Whitefish works on upgrades to Armory Park
City Council on Monday will consider awarding a construction contract to Lipka Excavating for the fourth phase of improvements planned for the park. The contract is $153,880 for a foundation for a storage garage, grading and development of a new well.
City Council meets at 7:10 p.m. at City Hall, 418 E. Second St.
Armory Park is the city's largest park at 30 acres. The city Park Board updated the park's master plan in 2019 to identify phases of improvements for the park.
The Parks and Recreation Department plans to complete, in fiscal year 2025, the installation of a small child playground and some identified park amenities. Completed engineering on drainage improvements around the Armory building, well development for the dog park and a storage garage foundation have been completed, notes Parks and Recreation Director Maria Butts.
"We continue to work on engineering for the reconstruction of one softball field, the removal and associated drainage improvements to the second existing softball field, restrooms, playground paths and benches, and an additional south parking lot," Butts said in a memo to Council.
Council is also expected to approve applying for Land and Water Conservation Fund assistance through the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks for the next phases of development of Armory Park. Changes have an estimated cost of $1.6 million.
The city will seek about 45% funding for the cost of the project.
AN UPDATE of the city's ordinance on snow and ice removal is on the agenda for Monday. Council will consider updating the ordinance to include additional commercial zones and adding bulb-outs to the list of areas cleared in the business district. The administrative fees for those not in compliance will be changed from 20% to a $60 minimum and $300 maximum.
In addition, language in the ordinance will be revised to state that all sidewalks and paths be reasonably clear of accumulations of snow and ice and passable for pedestrians. The ordinance now says free and clear of all accumulations.
"This revision is meant to address the feasibility of clearing snow and ice in Montana's climate and lessen the city's risk by creating a more reasonable and achievable expectation for property owners," Butts said in a memo to Council.
The city's Parks and Recreation, Public Works and Planning and Building departments recently reviewed the ordinance to revise it, addressing any ongoing challenges associated with the ordinance.
During a work session at 5:30 p.m., Council will hear an update on the 2045 Vision Whitefish Growth Policy.
Deputy Editor Heidi Desch may be reached at 758-4421 or hdesch@dailyinterlake.com.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CBS News
4 hours ago
- CBS News
Stockton City Council meeting ends with delay in city manager decision
Stocktonians were frustrated waiting nearly three hours for the regularly scheduled city council meeting to begin Tuesday, and those frustrations grew when city leaders opted to push the decision to appoint a new city manager further down the line. The closed session was hours long, but nothing came out of it. "Never seen such disrespect from the council or the mayor as far as their concern or lack of concern for the time and opinions of the citizens," said civilian Cynthia Gail Boyd. Several people were upset about not only the wait, but that the late start delayed important decisions, like who would be Stockton's new permanent city manager. In the city agenda, it was item 12.5 with a recommendation by city staff to extend interim City Manager Steve Colangelo. Ultimately, the agenda item was pulled just before 9 p.m. David Sengthay is against Colangelo's extension. "I think Will Crew should stay as the interim city manager. The search is still live," he said. "We do not need to go for somebody who is shrouded in controversy and has brought drama to city hall." Still, some were in support of Colangelo remaining. "He exemplifies the commitment that Stockton needs," said former Stockton Mayor Anthony Silva. Despite it all, some Stocktonians said they are fed up and frustrated with the way their local government is operating. "This is what we voted for?" asked another concerned citizen. Deputy City Manager Will Crew was appointed interim city manager back on July 29. He had been serving in that role since Saturday. Colangelo, if brought back as interim city manager and extended, would remain until at least November. If Colangelo's contract is extended, he could make just over $20,000 a month.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mayfield Village to hold public meeting on proposed charter changes
Mayfield Village has announced that its Charter Review Commission, which was appointed by Mayor Brenda Bodnar and City Council in January, will present six different possible amendments to voters in the upcoming election. Although village officials said that they don't legally need to provide the public with a chance to review the proposals before they hit the Nov. 4 ballot, they will be having a public hearing on several charter amendments at 7 p.m. Aug. 18 at the Mayfield Village Civic Center, 6622 Wilson Mills Road. One change would be to allow the village council to meet online instead of in person. Law Director Diane Calta said that if the amendment did get approved by voters, that the council itself would iron out the details, and set the requirements that would determine if meetings were held online or not. Calta said that council would also be on the hook for making sure that online meetings were understandable for those that tune in, as ensuring the public can attend and participate would still be a requirement even if the meeting was held virtually. 