Vanessa Kirby reinvents Sue Storm, talks about motherhood, baby co-stars and Robert Downey Jr.
Kirby, known for her emotionally grounded performances, revealed that what drew her to Sue Storm was the strength and complexity the character embodies.
"Yes, definitely," she said when asked if Sue's leadership qualities played a role in her decision. 'It's a testament to Matt Shakman's vision for her, and wanting to be faithful to the comics. It was such a pleasure to go back and read Sue from 1961.'
She added,"It always felt like, 'How can we be as true to what these incredible artists have imagined over the years?' She always felt like a total mixture of so many things: obviously, deeply maternal and deeply loving and incredibly steady, but also fierce."
The actress dove deep into Sue's comic book roots, particularly the early depictions from 1961. For Kirby, portraying a character often misunderstood as passive was a chance to explore the fierceness of maternal strength. 'To give birth, you have to be completely, totally fierce,' she noted. 'That's what motherhood is.'
Filming with babies, especially during emotionally intense scenes, presented its own set of challenges. Kirby revealed that the role of Franklin was played by real infants throughout the film, with one standout baby named Ada becoming a beloved presence on set.
She said, '100% of the film was shot with a real baby. Our lead baby, Ada, a little girl, was just heaven. We had lots of other babies who were acting with us and helping us. We got really attached to them, and they were so part of our journey. It almost became weird if they weren't there.'
'Also, it's challenging. The speech that Sue has was a night shoot. It was really late and we were shooting in winter in London, and all the babies cried at exactly the same line. I thought, 'Am I delivering something so bad that they're crying at the same moment?' Babies are the most natural actors in the world,' she added.
Kirby also spoke warmly of her experience working with Robert Downey Jr., who is set to portray Dr Doom in future instalments. 'Robert's never not been on set. He's always there. He is our leader. We call him our Godfather. He's looked after us. It's such a joy working with the Russos and him, because they've had such deep collaboration for so long.,' she shared, emphasising his support and leadership.
With 'Fantastic Four', Kirby not only redefines a beloved superheroine but also brings emotional depth and quiet strength to a new generation's Sue Storm.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
5 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Tom Holland debuts new Spider-Man suit in Brand New Day; Fans say ‘prayed for…'
Tom Holland's all-new Spider-Man suit from the highly anticipated Spider-Man: Brand New Day has been unveiled. After teasing the fans on National Spider-Man Day (August 1), he stepped out of the shadows in a dramatic video on Saturday morning, which unveiled a brighter, comic-accurate costume. Tom Holland debuts new suit for Spider-Man: Brand New Day(X/@SpiderManMovie) 'We ready?' Holland asked in the clip before revealing the redesigned outfit, which features bolder red and blue tones and a larger spider insignia, which is in line with the classic comic book version rather than his previous suits in Homecoming, Far From Home, and No Way Home. Fans react to new Spider-Man suit Fans went berserk after the all-new suit was unveiled in a video on X (formerly Twitter). Many of them said they were pumped for Spider-Man: Brand New Day. Some said they 'prayed for days like this' and added the latest instalment could be the best Spider-Man movie ever. An X user wrote, 'The new Spider suit looks great and I am more than hyped for this movie!' The user added that with every new promo, they were getting more excited to watch the film and said, 'I will be seated at the theater July 31 2026!' Another user wrote, 'It is the same suit as at the end of No Way Home, I prayed for days like this!! A Brand New Day, a Brand New Era!' A third user commented they don't care if the new suit has glazing or not, but one look at the costume, the plot rumors for the film have them believing that Spider-Man: Brand New Day could be 'one of the best Spider-Man movies ever'. Also read: Spider-Man Brand New Day first look: Tom Holland returns in a sharp new suit. Watch 'The web pattern, the colors, the shiny blue, the my days,' a fan wrote while another gushed, 'No disrespect, but this 15-second clip made me happier than Superman and F4 combined! Call me biased, but it is what it is. Nothing can top Spider-Man.' One more fan wrote, 'His new suit is so good, the fact that the blue segments are slightly darker than before is perfect.' Brand New Day marks Holland's fourth solo outing as the web-slinger in the Marvel Cinematic Universe and first since 2021's Spider-Man: No Way Home, which brought together three generations: Holland, Tobey Maguire, and Andrew Garfield, in a multiverse adventure, reported Variety. In No Way Home, Peter Parker's identity is publicly exposed by Mysterio (Jake Gyllenhaal), prompting him to seek help from Doctor Strange (Benedict Cumberbatch). A spell gone wrong leads to a multiverse collision, the death of Aunt May (Marisa Tomei), and a heartbreaking decision to erase everyone's memory of Peter