Hubble offers sharp new view of interstellar comet
The Hubble Telescope and its Wide Field Camera 3 got an incredible view of the comet named 3I/ATLAS, which came from beyond our solar system, on July 21 when the object was 277 million miles (445 million kilometers) from Earth.
In the image, a teardrop-shaped dust cocoon can be seen streaking from the comet's icy nucleus. A comet's nucleus is its solid core, made of ice, dust and rocks. When comets travel near stars such as the sun, heat causes them to release gas and dust, which creates their signature tails.
The venerable telescope is just one of many that are being used to track the comet, first discovered on July 1, as it zooms at a blistering 130,000 miles (209,000 kilometers) per hour. Its speed makes 3I/ATLAS the fastest object that originated outside of our solar system to ever be observed traveling through it.
New observations, like those made with Hubble, are shedding more light on the comet's size. The small nucleus, which cannot be directly seen, could be as large as 3.5 miles (5.6 kilometers) in diameter or as small as 1,000 feet (305 meters) across, according to a new paper accepted by The Astrophysical Journal Letters.
Meanwhile, other space-based telescopes like the James Webb Space Telescope, the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite and the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, along with ground-based observations from the W.M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii, could reveal more about the object's chemical composition. The comet is expected to remain visible to ground-based telescopes through September before passing too close to the sun to be spotted until it reappears on the other side of our star in early December.
But big questions about 3I/ATLAS remain, some of which may be impossible to answer — including where exactly it came from.
'No one knows where the comet came from. It's like glimpsing a rifle bullet for a thousandth of a second. You can't project that back with any accuracy to figure out where it started on its path,' said lead study author David Jewitt, professor of astronomy at the University of California, Los Angeles, in a statement.
While the comet appears to behave like those that originated in our solar system — as evidenced by that dust plume Hubble captured — the speed of 3I/ATLAS is one indicator that it's a visitor from another solar system in our galaxy.
Scientists estimate it has been traveling through interstellar space for billions of years. As objects travel through space, they experience a gravitational slingshot effect from whizzing by stars and stellar nurseries that increases their momentum. So the longer 3I/ATLAS has spent in space, the faster it moves.
The comet is only the third known interstellar object to have been observed in our solar system after 'Oumuamua in 2017 and 2I/Borisov in 2019.
'3I in particular is remarkable due to its velocity,' said Matthew Hopkins, a recent doctoral student in the department of physics at the University of Oxford who authored a separate study about the object. 'This velocity is very useful to us in particular as over the last few years me and my coauthors have been building a model that allows us to predict properties of (interstellar objects) such as their age and composition, just from their velocity.'
For Hopkins, the discovery of 3I/ATLAS was incredibly fortuitous. The find occurred just five days after he finished his doctoral work, which involved a lot of time spent making predictions about future interstellar object discoveries. In a few months, he'll begin a postdoctoral research fellowship at the University of Canterbury in New Zealand, where he'll continue to research 3I/ATLAS.
During his doctoral studies, Hopkins and his collaborators in New Zealand developed the Ōtautahi–Oxford model, a combination of data from the Milky Way's star population and models of how planetary systems form that could help astronomers determine what interstellar object populations should look like. Now, Hopkins is the lead author of a separate preprint study about 3I/ATLAS.
It's difficult to determine the age of interstellar objects, but Hopkins and his colleagues believe 3I/ATLAS has about a 67% chance of being more than 7.6 billion years old — while our sun, solar system and its comets are only 4.5 billion years old, he said.
It's pure chance that the interstellar comet crossed into our solar system — but it's not entirely rare, Hopkins said. We just don't see these visitors most of the time.
'(Interstellar objects) actually pass through the Solar System all the time, especially the smaller ones which are more numerous: 80 the size of 'Oumuamua (about 656 feet, or 200 meters, across) pass through the orbit of Jupiter every year, they're just too small to detect unless they get very close to the Earth,' Hopkins wrote in an email.
However, astronomers are eager to have the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, which released its first images this summer, scanning the skies for interstellar objects.With the observatory's massive primary mirror spanning 28 feet (8.4 meters) across, it can spot small, faint and distant objects — and it's scanning the entire sky every three nights, allowing the telescope to better catch sight of rapidly moving interstellar objects.
Hopkins' coauthors estimate that Rubin could spy anywhere between five and 50 interstellar objects over the next 10 years, and Hopkins is optimistically leaning toward the latter. Discovering more interstellar objects could help astronomers determine how varied or similar they are, especially since the first three have been so different from one another, Hopkins said.
