Fort Worth Mayor Mattie Parker re-elected to third term
Mattie Parker has been re-elected as mayor of Fort Worth
It will be Parker's third term as mayor.
She is the 45th mayor in Fort Worth's history.
FORT WORTH, Texas - Mattie Parker has been elected to a third term as the mayor of Fort Worth.
In unofficial results, Parker received 67 percent of the vote.
Parker defeated seven other candidates.
Parker was first elected to be the mayor of Fort Worth in 2021, becoming the first millennial and youngest mayor of a major American city.
Prior to running for office, Parker, a licensed attorney, served as chief of staff for Mayor Betsy Price and Fort Worth City Council.
In her time as mayor, Parker has pushed for improvement for Fort Worth ISD schools, an increase in police and fire and created an initiative to invest in parks and greenspaces in the city.
She has also advocated for an increase in film incentives for Fort Worth.
Parker is the 45th mayor in Fort Worth's history.
The Source
Information in this article comes from Tarrant County election results and past FOX 4 coverage.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
15 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
Trump wants to paint border wall black so it's hot to touch
Advertisement Noem didn't say how much the project will cost or how long it will take. She applied paint herself to a small section of a fence during the media appearance in Santa Teresa, New Mexico. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up Noem's visit came as arrests at the southwest border have plunged to levels not seen in decades as the administration enacts stricter enforcement measures. It has also shut down the CBP One mobile app that had previously been a key way for migrants to schedule appointments to cross the border and seek asylum. Walter Slosar, the interim chief patrol agent in the El Paso Sector, covering far West Texas and all of New Mexico, said the current seven-day arrest average is about 41 a day, with an additional nine migrants crossing daily without being stopped. A year ago the average was closer to 400 a day and it was roughly 2,300 in 2023. Advertisement Still, the administration has pressed ahead with wall construction, filling in gaps in Santa Teresa, where about seven miles of new barriers are being installed. Trump's plan to build out a southern border wall has long been a lightning rod, dating back to Trump's first term when his administration added razor wire to some sections and painted other areas black, but ultimately built far fewer miles of new barriers than initially promised. Despite that, Trump has kept the wall central to his immigration message, portraying it as a tool of enforcement. Congress has approved a budget bill that set aside almost $47 billion for continued border wall construction and maintenance, giving the administration a new stream of money to carry forward Trump's plans. The clampdown is visible across the desert region. In Sunland Park, New Mexico, residents can see a Stryker armored combat vehicle perched on a mesa overlooking Mexico, an American flag fluttering from its rear. Border Patrol agents and military personnel patrol the area, part of an arrangement that has thousands of active-duty troops deployed under US Northern Command. The troops have been authorized to briefly detain and search migrants in newly designated 'National Defense Areas' near the boundary, which the Pentagon says are effectively extensions of US military installations. For Lydia Pinon, who lives in a modest home in the area, the Stryker's presence has become the norm. 'At night there's a lot of lights and noise,' Pinon said. 'I think it's just there to scare the people,' she said of the armored combat vehicle.
New York Times
43 minutes ago
- New York Times
Trump Administration Live Updates: President Demands Resignation of a Fed Governor
Arizona State University has one of the highest proportions of international students, but their numbers are set to drop this fall. Many Iranians are not going to American universities this fall. Students from Afghanistan are having trouble getting to campus. Even students from China and India, the top two senders of international students to the United States, have been flummoxed by a maze of new obstacles the Trump administration has set up to slow or deter people entering the country from abroad. Between the federal government's heightened vetting of student visas and President Trump's travel ban, the number of international students newly enrolled in American universities seems certain to drop — by a lot. There were about a million international students studying in the United States a year ago, according to figures published by the State Department. Data on international student enrollment is not expected to be released until the fall. But higher education is already feeling the pain and deeply worried about the fallout. Many schools have seen the number of international students grow in recent years. But a survey of over 500 colleges and universities by the Institute of International Education, a nonprofit which works with governments and others to promote international education, found that 35 percent of the schools experienced a dip in applications from abroad last spring, the most since the pandemic. In China and India, there have been few visa appointments available for students in recent months, and sometimes none at all, according to the Association of International Educators, also known as NAFSA, a professional organization. If visa problems persist, new international student enrollment in American colleges could drop by 30 to 40 percent overall this fall, a loss of 150,000 students, according to the group's analysis. Some students have given up on enrolling in U.S. schools entirely out of anxiety over the political environment in the