logo
Police chiefs must learn to use their common sense

Police chiefs must learn to use their common sense

Spectator18 hours ago
Britain's top cop club has released new guidance to forces in England and Wales on when and how to describe the suspects of serious crimes. It's a day late and a dollar short. The National Police Chiefs Council (NPCC), stirred from their deckchairs by nationwide riots of only twelve months ago, are now advising constabularies that it's probably a good thing in most circumstances if people's ethnicity and immigration status are disclosed at the point of charge. If you're wondering why it takes this body in conjunction with the College of Policing to tell chiefs they are allowed to use common sense, you're in good company.
But let's apply this new dispensation to a real-life example to see if it flies. Say, the one where police obfuscation over the identity of a suspect contributed to the worst public order breakdown for over a decade. Alex Rudukabana, the Southport child murderer, was arrested on 29 July last year. Police gave the first information about him to the public later that same evening, which did nothing to contradict misinformation already halfway round the world. Its selectivity only fuelled public anger. After arrest for multiple murders, the police had 96 hours to charge or release him under legislation. By the time police announced he had been charged on the morning of 1 August, serious disorder had broken out in five locations with dozens of officers injured and a violent contagion was released across the UK.
It's fair to say that this anaemic intervention should at least stop huge inconsistencies that exist across the country. Chief officers are clearly befuddled by what they perceive to be legal or community tension obstacles to doing the right thing at the right time. Merseyside police, perhaps stung by their mishandling of the Southport massacre comms, swung into action when a car-ramming horror happened on the streets of Liverpool in May. The ethnicity of the alleged assailant – 'a white British man' – was released two hours after his arrest and long before Paul Doyle was charged with multiple counts of GBH.
Contrast this with the arrant idiocy of Warwickshire police, whose extreme reluctance to confirm the immigration status and ethnicity of two reported asylum seekers suspected of the rape of a 12 year old girl in Nuneaton recently was based not on any legislative obstacle but on the lack of guidance to tell them they could. The precise status of the alleged attackers Ahmad Mulakhil and Mohammad Kabir is still shrouded in mystery.
While they are entitled to the presumption of innocence and due process, I can't see anything that would preclude those facts from being released. Beyond, of course, the cack-eyed fealty to 'community cohesion', which seems to eternally ignore the fact that this social contract relies on the majority in the country believing in it. There is no substitute for the fullest information being disclosed accurately and fast. Where there might be a legal impediment, for example age, that is relied upon to stop any early disclosure, this must be changed.
The National Police Chiefs Council ought to be an anachronism these days. We introduced local democratic accountability years ago in the form of policing and crime commissioners (PCCs). But they are too often incompetent duds and political retreads far behind the curve of public opinion that elected them.
If this architecture must exist along with the insatiable bureaucracy of the College of Policing, it ought to spend more time ensuring that police chiefs and their guidance are both fit for purpose. Otherwise we will continue to see people like Essex Chief Ben-Julian Harrington well over his head when it comes to policing protests, such as those tinderbox concerns over illegal migration, despite being the NPCC lead for public order. His misunderstanding of the Human Rights Act and the convention it is built on meant that masked antifa protestors from outside the community were given a police escort into and away from a then peaceful demonstration by townspeople outside a hotel for migrants in Epping. This had disastrous results both in terms of disorder and public confidence.
One thing PCCs can do is hire chief officers who are able and willing to do the thing public trust relies on – police without fear or favour – and fire those who can't. Perhaps it is not too late for them to step up.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man accused of driving into Liverpool parade crowds faces 24 new charges
Man accused of driving into Liverpool parade crowds faces 24 new charges

Wales Online

time18 minutes ago

  • Wales Online

Man accused of driving into Liverpool parade crowds faces 24 new charges

Man accused of driving into Liverpool parade crowds faces 24 new charges The incident happened as Liverpool celebrated the Premier League title win An inflatable field tent at the scene in Water Street near the Liver Building in Liverpool (Image: Peter Byrne/PA) Paul Doyle, 53, who was accused of driving into crowds at Liverpool's victory parade, faces a further 24 charges relating to the incident. Six of the new offences relate to children, including one six-month-old and one seven-month-old, Liverpool Crown Court was told at a hearing on Thursday. Doyle was in tears as he appeared over video link from prison. The case was adjourned to September 4, when Doyle is expected to enter pleas. Article continues below Court artist sketch of Paul Doyle, 53, appearing at Liverpool Magistrates' Court in May More follows.

Man accused of driving into Liverpool parade crowds faces new charges
Man accused of driving into Liverpool parade crowds faces new charges

The Independent

time18 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Man accused of driving into Liverpool parade crowds faces new charges

A man accused of driving into crowds at Liverpool's Premier League victory parade faces an additional 24 charges, including two relating to alleged victims who were babies. Paul Doyle, 53, was in tears as he appeared over videolink from prison for the Liverpool Crown Court hearing on Thursday. He was originally charged with seven offences after the incident on Water Street in the city centre just after 6pm on Monday, May 26. Liverpool Crown Court on Thursday heard six of the new charges relate to children, including two babies, one aged six months at the time and one aged seven months. Doyle, wearing a grey T-shirt, did not enter any pleas during the hearing, which lasted about 20 minutes. Recorder of Liverpool Judge Andrew Menary KC adjourned the case until September 4 when Doyle is expected to enter pleas. The new charges include 23 assault charges and one count of affray. Merseyside Police said 134 people were injured when Doyle allegedly drove his Ford Galaxy Titanium into crowds who were leaving the waterfront after the parade. Doyle, of Croxteth, Liverpool, was charged in May with two counts of wounding with intent, two counts of causing grievous bodily harm with intent, two counts of attempted grievous bodily harm with intent and one count of dangerous driving. A wounding charge and an attempted grievous bodily harm charge relate to children, aged 11 and 17. Earlier this year, a provisional trial date was fixed for November 24, and the case is expected to last three to four weeks.

Liverpool parade crash suspect Paul Doyle faces 24 new charges after car ploughed into fans
Liverpool parade crash suspect Paul Doyle faces 24 new charges after car ploughed into fans

The Independent

time18 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Liverpool parade crash suspect Paul Doyle faces 24 new charges after car ploughed into fans

A former Royal Marine is facing 24 further charges after his car ploughed into football fans at Liverpool's Premier League victory parade. Paul Doyle, 53, was previously charged with seven offences after 134 people were injured when he allegedly drove his Ford Galaxy Titanium into crowds in Liverpool city centre. Six of the new offences relate to children, including one six-month-old and one seven-month-old, Liverpool Crown Court was told at a hearing on Thursday. Mr Doyle sobbed as he appeared over video link from prison. The case was adjourned to 4 September, when he is expected to enter pleas. Hundreds of fans were leaving the waterfront victory parade when the incident occurred on Water Street just after 6pm on 26 May. Up to a million supporters had gathered to celebrate Liverpool's 20th league title in a 10-mile parade in the city. Mr Doyle, of Croxteth, was arrested at the scene, where fire crews worked to rescue several people who were trapped under the car, and dozens were taken to the hospital for treatment. Recorder of Liverpool Judge Andrew Menary remanded him in custody. A provisional trial date has been set for 24 November, which could last three to four weeks. It is alleged Mr Doyle drove dangerously on roads between his home address in Burghill Road and Water Street. At his first court appearance, Liverpool Magistrates' Court heard he was alleged to have "used his vehicle deliberately as a weapon".

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store