'This latest interstellar tourist is one of a previously undetected population of objects bursting onto the scene that will gradually emerge,' Jewitt said. 'This is now possible because we have powerful sky survey capabilities that we didn't have before. We've crossed a threshold.'
Sign up for CNN's Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
NASA Rovers Keep Getting Stuck, And We Finally Know Why
Although humanity is getting better at sending robotic probes out into the Solar System to explore the places no human can tread, we're still very much on a learning curve. The first extraterrestrial robotic rover was launched from Earth in 1970. It's only now, more than half a century later, that scientists have figured out why these marvels of ingenuity and engineering keep getting stuck in the soils of alien worlds. "In retrospect, the idea is simple: We need to consider not only the gravitational pull on the rover but also the effect of gravity on the sand to get a better picture of how the rover will perform on the Moon," explains mechanical engineer Dan Negrut of the University of Wisconsin-Madison. "Our findings underscore the value of using physics-based simulation to analyze rover mobility on granular soil." Related: We Will Never Get Tired of This Video of Astronauts Falling Over on The Moon Making a rover that will operate in an alien environment is more complicated than making one that will work on Earth. We've lost more than one Mars mission to giant dust storms that leave drifts of sand on solar panels, preventing the machinery from being able to generate power, for instance. Gravity is another one. The Solar System bodies on which we have deployed robotic rovers have lower gravity than Earth, and this has an effect on how things move around. Engineers, when designing rovers, have therefore taken into account the effects the target gravitational environment will have. Nevertheless, rovers still manage to get stuck pretty often, requiring control teams to conduct a series of maneuvers to try and free the poor robot. It's usually fine, if annoying, although in one notable case it was not: NASA's Mars rover Spirit got stuck in soft soil in 2009, and there it remains to this day. Using computer simulations running on a physics-based engine called Project Chrono, Negrut and his colleagues set out to get to the bottom of this recurring problem. Comparing their results with real-world tests on sandy surfaces revealed a discrepancy that pointed right to it. Previous tests of rover designs in Moon- and Mars-simulated dirt omitted one very, very important detail: sand, also, behaves differently under different gravitational conditions. The dust that coats the Moon and Mars is fluffier and squishier than dust on Earth, shifting more easily, and hindering traction – making it far easier for their wheels to get stuck. Think of a vehicle on Earth that has driven into slippery mud, or very loose desert sand. This eureka moment could be the missing piece of the puzzle that could keep future space exploration rovers out of a dusty jam. "It's rewarding that our research is highly relevant in helping to solve many real-world engineering challenges," Negrut says. "I'm proud of what we've accomplished. It's very difficult as a university lab to put out industrial-strength software that is used by NASA." The research has been published in the Journal of Field Robotics. Related News Wild New Theory Suggests Gravitational Waves Shaped The Universe August's Full Sturgeon Moon Is Here: What It Is And How to See It An Astrophysicist Proposes We Send a Spacecraft to Visit a Black Hole Solve the daily Crossword
Bloomberg
6 hours ago
- Bloomberg
NASA's SpaceX Crew-10 Returns to Earth Successfully
NASA and SpaceX Crew-10 Mission to the International Space Station splashed-down to Earth successfully. The crew returns to Earth after a 5 month mission to the International Space Station. (Source: Bloomberg)
Forbes
13 hours ago
- Forbes
‘Ah, Houston, We've Had A Problem' - Astronaut Jim Lovell Gone At 97
Captain Jim Lovell at Earth to America! which airs on TBS Sunday, November 20 at 8 p.m. 10423MC_80036.jpg (Photo by M. Caulfield/WireImage for Temp Account) WireImage for Temp Account The world is mourning the loss of the great Apollo astronaut Jim Lovell dead at 97. What many folks don't know is that Lovell is the only person to have visited the moon twice without setting foot on it. Aboard Apollo 8, his crew became the first to orbit the moon on Christmas eve 1968, a scheduled operation. Then, in 1970 on Apollo 13, trouble caused Lovell and his crew to abandon their scheduled landing, only to loop around the moon and return directly to earth. The catastrophic mission, of course, became the critically acclaimed 1995 film 'Apollo 13,' with Tom Hanks playing the part of Lovell. I was lucky enough to have interviewed Lovell when he was in his 80s. He was a kind man with a wry sense of humor. I thought what he had to say back then might shed some light on his illustrious life. As such, following are edited excerpts from our conversations over the years. Jim Clash: How