Parker. The Variety report added that in Brand New Day picks up pieces of the fallout and reportedly draws inspiration from the controversial comic book arc of the same name, where Peter makes a deal with the demon Mephisto to resurrect Aunt May and reset his life, at the cost of erasing his relationship with MJ. New faces and familiar heroes join the cast of Spider-Man The upcoming film is directed by Destin Cretton, best known for Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings. The film introduces Sadie Sink and Liza Colon-Zayas in undisclosed roles while welcoming back Mark Ruffalo's Hulk and Jon Bernthal's Punisher to the MCU, the Variety report added. With these changes in storyline and cast, a change in tone might be certified for the franchise, possibly granting the birth of a new era of Marvel storytelling while acknowledging Spidey's sitting legacy. The film will be released on July 31, 2026. FAQs Q1: When will Spider-Man: Brand New Day release? A: The movie is set to release on July 31, 2026. Q2: What's different about Spider-Man's new suit? A: The suit features brighter colours and a larger spider logo, closely resembling the original comic-book design. Q3: What happened in the last movie, No Way Home? A: Peter's identity was revealed, leading to a spell that erased everyone's memory of him, including MJ and Ned. Q4: Who's directing the new film? A: Destin Daniel Cretton, known for Shang-Chi, is directing. Q5: Will MJ (Zendaya) return? A: Her return has not yet been confirmed. Q6: Who are the new characters? A: Sadie Sink and Liza Colón-Zayas are new additions. The film also features Punisher and Hulk.
Mint
9 hours ago
- Mint
My Oxford Year Review: Sofia Carson, Corey Mylchreest's film is a bittersweet ode to love, loss, and finding oneself
Romantic comedies are often expected to follow a formula: meet-cute, tension, resolution, happily-ever-after. But every once in a while, a film like 'My Oxford Year' arrives – a sweet, poignant love story that dares to embrace realism over fairytale endings, and does so with touching sincerity. Directed by Iain Morris and based on Julia Whelan's novel (itself adapted from an original screenplay by Allison Burnett), 'My Oxford Year' brings a fresh yet emotional spin to the genre. The film stars Sofia Carson as Anna, an ambitious American student who temporarily trades Wall Street dreams for a prestigious year studying poetry at Oxford. With her post-graduation job at Goldman Sachs already lined up, Anna is a woman with a plan – one she intends to follow with military precision. But Oxford has other plans. Anna's ideal academic experience is upended when her chosen professor, Professor Styan, delegates her class to a younger scholar, Jamie Davenport (Corey Mylchreest). What starts as mild irritation soon turns to intrigue and eventually, undeniable chemistry. Jamie is witty, charismatic, and just enough of a mystery to pull Anna in. Their relationship blossoms in the charming, ancient streets of Oxford, filled with golden-hour walks, pub banter, and the tension of fleeting romance. Yet, the narrative takes a sobering turn when Anna learns Jamie is terminally ill. What began as an academic adventure and casual romance deepens into something neither of them expected. Despite Jamie's insistence that Anna continue her carefully mapped-out future, she decides to stay – not just in Oxford, but in his life, surrounded by new friends and his quietly heartbroken parents. The ending, like much of the film, is open to interpretation. Jamie chooses to discontinue treatment, dying peacefully with Anna by his side. It's a quiet, tender farewell. For some, it may be a sad ending – for others, it's filled with hope and love. Anna, having truly found herself through poetry and love, chooses a life truer to her spirit than the one she'd meticulously designed. Yes, Jamie's parents lost both their sons, the narrative quietly reminds us, but in a way, they gained two daughters – Cecilia and Anna. Sofia Carson, already something of a romantic film mainstay on Netflix, brings grace and strength to Anna. She plays her with equal parts ambition and vulnerability. Corey Mylchreest, as Jamie, gives a performance of quiet yearning – much of which is delivered through unspoken glances and weighted silences. His eyes speak volumes. But it's Dougray Scott, playing Jamie's father, who delivers the film's most haunting and deeply moving performance. The absolute heartbreak when he realises that his son does not want to go through with the treatment – you would think Dougray is the one losing his own children. His pain is palpable, raw, and devastating. Visually, 'My Oxford Year' is a treat – rich with academic nostalgia, ivy-covered halls, and timeless British aesthetics. The film oozes old money charm in a way that doesn't feel forced, but lived-in. The soundtrack is equally evocative, with 'Kaleidoscope' by Chappell Roan standing out as a particularly gorgeous and well-placed track. In a sea of romantic comedies that often rely on clichés or tidy conclusions, 'My Oxford Year' dares to offer something more heartfelt and believable. It is not a story of perfect love, but of love that is real, fleeting, and transformative. And sometimes, that's more than enough.
Mint
9 hours ago
- Mint
Who, Exactly, Is the ‘Netflix of AI' For?
