
Health First Indiana set to receive less funding as legislators debate its impact
As the state legislature discusses the future of Health First Indiana funding, Lake and Porter County health officials would like to see the state continue funding the program.
Health First Indiana was created by Senate Enrolled Act 4, which the legislature approved in 2023, to address public health in Indiana. The program establishes a public health infrastructure through a state and local partnership where each county, after choosing to opt in, can determine which health services to invest in based on community needs.
The state funded the program $75 million in fiscal year 2024 and $150 million in fiscal year 2025, said Sen. Ed Charbonneau, R-Valparaiso, who authored the bill to establish the Health First Indiana program.
In the upcoming two-year budget, the program has been slated to receive $100 million in fiscal year 2026 and $100 million in fiscal year 2027. But, as the budget has been discussed in committee, some legislators have voiced concern about continuing to fund the program.
While Health First Indiana has been successful, Charbonneau said its funding, like the funding for all programs, has been closely examined this budget session as the legislature grapples with a nearly $1 billion Medicaid shortfall.
'Not everyone is 100% convinced that it's working. A part of the issue, the problem, that we're dealing with is the fact that this isn't like an economic development project where you invest $100 million … and you have an almost immediate return on your investment. This is a long-term commitment, and it's not going to provide any measurable results for many years,' Charbonneau said.
In Lake and Porter counties, health officials said the program was created as former Gov. Eric Holcomb's administration realized how far behind Indiana lagged in public health measures nationwide. The money they have received, officials said, has gone toward improving public health, the effects of which won't be seen for a few more years.
'We strongly believe that good public health and good preventative care is going to be very good in terms of overall health of the county. That will reduce the number of people who need the emergency room, it will require less hospitalization,' said Lake County Health Officer Dr. Chandana Vavilala.
Lake County – Health First Indiana
Lake County received approximately $190,500 in 2023, approximately $6 million in 2024 – of which approximately $1.2 million was split between the East Chicago and Gary health departments – and approximately $11.6 million in 2025 – of which approximately $2 million was split between the East Chicago and Gary health departments, said Lake County Health Department Administrator Sheila Paul.
The Lake County Health Department has spent its funds toward 20 partnerships, including the Indiana University School of Medicine with disease prevention education, the Purdue Extension to address chronic disease prevention, and the Food Bank of Northwest Indiana for medically tailored grocery supplies for at-risk pregnant women and those with anxiety and depression, Vavilala said.
Michelle Arnold, the Lake County Health First Indiana program director, said the Purdue Extension partnership focuses on chronic disease management, like diabetes, and its Be Heart Smart program, which focuses on food label education, nutrition and physical activity.
Through the Food Bank of Northwest Indiana partnership, the health department will receive a locker that has a refrigerated section to provide food and a separate section for hygiene products, diapers, coats and other items, Arnold said.
The Lake County Health Department has partnered with the St. John Fire Department to help people prevent falls and reduce emergency room visits, Vavilala said. The department also used the funds to purchase a mobile clinic to increase access to health services, she said.
Further, the department partnered with Methodist Hospital to support maternal and infant well-being, safe sleep and car seat education and breastfeeding instructions, Paul said.
The department has also partnered with Mental Health America for safe sleep education for at-risk parents and caregivers, and for gun safety education for families with young children, Paul said. It has also partnered with Sounds of Sarah to provide education and awareness on dangers of illicit drugs, addiction prevention and access to life-saving services, she said.
The Health First Indiana funds have helped the county increase access to preventative care and health screenings, strengthened community partnerships, expanded home visiting and case management services for vulnerable populations, among others, Paul said.
If the funding were reduced, Paul said, it would 'significantly limit our ability to provide and expand our services.' A potential reduction would result in the roll back of the mobile clinic to rural and underserved communities and home visiting programs would be scaled back, which would increase avoidable hospitalizations.
Reducing public health funding won't benefit the county or the state in the long run, Vavilala said. Funding public health improves people's lives, reduces hospitalizations and has economic impacts as businesses prefer to establish themselves in healthy communities, she said.
'If we don't spend enough on public health, or the preventative care, in the beginning, we will be paying a much higher price in the long run anyways. Spending the money towards the preventative health care is much better than spending the money on the negative effects that we can have in the long run by not investing adequately into public health,' Vavilala said.
Porter County – Health First Indiana
Porter County received $135,768.41 in 2023, approximately $1.8 million in 2024 and approximately $3.4 million in 2025 in Health First Indiana funds, said Porter County Health Department Administrator Carrie Gschwind.
