Fannie Mae Former Employees Sue Company, Pulte for Defamation
Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion
The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider
To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines'
Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain
For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets
The ex-employees of the government-controlled mortgage giant are seeking damages amounting to more than $2 million per person, according to complaints filed in Fairfax County Circuit Court in Virginia, which were distributed to the media by their lawyers.
The FHFA and Fannie Mae did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Fannie announced in April that more than 100 employees had been removed 'for unethical conduct, including the facilitation of fraud.' In a Fox News interview the following day, Pulte said an investigation found that workers were making donations to 'the internal company charity' and then getting kickbacks.
The legal challenge comes as the Trump administration is weighing a sale of shares in Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, targeting an offering as early as this year at a valuation that would raise about $30 billion for the government.
The dismissals have been linked to alleged violations of Fannie's matching gift program, which matches employees' charitable donations to 'a cause or organization of their choice' of up to $5,000 annually.
Three Democratic lawmakers questioned the mass termination of mostly Indian-American employees around the time it was announced. Representative Suhas Subramanyam joined two House colleagues in writing an April letter to Pulte and Fannie's CEO Priscilla Almodovar.
The lawmakers expressed concern that participation in the program and donations to Indian-American organizations 'may have been used as a pretext to make indiscriminate cuts to Fannie Mae's workforce and to tarnish employees' reputations' without proper investigation.
The complaints filed in Fairfax said that the former employees were summarily ousted by email and phone, and 'despite multiple requests' have never been given any evidence to support the claims against them.
It's not the first lawsuit to emerge from the mass termination. Last month, another complaint was filed in the District of Columbia by 66 of the former employees, all of Indian descent, alleging that the removals amounted to discrimination based on national origin and age.
Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates
Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash
Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan
Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist
A $340 Million New York Office Makeover Is Converting Boardrooms to Bedrooms
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Brian Kelly Addresses Public, LSU Players After JT Lindsey's Arrest
Brian Kelly Addresses Public, LSU Players After JT Lindsey's Arrest originally appeared on The Spun. There's been yet another college football player arrest, though the charges for LSU's freshman running back JT Lindsey are a little more serious. The former four-star prospect and top back from the state of Louisiana is facing charges of accessory to murder. Lindsey has been accused of unlawfully housing two suspects wanted for the murder of 17-year-old Corey Brooks. He was arrested last week and was subsequently suspended indefinitely by the team. Lindsey has since posted bail. "Lindsey, 18, was arrested last week on felony charges of accessory to the murder of Corey Brooks, 17, in Alexandria last May because Lindsey allegedly unlawfully housed the two suspects wanted for that murder after the fact. A 2025 signee from Alexandria Senior High, Lindsey has been suspended indefinitely from the football team by LSU since his Aug. 8 arrest. He was bailed out of East Baton Rouge Parish Prison shortly after the arrest," explained. Wasted potential rated Lindsey as a four-star prospect and the No. 149 player in the Class of 2025. He was the No. 7 running back in the nation and the No. 4 player from the state of Louisiana. As a junior he rushed for a whopping 1,726 yards and 26 touchdowns while also contributing in the return game and competing in track. He was crucial in helping his team go 8-5 and reaching the state quarterfinals. Together with top running back in the country Harlem Berry, Lindsey was primed to give LSU one of the best backfield tandems in college football for years to come. The lesson moving forward On Friday, LSU head coach Brian Kelly addressed the situation with Lindsey publicly for the first time. He stated that the tragedy of the situation comes down to "who is in your circle." Kelly believes that the issue has less to do with the university and its campus security and more about who people allow into their personal circle. 'Well, this is all about who is in your circle,' Kelly said. 'I'm not concerned about our university and security and such,' Kelly said,. 'This is about who do you give access to in your circle? Your circle of influence has got to be based upon people that you trust, people that know you, and you know them. And that circle really needs to be evaluated by some players and some individuals. It's not just players. It's anybody that can gain access through what you have. And if you're going to give that up to somebody, it's going to allow access to areas that they shouldn't be in.' Kelly said that players need to be more careful with who they allow to be a part of their lives, especially now that they're making huge money through NIL deals and revenue-sharing. 'This is really about individuals understanding, and in particular players today,' Kelly said. 'I mean, they're making revenue-share money and NIL. People want to ingratiate themselves with people that are making substantial amounts of money. So, you've got to be careful.' The LSU Tigers begin their 2025 campaign on the road against No. 4 Clemson in two weeks from today. Brian Kelly Addresses Public, LSU Players After JT Lindsey's Arrest first appeared on The Spun on Aug 16, 2025 This story was originally reported by The Spun on Aug 16, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Idaho Victim's Dad Claims Bryan Kohberger Has Been 'Marked' And Will Face Worse Than Prison 'Taunts'