was it you became an astronaut? Jim Lovell: I was a naval officer and aviator. I tested airplanes, and got selected to be an astronaut later on. It was just a continuation of a type of career I wanted to follow. Clash: What did you think of Tom Hanks' movie, "Apollo 13"? Lovell: Actually, it was pretty good all the way around. It followed the book very closely. There was some artistic license taken to tell the story without it being too long and wordy, though. It appeared that Jack Swigert had to earn his wings every day because he was suddenly put on the flight as the backup, not as primary. Yet he was a very competent astronaut, so we didn't really worry about him in real life. And then, towards the end of the movie, it appears that Ken Mattingly, played by Gary Sinise, is the person who really got us home safely by knowing how to transfer the power. That wasn't exactly true, either. It was four good electrical engineers plus Ken that did the job. Clash: Is there anything in life you thought was failure that later turned out to be success in disguise? Lovell: That's a good question. For some time, I thought Apollo 13 was a failure. I was disappointed I didn't get to land on the moon. But actually, it turned out to be the best thing that could have happened. After six successful Apollo flights, including two lunar landings, people were getting bored. Those in the media weren't calling anymore. We sent a TV feed out to the three networks [for Apollo 13] and they never even bothered to carry it. It was, "You've been there, done that - what else can you do?" But when the explosion occurred, it brought out the true value of leadership, teamwork, and initiative at Mission Control and turned an almost certain catastrophe for NASA into a successful recovery. Tom Hanks, Kevin Bacon, and Bill Paxton in zero gravity in a scene from the film 'Apollo 13', 1995. (Photo) Getty Images Clash: You must have experienced fear when that oxygen tank exploded en route to the moon. Lovell: Well, we were all apprehensive. But you have to have a positive attitude, number one. And number two, we were all from test pilot backgrounds, so naturally, this was an adventure. [With Apollo 13] we had to say, "Okay, here's the problem. What do we have to work with? Is it immediate that we have to do something?" We first thought a meteorite had hit the Lunar Module. Had that happened, we'd have been dead in just a few minutes when we lost atmosphere. But that wasn't the case. It turned out that the explosion had crippled the Command Module. So we still had the Lunar Module, which we used as a lifeboat to get home. Clash: On Apollo 8 in 1968, how was it that Bill Anders, the junior crew-member, managed to take the iconic Earthrise photo? Lovell: At the beginning of the flight, he was designated as the camera guy. When the Earth came up from the lunar horizon, I was the first one to really look at it and say, "We've got to take a picture." Bill had a Hasselblad, with ektachrome film. He got the shots, which were great - I'm glad he did. But I always kid him and say, "I directed you on how to shoot that thing.' Clash: Did you guys take photos, too? Lovell: Yeah, but we were handicapped. I think Frank [Borman] took some black-and-whites. Like I said, Bill had the color film, but he also had a telescopic lens. If you look at that picture, the Earth is really bigger than it is when you see it with the naked eye. Bill was the lunar pilot on the flight, and we didn't have a Lunar Module. We had to give him something to do, so we thought photography would be pretty good [laughs]. Clash: Describe your view of the back of the moon, the first-ever by humans, aboard Apollo 8. Lovell: Well, that was quite a thrill, the high point of my space career. We got up there and saw those age-old craters on the far side, which you can't see from down here on Earth. But the real revelation was looking at Earth as it really is in space. It's a very small body when you see it from the perspective of the moon and sun. It has color. - the moon, of course, is only shades of grey. And when you look at it, you realize there are more than six billion people down there. I could put my thumb up to a window and completely hide the Earth. I thought, "Everything I've ever known is behind my thumb.' Clash: There have been differing views about whether our next step in space should be to go back to the moon or go directly to Mars. Lovell: My view is that we should go back to the moon, build up the infrastructure to make flights there commonplace - be comfortable with it - then use that infrastructure to expand and go to Mars. In spaceflight terms, six landings on the moon back in the sixties and seventies doesn't mean much. Mars is a long ways away. The moon is only 240,000 miles, but Mars is in the millions. It's too risky without spending more time going to the moon. Clash: Didn't you meet the great Charles Lindbergh once? Lovell: Yes, before one of my Apollo flights. I remember joking about his fuel load and ours. All the fuel he had put on his airplane to fly to Paris probably wouldn't even light our rocket engines!