In Porter County, funds have gone toward a health fair, which allowed community health organizations to gather to offer free health screenings and services from vision to heart health and provide IHSA sports physicals, among other services, Gschwind said.
The Porter County Health Department partnered with the Portage YMCA, Purdue Extension and Powers Health to work toward chronic disease prevention, which included blood pressure and diabetes screenings, and connecting people with resources they may have needed, she said.
Further, Porter County also worked with food pantries to provide diapers and baby wipes to those who need them, Gschwind said. The department has also partnered with area school districts and Northwest Indiana No Child Hungry to address food insecurity in children, she said.
The funding also went toward reviewing trauma and fatalities, offering harm reduction kits – with items ranging from seasonal wound care to hygiene products – throughout the county, and working toward becoming a Heart Safe county, which includes CPR training, installing AEDs in county buildings and a certain number of Heart Safe community sites, Gschwind said.
The Porter County Health Department also hired a psychoanalyst to work with the Porter County Sheriff's Department to offer mental health support to county first responders, Gschwind said.
The 2024 funds went toward other programs as well, including a mobile health clinic, Gschwind said. In 2025, the funds will go toward the programs established in 2024 as well as addressing four areas of need for the county, she said.
For 2025, the Health First Indiana funds will go toward reducing adult obesity over the next 10 years, reducing emergency room visits for asthma attacks by 2027, reducing the suicide rate by 2027, and increasing the number of required immunizations in children by 2027, Gschwind said.
The Health First Indiana program has let county health officials work with community partners to identify the health needs within the community, Gschwind said. Losing funding, she said, would be 'devastating to the work' the department has begun.
'Without the funding, we wouldn't be able to offer these expanded services, this type of outreach. We wouldn't be able to further these programs that we've started to be able to see that needle move,' Gschwind said. 'This was an amazon state investment in public health. We just ask that we're able to continue and expand upon even more this great work.'
Legislative debate
As the Senate Appropriations Committee holds hearings about the budget, the Health First Indiana funding has been placed under a microscope.
During a committee meeting earlier this month, Committee Chair Sen. Ryan Mishler, R-Mishawaka, said he and other legislators received pressure from constituents to cut or eliminate the program because they question how the money has been spent.
In the same meeting, Sen. Liz Brown, R-Fort Wayne, questioned allocating more funds to the program because the state hasn't seen 'significant results' in the last two years.
Charbonneau, a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee, said in an interview with the Post-Tribune that he's concerned about funding the program amid the Medicaid shortfall. But Charbonneau pointed to the irony of facing a Medicaid shortfall and its rising costs while discussing funding for preventative care.
'The problem is going to continue to grow unless we stop the front end, unless we stop people from getting sick,' Charbonneau said. 'What this is doing is focusing on the front end and addressing issues before they become serious problems.'
Charbonneau said he's hopeful that the program will retain its allocation of $200 million over the next two years.
'We may, at a minimum, put some guardrails on it as to how the money can be spent. I can live with some guardrails, as long as they are reasonable, if that's what it takes to continue the funding,' Charbonneau said.
Specific guardrails haven't been discussed, Charbonneau said. The Health First Indiana program is a paradigm shift for the state, he said, and should receive funding.
'The return on investment will be incredible, but it's going to take time,' Charbonneau said.
Vavilala agreed, saying the program will have lasting benefits into the future.
'We are investing not just for now,' Vavilala said. 'We are investing this money for generations to come.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Bloomberg
25 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
A $50 Billion Slush Fund Won't Save Rural Hospitals
Republicans' 'Big, Beautiful Bill' might not have passed absent an 11th-hour provision. Worried that cutting almost $1 trillion from Medicaid might hurt rural hospitals, some lawmakers demanded a special subsidy to keep them afloat. What resulted was something of a slush fund. The 'rural hospital transformation program' allocates $50 billion toward state grants. Its requirements to participate are broad, to say the least. Half the funds will be given to states that submit a plan to 'transform' rural health care. The rest will be disbursed at the administration's discretion. Perplexingly, there's no requirement that grants actually go to rural hospitals.


