
Inside Saudi's blood-soaked $8.8TRILLION Neom megacity project plagued by death & chaos as it grinds to humiliating halt
But the Middle Eastern nation's NEOM project - which would see a high-tech utopia built from scratch near the country's border with Jordan - has long been cursed as one worker reveals all.
10
10
10
10
NEOM was announced as part of Saudi Crown Prince Mohammad bin Salman's Project 2030 in 2017 - a major push to wean the oil-rich nation's economy off its reliance on fossil fuels.
NEOM will be a futuristic city across 26,000 sqft on the Red Sea and will include smaller projects The Line, Oxagon, Trojena, Sindalah and the Gulf of Aqaba Projects.
Stunning concept art gave a taste of what was to come, from floating structures to luxury holiday and ski resorts, but eight years on and not much progress has been made.
The daring project has been plagued by setbacks and controversy ever since the first construction workers descended into the sprawling dunes.
The anticipated cost of delivering the gargantuan scheme is reported to have spiralled from $500bn (£386bn) estimate to a head-spinning $8.8 trillion (£6.8 trillion), according to The New Civil Engineer.
But even more shocking are the human rights abuses and brutal conditions for workers looming over NEOM - issues that have plagued the country well before the project.
As many as 21,000 are reported to have died during construction on various sections of NEOM, although Saudi authorities have disputed this figure.
One former employee has shared their story of working at the gigaproject with The Sun, shedding light on the atrocities taking place behind NEOM's doors.
Rights organisations have long blasted the Saudi regime's record on workers' welfare, with a recent Human Rights Watch report detailing the "gruesome yet avoidable" deaths faced by many migrant workers.
The advocacy group mentions that some workers die falling from buildings, by electrocution, and even decapitation.
Human Rights Watch researcher Joey Shea told the Sun: "Unfortunately migrant workers in Saudi Arabia continue to face widespread abuses, some of which may amount to situations of forced labour, including at high profile gigaprojects.
"On NEOM, Human Rights Watch has found that ambitious targets set by Saudi authorities have tight and unrealistic deadlines which can lead employers to demand that workers continue to work under dangerous conditions.
"Migrant workers in Saudi Arabia experience illegal and exorbitant Recruitment Fees, limits to job mobility, obstacles exiting the country, as well as serious health and safety risks."
Michael, whose name has been changed to protect his identity, told The Sun that the project is unlikely to be anywhere near complete before 2055.
Talking about delays, Michael said: "From the very beginning, NEOM had a very long timeline.
"There were certain objectives they wanted to achieve by 2030, but most of the leadership were aware of a longer timeframe."
Michael said NEOM's management has "overspent quite a bit" since its announcement.
He says: "They were focusing on way too many things at the same time.
"They just wanted everything at the highest level possible. The biggest entertainment complex in the world. The biggest media studio in the region.
"No matter how much money you throw at the thing, it takes more than just money to make it work."
The much hyped project, aided by an aggressive social media marketing campaign, has sought to big up NEOM as a vision of futuristic city living.
Sci-fi ideas from levitating trains to an artificial moon are reported to have been among the features of the project.
But NEOM continues to fall chronically behind schedule, with many of its most ambitious projects still looking like a distant dream.
Speaking exclusively to The Sun, the former employee described the work culture at NEOM.
10
10
10
He said: "When I started doing the project, I talked to some people and said that it's absolutely crazy.
"Then my Saudi friend told me that in this region, things tend to not be the way they seem. In reality, you never know what's going on in the highest echelons of power."
NEOM brands itself as the "future of urban living", aimed at providing sustainable living with 100% renewable energy.
One of the flagship proposals in the project is The Line - a single-building high-tech "city" that would house nine million people in just 34 square kilometres.
Located deep in the desert, NEOM's construction has also seen horrifying reports of forced displacement of tribal villagers from to make way for construction.
Those who resisted suffered a brutal crackdown, which has drawn furious condemnation from human rights groups.
