Saudi Arabia: 'Masked Youth Movement' challenges 'tyrant' MBS over lack of freedom
A series of videos featuring masked individuals expressing dissatisfaction with the standard of living in Saudi Arabia and calling for the fall of de facto ruler Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has ignited an intense debate on social media this week.
The videos, posted by young men whose faces and eyes are covered and voices often changed, draw attention to what they say are deteriorating living conditions and a lack of economic opportunity amid state spending on lavish entertainment events and megaprojects.
They allege growing unrest within the kingdom and call for the overthrow of the crown prince.
Middle East Eye has not independently verified the videos.
The clips have been posted primarily on anonymous accounts on TikTok, and have been reshared across multiple social media platforms, sparking both condemnation and praise.
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"Today we witness a powerful movement led by the free youth of our nation, courageously raising their voices for legitimate rights: freedom & the right to determine our own fate," said one user.
Others said the videos were a result of growing domestic frustration, and said the masked figures were speaking for suppressed voices within the kingdom.
"In a land where voices are forbidden, the masked man emerges as an icon of rejection... The Saudi masked man is not an individual, but a moment of dignity... Behind the mask is another homeland yet to be born," one user expressed.
Translation: The voice of the Arab youth will not be silenced. The youth love the truth and do not love falsehood. I fight every stubborn tyrant And separation kills me, without a fight. #MaskedYouthMovement #Friday #SupportPilgrimsWithWater
Another said the videos "place the Saudi regime on the brink of a volcano" while others invited people to join the movement in order "to support the oppressed and achieve the demands of the people (and) to overthrow the tyrant who has turned the country into a private farm, ruled by a corrupt gang that humiliates the people, strips them of their rights, and uses military institutions and security agencies to ... insult their dignity."
Amid the growing discourse, others launched the hashtag #خونة_الوطن ('#KingdomTraitors'), accusing the individuals in the videos of being "foreign agitators" or exiled dissidents seeking to destabilise Saudi Arabian society from abroad.
يتم الآن تداول مقطع من قِبل الأدوات المُشرّدة لرجل مُلثم يدّعي انه متواجد داخل السعودية ويهدد الدولة بالمظاهرات ..
~~~~~
1- المقطع ليس في السعوديه بل في بريطانيا
2-صاحب المقطع هو المُشرّد (خالد الجهني) وبدليل بسيط جداً شاهدوا النظارات الشمسية ..⬇️🌷 pic.twitter.com/pB730vWXLi — راكان العتيبي (@RBM_1727) May 21, 2025
Translation: A video clip is now being circulated by exiled tools, showing a masked man claiming to be inside Saudi Arabia and threatening the state with demonstrations. 1. The clip is not in Saudi Arabia, but in Britain. 2. The owner of the clip is the exiled person (Khaled al-Jahni) and as a very simple proof, look at the sunglasses.
"After trying all the ways to create chaos and distort the Saudi society, today a masked boy comes out, following the same approach of the exiled. It is clear that they are foreigners born in Saudi Arabia and were expelled and are from the working class," one user said.
Some social media users also expressed concern for the safety of those posting videos.
The detention of people for social media posts - including those from anonymous accounts - has become a routine practice since bin Salman became crown prince in 2017.
Rights groups say the kingdom's cybercrime and antiterror laws have been broadly applied to suppress critics, who have been handed lengthy prision sentences and travel bans for social media activity.
'Free Masked Men Movement'
Since the publication of the first video earlier this week, new videos have emerged voicing solidarity with the masked individual, as well as others who have criticised the Saudi leadership.
A message across many of the clips is the suppression of freedoms and the view that public spending on concerts, festivals, nightclubs and megaprojects - hallmarks of the crown prince's ambitious Vision 2030 programme - is occurring at the expense of basic services and the public economy.
"We know and are certain that there are many free people who want a peaceful change in the country from the tyranny and oppression of the al-Saud family, headed by Mohammed bin Salman, who has oppressed the people with their money and provoked them with their beliefs and their Islam and deluded them with his illusory projects whose time has passed and were not implemented," said one person in a video.
A few of the figures also slammed what they perceived as moral decay due to 'degrading phenomena' like public dancing promoted by the crown prince, and framed their calls to action as a defence of the two holiest sites in Islam, which are located in the kingdom.