United States. Others are staying away because they worry that even if they were to gain entry, they would effectively be trapped, unable to do things that other students can, like apply for internships or travel home over the holidays to see their families. International students make up a significant portion of enrollment at elite universities like Columbia, but also at public institutions like Purdue. At Arizona State University, one of the ten universities that enroll the most international students, the number beginning their studies this fall — 14,600 in all — is down by about 500 from last fall, a spokesman said, mostly because of visa delays. Many international students pay full tuition and are a revenue source that schools have come to rely on, including to help underwrite financial aid for other students. It's part of the business model. Wendy Wolford, vice provost for international affairs at Cornell University, said the biggest loss from the drop in international enrollment is talent. 'They're literally some of the best in the world,' she said. Ms. Wolford said she was also worried about the lost opportunity for domestic students to be exposed to students from different cultures, and for international students to spread good will toward the United States when they return home. The Trump administration began focusing on international students last spring, taking a number of steps to target students who were already in the country and to increase vetting of those who wanted to enroll. While President Trump said that he welcomed international students, he argued that some of them pose security risks and may be involved in academic espionage. He also said foreign students were taking up coveted slots at universities that could instead go to American citizens. 'We have people who want to go to Harvard and other schools, they can't get in because we have foreign students there,' Mr. Trump said. 'But I want to make sure that the foreign students are people that can love our country.' Image Cornell University is allowing international students to enroll at its campuses abroad, but few have taken up the opportunity. Credit... Heather Ainsworth for The New York Times In one of its first moves, the Trump administration threatened to deport more than 1,800 international students studying in the United States. In many cases, the reasons were opaque. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has said that international students who were a part of campus protests over the war in Gaza, in particular, were not welcome. 'We gave you a visa to come and study and get a degree,' he said last spring, 'not to become a social activist that tears up our university campuses.' Several groups have gone to court to challenge what they called an ideological deportation policy. Veena Dubal, general counsel for the American Association of University Professors, says the administration is violating the constitutional rights of noncitizens and citizens alike in choosing to deport people based on views that are protected by the First Amendment. Jameel Jaffer, executive director of the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University, has argued that the crackdown is undemocratic. 'This practice is one we'd ordinarily associate with the most repressive political regimes,' he has said. After an outcry, many of the students targeted for deportation were reinstated. But overall this year, State Department officials said they have revoked more than 6,000 student visas, on grounds of supporting terrorism, overstaying visas and breaking the law, a number first reported by Fox News. And the State Department suspended new student visa appointments between May 27 and June 18, a time of year that is ordinarily the peak season. When the government began issuing student visas again in late June, it was with a proviso that consulates would scrutinize applicants' social media more rigorously. That has made the process much slower, and students who have yet to clear the interview process may be in danger of missing the start of fall classes or may even have to postpone enrollment by a semester or more. 'There does appear to be a heightened review of student visa applications,' said Ms. Dubal, adding: 'Their social media are being reviewed for expression of pro-Palestinian sentiment or critiques of Trump's foreign policy positions.' Mr. Trump signed a proclamation in late May barring foreign students from entering the United States to attend Harvard, citing security concerns, but a judge has blocked the order from taking effect. In June, Mr. Trump signed another proclamation to fully or partially restrict the entry of people from 19 countries, including Afghanistan, Haiti, Iran, Yemen, Cuba, Laos and Venezuela, and to increase scrutiny of people from other countries, to make sure that the people 'do not intend to harm Americans or our national interests.' Though the proclamation did not target students in particular, many students have been caught up in the travel restrictions. 'Because of the travel ban, it's just not possible to get student visas from certain countries,' said Dan Berger, an immigration lawyer in Northampton, Mass. 'A lot of Afghan women had been offered full scholarships in the U.S. and can't get visas.' Asked about delays, a State Department spokesperson said that the department had made its vetting of visa applicants more effective and more efficient. 