A report into the matter by Saudi human rights group ALQST reads: "The NEOM project, which has been mired in secrecy from the start and marked by serious rights violations, shows the extent to which the Saudi authorities are prepared to proceed with planned projects at the expense of local inhabitants."
Julia Legner, executive director at ALQST for human rights, told The Sun: "While the project faces reported delays and downsizing, the human rights concerns remain as pressing as ever.
"These include widespread labour rights abuses and uninvestigated worker deaths, and the continued imprisonment of dozens of local inhabitants who peacefully opposed their forced displacement.
"At this critical juncture, companies involved—or considering involvement—must carefully assess the situation and take appropriate action to avoid complicity in these ongoing abuses."
Many experts have questioned the viability of the proposals, and Michael is sceptical they will ever be realised.
"Maybe the idea of The Line and robot cops is a very expensive marketing ploy. But it's worked," he said.
"So what if it's going to be scaled back? They've achieved their objective. It's put Saudi Arabia on the map.
"Even if NEOM just becomes a small tourist resort with some hotel and villas, that would already be seen as a massive success."
Saudi Arabia has invested vast sums in prestige building projects across the country over the past decade.
This isn't just limited to NEOM, with plans to build the world's tallest building in Jeddah and numerous stadiums for the 2034 FIFA World Cup also well underway.
Top 5 blunders plaguing NEOM project
BY Juliana Cruz Lima, Foreign News Reporter
Saudi Arabia's NEOM project, despite its ambitious vision, has been criticized for several major blunders that have raised concerns about its feasibility, ethics, and overall execution.
Here are the top five major blunders associated with the project:
Forced Displacement of Indigenous Communities: One of the most significant controversies surrounding NEOM is the forced displacement of the Huwaitat tribe.
This indigenous community, which has lived in the area for centuries, was forcibly removed from their ancestral lands to make way for the development of the mega-city.
The Saudi government's crackdown on those who resisted, including the killing of a tribal leader, Abdul Rahim al-Howeiti, has drawn widespread condemnation from human rights organisations.
This blunder not only sparked international outrage but also tainted NEOM's image as a forward-thinking, humane project.
Environmental Impact and Sustainability Concerns: NEOM has been marketed as an environmentally sustainable city, but the environmental impact of such a massive development is a major concern.
The project's scale—covering over 26,500 square kilometers—poses significant risks to local ecosystems, particularly in the Red Sea, which is home to rich marine biodiversity.
Critics argue that the construction of artificial islands and extensive urbanisation could lead to irreversible ecological damage.
The enormous water and energy demands required to maintain a green city in the desert also raise questions about the project's sustainability.
Economic Viability and Cost Overruns: NEOM is one of the most expensive development projects in history.
But there are serious doubts about its economic viability. Critics question whether the project can attract the necessary foreign investment and whether it will generate sufficient returns to justify the enormous expenditure.
The economic risks are further compounded by potential cost overruns and delays, which are common in megaprojects of this scale.
This financial gamble has led some to worry that NEOM could become a costly white elephant if it fails to meet its ambitious goals.
Technological Overreach and Ethical Concerns: NEOM is envisioned as a high-tech city, heavily reliant on artificial intelligence, robotics, and extensive surveillance systems.
While this technological ambition is central to NEOM's identity, it also raises significant ethical concerns. The level of surveillance planned for the city could lead to unprecedented control over residents' lives, sparking fears about privacy and civil liberties.
The lack of transparency about how AI will be used, coupled with concerns about job displacement, has also led to criticism that NEOM's technological vision may be more dystopian than utopian.
Cultural and Social Disconnect: NEOM's vision of a futuristic, liberalized society clashes sharply with Saudi Arabia's deeply conservative cultural norms.
The project plans to introduce mixed-gender sports, entertainment events, and other liberal lifestyle elements that are rare in the kingdom.
This cultural shift has raised concerns about a potential clash between NEOM's globalised vision and the traditional values of Saudi society.
The disconnect between the project's ambitions and the broader cultural context has led to skepticism about whether NEOM can truly integrate into Saudi Arabia's social fabric without causing significant friction.