Newsweek
9 hours ago
- Newsweek
Iowa Democrat Drops Out of Senate Race, Endorses Rival
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iowa Democratic Representative J.D. Scholten announced Monday that he is suspending his 2026 U.S. Senate campaign and endorsing fellow Democratic legislator Josh Turek in the primary race to potentially challenge Republican Senator Joni Ernst. Newsweek reached out to Scholten via email on Monday for comment. Why It Matters Scholten's endorsement consolidates Democratic support around healthcare advocacy, with Turek bringing a personal perspective to the issue. The two-time Paralympic gold medalist said his family relied on public assistance programs like Medicaid, as well as Iowa's Area Education Agencies and free summer lunch program as he was growing up, having gone through 21 surgeries by the age of 12 for spina bifida, according to his official campaign biography. The 2026 Iowa Senate race represents a critical opportunity for Democrats in a state that has shifted increasingly Republican in recent cycles. Senator Ernst's response to healthcare concerns has become a focal point for Democratic challengers seeking to make the race competitive. An important update 👉 Today I'm suspending my campaign and endorsing Josh Turek. We can't sit by while healthcare is ripped from millions of Americans and there's no better Democrat in Iowa to hold Joni to account for her cruelty than my friend fighter State Rep. Josh Turek. — J.D. Scholten (@JDScholten) August 18, 2025 What To Know Scholten, a Sioux City Democrat, entered the race in June after Ernst sparked controversy for responding to comments at a town hall about Medicaid cuts. "People are not ... well, we all are going to die," the senator said in part. Ernst's office later clarified to news outlets that she was attempting to make a broader philosophical point about mortality, not specifically about Medicaid policy. Turek, a Democrat from Council Bluffs, launched his campaign on Tuesday. The endorsement comes as both lawmakers represent western Iowa districts and share backgrounds as athletes serving in the state legislature. Scholten, a professional baseball pitcher for the minor league Sioux City Explorers, said he and Turek share many similarities as athletes representing western Iowa at the Statehouse. The Democratic primary field remains crowded despite Scholten's exit. Iowa Senator Zach Wahls, D-Coralville, Des Moines School Board Chair Jackie Norris and Nathan Sage, former Knoxville Chamber of Commerce director, are running for the seat, alongside Turek. On the Republican side, Jim Carlin, a former state lawmaker and Joshua Smith, who has run as a Libertarian candidate in previous elections, are also campaigning for the GOP nomination. Ernst has not officially said if she plans to run for reelection in 2026, though she has told reporters an announcement would be "coming soon." She also told a GOP audience last week that Democrats can "bring it on" in the 2026 election. The lawmaker has raised nearly $1.8 million in the first half of 2025 and scheduled an October fundraiser, possibly signaling preparations for a reelection campaign, the AP reports. Early polling of the race shows the senator with a slight advantage in Iowa. A June Public Policy Polling survey found that Ernst would lead a generic Democrat by about two percentage points—45 percent to 43 percent, with 12 percent still unsure. The poll did not ask voters about specific Democratic candidates. The poll surveyed 568 Iowa voters. What People Are Saying Scholten in a statement on Monday in part: "There are still so many issues facing Iowans today, but we can't sit by while healthcare is ripped from millions of Americans. And there is no better Democrat in Iowa to talk about healthcare issues than my friend: State Rep. Josh Turek." Scholten on his endorsement decision in part: "From the very beginning, I thought a prairie populist athlete from Western Iowa would be the best candidate to win in the General election. I still do, but instead of me, I have complete confidence that Josh Turek can take this on." Turek responding to Scholten's message on X: "I am honored to have the support of J.D. Over the last several years, J.D. and I have fought alongside one another in the state legislature to lower costs for Iowa's families, to make health care more affordable and accessible, to make housing more affordable, and to make life a little bit easier and a little bit better for Iowa's families." He concluded: "We have an incredible opportunity to beat Joni Ernst in 2026, and I'm proud to join forces with J.D." JD Scholten, running for congress in Iowa's 4th Congressional District against Steve King, waves to supporters outside the Wing Ding Dinner on August 9, 2019 in Clear Lake, Iowa. JD Scholten, running for congress in Iowa's 4th Congressional District against Steve King, waves to supporters outside the Wing Ding Dinner on August 9, 2019 in Clear Lake, Iowa. ALEX EDELMAN/AFP via Getty Images What Happens Next? Turek and Scholten will hold an event in Council Bluffs Monday evening. Ernst is expected to formally announce her potential reelection campaign within the coming weeks. Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article.


