Residents, activists challenge property tax assessments in Orange County
Four years ago, Orange County activists and homeowners successfully challenged what they believed were unfair and inequitable property revaluations in Chapel Hill's historically Black Northside community. Many of those same individuals were shocked in March when new property valuation notices showed what they saw as more of the same across the county.
Last week, the recently formed Orange County Property Tax Justice Coalition, shared data from the county's largest historically Black communities that show significant 'vertical regressivity,' meaning newer larger homes in those communities are undervalued while older homes are systematically overvalued.
'Orange County is way worse than I expected,' said Hudson Vaughan, director of the Community Justice Collaborative at the North Carolina Housing Coalition. 'I thought, especially after the work that folks did with the tax office four years ago, that things would look much better this time around.'
In 2021, activists in the Northside community found that property tax assessments of many new, larger student housing properties in Chapel Hill were lower than those of smaller homes owned by Black residents. According to Vaughan this is a common problem. He noted that in many established Black communities across the nation, homes are often undervalued for resale, bank loans and equity purposes, but over-assessed for property tax purposes.
Speaking at a recent virtual meeting held via Zoom, Vaughan said, 'I think what you'll see is that some of the student rentals in Northside got valued a little higher [in the recent revaluation], but across the county, the historically Black communities are way overvalued compared to other wealthier, historically white neighborhoods and without market justification.' Vaughan resides in the Northside neighborhood and helped lead the effort to bring fairness to tax assessments in 2021.
Northside residents' efforts in 2021 eventually resulted in about a $7 million reduction in assessed home values. Meanwhile, under-assessed rental properties saw assessment increases of $5 million to $6 million.
Vaughan recently led property tax assessments examinations across the Research Triangle. He said several neighborhoods in Wake County and Durham have real problems. Throughout North Carolina, Vaughan said, many homeowners in the lowest price housing are affected. In some counties, he said, they are paying proportionally twice the property taxes of owners of the highest price housing.
'And yet, even though that's the case, over four times as many high-income owners, primarily from white census tracts, appeal their tax values for being too high,' he said.
Vaughan shared an example from the current revaluation in Chapel Hill's Northside community: On one side of the street, a home owned by a Black resident for more than 50 years that is 1,200 square-feet and more than 100 years old is valued at a higher rate for property taxes than investor-owned property directly across the street. The investor's property has a duplex with a detached home behind it. Together, the investor-owned property contains at least eight bedrooms and totals 2,900 square feet. The smaller home's taxable value is $656,00 compared to $652,000 for the larger duplex and detached home across the street.
'The homeowner on the left [the Black homeowner] will end up paying higher property taxes as a result of this valuation,' Vaughan said.
He projects a $2 million total increase in property taxes for the historically Black neighborhoods he and other advocates have looked at, even if the county adopts a revenue neutral tax rate.
'We've already heard Orange County and Chapel Hill and Carrboro talk about how they're going to have to raise taxes, likely this year for very good reason, and we are in support of that, but it cannot be on the backs of the historically Black neighborhoods,' Vaughan said.
County tax administrator Nancy Freeman said her office explained to Vaughan and the coalition that when issues are found to be prevalent throughout several properties in appeals, that information can be taken to the Board of Equalization and Review for its consideration.
'We can show them that we see there is a problem with all of these properties, or there could be problems with all of these properties that are still under appeal, and we would like for you [the Board of Equalization and Review] to direct us to review this property or this neighborhood again,' Freeman said. 'That's how we would be able to go back and review the property and make adjustments, if needed, and make corrections to all affected properties in that neighborhood.'
After a preliminary review of the information provided by Vaughan and the coalition, however, Freeman said her office isn't seeing any 'prevailing issues' with properties it has been able to identify and review.
'That's not to say there are not problems within that need some attention but at this moment we've not completed a review and at this moment, the ones that we've looked at, there's nothing that's prevalent from all of them at this point,' Freeman said.
So far, Freeman said there have been 3,500 informal property valuation appeals, with more than 200 formal appeals, which are made to the Board of Equalization and Review after an informal review of a property's tax value.
'We suspect we might get another 500 [formal appeals] before the end of July [when the appeal filing deadline closes],' Freeman said.
The virtual meeting at which Vaughan held forth was hosted by the Orange County Property Tax Justice Coalition. The coalition is made up of community organizers from historically Black neighborhoods across Orange County including Councilville, Mars Hill, Fairview, Rogers Road, Piney Grove, Efland-Cheeks, Cedar Grove, Northside, Pine Knolls, Tin Top, and Glosson/Davie Rd.
The effort is supported by The Marian Cheek Jackson Center, the Rogers-Eubanks Neighborhood Association, Justice United, Habitat for Humanity, and The Community Justice Collaborative of the NC Housing Coalition.