But widespread problems with workers' rights have been reported across these projects, with Human Rights Watch blasting a "blatant failure to protect migrant workers" in the country.
"These abuses are enabled by Saudi Arabia's kafala, or labour sponsorship, system that ties the legal status of migrant workers to their respective sponsors," the group says.
An Amnesty International spokesperson told The Sun: 'With projects like NEOM Saudi Arabia is trying to present a glitzy, futuristic vision of the country, but this should not come at the expense of human rights.
'Governments supporting investment in the project have a clear obligation to ensure they are not contributing to human rights violations and all investors, and companies involved in NEOM have a responsibility to carry out necessary due diligence checks to identify, prevent and address human rights abuses.
"No vision of the future can justify trampling on human rights today.'
But Michael believes the country is ultimately "heading in the right direction", noting the lifting of a ban on women driving and reduction in policing of religion.
"NEOM is an incredibly interesting business story. It's a big story in how big projects sometimes fail," Michael said.
The Saudi embassy in London and NEOM were contacted for comment.
10
10
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
‘A duty to intervene': the former UK government lawyer at centre of pro-Palestine protests
Handcuffed and being hauled into the back of a police van, Tim Crosland still managed to crack a smile after being arrested under the Terrorism Act last month. 'The mother of all democracies, people,' the former government lawyer can be seen saying in now viral footage after he was one of 27 people arrested at the Gandhi statue in Parliament Square for allegedly showing support for a proscribed organisation, Palestine Action. Five weeks later, Crosland, 55, is once again at the centre of the action before what is expected to be a return to the square on Saturday by hundreds of people risking arrest under anti-terrorism laws. Defend Our Juries, of which he is a co-founder, has asked them to hold up signs saying: 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action.' The moment is also a milestone in a personal 'gamekeeper turned poacher' journey that has taken him from being a barrister holding senior positions at the Serious Organised Crime Agency (SOCA) and National Crime Agency (NCA), to being a radical activist using street protest to challenge the will of the state. 'Over time, I came to the conclusion that no, you do not make substantial change from the inside,' Crosland recalls of his time working for government. A large part of his role had been to advise on human rights obligations, but he now believes he was naive about this and there was a substantial gap between the rhetoric of government organisations about rights, and the reality. 'The forces are too strong, too powerful, you can delude yourself that you're making an impact and then you can look back and see that it's just gone back to where it was.' Born in Hammersmith, west London, Crosland attended the prestigious private school St Paul's, where the future chancellor George Osborne was a year below him. A vegetarian from a young age, he went on to study classics at Oxford, took a law conversion course and became a barrister. His legal career before joining government would lead him to a life changing experience when he worked in the deep south of the US on death row appeals – the case of a 17-year-old in New Orleans was particularly shocking. While the work on behalf of those on death row is something he had in common with Keir Starmer, it would not be until joining government that he would cross paths with the future prime minister, then a young lawyer. At SOCA, Crosland recalls instructing Starmer to write advice on positive human rights obligations and then on the intersection with the duty of care. 'I remember what he wrote was so bad we had to go to him and ask him to redo it,' adds Crosland, who says Starmer's initial effort was 'flaky' and he had not engaged with the question. 'He did deal with it reasonably gracefully when we said we were expecting a little bit more than that and came back with something much better.' After leaving government, Crosland became an environmental lawyer, co-founding the campaign group Plan B, which was one of the parties that brought a landmark legal case against Heathrow's owners over a planned third runway. In a change of events that would lead to him being disbarred in 2023, he was fined £5,000 in 2021 for criminal contempt of court after deliberately making public a supreme court ruling related to the airport before the result was officially announced. Since then he has gone from being in trouble with his friends in law, to being in trouble with the law itself. Police are yet to charge him and others who were arrested last month – he believes they are waiting in part to see what happens with a legal challenge of Palestine Action's proscription. Either way, opting out of further activism is not an option for Crosland, who talks of 'having a duty to intervene'. 'We are talking about deeply peaceful, principled people who are trying to stop atrocities,' he says of what might be his true 'tribe', the climate activists and those campaigning against Israel's actions in Gaza. 'That is my understanding of non-violent action. It doesn't mean sitting back quietly in a corner.'


