Opinion - Sadly, the scammers are winning — but our government can help.
We all know someone who has fallen victim to a scam — tricked into providing personal information, paying for something that was not legitimate, or losing life savings to an imposter. These stories are tragic, and unfortunately they are surging at an alarming rate, inflicting deep financial and emotional harm on American consumers and small businesses.
During this Financial Literacy Month, we cannot think of a more important issue for the federal government — lawmakers, policymakers and regulators — to shine a light on.
The U.S. Government Accountability Office recently released a report to Congress urging the development of a government-wide strategy to confront the fraud and scam epidemic that has affected millions of Americans across the country. The GAO report calls for the establishment of a national scam estimate, a common definition of scams, and an evaluation of the outcomes of consumer education.
The GAO's recommendations around national definitions and measurements of fraud and scams are especially important. It demands a national, cross-disciplinary public-private response built on transparent reporting and strong congressional leadership to bring accountability and urgency in the fight against scams.
America's leading retail banks have consistently raised the alarm on the need for urgent action. In July 2024, we convened a cross-industry roundtable bringing together public and private leaders to identify what is needed for a national strategy for fighting fraud and scams. From these discussions emerged our contribution to the publication 'Stopping Scams Against Consumers: Roadmap for a National Strategy,' which sets out an initial roadmap for cross-industry collaboration among financial institutions, technology companies, law enforcement and the federal government. We were pleased to see some of our findings cited in the recent GAO report as well.
This issue has risen to Main Street because it affects consumers in every congressional district in the country; there is a critical need to go beyond just words to solutions-oriented actions. Just last week, Reps. Zach Nunn (R-Iowa) and Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) introduced the Guarding Unprotected Aging Retirees from Deception Act. If passed, this legislation would direct federal agencies, for the first time ever, to report to Congress on the current state of fraud and scams. This level of transparency will not only bring light to the magnitude of the crisis but also drive greater accountability across the public and private sectors alike.
This legislation is a step in the right direction and provides a tangible example of how policymakers in Washington can advance sound policy to protect Americans. By publicly disclosing the scale of the issue, the bill would shed light on vulnerabilities and weaknesses across the consumer ecosystem to better inform and enable solutions at a level not possible today.
No private-sector industry can look across all sectors and gather the data and information required to fully assess the magnitude of the problem, detect and report rising fraud vectors or scam schemes, or track perpetrators. In this way, the federal government should be required to deliver consistent and comprehensive data that will not only reflect how Americans fall victim to scams, but also the scale of the financial impact it has taken on them.
The banking, telecommunications and technology industries — in partnership with federal law enforcement agencies — would be better equipped to develop targeted plans to protect their consumers and have the data to fine tune fraud prevention strategies. In this way, the GUARD Act serves as both a spotlight and a catalyst, encouraging meaningful progress with a shared responsibility.
Scams are a national crisis. They are eroding trust in reputable institutions, inflicting financial and emotional harm, and exploiting some of the most vulnerable members of our society. Robust, comprehensive reporting requirements that will equip our government with the data and insights necessary to take meaningful action to safeguard millions of hardworking Americans each and every day.
I urge lawmakers to swiftly pass this legislation to leverage data into commonsense actions that protect their constituents and hold bad actors accountable.
Lindsey Johnson is president and CEO of the Consumer Bankers Association.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
4 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Trump Tells German Chancellor D-Day Was 'Not A Pleasant Day For You'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump told German Chancellor Friedrich Merz that D-Day—the day Allied forces invaded Normandy, France, during World War II—was "not a great day" for Germany. What To Know Trump made his comments while he and Merz spoke to reporters during Merz's White House visit on Thursday. Merz pointed out that the anniversary of D-Day is on Friday, saying it was when "the Americans ... ended the war in Europe." "That was not a pleasant day for you," Trump responded. "No, that was not a pleasant—well—" Merz began before Trump interjected. "This was not a great day," Trump said. Merz cut in: "In the long run, Mr. President, this was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship." "That's true," Trump said. Merz went on to say that "we know what we owe you," adding that the U.S. can play a similarly crucial role in bringing an end to Russia's war against Ukraine. "America is, again, in a very strong position to do something on this war and ending this war, so let's talk about what we can do jointly," the German chancellor said. "We are ready to do what we can and you know that we gave support to Ukraine and that we are looking for more pressure on Russia ... we should talk about that." MERZ: Tomorrow is the D Day anniversary, when the Americans ended a war in Europe TRUMP: That was not a pleasant day for you? This is not a great day MERZ: This was the liberation of my country from Nazi dictatorship — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) June 5, 2025 President Donald Trump, right, meets Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, June 5, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump, right, meets Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, June 5, 2025, in Washington. Evan Vucci/AP This story is developing and will be updated as more information becomes available.