حركة الملثمين الأحرار في #السعودية تنشر بيانها الأول، تؤكد فيه وفاة الملك سلمان، وتدعو الشعب للثورة ضد محمد بن سلمان بسبب الفساد والترويج للمظاهر الهابطة كالرقص والمجون في بلاد الحرمين الشريفين. pic.twitter.com/Iy1eOAp1jM — همام شعلان || H . Shaalan (@osSWSso) May 23, 2025
The videos threaten mass uprising unless the crown prince changes his course.
"We will take to the streets with demonstrations and marches if you continue imprisoning people," said one man in a video.
Another was more direct: "This message directly to Mohammed bin Salman: your fall will be at the hands of your people."
Middle East Eye has reached out to the accounts posting these videos. One account has declined to comment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
23 minutes ago
- The National
Air raid sirens blare out across Israel as missiles are fired from Yemen and Syria
The Israeli military said it intercepted a missile, while others fell on open land, and there were no immediate reports of casualties or damage
Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Saudi Arabian and Omani officials propose nuclear facilities for Iran on Gulf island: Report
Omani and Saudi Arabian officials have proposed building a nuclear enrichment facility in the Gulf alongside Iran in an attempt to overcome obstacles in ongoing nuclear talks. US envoy Steve Witkoff provided Iran with a proposal for a nuclear deal over the weekend, which includes a consortium to provide nuclear fuel to Iran and any of its neighbours interested in developing civilian nuclear power or research programmes, according to a New York Times report on Tuesday. The idea is part of an attempt to bridge Washington and Tehran's red lines that could scuttle a deal. US President Donald Trump says the US will not allow Iran to enrich uranium as part of a nuclear deal, while Tehran insists it retains the right to enrichment for civilian purposes. The nuclear consortium could include Saudi Arabia and the UAE, the report said. The Gulf states are close US partners with their own nuclear ambitions. They are rivals with Iran but have undergone a fragile rapprochement. The consortium would be overseen by the International Atomic Energy Agency. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The NYT reported that Iran may be prepared to accept the consortium idea in order to prevent the collapse of talks but could push to build the enrichment facility on one of their islands, including Kish or Qeshm in the Gulf. Another option could be to build the facility on a disputed island. Abu Musa, Greater Tunb, and Lesser Tunb in the Gulf have been occupied by Iran since 1971 but are claimed by the UAE. Until the consortium gets up and running, Iran would be allowed to continue enriching uranium at low levels. Axios reported on Monday that the Witkoff proposal would allow Iran to enrich Uranium to three percent, well below the 60 percent it is currently at. Trump said on Monday, after the Axios report, that Iran would not be allowed to enrich uranium. But if the final stage of the deal prevents Iran from enriching uranium alone once a consortium is established, it could give Trump some wriggle room around his publicly stated position. Although there are several flashpoints that could derail an agreement, whether Iran is able to enrich uranium on its soil, as part of a consortium or not, is shaping up to be the biggest obstacle. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said on Tuesday that Iran's right to enrich uranium on its soil was a "red line" after the United States submitted its proposal for a new nuclear deal. "Continuing enrichment on Iranian soil is our red line," Araghchi said while on a visit to Lebanon, adding that his country will respond to the proposal in the coming days based on Iran's "principled positions and the interests of the Iranian people'. Iran has also called on the US to lift all sanctions on the country, not just those related to its nuclear programme, as part of a deal, the NYT reported. Trump is under pressure from Republicans in the US Congress and Israel to take a hard line on Iran. He said last month that he warned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu not to launch preemptive military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
Middle East Eye
2 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
The quiet migration: Why Muslims are leaving India in staggering numbers
When *Taufeeq Ahmed boarded a flight from New Delhi to Canada in early 2020, he wasn't chasing a promotion, a degree or the promise of a better paycheque. Instead, he was trying to leave something behind - a heavy sense of unease that had been quietly building for years, and a fear that had finally become impossible to ignore. 'I lived close to Jamia Millia Islamia,' he said, referring to the prominent university in New Delhi where he used to study. 'During the anti-CAA protests, I saw police beating unarmed students, dragging them by their hair, firing tear gas into libraries. I had seen footage of this kind of state violence in Egypt or Hong Kong. But now, it was right outside my door.' The CAA, or Citizenship Amendment Act, was passed in 2019 by India's ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), sparking nationwide protests. The law fast-tracks Indian citizenship for non-Muslim refugees from neighbouring countries, drawing criticism for institutionalising religious discrimination. