After 26 years, city politicians take over running London Transit
Social Sharing
London city councillors are saying goodbye to a longstanding commission that has overseen London's public transit system for decades, citing leadership concerns.
In a vote at city hall Tuesday, the Strategic Priorities and Policy committee (SPPC), which includes all members of council, voted 9-6 in favour of eliminating the London Transit Commission (LTC).
Instead, they agreed to temporarily put five of their own in charge of the board that oversees the city's bus system until a long-term plan is finalized.
The decision comes after three board members suddenly quit yesterday, taking the chair of the board by surprise.
Is London's transit so bad it's worth dissolving the governing body? Chair pushes back and says no
1 day ago
Duration 1:09
Some London Transit Commissioners resigned and called for new leadership this week. They say the service isn't meeting the needs of Londoners. The chair of the commission disagrees. Stephanie Marentette points to the work being done with paratransit that she says shows service improvements.
Councillors Corrine Rahman, Shawn Lewis, David Ferreira and Elizabeth Peloza wrote an open letter Monday asking for the transit commission to be replaced by three city politicians who would oversee the transit authority while a governance review is underway.
"Concerns have been raised by council and the public: around accessibility issues, ridership experiences, route extensions into new developments, growth hours, rapid transit implementation and council directions," the four wrote in the letter.
After a lengthy debate, the councillor's proposal was accepted. The committee appointed five, not three councillors as initially suggested, to replace the commission.
Councillors will be able to volunteer for the position at next week's full council meeting.
The London Transportation Commission, as it was first known, was formed in 1951 when the City of London bought the public transit service. The current CEO, Kelly Paleczny, has led the LTC since 2014. She declined to comment Tuesday.
The LTC has seen decreasing ridership numbers, and complaints from people with disabilities who can't rely on the accessible service. It's also in need of major repairs and new buses to keep up the fleet.
LTC Chair Stephanie Marentette spoke to council on Tuesday, urging them not to get rid of the commission as she believes the organization's relationship with the city can be repaired.
Marentette proposed councillors fill the three vacant seats and let the remaining four commissioners stay on the board instead of dissolving the entire LTC because having three new members with no LTC experience manage the organization alone is setting it up for failure, she told councillors.
Some councillors tried to delay the vote to a future meeting next month because they said they didn't have all the information at hand and wanted more time before making a decision. But others, including Mayor Josh Morgan, urged the situation needs to be dealt with immediately.
Marenttette told CBC News after the meeting that the close vote makes her believe councillors could change their minds by next week when they have to make the final decision and she will continue having conversations with them.
"I don't feel confident that every single member of council who voted tonight is confident in their decision and I think there's still an opportunity here and I'm going to keep pushing," she said.
Accessibility advocate Jacqueline Madden was among the three board members who resigned, saying the LTC board wasn't able to work well with city council. After the meeting, she expressed relieved at SPPC's decision.
"I found that I wasn't able to contribute on a level playing field with everybody else and something needed to happen to make a change," she said, adding that communication with the city was lacking on projects like school bus passes and assessment growth.
The commission's remaining four members are:
Chair Stephanie Marenttette
Vice-chair Scott Collyer
Commissioner Sheryl Rooth
Commissioner and Coun. Jerry Pribil
Other members of the board who resigned alongside Madden are Coun. David Ferreira and commissioner David Little.