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- In the ongoing, fiercely competitive race to see who can come up with the most unwanted, unwelcome AI technology, we may have a new frontrunner. According to Variety, Inc. has made an undisclosed investment in Fable, a Bay Area start-up, and specifically in its newly launched Showrunner service, which Fable is touting as the 'Netflix of AI.' The company describes its software, which went public Wednesday and is currently available via its Discord, as '[an] AI platform that puts a studio at your fingertips, where anyone can create, watch, and personalize series and stories.' More specifically, it allows users to use keywords to create scenes or episodes of animated cartoon shows, either of the user's own creation or (more likely, and easily) from existing templates of television programs. What seems to be missing from Fable and Amazon's efforts is consideration for the most essential question in any consumer product strategy: Who, exactly, is this for? The potential copyright issues alone are exhausting. Fable's CEO and co-founder Edward Saatchi told Variety that he is 'in talks' with Walt Disney Co. and other studios about licensing partnerships, but there's plenty of potential here for studios and IP holders to slap the company with a Midjourney Inc. type lawsuit. When Saatchi tested (and showed off) the software two years ago with nine short South Park episodes, he didn't bother securing rights or permission from the show's creators. Reportedly, he reached out to assure them that it wasn't for commercial use. While the animations got over 80 million views, South Park's cultural cachet was likely the driving force. With the software's star power still a big if, the question of who Showrunner's intended audience is looms even larger. On one hand, sure, animation (and, for that matter, live-action filmmaking) is costly, laborious and difficult. I'm certain there are plenty of would-be Walt Disneys who'd like to make their own little cartoons. But — and this is the tricky part — who wants to watch them? It's tiring enough to scroll through the constant stream of clumsy generative-AI 'art,' with its unsettling visuals and recurring anatomical errors— so the idea of actually watching a full scene, let alone an entire episode, of AI-generated animation feels especially unappealing. What Showrunner is offering seems like the streaming equivalent of self-publishing in the book world: empowering for the authors, but rarely read by anyone else. The company's website proudly promises 'No agents' and 'no studio gatekeepers,' but here's a potentially controversial opinion: Sometimes gatekeepers are good. They serve to filter out untalented artists and elevate gifted ones. The burning desire to tell a story does not necessarily translate to the skill of telling one, and if you don't believe me, go spend a day at a third-tier film festival sometime. Beyond the specifics of this software, however, lurks a larger disconnect between the people who create entertainment and the people who create technology intended to supplant entertainment. Saatchi insists, 'Our relationship to entertainment will be totally different in the next five years,' and claims that 'Hollywood streaming services are about to become two-way entertainment: audiences watching a season of a show [and] loving it will now be able to make new episodes with a few words and become characters with a photo.' As someone who engages with film and television all the time, the concept is genuinely puzzling and not particularly appealing. The idea of 'two-way entertainment'— where loving a show or movie leads to inserting oneself into it or reshaping its narrative through personalized storylines — runs counter to why we engage with art. Part of the joy in watching something is experiencing a creator's vision. The expectation that audiences should actively participate in shaping entertainment feels more like a shift toward self-involvement than storytelling. It's hard to imagine watching a favorite show and thinking, 'The only thing that would make this better is if I were in charge of it.' The creators and consumers of fanfiction may disagree, but these matters are best left to the professionals. Perhaps that, ultimately, is what this all boils down to. The generative AI that we're constantly being bombarded with, in the fields of prose writing, visual art and now streaming television, comes at the expense of human artists, sidelining the very creativity and craft that give meaning to the work itself. People in all walks of life — especially in business and tech — love to describe themselves as 'storytellers' (even when they're only 'telling stories' in the most generous sense of the phrase), while simultaneously taking every opportunity to kneecap actual storytellers. Each so-called advancement rests on the premise that anyone can create high-quality art. But the reality is, not everyone can. Sure, I can daydream my own episodes of The Sopranos or Breaking Bad, to use two of my favorite series as examples. But that's exactly where those fantasies belong: in my head. What makes those shows exceptional is the mastery of David Chase and Vince Gilligan, who understand how to build complex characters, construct meaningful conflict, and deliver rising action and satisfying conclusions. Of course, it would be far more convenient — and far more profitable — for streaming platforms if anyone could replicate that expertise. And that may be the most troubling part of this deal: not just that software exists that devalues artists, erases creative labor and potentially infringes on copyrights, but that Amazon is so eager to invest in From Bloomberg Opinion: This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners. Jason Bailey is a film critic and historian whose work has appeared in the New York Times, Vulture, the Playlist, Slate and Rolling Stone. He is the author, most recently, of 'Gandolfini: Jim, Tony, and the Life of a Legend.' More stories like this are available on
