Thabo Mbeki calls for a reassessment of South Africa's national interests in a multipolar world
Image: Picture: Armand Hough/Independent
Former South African President Thabo Mbeki has called on the nation to critically assess and articulate its national interests in an increasingly multipolar world and the evolving foreign policy of the United States.
In an interview with Dr Mbuyiseni Ndlozi on Power FM on Monday, Mbeki reflected on recent diplomatic tensions, including the controversial meeting between President Cyril Ramaphosa and former US President Donald Trump—an encounter many observers described as a diplomatic misstep.
Mbeki pointed to a February statement by US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, which shed light on Washington's post-Cold War worldview.
Rubio stated that 'after the Soviet Union's collapse, the global political landscape changed,' a shift Mbeki sees as emblematic of US foreign policy.
'The norm now should be a multipolar world where countries pursue their interests,' Mbeki emphasised.
"When Trump spoke of 'Making America Great Again,' he wasn't advocating isolation. He asserted America's right to define and pursue its interests—controlling resources, influencing regions, shaping global institutions—regardless of others' opinions.'
Power Politics in a Multipolar World
Mbeki highlighted that this focus on self-interest isn't exclusive to Trump's administration.
'Every US government, regardless of party, operates on the principle of pursuing its national interests,' he said.
'They may see strategic value in places like Greenland or Panama and act accordingly.'
This, he explained, is a defining feature of contemporary international relations.
'The guiding principle now is what benefits the US, not respect or equality. That's how they see the world.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Implications for South Africa and Africa
Mbeki warned that Africa must understand this global shift to safeguard its interests.
'If we ignore the reality that global powers are driven primarily by self-interest, we risk being manipulated or sidelined,' he cautioned.
'We need to articulate and defend our interests instead of passively accepting external dictates.'
He touched on recent diplomatic tensions, notably South Africa's support for Palestine.
'Our stance is rooted in principles of justice and solidarity,' he said. 'But we must also recognise that US interests in the Middle East often conflict with ours.'
Dependency and the Role of US Diplomacy
Ndlozi criticised Africa's reliance on global powers, pointing to last week's White House incident where Trump accused South Africa of genocide—without evidence.
'That scene—staged videos, prepared images—showed how the US believes it has the right to lecture us,' Ndlozi remarked. 'This is a clear example of structural dependency and diminishing our dignity.'
He argued that what is often framed as 'respect' is actually a form of dominance.
'It's not about mutual respect; it's about control,' he said. 'Our relationship with global powers has become asymmetrical—rooted in dependence, not equality.'
The Changing Dynamics of US-South Africa Relations
Ndlozi observed that US-South Africa relations have worsened under the current administration.
'In the past, even during disagreements—whether with Bush or Obama—there was a certain decorum,' he said.
'Now, the US acts as if it's entitled to dictate to us, regardless of our sovereignty.'
He reflected on the diplomatic approach of previous US presidents.
'Visits by Bush or Obama, even amid disagreements, maintained mutual respect. Today's aggressive posture is deeply concerning,' Ndlozi noted.
Moving Forward: A Call for Vigilance
Mbeki concluded by emphasising that the world is shifting away from unipolar dominance. He urged African nations to be proactive by defining their interests and standing firm.
'Developing the capacity to defend our sovereignty is essential to avoid being passive recipients of Western or US policies.
thabo.makwakwa@inl.co.za
IOL Politics
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mail & Guardian
13 minutes ago
- Mail & Guardian
Pace of gender equality at tertiary education institutions painfully slow
A 2024 study at a South African university found female staff are concerned about their future in the workplace because of their gender. Photo: File This year, 2025, marks the 30th anniversary of International Women's Day, the Beijing Declaration and Platform for Action, an agenda for women's empowerment. On 8 March, International Women's Day was observed under the theme 'For All Women and Girls: Rights. Equality. Empowerment'. Sorry to burst the celebration bubble but, with the deadline to achieve the UN sustainable development goals just under five years away, true emancipation of women seems a distant goal. An Concerning women leaders at institutions of higher learning, the Without taking anything away from both women's achievements, it is perplexing that it took the institutions 167 and 148 years to have a woman at the helm. Several scholars have published articles about problems facing academic and support personnel in both traditional universities and universities of technology. The battle to attain gender equality at institutions of higher learning, even beyond 30 years of democracy in South Africa, is there for everyone to see. Delving into some of the scientific evidence, in their 2024 study Reforming Higher Education in South Africa by Addressing Gender Inequalities, researchers Anri Wheeler and Laurika Wiese identified the absence of ' Their research article, published in the Journal of Adult and Continuing Education , shows that the policy vacuum perpetuates the marginalisation of female students and personnel. The study was conducted with female employees from varied staff components at a university of technology and they applied the Gender and Development Theory, which asserts that 'genuine economic and social progress is hindered as long as gender inequalities endure'. Some of the study's key findings highlight the preference of some males for working only with colleagues of the same gender. Meanwhile, female staff remained concerned about their future in the workplace because of their gender. The results also highlight that the selection of female staff into higher positions often serves only to comply with filling of quotas — a tick-box exercise. Even more disturbing, some participants confirmed the existence of a 'band of brothers' mentality in institutions — a group of male colleagues indifferent to working