Newsweek
13 hours ago
- Newsweek
Medicaid Cuts Threaten to Stall a Breakthrough in Addiction Care
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The first wave of the opioid epidemic began 26 years ago, and it continues to be a major issue for the health care system today. However, there is one treatment model that shows promise—but it could see progress stunted by future Medicaid cuts. In 2022, 81,806 opioid-involved overdose deaths occurred in the United States, more than any year prior. However, in 2024, overdose deaths relating to synthetic opioids dropped by almost 37 percent from 2023. A form of treatment that has proved and could continue to prove beneficial for treating opioid use disorder (OUD) is the collaborative care model (CoCM). In the SUMMIT randomized clinical trial, published in 2017, 32.8 percent of patients in a CoCM displayed abstinence from opioids or alcohol, as compared to 22.3 percent in standard care. Collaborative care models are revolutionizing treatment for opioid use disorder, combining the expertise of a primary care doctor, behavioral health clinician and consulting specialist, like a psychiatrist or addiction medicine specialist. Collaborative care models are revolutionizing treatment for opioid use disorder, combining the expertise of a primary care doctor, behavioral health clinician and consulting specialist, like a psychiatrist or addiction medicine specialist. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Canva How do collaborative care models work? The CoCM is depicted as a triangle and involves a behavioral health clinician, a consulting specialist (like a psychiatrist or addiction medicine specialist) and a primary care provider, collaborating to provide behavioral health services to a patient. This treatment model stems from research conducted at the University of Washington at its Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions (AIMS) Center to understand whether it was possible to leverage the power of the relationship between a primary care physician and their patient while also increasing access to mental health services. Dr. Rachel E. Kishton, a physician at Penn Medicine, headquartered in Philadelphia, was recently named medical director of the Penn Integrated Care (PIC) program, where she oversees Penn's integrated and collaborative care programs. "By including everything within the primary care setting and centering that relationship between the primary care physician and the patient, you get over the hump of the fear and stigma related to it but also start from a place of trust," Kishton told Newsweek. Collaborative care models have been used to treat individuals with disorders like OUD and alcohol use disorder but are also used to treat mental health disorders. Within this lies the biggest challenge in treating patients for OUD using a CoCM. More often than not, OUD is accompanied by comorbid mental health disorders. According to Kishton, the need for a shift to more immediate and definitive treatment for mental health disorders is overlooked, compared to other disciplines in medicine. Kishton provided the metaphor of a patient having a heart attack. In that scenario, the patient should be rushed to the catheterization lab, not kept in an outpatient office and given aspirin. The distinction isn't always clear when a patient is having a mental health crisis. Physicians need better guidelines to respond to behavioral health patients with the proper level of urgency, the same way they would for a patient experiencing physical symptoms. "More research is definitely needed to understand when you send someone to the cath lab," she said, continuing the metaphor. "We need to ensure this research is continued to understand what the next steps are." Dr. Tyler Winkelman, a primary care physician at Hennepin Healthcare in Minneapolis, explained that often patients with depression or anxiety come in with the understanding that they have the disorder, whereas OUD patients often have yet to recognize what they're dealing with. "We've had a lot of success in referring patients with anxiety, depression and alcohol use disorders to the model," Winkelman said. "It has been trickier to figure out how to adapt the model for people with opioid use disorder." As a result of this, Hennepin recently started shifting its CoCM strategy. It previously treated OUD similarly to mental health disorders and is now using the model to prioritize care coordination and access, since that's what the patient population needs most. The collaborative care model is a highly evidence-based and adaptable form of treatment. The behavioral health clinician in the model will typically utilize evidence-based therapy modalities, including cognitive behavioral therapy and behavioral activation. The typical progression for these programs is six to eight sessions with a therapist over three to four months. However, despite the model appearing somewhat formulaic, Kishton emphasized that collaborative care programs vary across institutions. "If you've seen one collaborative care program, you've seen one collaborative care program," Kishton said. "They can be very different, depending on what the goals are, where the funding's coming from and what the core patient group is that you're working with." How do collaborative care models help build patient trust? In addition to Penn Medicine, other institutions around the country are working to create collaborative care programs to serve this patient population. Dr. Gavin B. Bart, who has been a physician of internal and addiction medicine at Hennepin Healthcare for 20 years now, believes the collaborative care model is instrumental in helping people with substance-abuse disorders. "People with substance use disorders are complicated because they've been so marginalized by the health care system," Bart said. "Having care coordination within a single site helps prevent the fragmentation of care that is sort of the standard right now." The CoCM addresses this fragmentation of care by providing patients with direct and immediate access to care within one facility, preventing them from having to find and build trust with a new provider. "The initial part of treating addiction requires much more upfront management to make sure the patient's needs are being mapped, their withdrawal is being