
Netanyahu hints at expanded war in Gaza but former Israeli military and spy chiefs object
The new pressure on Netanyahu came as Gaza's Health Ministry said the Palestinian death toll had surpassed 61,000. Health officials reported new deaths of hungry Palestinians seeking food at distribution points. As desperation mounts, the Israeli defense body coordinating aid announced a deal with local merchants to improve aid deliveries.
Among those speaking out were former leaders of Israel's Shin Bet internal security service, Mossad spy agency and the military — and also ex-Prime Minister Ehud Barak. In a video posted to social media this week, they said far-right members of the government are holding Israel 'hostage' in prolonging the conflict.
Netanyahu's objectives in Gaza are 'a fantasy," Yoram Cohen, former head of Shin Bet, said in the video.
'If anyone imagines that we can reach every terrorist and every pit and every weapon, and in parallel bring our hostages home — I think it is impossible,' he said.
Netanyahu convened his Security Cabinet to direct the military on the war's next stage, hinting that even tougher action was possible. However, the meeting wrapped up hours later without any announcements about Israel's plans.
US President Donald Trump, asked by a reporter whether he supported the reoccupation of Gaza, said he wasn't aware of the 'suggestion' but that 'it's going to be pretty much up to Israel.' Netanyahu said his objectives include defeating Hamas, releasing all 50 remaining hostages and ensuring Gaza never again threatens Israel after the Hamas-led 2023 attack sparked the war.
Israeli media reported disagreements between Netanyahu and the army chief, Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, on how to proceed. The reports, citing anonymous officials in Netanyahu's office, said the prime minister was pushing the army, which controls about three quarters of Gaza, to conquer the entire territory — a step that could endanger hostages, deepen the humanitarian crisis and further isolate Israel internationally.
Zamir reportedly opposes this step and could step down or be pushed out if it is approved. Israeli officials did not respond to requests for comment on the reports.
Health officials in Gaza said Israeli forces opened fire on Tuesday morning toward Palestinians seeking aid and in targeted attacks in central and southern Gaza, killing at least 45 people.
There was no immediate comment from the Israeli military, which has said after previous shootings around aid distribution that it only fired warning shots at people who approached its forces.
The dead include at least 26 people killed in the Morag Corridor, an Israeli military zone where looters and desperate crowds unloaded UN aid convoys.
Six people were killed in Teina, near a road leading to a site run by the Israeli-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, an American contractor. Morgue records at the nearby Nasser Hospital, which received the bodies, detailed the deaths and locations.
The hospital is part of the Health Ministry, which doesn't distinguish between militants and civilians but says roughly half the dead from the war have been women and children. The ministry operates under the Hamas government. The UN and other international organizations see it as the most reliable source of casualty data.
Sami Arafat, a father of seven, described the chaos in the Morag Corridor early Tuesday, saying crowds rushed toward a convoy of UN aid trucks and Israeli forces fired toward them.
'There are no buildings to shelter us from the shooting,' he said. "The area is all rubble.' He said looters brandishing knives climbed aboard the trucks first and tore into the aid boxes, taking sugar that could be resold at the market while leaving less expensive rice behind.
Elsewhere in central Gaza, Al-Awda hospital said it received the bodies of six Palestinians who were killed when Israeli troops targeted crowds near another GHF aid distribution site.
The GHF said there were no incidents at its sites Tuesday and that most of the recent violence has been linked to UN aid deliveries.
Several hundred Palestinians have been killed by Israeli fire since May while heading toward food distribution sites, airdropped parcels and aid convoys, according to witnesses, local health officials and the UN human rights office. Israel's military says it only has fired warning shots and disputes the toll.
The Israeli defense body in charge of coordinating aid, COGAT, said on social media there will be a 'gradual and controlled renewal of the entry of goods through the private sector in Gaza.' It said a limited number of local merchants were approved for the plan.
Mohammed Qassas from Khan Younis said his young children are so hungry that he is forced to storm aid trucks, which rarely reach warehouses these days because they are stopped by hungry crowds.
'How am I supposed to feed them? No one has mercy,' he said Monday. 'If we fight, we get the food. If we don't fight, we don't get anything.' It has become routine to see men returning from aid-seeking carrying bodies as well as sacks of flour.
Israel's blockade and military offensive have made it nearly impossible to safely deliver aid, contributing to the territory's slide toward famine. Aid groups say Israel's week-old measures to allow more aid in are far from sufficient .
Families of hostages in Gaza fear starvation affects them too, and blame Hamas.
