Former Providence Police Chief Hugh Clements is on President Trump's radar
Advertisement
The bigger picture:
There's only one major challenge that could stand in Clements' way from being reappointed: He's a Biden appointee.
Clements was chief in Providence for 11 years before joining the Justice Department in 2023, but has never been known as especially partisan. He deftly navigated immigration policy-related issues in the city, and maintained the respect of both the local police union and more progressive advocates and elected officials.
The FOP's endorsement is significant. The union has been one of Trump's most loyal allies, having endorsed him all three times that he has run for president.
This story first appeared in Rhode Map, our free newsletter about Rhode Island that also contains information about local events, links to interesting stories, and more. If you'd like to receive it via e-mail Monday through Friday,
Dan McGowan can be reached at
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Venezuela's ex-spymaster pleads guilty to US drug trafficking charges
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -A former director of Venezuelan military intelligence, Hugo Carvajal, pleaded guilty on Wednesday to drug trafficking and narcoterrorism charges in U.S. federal court, the Justice Department said in a statement. Carvajal, 65, once one of the most powerful figures in the Venezuelan government, pleaded guilty to four criminal counts including narcoterrorism conspiracy, conspiracy to import cocaine, and weapons charges. He faces a maximum of life in prison. 'The deeply troubling reality is that there are powerful foreign government officials who conspire to flood the United States with drugs that kill and debilitate,' Jay Clayton, the interim U.S. attorney in Manhattan, said in a statement. A lawyer for Carvajal did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Federal prosecutors alleged Carvajal, along with other high-ranking Venezuelan government and military officials, led a drug cartel that coordinated the shipment of tons of cocaine bound for the United States. The cartel partnered with the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC), a now demobilized guerrilla group that the United States once considered a terrorist organization, to produce and distribute cocaine, prosecutors alleged. Carvajal was late Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez's eyes and ears within the South American country's military for more than a decade. Nicknamed "El Pollo," the chicken, Carvajal took part in the failed 1992 coup that lifted Chavez to political prominence and is considered one of the most powerful figures of the socialist leader's 1999-2013 rule. Carvajal was extradited to the United States from Spain in 2023 following a more than 10-year effort by the Justice Department to bring him to U.S. soil. His sentencing in U.S. court in Manhattan is scheduled for October.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Trump administration is suing Minnesota over breaks in higher education for immigrant students
Minnesota became the latest state Wednesday to face a lawsuit from the Trump administration seeking to force it to give its high school graduates who entered the U.S. illegally as immigrants the same lower tuition rates reserved for in-state citizens. The U.S. Department of Justice's lawsuit also seeks to strike down a law that allows the same immigrant students to receive scholarships covering part or all of their tuition under the state's North Star Promise program. The department filed its case in federal district court in Minnesota, naming Democratic Gov. Tim Walz and Democratic state Attorney General Keith Ellison as defendants, along with the state's Office of Higher Education. The Justice Department has filed similar lawsuits this month against policies in Kentucky and Texas. Last week, a federal judge in Texas blocked that state's law giving a tuition break to students living in the U.S. illegally after the state's Republican attorney general, Ken Paxton, said he supported the legal challenge. Walz's office said it is reviewing the lawsuit 'to better understand what this means for the state.' Justice Department says state discriminates against US citizens The lawsuit argued that Minnesota is 'flagrantly violating' a federal law that prevents states from providing a benefit in higher education to resident students living in the U.S. illegally if U.S. citizens cannot receive the same benefits. States generally set higher tuition rates for out-of-state students. Also, President Donald Trump issued executive orders in February directing federal agencies to see that public benefits do not go to immigrants living in the U.S. illegally and to challenge state and local policies seen as favoring those immigrants over some citizens. The lawsuit argues that the Republican president's orders enforce federal immigration laws. The lawsuit also argues that Minnesota's policies discriminate against