logo
750 credit score and still rejected? Here's why premium credit cards say no

750 credit score and still rejected? Here's why premium credit cards say no

Mint23-04-2025

A credit score of 750 or more is generally considered excellent in India. Still, many applicants find themselves in difficult situations, facing denial when applying for premium credit cards.
This contradiction clearly highlights that a credit score is important but still, it is not the sole determinant for the approval of premium, high end credit cards.
Let's discuss some important reasons and considerations such as optimum credit scores, income stability, past loan settlement, payment history, over-all debt etc., that all credit card applicants must be aware of before applying for a premium credit card.
According to Akshay Aedula, product and growth at CRED, 'Credit score is an output of past financial decisions and an input for financial institutions to understand the level of risk that you may pose as a borrower. A score above 750 indicates that you can understand and manage credit responsibly, and that you have demonstrated a history of paying consistently and on time. It's a strong signal of creditworthiness.'
'However, different issuers have different cutoffs for eligibility, and credit score is just one factor in decision-making. Beyond a good score, income, employment status, existing bank relationships all play a role.'
He further added, 'A high score can also unlock higher limits, faster approval, and access to better cards. If the card you'd like has a higher credit score cutoff, you can set a target on CRED and the feature will provide personalized recommendations to guide you on the right actions to achieve it within the desired timeframe.'
Hence, a credit score of 750 or more is generally considered as a strong number for approval of new premium credit cards, personal loans etc. Still, there are numerous other factors that influence the decision of providing premium credit cards to applicants.
Employment stability and income: Premium and top notch credit cards come with stringent income requirements. For example, HDFC Bank's Diners Club Black Card makes it mandatory to have a net monthly income of more than ₹ 2.5 lakhs for salaried individuals.
Not only this, if you are self employed then you must have an annual income of over ₹ 30 lakhs. Further, erratic job changes, gaps in employment etc., can project instability to the lenders and such developments can result in rejection of applications.
Credit utilisation and debt to income ratio: Now, even if you have an excellent credit score, still a high debt to income (DTI) ratio can be a serious drawback. Banks generally prefer individuals who have a DTI of less than 35%. On similar lines, utilising a significant portion of your credit limit i.e., credit utilisation ratio, this may indicate financial pressure and over dependence on credit.
Past credit behaviour and lack of accuracy in application: Mistakes in application forms such as incorrect address, incomplete documentation, wrong PAN and Aadhaar details etc., are all such factors that can result in immediate rejection.
Further, also applying for several different credit cards within a short period of time can project credit hungry behaviour, which can in turn adversely impact your credit rating and chances of approval.
Hence, given a high credit score is a significant asset, it is still important to consider other factors such as employment stability, income level, debt obligations, accuracy with application forms, and meeting all eligibility criteria.
For example, for a credit card that has an eligibility criteria of over ₹ 2 lakh monthly income, just a good credit score won't suffice. Therefore, being aware of these rules, criteria and additional requirements can boost the prospects of seamless approval of your premium credit card applications.
Disclaimer: Mint has a tie-up with fintechs for providing credit; you will need to share your information if you apply. These tie-ups do not influence our editorial content. This article only intends to educate and spread awareness about credit needs like loans, credit cards and credit scores. Mint does not promote or encourage taking credit as it comes with a set of risks such as high interest rates, hidden charges, etc. We advise investors to discuss with certified experts before taking any credit.
First Published: 23 Apr 2025, 03:50 PM IST

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lilavati Trust's allegations against MD & CEO Jagdishan baseless: HDFC Bank
Lilavati Trust's allegations against MD & CEO Jagdishan baseless: HDFC Bank