As international alarm has mounted, several countries have airdropped aid over Gaza. The UN and aid groups call such drops costly and dangerous for residents, and say they deliver far less aid than trucks.
Palestinians gather daily for funeral prayers.
"We are unarmed people who cannot endure this," shouted Maryam Abu Hatab in the yard of Nasser hospital.
Ekram Nasr said her son was shot dead while seeking aid near the Morag corridor.
'I had to go alone to carry my son," she said, tears in her eyes. "I collected the remains of my son like the meat of dogs from the streets.' 'The entire world is watching," she added. "They are watching our patience, our strength and our faith in God. But we no longer have the power to endure."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Seoul's bid for leniency on binding plastic cuts in UN treaty faces scrutiny
Despite President Lee Jae-myung's pledge to 'de-plastic' by the end of 2025, South Korea is drawing scrutiny for proposing softer language for a key provision in UN-led treaty negotiations aimed at reducing plastic waste. The South Korean government submitted amendments in tandem with Brazil to a draft provision mandating countries to reduce hazardous plastic products during the resumed fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee tasked with finalizing a legally binding international treaty on plastic pollution. The INC-5.2 began Tuesday in Geneva and will continue until Thursday. The second part of the INC-5 was launched as participating country representatives failed to reach a full consensus on what should and should not be included in a binding agreement against plastic pollution during the first INC-5 at Busan in December 2024. The original text, proposed jointly by Switzerland and Mexico, stated that each supporting state 'shall reduce' harmful plastic products with legally binding force. The definition of harmful plastics included plastics that risk leaking into the environment or human bodies, contain chemicals with potential health or environmental impacts, cannot be feasibly recycled or reused at scale or significantly obstruct circular economy efforts. A total of 77 countries — including all 27 EU member states and 14 Pacific Island nations formally backed the proposal, according to the UN Environment Program. However, the proposal submitted by South Korea and Brazil sought to revise the text to a more suggestive tone — requiring parties to 'take appropriate measures to address, manage, reduce or prohibit' harmful plastic products. In the proposal, two countries also suggested taking each country's 'circumstances, capacities and socioeconomic factors' into consideration when determining what constitutes an 'appropriate measure' to counter plastic waste. This is not the first time Seoul has aligned with Brazil in global plastic negotiations. A similar proposal was made during the first INC-5 meeting last year under the previous Yoon Suk Yeol administration. Local climate advocacy groups sharply criticized the Korean government's stance throughout talks held so far at INC-5.2. 'President Lee made de-plasticization one of his core pledges during his presidential campaign and even promised to come up with a roadmap by the end of this year to combat plastic waste. Introducing a watered-down language during the treaty talks goes directly against that commitment,' said Solutions for Our Climate through an official statement issued Friday. Claiming that a legitimate response to the climate crisis is 'fundamental reduction, the group added that 'managing or addressing plastic pollution is not enough.' 'Korea must step up and lead on real solutions, not backtrack,' the group added. In response to mounting criticism, the Ministry of Environment denied claims that Korea was attempting to block plastic reduction efforts. 'We're not opposed to the reduction of harmful plastics,' a ministry official told The Korea Herald. 'From our knowledge, several countries have expressed difficulty in accepting the proposal presented by Switzerland and Mexico in its current form. Korea's intention was to facilitate dialogue by introducing alternative language that could help break the deadlock.'


Korea Herald
5 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Amid LDP turmoil, Japan's Koizumi to meet S. Korea's top diplomat in Seoul
South Korean Foreign Minister Cho Hyun will meet Japanese Agriculture Minister Shinjiro Koizumi in Seoul on Monday, the Foreign Ministry in Seoul said Friday. Koizumi, a potential contender to become the next leader of Japan's ruling Liberal Democratic Party amid domestic political turbulence following the party's recent election debacle, will embark on his three-day trip to South Korea on Saturday. Koizumi will participate in the APEC Food Security Ministerial Meeting, hosted by South Korea and scheduled for Saturday and Sunday in Incheon. He will also attend a trilateral meeting of agricultural ministers from South Korea, Japan and China on Monday. 'Our government has been seeking various high-level exchanges to forge a more solid and mature relationship between Korea and Japan, and this meeting is part of those efforts,' a Foreign Ministry official in Seoul said on condition of anonymity when asked about the background of Cho's meeting with Koizumi. Cho's separate meeting with Koizumi is widely seen as rare and commanding attention, given the ongoing Japanese political turmoil and his rise as a contender for the next LDP leader. The LDP-led coalition's loss of its upper house majority in a historic defeat in the July 20 election has left the fate of Prime Minister and LDP leader Shigeru Ishiba hanging in the balance. A recent public opinion poll conducted by Japan News Network from Aug. 2 to 3 among 2,531 people nationwide aged 18 or older found that Koizumi was favored when asked who would be the most suitable next prime minister should Ishiba stand down. Koizumi topped the poll with 20.4 percent of respondents choosing him, followed by former Economic Security Minister Sanae Takaichi with 16.7 percent. Koizumi's prospects as a political leader were widely deemed over after he finished third in the LDP's leadership race in September. However, Koizumi has recently reclaimed the political spotlight after being inaugurated as Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries in May. Koizumi has been acclaimed for bringing down rice prices in his current capacity amid rising household burdens, with his leadership viewed as being in a manner evocative of his father, popular former Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi.