'But in every case, we will take the time necessary to ensure an applicant is eligible for the visa sought and does not pose a risk to the safety and security of the United States,' the spokesperson said. Noushin, an Iranian student who was admitted to the University of South Carolina to study for a doctorate in chemical engineering, was caught up in the travel ban. She had a visa interview in September 2024 and was to start her studies in the spring of 2025, but she has yet to hear whether her visa will be approved. She is now helping to organize a lobbying campaign to end the visa delays, and says that a chat group on Telegram suggests that there are hundreds of other Iranian students in similar situations. Noushin, who asked for her last name not to be disclosed for fear that it would affect her visa prospects, said she chose the United States as the place to study because she believed that it offered the best higher education in the world. Now she believes she is being punished because of assumptions about her political beliefs, though as a scholar, she argues, she is separate from politics. Michael Crow, the president of the University of Arizona, said he met with an American diplomatic official in India a few months ago to discuss the visa problem, and was told the State Department was doing the best it could. The uncertainty about getting a U.S. visa is prompting some students to look elsewhere. Dr. Wolford, of Cornell, said universities were already seeing European students diverting to European universities and Asian students to Asian universities. 'Our international students had always been very secure in the knowledge that they understood the rules of the game, and last year the rules of the game changed dramatically,' he said. Many American universities now have campuses abroad and have tried to accommodate international students at those campuses until they can get U.S. visas. Cornell, for instance, gave students the option to start the fall 2025 semester at its campuses in Edinburgh, Hong Kong or Seoul. 'We didn't have many students take us up,' Dr. Wolford said. 'Students were hoping they would either get their applications through and come to us, or they decided to go someplace else.' Iranian students, including some admitted to Cornell, have banded together to try to attract attention to their plight. The group is highly educated, said Pouria, a civil engineering student, who asked that his surname not be used to protect his visa chances. He was admitted to a doctoral program at the University of Texas at Austin. He said his research project — to investigate how polymeric geocells can be used to reinforce roadway foundations — is financed by the Texas Department of Transportation. His request for a visa has been stuck in 'administrative processing' for 14 months, he said. In the meantime he has been collaborating with colleagues remotely to keep the project from slowing down. Students like him, he argued, are not a threat to U.S. society.
Fox News
43 minutes ago
- Fox News
Trump administration to vet legal immigrant applicants for 'anti-Americanism' and antisemitism
Federal officials are now being instructed to vet immigrants looking to legally live and work in the U.S. for "anti-American," terrorist, or antisemitic views under new guidance. The updated policy, part of President Donald Trump's broader immigration clampdown, gives U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) officers broad discretion to treat such views as "overwhelmingly negative factors" when deciding whether to approve green cards, visas or citizenship. The guidance took effect immediately and applies to both new and pending applications. "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies," Tragesser said. He added that USCIS is committed to implementing policies that root out anti-Americanism and strengthen vetting. "Immigration benefits — including to live and work in the United States — remain a privilege, not a right." While the release offered no clear definition of "anti-Americanism," USCIS referenced the Immigration and Nationality Act, which prohibits people linked to terrorism, antisemitism or "world communism" from gaining citizenship. It noted that officers, when conducting a discretionary analysis, will weigh whether an applicant's requests were made in line with existing laws and policies. The change comes alongside a wave of new immigration measures in Trump's second term, including expanded social media vetting and a tougher "good moral character" standard for naturalization. USCIS said reviews of anti-American activity will now be folded into social media screenings. "The message is that the U.S. and immigration agencies are going to be less tolerant of anti-Americanism or antisemitism when making immigration decisions," Elizabeth Jacobs, director of regulatory affairs and policy at the Center for Immigration Studies, a group that advocates for immigration restrictions, said on Tuesday. Jacobs said the government is being more explicit in the kind of behaviors and practices officers should consider, but emphasized that discretion is still in place. "The agency cannot tell officers that they have to deny — just to consider it as a negative discretion," she said. But Ruby Robinson of the Michigan Immigrant Rights Center argued constitutional rights apply to all people in the U.S. regardless of status — and predicted legal challenges. "A lot of this administration's activities infringe on constitutional rights and do need to be resolved, ultimately, in courts," Robinson added. Critics like David J. Bier, the director of immigration policy at the libertarian Cato Institute, warned the policy could be wielded to silence dissent and punish political opponents. "This is a new powerful weapon in President Trump's arsenal against politically disfavored groups," Bier told the Washington Post. Jonathan Grode, managing partner of Green and Spiegel immigration law firm, said the policy fits Trump's longstanding approach and that the administration is within its authority. "This is what was elected. They're allowed to interpret the rules the way they want," Grode told the Washington Post. "The policy always to them is to shrink the strike zone. The law is still the same."