The LTC's fate lies in the hands of the full council vote on April 1.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Ottawa Citizen
16-05-2025
- Ottawa Citizen
Ottawa councillors give city staff nine months to craft 'bubble bylaw'
City of Ottawa staff will have nine months to craft a draft 'bubble bylaw' aimed at protecting vulnerable 'social infrastructure' while respecting the right to protest, Article content On Thursday and Friday, councillors faced a roster of 42 speakers who had signed up to speak to a motion from Barrhaven West Coun. David Hill to develop a bylaw that would prohibit 'specified nuisance demonstrations' within a defined distance of vulnerable social infrastructure such as schools, hospitals, long-term care facilities and places of worship. Article content Article content The proposed bylaw comes in the wake of anti-trans protests and counter-protests on Broadview Avenue, where there are two high schools and an elementary school, and an anti-Israel protest outside the Jewish Community Centre, which is near the Hillel Lodge long-term care facility, Article content Article content Among the most contentious issues was the definition of what would define a 'nuisance demonstration,' and there were concerns that a bylaw would give police and bylaw officials blanket authority to suppress dissent. There were also concerns over a proposal for a 100-metre bubble, which would result in many neighbourhoods, especially those downtown, being covered by dozens of overlapping bubbles with no room to protest. Article content Katy de Souza, a Broadview Public School parent, said she had attended counter-protests on Broadview Avenue. 'I can say from the display of solidarity I witnessed and got to be part of, the community is more than capable of handling something like this without having to resort to this kind of blanket ban on protests,' she told councillors. Article content Article content Hillel Lodge CEO Ted Cohen said disruptions, especially those with load noises and visual chaos, could trigger confusion, agitation and even medical episodes among vulnerable LTC residents. Article content 'Protesters arrived with signage, flags, banners, bullhorns, loudspeakers and drums,' Cohen said of the anti-Israel protest last September. 'The protest was loud, forceful and unrelenting.' Article content Hill said the goal of the motion was to be narrow and 'surgical,' minimizing the impact on protesters while maximizing protection for vulnerable people. Article content For example, Knox Presbyterian Church is very near Ottawa's city hall, but that would not preclude a protest at city hall, he said. Article content 'If you choose to protest city hall, the fact that Knox Presbyterian is next door and that there's a daycare in this building will not deny anybody the ability to assemble and speak out at city hall. Common sense prevails,' Hill said. Article content 'We're asking staff to consider time-limited protective zones so that, if a school is closed for a weekend or a place of worship is outside its hours of operation, we're not placing protections on empty buildings,' he said.
CBC
04-05-2025
- CBC
Q&A: Why we're still counting federal election ballots by hand
When Londoners voted in the federal election on Monday, they likely noticed there wasn't an electronic tabulator when they cast their ballot. While electronic voting is used in the Ontario election and by other countries around the world, Elections Canada continues to use the simple ballot box. For insight into why votes are still counted by hand, London Morning host Andrew Brown spoke with Aleksander Essex, an associate professor of software engineering at Western University. The following interview has been edited for length and clarity. Andrew Brown: So what do we know about why Elections Canada is still doing the paper ballot in the box? Aleksander Essex: Well, that's a great question for the chief electoral officer, and they have, I'm sure, their reasons. But I think one comment made in a recent CBC interview gives us some insight. They described their method of vote counting as "open to scrutiny." That means independent observers and candidate representatives can actually stand there and watch with their own eyes as the ballots are being counted. AB: A lot of us who voted in the Ontario election will remember our ballots going through a machine, and then we got the results quickly on election night. I think they called the PC government in six minutes. Why is Ontario able to pull this off? AE: Well, in fairness, Elections Canada was also able to count up the election fast enough for CBC to call it on election night. Elections Ontario moved toward tabulators for a variety of reasons, including cost and general ease of administration. One advantage is that you don't need as many people in the polling place — at least in theory. So you can do a faster vote count. That said, Elections Canada's vote counts are still pretty fast because it's usually just one contest. If it were a large, American-style ballot, there'd be a stronger use case for tabulators in terms of practicality. But for a single-race ballot, we can manage just fine without them. AB: Is there any downside to using tabulators? AE: It's not about tabulators versus hand-counting — it's about being open to scrutiny. You can make tabulators open to scrutiny, but we don't. And that's something that really needs to be addressed. AB: Could you elaborate on that a little bit? What do you mean by "open to scrutiny?" AE: I've worked at the polls, and when I'm a deputy returning officer, I have to count the ballots in full view of candidate representatives. You've got people standing there watching, and if they have a problem with how you interpret a ballot, they can challenge it in the moment. Those ballots are put aside in a separate bag for adjudication. With tabulators, you