Korea Herald
a day ago
- Korea Herald
Afghanistan's Taliban have 'weaponized' judicial system to oppress women: expert
UNITED NATIONS (AP) — Afghanistan's Taliban rulers have 'weaponized' the legal and judicial system to oppress women and girls in what amounts to 'crimes against humanity,' the independent UN investigator on human rights in the country said. Richard Bennett said in a report to the UN General Assembly circulated Wednesday that after seizing power in 2021 the Taliban suspended the 2004 constitution and laws protecting the rights of women and girls. These include a landmark law that criminalized 22 forms of violence against women, including rape and child and forced marriage. The Taliban dismissed all judges under the previous US-backed government, including approximately 270 women, replacing them with men who share their extreme Islamic views, lack legal training and hand down decisions based on edicts issued by the Taliban, he said. In addition, he noted that the Taliban have assumed full control over law enforcement and investigative agencies, systematically purging Afghans who worked for the previous government. Bennett, who was appointed by the Geneva-based UN Human Rights Council, focused on access to justice and protection for women and girls in his report. He said he held meetings, focus-group discussions and one-on-one interviews with more that 110 Afghans inside and outside the country. He did so remotely because the Taliban have refused to grant him a visa to travel to Afghanistan. Since the Taliban took control of Afghanistan, their crackdown on women and girls has been widely reported and globally denounced. Taliban leaders have barred education for women and girls beyond sixth grade, banned most employment, and prohibited women from many public spaces, including parks, gyms and hairdressers. New laws ban women's voices and bare faces outside the home. The Taliban remain isolated from the West because of their restrictions on women and girls and have only been recognized by Russia. Bennett said the Taliban did not respond to an advance copy of the report and a request for information about their efforts to ensure access to justice and protection for women and girls. The Taliban defend their approach to justice by claiming they are implementing Islamic sharia law, but Islamic scholars and others have said their interpretation is unparalleled in other Muslim-majority countries and does not adhere to Islamic teachings. They say protecting the legal rights of women is a priority. Bennett said, however, that women have virtually no rights. 'Today, there are no women judges or prosecutors and no officially registered female lawyers, leaving women and girls with fewer safe channels to report abuse or seek redress,' he wrote. 'Coupled with a lack of female officials in the police and other institutions, the result is widespread underreporting of violence and discrimination against women and girls.' Bennett said access to justice for girls 'is further undermined by the dismantling of key legal safeguards and institutions protecting the rights of children,' including juvenile courts and juvenile rehabilitation centers. The Taliban requirement that a woman must be accompanied by a male relative also creates barriers to filing complaints and attending court proceedings, he said, and disproportionately affects widows, women who are the heads of their households, the displaced and disabled. 'Women who engage with the Taliban court system — whether as victims seeking redress, to resolve family issues, to obtain official documents or as alleged offenders — face a hostile environment,' Bennett said. 'Courts often reject complaints made by women and are especially reluctant to accept cases relating to divorce, child custody and gender-based violence.' Facing these obstacles, Bennett said, women increasingly turn to traditional and informal justice mechanisms, including formal jirgas and shuras — community councils of elders — and informal mediation by religious leaders, community elders or family. But these are all male-dominated and raise 'serious concerns about the rights of women and girls,' he said. He said international forums offer the best hope for justice. He pointed to the International Criminal Court's request on Jan. 23 for arrest warrants for two senior Taliban leaders accused of crimes against humanity for persecution 'on gender grounds.' And he urged all countries to support efforts to bring Afghanistan before the International Court of Justice, the UN's highest tribunal, for violating the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.