A victim's father has mocked Bryan Kohberger for "snitching" on fellow inmates' taunting antics. Steve Goncalves, the father of Kaylee Goncalves, one of the slain Idaho university students, called the convicted murderer "stupid" and warned that the decision could come back to haunt him. The grieving father's remarks come after Bryan Kohberger complained to prison officials at the Idaho Maximum Security Institution about the harassment, saying he has lost sleep due to the taunting. The Grieving Father Labeled Bryan Kohberger 'Stupid' For 'Snitching' Days into Bryan Kohberger's life sentence at IMSI, the convicted murderer was said to have lodged complaints with prison authorities about being the target of a taunting campaign by fellow inmates. Kohberger reported that the harassment had caused him to lose sleep, hoping prison officials would step in and intervene. Kohberger's complaints were seemingly brushed off as trivial by the Idaho Department of Corrections. Still, Goncalves, the father of one of the victims, has argued that Kohberger made a grave mistake by raising the complaints, per TMZ. According to the grieving father, the taunts should be the least of Kohberger's concerns in prison, and by "snitching," he has shown how truly "stupid" he is. He also revealed he was pleased to hear inmates were already making Kohberger's life miserable, a wish his wife, Kristi Goncalves, had expressed in her victim impact statement during Kohberger's sentencing last month. Victim's Father Thinks Bryan Kohberger Is 'Marked' Due To His Crimes Speaking further about the situation, Goncalves suggested that Kohberger's complaints would only further provoke inmates, who already view him as the worst among them because of the nature of his crimes. He believes the convicted murderer is likely "marked" under the prison code that forbids harming children, a code that, in his view, still applies even though Kohberger's victims were young college students. To the grieving father, inmates may also see Kohberger as a particular threat since he killed his victims while they were sleeping. Steve Goncalves Believes The Idaho Killer' Can't Hide' In Prison Due to the seriousness of Kohberger's crimes, Goncalves believes the killer "can't hide" in prison, as all the inmates are well aware of what he did. However, despite his prediction, Kohberger's safety is seemingly assured, as the Idaho Department of Corrections guaranteed it in a statement after his complaints went viral. "Bryan Kohberger is housed alone in a cell, and IDOC security staff maintain a safe and orderly environment for all individuals in our custody," the Idaho Department of Corrections said in a statement, per News Nation. Bryan Kohberger Stays In His Cell For 23 Hours Each Day The cell where Bryan Kohberger is housed is located in the restricted J Block section of the Idaho Maximum Security Institution (IMSI). This area of the facility houses inmates who pose a significant threat to themselves or others, including those who are on death row. Kohberger spends 23 hours a day locked in his cell, with only one hour permitted outside for recreational activities. Meals are delivered through slots in the door, and showers are allowed every other day. As for visitations, Kohberger is permitted two visitors, though it is likely his visits fall under the no-contact rule given his placement in the restricted J Block. Visitation is available four days a week, Thursday through Sunday, while Monday through Wednesday remain closed. IDOC Are Investigating Viral Prison Videos Of The Idaho Killer Recently, viral clips allegedly from inside Kohberger's prison have been making the rounds online. In response, the Idaho Department of Corrections has stated that they are "aware of the videos" and are "investigating the matter." They also vowed to impose strict consequences on any staff found complicit if the videos are proven authentic and not AI-generated. "While we cannot yet confirm the veracity of the videos, if verified, they are a clear violation of IDOC policy and the parties responsible will be held accountable, up to and including termination," the agency noted in their official statement. On social media, several netizens have speculated that the videos were from Ada County Jail, one of the prisons Kohberger stayed in amid his murder case. However, the Ada County Sheriff's Office released a statement denying this possibility. "We are aware of the video footage circulating online showing Bryan Kohberger in a cell. We can confirm it was not recorded at and does not feature the Ada County Jail," read the statement on its Facebook page.
TechCrunch
6 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Judge says FTC investigation into Media Matters ‘should alarm all Americans'
A federal judge has granted a preliminary injunction blocking the Federal Trade Commission's investigation into left-leaning advocacy group Media Matters. Back in 2023, Media Matters published research showing ads from major companies had appeared alongside antisemitic and other offensive content on Elon Musk-owned X. When major advertisers subsequently pulled back from the platform, X sued Media Matters. It also sued advertisers and advertiser groups over what it claimed was a 'systematic illegal boycott.' After Musk's then-ally Donald Trump took office again in January, the FTC also began an investigation into whether Media Matters had illegally colluded with advertisers. On Friday, however, Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan sided with Media Matters and blocked the FTC's investigation. In her decision, Sooknanan (a district court judge for the District of Columbia appointed by Joe Biden) wrote that the Media Matters article represented 'quintessential First Amendment activity' and the FTC's 'expansive' investigative demands appeared to be 'a retaliatory act.' 'It should alarm all Americans when the Government retaliates against individuals or organizations for engaging in constitutionally protected public debate,' she wrote. 'And that alarm should ring even louder when the Government retaliates against those engaged in newsgathering and reporting.' Sooknanan noted that before his appointment as the current FTC chair, Andrew Ferguson had appeared on Steve Bannon's podcast and called for the FTC to investigate progressive groups criticizing online disinformation, and that he subsequently 'brought on several senior staffers at the FTC who previously made public comments about Media Matters.' The FTC did not immediately respond to a TechCrunch email asking whether it intends to appeal. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital, Elad Gil — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $600+ before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW Regardless of the legal outcome, X's lawsuits have already had a significant effect on the targeted organizations, with Media Matters cutting staff (one of the laid off researchers is now running for Congress), while the World Federation of Advertisers shut down its brand safety program and reportedly complained of drained finances. Sooknanan said the FTC investigation has also had its 'intended effect,' prompting Media Matters to decide 'against pursuing certain stories about the FTC, Chairman Ferguson, and Mr. Musk.'