managed and other medical issues are managed," said Bart. "And it should be done in a quick manner, otherwise the patients walk away and don't come back." Nurse Practitioner Brenda Bauch works within Hennepin's addiction clinic and shed some light on the vulnerability patients often come into the clinic with. "We see patients who often have a distrust of doing something new," Bauch said. "We have access to effective FDA-approved medications for OUD. That's wonderful and can be life-changing. But initially, it's about saying, 'You're welcome here in wherever you're at in your state of transformative change.'" Could Medicaid cuts limit access to collaborative care? Hennepin Healthcare provides services through grants provided by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). However, Minnesota's state Medicaid agency is yet to adopt the billing codes that cover the cost of a collaborative care program. Bart and Winkelman from Hennepin Healthcare expressed concern regarding pending Medicare and Medicaid cuts. "As a public safety net hospital, we're certainly concerned about the potential cuts," Bart said. "The best we can do to preserve our finances is not squander the knowledge we've gathered through research and public health information. There's data that tells us for every dollar invested in treatment, the amount of savings that occur elsewhere in society in terms of reduced rates of incarceration, increased employment rates and more. We need to not lose touch with that as we create our plans, moving forward, to make America healthy." Despite this possible obstacle, Hennepin Healthcare has been largely successful in helping OUD patients transform their lives. Aside from sharing concerns regarding the financial sustainability of the collaborative care program at Hennepin, Winkelman, too, is "extremely optimistic" about the model's future in treating OUD and other disorders. "I've had so many patients in the last two years benefit dramatically from these services, and we've really been able to help patients get back on their feet," he said. "It has improved the quality of health care that we've provided. And I really see it as the standard of care moving forward in primary care." What's on the horizon for collaborative care models? Currently, research is shifting to examine not only how the collaborative care model can address substance abuse symptoms but also the co-occurring mental health conditions. Penn Medicine's Whole Health Study focused on this with a randomized controlled trial designed to assess collaborative care models and their effectiveness in treating patients for OUD and the comorbid mental disorders that accompany it. The study utilized three conditions. In the first, primary care doctors were prescribing buprenorphine and referring patients out for mental health care. Currently, buprenorphine, a Schedule 3 controlled substance, is one of the medications most commonly used to treat OUD and help patients reduce or quit their opioid usage. In the second condition, a collaborative care model was implemented with a licensed clinical social worker and a psychiatrist who were providing mental health treatment within the primary care practice. The final condition added a peer or certified recovery specialist to increase treatment engagement and retention. The study's principal investigator, David Mandell, professor of psychiatry and director of the Penn Center for Mental Health, shared details regarding the initial results the center recently shared with the College on Problems of Drug Dependence (CPDD) organization in New Orleans. "In all three conditions, there's a substantial reduction in opioid use, and [use] stays low for the six months they're in [the CoCM]," said Mandell. "But our collaborative care condition also results in substantial reduction in psychiatric symptoms and even remission from psychiatric disorder, relative to the usual care condition." According to the study's protocol published in 2021, poor treatment retention is relatively common in CoCMs treating OUD. Mandell described a few reasons why this occurs: the location of care sites, which can make it difficult to live one's life during treatment; punitive measures and caregivers' refusal to see patients after relapses; and problems that accompany opioid use, like food insecurity and housing instability. The center recruited participants from among primary care doctors' existing patients; these patients had either initiated treatment or had been in treatment for some time but were still experiencing psychiatric distress. Hence, convincing patients to begin treatment wasn't necessarily part of conducting the study. "One of the really exciting things we see is, across the conditions tested, 80 percent of people stayed in treatment," Mandell said. "This suggests they liked their doctors, thought the treatment was effective and thought people were meeting them where they were." Mandell believes one of the main reasons for this is the harm reduction approach used by Penn primary care doctors, in which they're more responsive to patients' needs and don't use the punitive approach often taken to OUD patients. When asked about the most rewarding part of the trial, Mandell mentioned seeing how much the primary care doctors loved the model, because they've been eager to secure a high level of support for their patients for a long time. Mandell also enjoyed reading patient testimonials, talking about how much they loved their therapists and benefited from their treatment. "The emails we get, where they say, 'You've turned my life around. Things are so great,' relative to what they were. 'I don't know what I would've done without this social worker.' That's very rewarding," said Mandell. To ensure success, Mandell had a multidisciplinary team working alongside him, and working with the members has been one of his favorite parts of leading the trial because of their determination to help this patient population. "This patient population has a lot of stigma around it, and many people are not interested in helping these folks," he said. "They believe, 'You could stop if you wanted,' and 'You get what you deserve.' But these are people really committed to helping OUD patients and figuring out the best way to support them. And that has just absolutely restored my faith in humanity."