'These historically Black neighborhoods are some of the most historic, culturally diverse, and, you know, are the spaces of remaining affordability within the county,' said George Barrett, a former Northside resident and executive director of the Marian Cheek Jackson Center.
'Our neighborhoods and our communities hold so much history and so much connection and love and spirit,' Barrett said. 'Our communities and our neighborhoods are…the ones who are facing an intense amount of threat by these new revaluations. In these existing hubs of the Black community within Orange County…we, as a coalition…have formed to fight back against this and really preserve the future of our neighborhoods in the midst of these current revaluations'
Horace Johnson Jr., the son and namesake of Hillsborough's first and only Black mayor who recently died, warned those on the Zoom call that he would be blunt in his assessment of the revaluation.
'This is extinction level gentrification,' Johnson said.
He called the assessments 'mind numbing,' a phrase he said he reserves for things that cannot be reasonably explained.
Johnson said Hillsborough leaders are using high taxes to turn the town into an 'OAW' community.
'OAW represents old and white, specifically for Hillsborough, a town that's rich in tradition,' Johnson said. 'I've been here all my life. They're trying to turn this community to old and white, which brings it back to class, the have and the have nots.'
Johnson said his late father would not want him to just 'weep and mourn.' He'd want him to continue to fight against injustice.
Retired District Court Judge Beverly Scarlett joined the meeting and said high property taxes can make owning a home unaffordable for vulnerable populations such as the elderly, who might be forced to put off buying medication to pay bills.
'I've seen this within my own family, [where someone] will decide 'I'm not going to buy my medication because I need to put together money, put my pennies together to be able to pay these taxes' — that's going to lead to negative health outcomes,' Scarlett said.
Vaughan said the good news is that tax offices can make neighborhood adjustments, and many other counties have.
'Guilford County adjusted land values in a historically Black neighborhood when they realized the land values were wrong,' he said. 'Wake County is currently looking at two neighborhoods that had much more complicated differences and yet were problematic for a lot of the long standing historically Black residents.'
Durham is also looking at systematic tools, and all of the counties have access to the regressivity tools that Vaughan shared. 'Orange County decided not to use the tool this time and made huge mistakes,' Vaughan said.
Barrett said more than 100 residents from across the county have signed a letter to county commissioners asking for fairness and justice on property tax assessments.
'We want to see these neighborhood wide adjustments in historically Black and Brown neighborhoods be made and we want to also have a revisitation of undervalued, wealthier neighborhoods,' Barrett said. 'Investor-owned buildings should carry their fair share of the property tax burden.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time Magazine
an hour ago
- Time Magazine
D.C. Families Brace For Start of School Under Trump Takeover
On a recent summer night, a 9-year-old girl in Northwest Washington, D.C. was having trouble sleeping. She heard on the news that speaking Spanish could draw the attention of federal agents, and she worried aloud to her Hispanic father that immigration officers might come for her classmates' parents. 'She kept asking, 'Can they come to people's homes? Can they come to our home?'' her father said. 'She was terrified.' Their family, longtime residents of the city and American citizens, are not at risk of deportation. But the girl's anxiety reflects a broader unease rippling through D.C. families as the city's public schools prepare to start a new school year on Monday, Aug. 25, under the shadow of President Donald Trump's takeover of the city's police force and a ramp up in federal immigration enforcement. Across the nation's capital, parents are setting up group chats on WhatsApp and Signal to coordinate carpools and walking groups. Some are pressing the city to relax attendance requirements, out of concern that some families might feel they have to keep their kids at home. 'We've got people volunteering to carpool other people's kids to school because the parents are afraid to try to get their kid to school on their own,' says Catherine Morgan, a D.C. resident whose child starts third grade on Monday. Since announcing in August that he would place the Metropolitan Police Department under federal control and deploy National Guard troops to patrol the streets, Trump has insisted his measures are necessary to curb what he has described as 'roving mobs of wild youth' and 'bloodthirsty criminals,' despite statistics showing violent crime in the city had hit a 30-year low earlier this year. His administration has also rolled back protections that once limited immigration enforcement around schools, allowing agents to conduct raids in neighborhoods and workplaces. The result, according to parents, educators and community leaders, is a climate of fear and confusion at the very moment when families are usually focused on first-day jitters, backpacks, and back-to-school clothes. Parents across the city interviewed for this story described adjusting their routines to shield their children from encounters with federal law enforcement whose mandate remains unclear. Marta Urquilla, a D.C. resident and mother of two teenagers, says she will not let her kids ride public buses to school. 'At this point, that's off the table,' she says. 'My kids present as Black, and that's just not something I am inclined to expose them to.' She says families in her neighborhood near Howard University have organized walking groups to the grocery store and that similar plans would be in place for school commutes. The federal occupation, Urquilla adds, has not been evenly felt across the city. 