Business Standard

time21 minutes ago

  • Business Standard

Lilavati Trust's allegations against MD & CEO Jagdishan baseless: HDFC Bank

After the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust (LKMM Trust), which runs Mumbai's Lilavati Hospital, on Saturday called for 'immediate suspension and prosecution' of HDFC Bank managing director (MD) & chief executive officer (CEO) Sashidhar Jagdishan, alleging his direct involvement in serious financial fraud, criminal conspiracy, evidence tampering etc, India's most valuable bank said the allegations made by the LKMM Trust against its MD & CEO are 'baseless' and 'malicious'. 'The outrageous and preposterous allegations are strongly and categorically denied,' said a HDFC Bank spokesperson, adding that their MD & CEO is being targeted by unscrupulous persons who are abusing the legal process to thwart the recovery of the long outstanding loan due to the Bank from recalcitrant defaulters. LKMM Trust members said they were seeking actions against Jagdishan on the basis of orders of the Metropolitan Magistrate's court in Bandra passed on May 30 and a resultant FIR (No. 818/2025) filed by the Bandra police station. Business Standard has reviewed a copy of the first information report (FIR) and the Bandra Metropolitan Magistrate court order. According to the order, the Bandra police station was asked to file an FIR against Jagdishan and seven others in the case. LKMM claimed that apart from Jagdishan other alleged perpetrators include one Chetan Mehta, along with Rashmi and Niket Mehta and four other accused in the said criminal case. The Trust alleges that Jagdishan received Rs 2.05 crore in unaccounted cash from former trustees of the hospital for the sole purpose of harassing the father of one of the current members of the Trust. The petitioners have alleged that the transaction was recorded in a hand written diary which was recovered by the current members. The Magistrate court sought for any more evidence available in the matter. To this, the LKMM members have said that erstwhile members had likely destroyed all evidence in the matter. It claims this payment forms part of a wider pattern of misconduct involving misuse of charitable funds, preferential treatment, and suppression of internal complaints. The FIR invokes several sections of the Indian Penal Code, including those related to criminal breach of trust and conspiracy. The Trust has also alleged that a Rs 1.5 crore offer was made to hospital staff under the pretext of CSR funding, which it claims was aimed at influencing internal processes. According to the Trust, the alleged payment was made during a period when it says a group of former trustees held unauthorised control of the hospital and its finances. The Trust has further alleged that Jagdishan's involvement helped facilitate this group's actions. The current FIR is among several filed in connection with the LKMM Trust's operations. The Trust has pointed to three earlier FIRs as part of what it describes as a broader pattern of financial irregularities. These include FIR No. 972/2024, which pertains to the alleged misappropriation of Rs 11.52 crore; FIR No. 1916/2024, involving claims of Rs 85 crore being siphoned off under the guise of legal fees; and FIR No. 375/2025, related to the alleged unauthorised procurement of medical and pharmacy equipment valued at Rs 1,243 crore. All three cases are currently under investigation. In its public statement, the Trust has urged the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi), and the Ministry of Finance to take immediate action. It has called for the suspension of Jagdishan from all executive and board positions, a forensic audit of all transactions between HDFC Bank and the Trust, and the disclosure of any legal expenses incurred by the Bank in his defence. Additionally, the Trust has sought a bar on Jagdishan from holding office in any SEBI-regulated entity while investigations are ongoing. The Trust maintains that the current board's actions are aimed at restoring financial transparency and that its complaint is not part of a personal dispute but a larger issue of public accountability. 'The Trustee, Prashant Mehta and his family members owe substantial amounts to HDFC Bank which were never repaid. Recovery and enforcement actions have been taken by the Bank over two decades and at every stage Prashant Mehta and his other family members have launched numerous vexatious legal actions,' HDFC Bank's spokesperson said. 'Having consistently failed at all levels including the Hon'ble Supreme Court, they have now resorted to the recent mala fide personal attacks on the Bank's MD & CEO with the sole objective of intimidating and bullying the Bank and its MD & CEO from carrying out the mandate of recovering all outstanding loans in every possible manner permissible under law,' the spokesperson further said, adding that the Bank has obtained comprehensive legal advice and representation in this regard and is committed to pursuing legal remedies and options to defend its MD & CEO's reputation. 'The Bank is confident that our judicial process will recognise the fraudulent intention and devious objectives of the Trustee and officials of Lilavati Trust of tarnishing the image of the Bank and its MD and CEO,' the spokesperson said, adding that the the Bank takes immense pride in the integrity and leadership of its MD & CEO. Lilavati Hospital was built by Kishor Mehta in 1997 and later his brother Vijay Mehta's family members were slowly inducted into the board of trustees. The LKMM Trust is a registered charitable institution with a long-standing presence in Mumbai's healthcare sector. It claims to spend crores annually on subsidised or free treatment, including for victims of terror attacks and army personnel injured in combat operations. The tussle between the old and new members of LKMM Trust is not new. These two factions have been having a tussle surrounding forgery and other irregularities. Both Kishor and Vijay Mehta have now passed away. Earlier in March, Lilavati Hospital's executive director Param Bir Singh and Kishor Mehta's son Prashant Mehta held a press conference to talk about the findings of a forensic audit into the workings of the Trust. They alleged of Rs 1,200-1,500 crore fund diversion by the former trustee's family apart from unsettling claims of alleged black magic rituals within the hospital premises. Investigations into these former complaints are ongoing.