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters The protests at Jamia turned violent when police stormed the campus. For Ahmed, that moment ended any illusion he had of safety. 'That night changed something inside me,' he said. 'It wasn't just about policy anymore. It was personal. The fear was immediate and physical.' Vulnerability In the following weeks, the weight of that fear hardened into a more profound disillusionment. What Ahmed had once brushed off as isolated incidents - lynchings in distant towns, discriminatory remarks at workplaces, inflammatory speeches by politicians - now felt systemic and undeniable. The realisation that the institutions built to protect people were complicit, or worse, indifferent, left him questioning the very idea of belonging. 'I was totally disillusioned by the idea of our country. It is truly messed up in so many ways - inequality, environment, caste, urban planning. I can go on, but speaking as a Muslim, the hate that the majority population have for Muslims is unimaginable. The levels of Islamophobia are through the roof,' Ahmed told Middle East Eye. Today, Ahmed and his wife live in Toronto, where he says his faith is respected, not scrutinised. Muslims fear potential 'Israel-like' retaliation after Kashmir attack Read More » 'There are prayer rooms in public buildings, and accommodations during Ramadan exams. It is unimaginable in India,' he said. 'The contrast made me realise just how deep Islamophobia runs back home.' Ahmed's story is part of a broad but quiet trend: Indian Muslims leaving the country in growing numbers. While India's economic migrants and tech talent continue to dominate headlines, this exodus, driven by religious polarisation, is rarely discussed. 'I am selling my property here and shifting to Dubai. At least I will get some peace,' said *Karim Sadiq, a businessman based in Lucknow, the capital of India's most populous state. Sadiq says the police have been after him since he and his family volunteered for one of the anti-government protests. For fear of reprisal, he refused to divulge more details. 'I will take my family along soon after things are settled there (Dubai),' he added. According to a Pew Research Center analysis, India is the second-largest source of Muslim migrants globally, after Syria. Roughly six million Indian-born Muslims now live abroad. Though Muslims represent about 15 percent of India's population, they account for an estimated one-third of Indian emigrants, indicating a migration rate significantly higher than other religious groups. 'This isn't just economic,' said Dr Nizamuddin Ahmad Siddiqui, a legal academic and co-founder of Project Mishkat, which fosters Muslim public discourse. 'It is social, political, psychological. Indian Muslims increasingly feel like second-class citizens in their own country.' Rising hostility India's political climate under Prime Minister Narendra Modi's BJP, which has been in power since 2014, has been marked by rising Hindu nationalism. Incidents of communal violence, discriminatory laws, and hate speech targeting Muslims have grown more frequent. Muslims in India have faced a range of challenges during this period, including mob lynchings over allegations of cow slaughter, campaigns against interfaith marriages often labelled as "love jihad", economic and social boycotts, and rising barriers to employment and housing. Hate speech by political leaders and the spread of Islamophobic narratives through social media have further fuelled hostility. In several instances, Muslim places of worship have been targeted, and there has been growing pressure on Muslim identity and practices in public life. The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom recommended that the US government designate India as a "Country of Particular Concern" in its 2025 report, citing egregious systematic violations of religious freedoms. For Muslims in India, day-to-day life has become fraught. Ahmed says that after every major incident of violence against Muslims in the country, friends start reaching out, asking how to move to Canada. 'As a Muslim scholar, I no longer feel safe even expressing my views' - Kamran Ahmed, Delhi-based researcher 'Whenever something awful happens - a lynching, a hate crime - I get calls,' he said. 'But many have to give up because migration is expensive and hard. Not everyone can afford it.' For those who can afford it, though, the decision is increasingly clear. Kamran Ahmed, a Delhi-based research scholar, says he is using most of his and his parents' savings to move out of the country. The decision, he says, is heartbreaking but necessary. 'As a Muslim scholar, I no longer feel safe even expressing my views,' he said. 'I have faced veiled threats, professional exclusion, and constant surveillance. I want to work in a place where I can breathe and where I am not reduced to my religion.' His story is not unique. According to a study by the Centre for the Study of Developing Societies in India, in collaboration with German think tank Konrad Adenauer Stiftung, 44 percent of Muslim youth reported experiencing discrimination because of their religion. Another study revealed that 47 percent of Muslims feared being falsely accused of terrorism. 