'The closer you get to where immigrants live, to where Black folks live and work, the more you see it,' she says. Rumors of ICE enforcement actions have swirled since Trump's inauguration in January, but have intensified over the past two weeks as ICE, FBI, Border Patrol, National Guard troops, and more have descended on D.C. streets. Videos have circulated of federal agents and local police arresting individuals in handcuffs and stopping others at various checkpoints. Across the country, school districts have been taking precautions to shield children from immigration enforcement. In New York, officials unanimously passed a resolution this year that prohibits ICE agents from entering schools or accessing student records without a judicial warrant. In Los Angeles, school leaders announced new 'safe zones' in areas targeted by ICE to protect students before and after school. D.C. parents, however, remain uncertain how much protection their schools can offer, given the city's lack of statehood and Trump's direct authority over its institutions. At a virtual information session for parents on Wednesday night, D.C. Public Schools officials attempted to address concerns about the increased law enforcement presence in the city, noting that they expect very little impact to schools. "Any law enforcement action on school grounds can only take place with a valid warrant or court order,' said Dr. Lewis D. Ferebee, the chancellor for District of Columbia Public Schools. He stressed that school resource officers are not performing any duties related to immigration or custom enforcement. DCPS also shared a few 'best practices' for parents to share with students, including to always travel in a group or with trusted adults, and to avoid distractions while traveling, such as being on a phone or using headphones. 'Please advise our young people to stay aware of their surroundings,' Ferebee said at the information session. D.C. police are currently enforcing a citywide juvenile curfew that begins at 11 p.m. for people under 17. In some targeted neighborhoods, juvenile curfews begin as early as 8 p.m. But some parents remain frustrated by the lack of communication from their schools about what many view as an unprecedented moment. 'We haven't been told a goddamn thing,' says Morgan when asked what her daughter's school in D.C. had communicated about the coming week. 'It makes us feel like, what are you going to do? Are you just going to let them come in and take these kids?' Jenn Kauffman is a mother of two who sits on the city's advisory neighborhood commission representing her neighborhood in Brightwood Park. She says parents are demanding stronger assurances from school leaders. 'I want bare minimum for the schools to kind of stand up and say what they will do to protect students,' she said. 'But in this climate, and you know, D.C. being a federal jurisdiction, I'm also afraid that still won't be enough.' Her 7-year-old, who attends a bilingual school, has already been discussing the situation with classmates. 'The kids have been talking about this and aware about this,' she says. 'But I think it's risen to a new level.' Parents say their children are absorbing the stress—and so are they. Lara Fife, whose 4-year-old started pre-K this month, says he has asked her why police are detaining people. 'I've been extremely stressed and not sleeping well at all,' she says. The White House insists the deployments are making Washington, D.C. safer, but most residents don't see it that way. A Washington Post-Schar School poll published Wednesday found roughly 80% of D.C. residents opposed Trump's executive order to federalize the city's police department, and 65% do not think Trump's actions will make the city safer. Residents warn that the show of force may deepen mistrust and drive children away from school. In Los Angeles, officials recently reported a 7% rise in online academy enrollment, attributing the spike in part to immigration fears. D.C. parents worry they may soon face the same difficult choice. 'Are we at a point where we need a virtual schooling option?' Kauffman asks. 'Because what's going to happen then is families are going to have to choose between risking their child, or being referred to Child Protective Services for truancy. And that's just immoral.' For now, families are bracing for Monday. Some will walk in groups. Others will drive in carpools. Still others may keep their children home. But the sense of unease remains. The Hispanic father with the worried 9-year-old daughter says his family plans to arrive at school extra early on Monday so he can warn other families if they notice ICE or other federal law enforcement in the area. 'I'm not hearing from any person of color or minorities that they feel safer or that they think that the police presence is here to quote, unquote, restore safety or security, right? It's quite the opposite,' he says.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Justice Department said to consider probe of Fed's Lisa Cook