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
UK housebuilders in focus as construction woes cloud outlook
UK housebuilders will be in sharp focus as the sector grapples with construction woes, despite the Government ploughing ahead with plans to stimulate more building. Persimmon and Balfour Beatty will announce their half-year results on Wednesday, and Bellway will provide a trading update on Tuesday. York-based developer Persimmon said in May that forward sales – meaning homes ordered but not yet bought – had surged by 17% over the first three months of the financial year, compared to the previous year. It was expecting to complete the sale of between 11,000 and 11.500 new homes over the year, which would be significantly more than the roughly 10,670 it sold in 2024. However, experts said Persimmon was among the builders fighting issues 'outside of its control' in the wider property sector. Richard Hunter, head of markets for Interactive Investor, said: 'It remains to be seen whether the momentum has continued into the half-year results, or whether slowing construction activity and mortgage availability concerns remain uppermost. 'Even so, the group should eventually benefit from the extreme supply and demand imbalance in the UK, while government reforms should also prove to be a tailwind.' The Labour Government has been pushing to introduce new planning reforms to help meet its pledge to build 1.5 million homes this Parliament. The Planning and Infrastructure Bill, which is making its way through the House of Lords, includes mandatory housing targets and reforms to planning rules to make it harder to reject developments. City analyst Michael Hewson said: 'With the current Government vocal in its commitment to ramp up a housebuilding programme, you would think that housebuilders would be reaping the benefits of that. 'Sadly, the reality is somewhat different, especially where governments are involved.' He pointed to recent survey data from S&P Global, closely watched by economists, which showed UK construction work dropping at the fastest rate in more than five years in July. This was partly driven by a fresh slump for residential housebuilding, which had been showing early signs of a rebound. Construction firms said there was a lack of opportunities for new work, and hesitancy from customers to commit to projects, while some had been buying fewer materials. Meanwhile, investors will also be looking to Bellway's trading update to see how it is navigating wider sector challenges. In June, the company lifted its forecast for the number of homes it will build this year, while also reporting an increase in the level of forward sales it secured.


Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
OPEC oil output rises in July led by UAE and Saudi, survey finds
LONDON, Aug 8 (Reuters) - OPEC's oil output rose further in July after an OPEC+ agreement to raise production, a Reuters survey found on Friday, although the hike was limited by Iraq making additional cuts and by drone attacks on Kurdish oilfields. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries pumped 27.38 million barrels per day last month, up 270,000 bpd from June's revised total, the survey showed, with the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia making the largest increases. OPEC+, which comprises OPEC and its allies including Russia, is accelerating its plan to unwind its most recent layer of output cuts. At the same time, some members are required to make extra cuts to compensate for earlier overproduction, in theory limiting the impact of the hikes. Under an agreement by eight OPEC+ members covering July output, the five of them that are OPEC members - Algeria, Iraq, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia and the UAE - were to raise output by 310,000 bpd before the effect of compensation cuts totalling 175,000 bpd for Iraq, Kuwait and the UAE. According to the survey, the actual increase by the five was 150,000 bpd. Saudi supply for June was revised up by 50,000 bpd after the country reported in OPEC's July monthly report that it supplied 9.36 million bpd in June. Iraq, which is under pressure to boost compliance with OPEC+ quotas, lowered output because of compensation cuts and due to drone attacks on oilfields in Iraqi Kurdistan. The UAE raised output by about 100,000 bpd, but still pumped below its OPEC+ quota. There is a wide range of estimates of output in Iraq and the UAE with many outside sources putting the countries' output higher than the countries themselves. While the Reuters survey and data provided by OPEC's secondary sources show they are pumping close to the quotas, other estimates, such as those of the International Energy Agency, say they are pumping significantly more. The Reuters survey aims to track supply to the market and is based on flows data from financial group LSEG, information from other companies that track flows such as Kpler, and information provided by sources at oil companies, OPEC and consultants.