with females and, in many instances, treating them with disrespect based on gender. Furthermore, one of the themes emanating from the study is female stereotyping, where female colleagues are undermined by labels such as 'emotional' because of their gender. The study indicates that universities can help to reduce inequities and create a more inclusive and diverse learning and working environment by addressing gender discrepancies in academic and professional contexts. Wheeler and Wiese affirm that by espousing sustainable development goal 5, higher learning institutions can simultaneously contribute to attainment of other goals such as poverty eradication; quality education; decent work and economic growth reduced inequalities. A 2022 study, Workplace Bullying and Its Implications for Gender Transformation in the South African Higher Education Sector: An Intersectional Perspective by Brightness Mangolothi and Professor Peliwe Mnguni is relevant in helping us find ways to fasttrack gender transformation. They employed qualitative semi-structured interviews wherein they targeted a sample of 25 women academics from three universities. Their research article, published in the International Journal of Critical Diversity Studies , makes a link between Mangolothi and Mnguni listed bullying behaviours directed at women such as excessive workload allocation, removal of key areas of responsibility and being given trivial tasks to replace their core duties. The researchers summarise women's academic journey through a model anchored in the elements of access, retention, development, performance, progression and exit through resignation. The authors' research findings are aligned to identified themes and point to bullying mostly affecting African, coloured and Indian women academics. Key findings include access being denied and resources withheld; not being seen or heard; shifting goalposts; recognition withheld and authorisation denied for women at institutions of higher learning. Mangolothi and Mnguni's study shows that there is a 'boys club' culture, where men support each other in bullying women, undermining and excluding them from decision-making structures. South Africa continues to grapple with the triple developmental challenges of poverty, inequality and unemployment, with women seemingly the most negatively affected. Amid the research concluding there is gender inequality, the question is whether there is a will to address the patriarchy's negative impact across society and the workplace — or will women emancipation remain an elusive dream? Shalate Davhana & Malesela Maubane are Tshwane University of Technology alumni, with the former a staff member at the university. They write in their personal capacities.
Eyewitness News
2 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
SACP defends SANDF chief Maphwanya over his Iran comments
JOHANNESBURG - The South African Communist Party(SACP) has hit back at critics of defence force chief, Rudzani Maphwanya, for his remarks during a recent visit in Iran. Maphwanya was at the centre of a diplomatic storm last week, when Iranian media reported that he appeared to publicly co-sign South Africa to stronger political and military ties with Tehran. It's understood that he said that Iran's military had significant capabilities that could be used in cooperation with the South African armed forces to serve mutual national interests and enhance regional and international security. READ: Presidency says action will be taken against SANDF's Maphwanya over his Iran comments Despite mounting pressure to account for his comments, the SACP has come to out in defence of Maphwanya. A few months ahead of his retirement, South African National Defence Force chief, Maphwanya, is now facing calls to step down over his comments. The SACP has since come out batting for him in what the party labelled as anti-Iran hysteria and geopolitical hypocrisy. In a statement released at the weekend, the SACP said that South Africa's ties with Iran were not out of the ordinary. The Department of International Relations and Cooperation (DIRCO) distanced itself from Maphwanya's comments, saying they did not reflect South Africa's foreign policy. President Cyril Ramaphosa called Maphwanya's comments ill-advised. The SACP said thats government's muddled response was concerning, accusing government of scapegoating the SANDF chief. It said that giving into the whims of Iran's foes to appease other countries sets a bad precedent.
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Pull the plug and start dialogue over
It's time to pull the plug on this whole thing… and start again. While the National Dialogue saga seems destined to generate little more than more hot air – as if we don't have enough already from our verbose politicians – it does provide some fascinating material for pondering our parlous political situation. First, the foundations associated with the elders of recent South African history – those who negotiated the way towards ending apartheid – have pulled out of the process. What the National Dialogue should've been One of the prominent critics of the dialogue process is former president Thabo Mbeki. He was the man who set in motion this idea of a national dialogue, and, in his own words, it should have been civil society in the driving seat, not President Cyril Ramaphosa and the ANC. That would seem, at first glance, to be noble and wise, as befitting Mbeki's status as an elder statesman. However, what if Mbeki realised that his own legacy – despite the collapse which followed after he left office – was going to be less than shining? Even ignoring the Aids debacle, where an estimated 250 000 people died while he dithered about antiretroviral medications, Mbeki is regarded by many critics as having moved the country onto a neocolonial, capitalist-friendly course, failing to deal with critical issues like land restitution. Perhaps he needs the dialogue to rebuild his legacy into one of 'the man who saved South Africa'. Yet, whatever his motive may be, Mbeki is correct – and so are the others who withdrew – that this dialogue should not be steered by Ramaphosa and the ANC. People, not political parties, should air their views on the future. That is why it is concerning that organisations like the DA and Freedom Front Plus, which represent many in the white community, have also chosen to stay away. It's time to pull the plug on this whole thing… and start again. READ NEXT: Mazibuko reaffirms that the National Dialogue will be in the hands of South Africans