'The normalisation of hate and the silence of institutions is making it impossible to live with dignity,' Kamran said. To be clear, migration for economic reasons is not new among Indian Muslims. Communities in Kerala, Uttar Pradesh, and Telangana have long histories of labour migration to the Gulf. However, experts say that what has also changed is the nature and intention behind this new wave. 'In the past, migration was temporary. People went to the Gulf for work and came back,' Siddiqui said. 'Now, they go to settle. They want their children to grow up in safer, more equitable societies.' He cites everyday examples of exclusion like being refused rental housing, facing suspicion for wearing a hijab or sporting a beard, or hesitating to pray in public. 'These might seem small,' he said. 'But together, they wear down your sense of belonging.' Institutions and identity under siege The sense of alienation is also tied to key flashpoints in India's communal landscape. The 1992 demolition of the Babri Masjid - a 16th-century mosque claimed by Hindu groups - was a defining moment. Its aftermath left scars that festered for decades. The 2019 Supreme Court verdict awarding the site to Hindus further deepened disillusionment, even among those who had reconciled with the loss. More recently, disputes over places of worship like the Gyanvapi Mosque in Varanasi and the Shahi Eidgah in Mathura have kept communal tensions simmering. 'Every other week, there is a new controversy targeting Muslim history, culture, or existence,' said Siddiqui. He also cited new laws regulating Waqf properties and the push for a Uniform Civil Code as examples of legislative efforts that, he said, aim to weaken institutions central to the Muslim community. Why Indian Muslims must endure endless loyalty tests Read More » 'It's hard to fight on every front,' he said. 'The minute one issue fades, another takes its place.' In 2022, over 225,000 Indians renounced their citizenship, the highest number in recent history, according to India's Ministry of External Affairs. While the government does not provide religious breakdowns, anecdotal evidence suggests a disproportionate number of Muslims are among those quietly exiting. 'Around 30 percent of the cases that come to us are Muslims,' said Khwaja Mohammad, owner of Yaseen Travels, a visa and travel agency based in Telangana, a state with a Muslim population of less than 13 percent. 'People are also investing a lot in Middle Eastern countries like the UAE and also in Turkey, which was not the case earlier. It means they intend to stay long-term or settle in these countries,' Mohammad said. Apoorvanand Jah, a professor at the University of Delhi, however, cautions against framing the exodus as entirely religious. 'It is those with resources who are leaving,' he said. 'Muslims are part of that class too, but so are many others.' Still, he notes, disillusionment is rising, especially among young Indians who see no economic or social future in the country. 'This is the first time, since independence, that India's youth feels completely hopeless,' he said. 'The economy is adrift, and hatred fills the airwaves. Who would want to stay in such a place?' Can the rift be healed? Despite the exodus and alienation, many of those leaving say they would return - if the climate changed. Ahmed hopes to one day return to India to care for his ageing parents. "I want to go back to India because my parents are there, and they will need care and support as they grow older," he said. And even if they didn't need care and support, I want to spend more time with them." If and when he does return, Ahmed said he would likely settle in a city he considers safer, such as Hyderabad or Chandigarh. Staying in his hometown in Uttar Pradesh, a state ruled by the BJP, he explained, would mean living "a very subjugated existence". 'Living there means to just quietly endure the numerous, daily, progressively more virulent acts of microaggression that the country's majority will do to you,' he said. 'The economy is adrift, and hatred fills the airwaves. Who would want to stay in such a place?' - Apoorvanand Jah, professor Siddiqui believes reconciliation is possible, but only through institutional reform and societal reckoning. 'This is not something Muslims alone can fix,' he said. 'The onus is on the majority community, the judiciary, and democratic institutions to step up.' He draws on the words of BR Ambedkar, a key architect of the Indian Constitution, who warned that the majority must earn the trust of minorities. 'That trust has been broken,' Siddiqui said. 'Now it must be rebuilt, if not for Muslims, then for India itself.' As India continues to project itself as a global economic power, the exodus of some of its brightest and most vulnerable citizens tells another story. 'What is happening may not be loud. There are no mass protests, no refugee convoys. But it is real,' said Kamran. 'It is a quiet, growing migration that says as much about the future of Indian Muslims as it does about the state of Indian democracy.' *Names have been changed to protect the identities of those interviewed.