U.S. citizens. "No state can be allowed to treat Americans like second-class citizens in their own country by offering financial benefits to illegal aliens,' U.S. Attorney General Pamela Bondi said in a statement. More lawsuits could be coming The Justice Department's lawsuit in Minnesota noted the cases filed earlier this month in Kentucky and Texas but did not mention any other states as potential targets of litigation. However, in discussing the Texas case, Bondi has suggested more lawsuits might be coming. Last year, Florida ended its tuition break for students living there illegally, but at least 21 states have laws or policies granting them, in addition to the University of Michigan system, according to the National Immigration Law Center, which favors them. Those states include Democratic-leaning ones such as California and New York, but also GOP-leaning ones like Kansas and Nebraska. According to the center, at least 16 states allow the immigrant students to receive scholarships or other aid to go to college. States deny discrimination against US citizens Supporters of the state tuition breaks argue that they don't violate federal law if they provide the same rates to U.S. citizens in the same circumstances — meaning they are residents of the state and graduates of one of its high schools. Generally states have imposed other requirements. For example, Minnesota requires male students to have registered with the U.S. Selective Service System and all students to be seeking legal resident status if that's possible. Backers of the laws also argue that the students generally were brought to the U.S. illegally by their parents, often when they were far younger, and are as much a part of their local communities as U.S.-born students. Also, they contend that such immigrants tend to be motivated high achievers.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
What this Trump nominee says about his potential SCOTUS picks
President Donald Trump's first term was marked by a contentious and ultimately wildly successful campaign to overhaul the federal judiciary — one that dominated the Senate floor calendar for nearly four years straight and occasionally exploded in partisan fury. Now, with Trump dealing with unpredictable foreign crises and a sprawling domestic policy megabill, judge nominations have been almost an afterthought in the White House and on Capitol Hill. That changed Wednesday, when Emil Bove — Trump's former personal lawyer, now a top Justice Department official — appeared for the Senate Judiciary Committee for a fiery hearing on his nomination to an appeals court judgeship. The decision to nominate Bove, and the apparent willingness of Republican senators to fall in line behind him, suggests Trump is embracing a new kind of judicial pick as he continues to face significant resistance to his governing decisions in the federal courts. Bove, 44, faced intense questioning from panel Democrats who pressed on his loyalty to the president as reflected not only in his private representation of Trump but his actions as principal associate deputy attorney general. Those include dismissing prosecutors tied to cases involving the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, ending the corruption prosecution of New York City Mayor Eric Adams and pursuing the administration's deportation agenda. 'Bove has led the effort to weaponize the Department of Justice against the president's enemies,' said Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin, the top Judiciary Democrat. 'Having earned his stripes as a loyalist to this president, he's been rewarded with a lifetime nomination.' The tenor of Wednesday's hearing suggested that there is no detente in sight in the escalating partisan fight over federal judges, which reached a crescendo in 2018 with the searing confirmation battle over Supreme Court Justice Brett Kavanaugh. The only check on the rancor might be the fact that there are relatively few judicial vacancies for Trump to fill at the moment. According to the U.S. court system, there are just about 50 across the country, the vast majority of which are on district courts. The president's first slate of judicial nominees, including a pick for the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals, is poised to have a vote Thursday before the Judiciary Committee. There are, however, three Republican-appointed Supreme Court justices 70 or over who are considered possible candidates for retirement over the next three-and-a-half years. Trump's willingness to nominate Bove — and to weather a hardball confirmation fight when a lesser-known nominee might have had an easier time — suggests he won't hesitate to tap another loyalist when a high-court slot opens up. With a potential lifetime appointment to the 3rd Circuit, with jurisdiction over appeals from New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Delaware, and the Virgin Islands, Bove himself could emerge as a SCOTUS short-list candidate if confirmed. The questioning Wednesday appeared to underscore the high stakes. Democrats questioned Bove about the pardons of Jan. 6 convicts and his role in the removal of the line prosecutors who sent them to jail. The issue was effective in sinking one prior Trump nominee: his initial pick for U.S. attorney for the District of Columbia, Ed Martin. Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), a Judiciary member up for next year, effectively tanked his chances by objecting to Martin's comments minimizing the Capitol riot. (Tillis said Wednesday he has not yet taken a position on Bove's nomination. 'Honestly I haven't discussed it with my staff yet,' he said.) Democrats also seized on the Justice Department's decision to abandon the Adams prosecution — a controversial order from Bove himself that triggered the resignation of at least 6 prosecutors in New York and Washington. In her resignation letter, then-acting Manhattan U.S. attorney Danielle Sassoon accused Bove of engaging in a corrupt deal to drop the case in exchange for the Democratic mayor's support of Trump's immigration policies. Asked during the hearing to swear to his 'higher being' that he didn't make a 'political deal' with Adams, Bove replied: 'I swear to my higher being and on every bone in my body.' But Bove also said that he ordered the case dismissed based on 'policy considerations,' explaining that 'the prosecution placed an inordinate burden on the mayor's ability to protect the city and to campaign in an ongoing election cycle.' Using that logic, Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.) said, 'there would be two classes of justice – one for people who are in office and one for everyone else.' Bove also denied allegations from a former DOJ official that he suggested defying court orders for the administration's deportation agenda. 'I am not anybody's henchman,' Bove told senators. 'I am not an enforcer. I am a lawyer from a small town who never expected to be in an arena like this.' Republicans rallied to Bove's defense, with the tone set early in the hearing by Judiciary Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who noted that the nominee had seen an 'intense opposition campaign' and extolled his credentials as a former prosecutor. Democrats, on the other hand, cast the fight over Bove's nomination as one of grave significance for the rule of law, echoing a familiar fight from Trump's first term. Indeed, federal judges appointed by presidents of both parties have been some of the most effective checks on Trump's power early in his second term — much to the president's frustration. Yet Democrats have little power to stop Trump's nominees so long as Republican senators stick together. With a 53-vote Senate majority, GOP leaders can lose several votes and still confirm Trump's picks with Vice President JD Vance as a tie-breaker. Democrats also lack the benefit of the 'blue slip' policy that gives home-state senators effective veto power over court nominees. Republicans abandoned the practice for circuit judges during Trump's first term, one of the procedural changes in the Senate that allowed the party to confirm hundreds of judicial nominees during those four years. Democrats maintained the practice after they won control of the Senate and Joe Biden won the presidency. Among those attending Wednesday's hearing were Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche — Bove's supervisors at the Justice Department. Blanche and Bove worked together as Trump's criminal defense attorneys, including during last year's criminal trial that resulted in his conviction on 34 felony counts of business fraud. Bondi defended Trump during his first impeachment trial. Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) contended that Bondi and Blanche attended for the sole purpose of 'whip[ping] the Republicans into shape, to make sure that they toe the line.' 'They were there to send a message to Republicans: We are watching you,' Blumenthal said during a news conference after Bove's testimony. 'They were there to watch members of this committee, the Republicans, whom they expect simply to fall into line.' Bove wasn't the only Trump nominee answering questions about his loyalty to the president Wednesday. Edward L. Artau, one of four district court nominees to also appear before Senate Judiciary members, was asked by Blumenthal why he did not recuse himself from a case involving Trump after he began lobbying for a federal judgeship. POLITICO previously reported that Artau, a state judge, was lobbying for a seat on the federal bench while he sat on a three-judge panel in Trump's defamation case against the board of the Pulitzer Prizes. Asked by Blumenthal why he did not recuse himself, Artau maintained that he abided by the relevant judicial conduct rule. He said he did not know he was under consideration from the White House at the time he wrote the opinion. 'Had the timing been differently, then I may have handled it differently,' Artau said. Calen Razor contributed to this report.