The Department of Justice is potentially launching an investigation into Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook over allegations of mortgage fraud, according to a letter seen by Bloomberg News. The notification comes only a day after President Donald Trump pushed for her resignation from the central bank. In the letter, senior DOJ official Ed Martin urged Fed Chair Powell to remove Cook from her Board of Governors post. 'At this time, I encourage you to remove Ms. Cook from your Board,' Martin wrote in the letter, per Bloomberg. 'Do it today before it is too late!" Bill Pulte, the head of the Federal Housing and Finance Agency, sent a criminal referral on Wednesday to the DOJ, alleging that Cook had been misleading in her mortgage applications for a pair of residential properties in Georgia and Michigan. Following the referral, President Trump was blunt in pushing for her resignation. "Cook must resign, now!!!" he said in a short social media post . The White House and Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Cook, for her part, is digging in. 'I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet,' she said in a statement provided by a Fed spokesperson on Wednesday. 'I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts.' Pulte's referral letter — first posted on social media — described mortgage documents it had obtained about Cook, alleging she had "falsified bank documents and property records to obtain more favorable loan terms." Over the course of a month in 2021, Cook obtained primary residence mortgages on two properties in Michigan and Georgia, declaring both to be her main residence. Trump recently had an opportunity to imprint his stamp on the central bank after the early resignation of former Fed Governor Adriana Kugler. That allowed him to name White House aide Stephen Miran to the slot, at least for now. He must still be confirmed by the Senate. Another opening in the Board of Governors would pave the way for the president to install a second pick who's receptive to his constant demand for lower interest rates. Still, Trump's ability to fire a Senate-confirmed appointee is extremely limited. Only the Fed chair can theoretically remove a sitting governor for cause, usually defined as conducting "malfeasance in office" or "neglect of duty" in the position. Cook was nominated by former President Joe Biden and confirmed by the Senate in a May 2022 party-line vote. She is the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's Board of Governors, a seven-member group that takes frequent votes on monetary policy and helps regulate the financial sector. Her current term expires in 2038.

Los Angeles Times
2 hours ago
- Los Angeles Times
Supreme Court says Trump may cancel DEI-related health research grants
WASHINGTON — A divided Supreme Court said Thursday the Trump administration may cancel hundreds of health research grants that involve diversity, equity and inclusion or gender identity. The justices granted an emergency appeal from President Trump's lawyers and set aside a Boston's judge order that blocked the canceling of $783 million in research grants. The justices split 5-4. Chief Justice John G. Roberts joined the court's three liberals in dissent and said the district judge had not overstepped his authority. The court's conservative majority has repeatedly sided with the administration and against federal judges in disputes over spending and staffing at federal agencies. In the latest case, the majority agreed that Trump and his appointees may decide on how to spend health research funds allocated by Congress. Upon taking office in January, Trump issued an executive order 'ending radical and wasteful government DEI programs and preferencing.' A few weeks later, the acting director of the National Institutes of Health said the agency would no longer fund 'low-value and off-mission research programs, including but not limited to studies based on diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and gender identity.' More than 1,700 grants were canceled. Trump's lawyers told the court NIH had terminated grants to study 'Buddhism and HIV stigma in Thailand'; 'intersectional, multilevel and multidimensional structural racism for English- and Spanish-speaking populations'; and 'anti-racist healing in nature to protect telomeres of transitional age BIPOC [Black, Indigenous, and People of Color] for health equity.' California Atty. Gen. Rob Bonta and his counterparts from 15 Democratic-led states had sued to halt what they called an 'unprecedented disruption to ongoing research.' They were joined by groups of researchers and public health advocates. The state attorneys said their public universities were using grant money for 'projects investigating heart disease, HIV/AIDS, Alzheimer's disease, alcohol and substance abuse, mental-health issues, and countless other health conditions.' They said NIH had terminated a grant for a University of California study examining how inflammation, insulin resistance, and physical activity affect Alzheimer's disease in Black women, a group with higher rates and a more aggressive profile of the disease. Also terminated they said was a University of Hawaiʻi study that aimed to identify genetic and biological risk factors for colorectal cancer among Native Hawaiians, a population with increased incidence and mortality rates of that disease. In June, the Democratic state attorneys won a ruling from U.S. District Judge William G. Young, a Reagan appointee. He said the sudden halt to research grants violated a federal procedural law because it was 'arbitrary' and poorly explained. He said Trump had required agencies 'to focus on eradicating anything that it labels as Diversity, Equity and Inclusion ('DEI'), an undefined enemy.' He said he had tried and failed to get a clear definition of DEI and what it entailed. When the 1st Circuit Court refused to lift the judge's order, Trump's Solicitor Gen. D. John Sauer appealed to the Supreme Court in late July. He noted the justices in April had set aside a similar decision from a Boston-based judge who blocked the new administration's canceling of education grants. The solicitor general argued that Trump's order rescinded an executive order from President Biden in 2021 that mandated 'an ambitious whole-of-government equity agenda' and instructed federal agencies to 'allocate resources to address the historic failure to invest sufficiently, justly, and equally in underserved communities.' He said the new administration decided these DEI-related grants 'do nothing to expand our knowledge of living systems, provide low returns on investment, and ultimately do not enhance health, lengthen life, or reduce illness.'