M-cap of 9 of top-10 most valued firms jumps Rs 1 lakh cr; RIL, HDFC Bank shine
M-cap of 9 of top-10 most valued firms jumps Rs 1 lakh cr; RIL, HDFC Bank shine

Economic Times

timean hour ago

  • Economic Times

M-cap of 9 of top-10 most valued firms jumps Rs 1 lakh cr; RIL, HDFC Bank shine

Nine of the top-10 most valued firms together added Rs 1,00,850.96 crore in market valuation last week, with Reliance Industries and HDFC Bank stealing the show with maximum gain, in line with an optimistic trend in equities. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Nine of the top-10 most valued firms together added Rs 1,00,850.96 crore in market valuation last week, with Reliance Industries and HDFC Bank stealing the show with maximum gain, in line with an optimistic trend in week, the BSE benchmark Sensex surged 737.98 points, or 0.90 per the top-10 pack, Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) emerged as the only laggard, while Reliance Industries, HDFC Bank Bajaj Finance , and Hindustan Unilever Ltd were the market valuation of Reliance Industries jumped Rs 30,786.38 crore to Rs 19,53,480.09 crore, the most among top-10 Bank's valuation surged Rs 26,668.23 crore to Rs 15,15,853.85 Finance added Rs 12,322.96 crore taking its valuation to Rs 5,82,469.45 market capitalisation (mcap) of ICICI Bank rallied Rs 9,790.87 crore to Rs 10,41,053.07 Unilever's mcap zoomed Rs 9,280.89 crore to Rs 5,61,282.11 market valuation of Bharti Airtel climbed Rs 7,127.63 crore to Rs 10,65,894.55 crore and that of Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC) advanced Rs 3,953.12 crore to Rs 6,07,073.28 added Rs 519.27 crore to its mcap, which stood at Rs 6,49,739.73 Bank of India's valuation went up Rs 401.61 crore to Rs 7,25,437.74 the mcap of TCS dropped Rs 28,510.53 crore to Rs 12,24,975.89 the top-10 chart, Reliance Industries remained the most-valued firm, followed by HDFC Bank, TCS, Bharti Airtel, ICICI Bank, State Bank of India, Infosys, LIC, Bajaj Finance, and Hindustan Unilever.

HDFC Bank to take legal action after fraud allegations against CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan
HDFC Bank to take legal action after fraud allegations against CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan

Time of India

time2 hours ago

  • Time of India

HDFC Bank to take legal action after fraud allegations against CEO Sashidhar Jagdishan

HDFC Bank said on Saturday it will pursue legal remedies in response to allegations made by the Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical (LKMM) Trust, which has called on financial sector regulators to suspend and prosecute the bank's Managing Director and CEO, Sashidhar Jagdishan , in connection with an alleged financial fraud. In a statement, the bank said it has obtained comprehensive legal advice and representation in this matter and is committed to exploring all available legal options to defend the reputation of its MD & CEO. The bank added that it takes immense pride in the integrity and leadership of its MD & CEO. According to media reports, the Lilavati Trust has alleged that one of its former members paid Jagdishan Rs 2.05 crore with the purported intent of harassing the father of a current Trust member. In its response, HDFC Bank strongly rejected the claims, stating that its MD & CEO is being targeted by unscrupulous individuals abusing the legal system to obstruct the recovery of a long-standing loan from wilful defaulters. The bank stated that the allegations made by the Lilavati Trust, its trustees, and officials are baseless and malicious, and categorically denied what it called outrageous and preposterous accusations. The Trust, in its own statement issued Saturday, said its actions were based on a May 30 order from the Mumbai Magistrate Court , which directed the Bandra police to file a First Information Report (FIR) against Jagdishan and seven others. In its response, HDFC Bank claimed that one of the Trust's trustees, Prashant Mehta, along with his family members, owes significant sums to the bank which remain unpaid. The bank said it has been pursuing recovery and enforcement actions for over two decades. At every stage, HDFC Bank said, Prashant Mehta and his family have launched multiple vexatious legal actions to delay recovery. Having failed consistently, including at the level of the Hon'ble Supreme Court, they have now resorted to personal attacks on the bank's MD & CEO in a clear attempt to intimidate and deflect. HDFC Bank expressed full confidence in the judicial process and said it believes the courts will recognise the alleged misuse of legal proceedings and the intention to malign the bank's leadership.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store