'That would be part of Village Council discussion because in order to implement virtual meetings you need to be able to have the communication accessible. So, there could be monetary expenditures that have to made to implement the technology to have all that.' Another proposed amendment in the charter, according to a written explanation posted to the Voice of the Village by Calta, would remove the requirement to form a committee that consists of at least five registered electors in any incidences that involves 'nominate(ing) candidates to run for office, propose ordinances through initiatives, repeal ordinances through referendums or bring a recall election.' This requirement is onerous and outdated and is not mentioned in Article VI which governs nominating petitions, creating an ambiguity.' wrote Calta. A full list of possible amendments has been posted online at Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Where would a tiny home village be built in Peoria? It's complicated
PEORIA — Members of the Peoria City Council are concerned that a "not in my backyard" mentality could dominate discussions about a potential tiny home village being built in the city as a solution to combat homelessness. Those concerns were voiced Tuesday night when the council reviewed possible changes to the city building code presented by city staff that would allow for a tiny home village to be constructed. The key piece of information still missing in the minds of council members: Where could this tiny home village be built? Councilmembers, even those who supported the concept, noted that pushback from nearby residents would be likely, no matter where the village was located. "It seems like the general sentiment around the horseshoe and not just here but also constituents I've talked to is that 'not in my backyard mentality, everybody is very concerned about where this is going to go," 2nd District councilmember Alex Carmona said. Denis Cyr, the 5th District councilmember, also worried about how a "not in my backyard mentality" would impact council discussions. Often a fiscal hawk for the council, Cyr raised questions about how a tiny home village would be paid for and the size of the homes themselves. "We all know what's going to happen when we build those. We're a very giving community but 'not in my backyard. I want to help those people but not in my backyard.' So let's be honest about what we're talking about here tonight," Cyr said. "So I am not very excited about putting anybody I know in a small room like that and then we're all going to get a bunch of phone calls, 'Hey this is a great idea, great idea let's help those people. But not in my backyard.'" Councilmember Andre Allen, who represents the 4th District, said he is open to learning more about the tiny homes concept in Peoria, but he noted that if it were to be built outside of Downtown Peoria, that would likely put it near a heavy residential area. Allen said there would be "hurdles" to finding the right location in Peoria. Mayor Rita Ali said Tuesday that she needed more information about the tiny home village, specifically locations where it could be built, before she gave staff any direction on drawing up ordinances. Ali did make clear, again, that she would not support a tiny home village being built in Downtown Peoria. "For me, it is where are we talking about having tiny homes?" Ali said. "It's hard to change the building codes without knowing where are we talking about having these tiny homes? What comes first, right? I think that's a critical question. Where are the possibilities? I haven't seen that, I don't see that, I don't see that map. Where are those possibilities where it's practical?" If Downtown Peoria does end up being ultimately ruled out of consideration, the question of where it would be built instead persists in the minds of councilmembers who also recognize that any proposed location will be controversial. The proposal for a tiny home village in Peoria, which has been led by 3rd District councilmember Tim Riggenbach, would see 32 tiny homes constructed for an estimated cost of $900,000. The annual operating cost for the village would be $300,000 annually, according to estimates by the Dream Center, which would run the operation. Homes would be roughly 70-square-feet and have heating, air conditioning and on-site laundry, showers and bathrooms. They would serve primarily single adults, specifically those who are not suited for a congregate shelter setting. More: Could a tiny home village help solve homelessness in Peoria? Here are the arguments The tiny homes discussion harkens back to the controversial ordinance passed by City Council last November, which effectively made it illegal for homeless people to set up tents and live on public land. In the time since that ordinance has passed, the city has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars to reimburse the non-profit organization LULA, which sheltered those people who had been living in encampments in a local motel. Funding for that motel project ran out at the end of July. While 60 people who were living at the motel found housing solutions, a handful of others, the exact number of which is disputed, were left with nowhere to go. Riggenbach, who voted to pass the ordinance last year, has been a champion of the tiny homes concept for months as a possible solution for those who had nowhere to go at the end of the motel project and in the future. On Tuesday night, Riggenbach said it would be important for the council to be as "united as we can be" on the tiny homes issue, noting that the homelessness issue would not be going away and the problem was a systemic one. He said the city must work toward a goal of reaching "functional zero" on homelessness. This article originally appeared on Journal Star: Peoria revisits discussion about tiny home village, but answers elusive Solve the daily Crossword