New York Times
5 minutes ago
- New York Times
Live Update: Trump and Musk Attack Each Other in Remarkable Break
Pinned Elon Musk and President Trump openly feuded over the Republican domestic policy bill on Thursday, with Mr. Trump criticizing Mr. Musk during an Oval Office meeting with the chancellor of Germany, and Mr. Musk replying in kind on his X, the social media platform he owns. President Trump and Elon Musk's alliance dissolved into open acrimony on Thursday, as the two men hurled personal attacks at each other after the billionaire had unleashed broadsides against the president's signature domestic policy bill. While meeting with Friedrich Merz, Germany's new chancellor, in the Oval Office, Mr. Trump broke days of uncharacteristic silence and unloaded on Mr. Musk, who until last week was a top presidential adviser. 'I'm very disappointed in Elon,' Mr. Trump said. 'I've helped Elon a lot.' As the president criticized Mr. Musk, the billionaire responded in real time on X, the social media platform he owns. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Mr. Musk wrote. 'Such ingratitude,' he added. Mr. Musk had been careful in recent days to train his ire on Republicans in Congress, not Mr. Trump himself. But he discarded with that caution on Thursday, ridiculing the president in a pattern familiar to the many previous Trump advisers who have fallen by the wayside. What started as simply a fight over the domestic policy bill sharply escalated in just a few hours. Within minutes of one another, Mr. Trump was making fun of Mr. Musk's unwillingness to wear makeup to cover a recent black eye, and Mr. Musk was raising questions about Mr. Trump's competency as president. The public break comes after a remarkable partnership between the two men. Mr. Musk deployed hundreds of millions of dollars to support Mr. Trump's 2024 presidential campaign, and after Mr. Trump won, he gave Mr. Musk free rein to slash the federal work force. And just last week, Mr. Trump gave Mr. Musk a personal send-off in the Oval Office. The president praised Mr. Musk as 'one of the greatest business leaders and innovators the world has ever produced' and gave him a golden key emblazoned with the White House insignia. Mr. Musk promised to remain a 'friend and adviser to the president.' But now Mr. Musk, who has left his temporary role, has turned into the most prominent critic of a top presidential priority. Mr. Musk has lashed out against the far-reaching policy bill in numerous posts on X. He has called it a 'disgusting abomination,' argued that the bill would undo all the work he did to cut government spending and hinted that he would target Republican members of Congress who backed the legislation in next year's midterm elections. Mr. Trump on Thursday said Mr. Musk's criticism of the bill was entirely self-interested, saying he only opposed the legislation after Republicans took out the electric vehicle mandate, which would benefit Tesla, Mr. Musk's electric vehicle company. (Mr. Musk has previously called for an end to those subsidies.) The president also downplayed Mr. Musk's financial support for him during the campaign, arguing he would have won Pennsylvania without Mr. Musk, who poured much of his money and time into the critical battleground state. Mr. Musk also on Thursday rebutted Mr. Trump's statement that Mr. Musk 'knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here.' 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' Mr. Musk wrote, sharing a video of Mr. Trump saying he was disappointed in Mr. Musk.

Wall Street Journal
8 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Congress Cleans Up Biden's Global-Tax Mess
Surprise, surprise: America's latest 'trade war' has nothing to do with President Trump. Commentators and European pols are clamoring that Washington has kicked off a global conflict over tax rules. But this fracas isn't about Mr. Trump's protectionist leanings. Rather, Congress is trying to clean up after one of the Biden administration's dumber gimmicks. You'll have read over the past couple weeks that the House version of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act—the budget behemoth bouncing around Capitol Hill—includes a retaliatory tax on nationals of some foreign countries. The provision, known as Section 899, creates a punitive surtax (starting at 5%, eventually hitting 20%) on companies and individuals hailing from countries that have imposed 'unfair foreign taxes' on U.S. companies. Cue a noisy, and silly, freak-out.