rate was on track. 'And we are seeing real progress – increases in both production and sustainment – associated with what we're doing with AUKUS and what the Americans themselves are doing,' Mr Marles told the ABC. 'That's what is set out in the agreement that we already have with the United States, which forms part of the treaty that we now have between the US and the UK. 'I think it's completely appropriate for this administration to have a look at all of the facts and figures around that.' Malcolm Turnbull, who was prime minister during Mr Trump's first term, took a different view. Also speaking to the ABC, he said it was 'very likely' Australia would end up 'having no submarines'. 'The latest numbers given to the congress by the navy on 11 March this year was that the rate of production is 1.1 per annum,' Mr Turnbull said. 'They need to get to two by 2028 to be able to meet their own requirements, and to 2.33 to meet their own plus Australia's. 'And they have not been able to lift production rates despite the expenditure of over $10bn over the last six or seven years.'So they've got a real problem there.' Mr Trump can renege on Washington's AUKUS commitments if they put US national security at risk.
Yahoo
37 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rubio: United States not involved in Israel's strike against Iran
The United States was not involved in Israel's strike against Iran, Secretary of State Marco Rubio says, warning Tehran not to target US personnel in the region. "Tonight, Israel took unilateral action against Iran. We are not involved in strikes against Iran and our top priority is protecting American forces in the region," he said in a post on X. "Let me be clear: Iran should not target U.S. interests or personnel," he added. Israel launched what it described as a "preemptive" strike on Iran's nuclear programme early Friday, with the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) reporting that dozens of jets struck military targets across Iran in a first stage. The IDF said the move was in response to ongoing threats from Tehran. Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz declared a state of emergency for the country, saying a missile and drone attack on Israel was expected "in the immediate future," according to the Times of Israel.