punch in a shutdown code at the end of the night, and the machine prints out a grocery store-style receipt with the vote totals. Scrutineers can be there, but they can't observe the count itself — just the receipt. So they're left to simply accept the results. AB: Because they can't look at the individual ballots at that point? AE: Right. The only way to look at the paper ballots is through a judicial recount. And to get that, the candidate has to provide evidence to support the challenge. Challenging an election is traumatic for everyone involved, so there's a high burden of proof. But in fairness, the burden of proof should be on the election official to demonstrate the count is correct — not on the candidate to prove it's wrong. AB: OK, so it sounds like you prefer the way the federal election works? AE: I prefer any method that provides openness to scrutiny. In the U.S., they deal with this in tabulator-based systems through something called a risk-limiting audit. It's a statistical sampling of paper ballots, so you don't have to recount everything. Many U.S. states have laws requiring these audits. If we're going to use tabulators, we need similar laws here. But we're not there yet. AB: So how does that sampling work in the States? AE: Well, they literally use Dungeons & Dragons-style dice to generate a random seed. That tells them which ballots to check. They then look at that random sub-sample and use statistics to determine whether the results support the tabulator count. Worst case, they do a full recount. Best case, just a small sample is enough to verify the result. AB: OK. That makes sense. So which direction do you think Elections Canada should go in? AE: Elections are hard to design in a way that meets every possible need. There are always trade-offs. One area where Elections Canada could be criticized is accessibility. For example, voters with visual impairments in Canada often have to vote with an assistant. In the U.S., the law requires that voters with disabilities be able to vote unassisted, which means they use more electronics at the polling places. That's something Elections Canada might have to improve. AB: Right. Do you see any changes coming to Elections Canada voting in the future? AE: Openly and overtly, I don't see any changes on the horizon from Elections Canada. But I do know there's a lot of pressure and interest in electronic voting, and it is achievable. If we're going to go there, we have to do it right. That means designing a system that allows for scrutiny of vote counting. The UN, for goodness' sake, requires transparency in that process. If we can provide that electronically, I don't have an issue. But it's going to take more thought — and more funding — to deliver.
CBC
28-04-2025
- CBC
London voters cast ballots saying they're motivated by different factors
Election day has finally arrived after a busy month-long campaign, and London voters wasted no time getting to the polls on Monday to cast their ballots. Polling stations across the city opened at 9:30 a.m. and will stay open until 9:30 p.m. Those still waiting in line when polls close will still be able to vote, Elections Canada says. Some Londoners voting at Carling Heights Optimist Community Centre said they were doing so to exercise their democratic right — and had no issues or delays casting a ballot. Cat Olcsvary said not voting would mean giving up the "right to complain about things," but said she felt the month-long campaign was "kind of a crapshow." "There was a lot going on, and everybody's kind of arguing with each other. We do need better for Canada ... I'm tired of the back and forth," said Olcsvary, who voted Liberal. "I just hope to see some change in a positive direction," said voter Kelsey Blais, who cast her ballot for the NDP. "I hope to see less conflict all over, and I hope to see a prime minister that is focused on our country's benefit." For Brad Fishleigh, who voted Conservative, a shortened campaign "might give an upper hand to one party over the other," he said. "I'm 35, and I'm self-employed, and I think it's important to try to represent your demographic and try to make a change." One voter, Nathan Stock, said he is casting a strategic ballot, in this case voting Liberal. "Dirka [Prout] is my riding, and normally I vote for her, but the strategic vote was more important this time," he said, referring to the NDP's candidate in London Centre. Some voters said this election was much too important to skip out on. "I think this is probably one of the most important elections we've had in a long time with what's going on down south and just on the world stage and the future of Canada," said Hali Blake, who voted with her husband, Jordan. Both cast a ballot for the Liberals, though Jordan noted he's normally an NDP supporter. "Canada will win either way. We're a great country. We don't subscribe to the things down south. I think we'll be winning either way. There's lots of great, great, great political leaders out there right now," he said. Record-breaking numbers during advance polls A number of Londoners CBC News spoke with Monday said they had already voted in advance polls, and were taking part in other activities offered at the polling station location. Elections Canada estimates 122,234 electors cast ballots between April 18 and 21 in the ridings of Middlesex—London, Elgin—St. Thomas—London South, London West, London Centre and London-Fanshawe. They are among the record-breaking 7.3 million Canadians who voted during advance polls. In London's three urban ridings alone, Elections Canada estimates 68,554 votes were cast in advanced polls last weekend. More than 26,000 people have also voted using special ballot voting kits, which are issued to electors, both in Canada and abroad, when an elector votes by mail, or when they vote in person at a local Elections Canada office.
