Pahalgam massacre has blown Pakistan's cover. Asim Munir turned the clock back
Just a week before the attack, Munir declared at the Overseas Pakistanis Conference in Islamabad that Kashmir was the 'jugular vein' of Pakistan and that 'no power in the world' could separate the two.
It is bad news because the pattern of attacks going back to spring 2000 has been repeated once again. It is bad news for Pakistan because there had been a palpable rush toward a semblance of business normalcy in the Kashmir Valley following years of unrest. And it is terribly bad news for Pakistan that this massacre comes in the wake of its Chief of Army Staff, Asim Munir, making provocative remarks.
Globally, it is bad news for Pakistan as the Resistance Front, an offshoot of its preferred terror module Lashkar-e-Toiba, claims responsibility for the brutal sectarian massacre of tourists in a Pahalgam meadow.
Also Read: Pattern of terror in J&K amid high-profile US visits—Chittisinghpura, Kaluchak & now Pahalgam
Bad news for Pakistan
Unlike in the past, where massacres of local civilians were not preceded by incendiary comments from Pakistani leaders or soldiers, the 22 April Baisaran massacre will always be dovetailed with the truly pyromaniac comments made by Pakistan's seminary-educated Chief of Army Staff.
That he should describe Kashmir as Pakistan's jugular vein in 2025 is simply a reflection of changelessness in the era of recreational space travel. Underlining differences in faith, customs, traditions, thoughts, and ambitions, Gen Munir set the stage for an outrageously sectarian massacre of unarmed Hindu men by Islamist insurgents.
However hard Pakistan may try to whitewash Munir's reactionary comments for the eyes of the world, it will not be able to retreat from his deliberately provocative position. That the retrogressive remarks were made before an audience of overseas Pakistanis highlights the agenda that is in store — or simply re-released for current consumption. The recipients of this message of hate have flown across the seven seas, carrying the words of the most powerful man in all of Pakistan. And it didn't take long for the words to have their first effects, however much Islamabad may want to distance itself.
The fact of the matter is that Islamabad needs to distance itself from GHQ Rawalpindi, especially now that current leadership speaks with a different tone and language than has been heard over the last decade or so.
Military leadership in Pakistan has spoken remarkably conciliatory language in the recent past, even if the words did not translate to greater breakthrough over policy change. But Gen Munir has turned the clock back to a period where Pakistan's policy choices ushered in an era of terrible violence and bloodshed.
Bad news for Pakistan, especially since its overseas messengers have gone back carrying hateful messages.
Also Read: Pahalgam attack deserves retaliation. India can borrow from US, Israel playbook
Bad news for Kashmir
It is also bad news for the Kashmir Valley, which was bracing itself for a booming summer season in tourism and travel-related industries. April is really when it all begins, and in 2025, it has taken a major hit just as it seemed like boom time had arrived. Cancellations have naturally begun and are likely to continue. Confidence is the first casualty in this game, and it is easy to understand why this causes deep anguish to the recently restored government of Omar Abdullah.
A summer full of pain is also politically lethal.
Fatalities are foretold in this season of suffering and grief. Government and security forces must ensure that, in the heat of the moment, innocents are not used as pawns for the PPT of success.
In the game of terror and counter-terror, success depends solely on mental stamina and the strength to stay the course. The war thrust upon India is an ideological one, and it cannot be won just by force. There is, undoubtedly, an important role for the use of force, as without it, the back of terror cannot be broken. But that alone isn't enough.
In the case of Kashmir 2025, what is equally important is that the people of the Valley be counted among those who stand up against terror.
It isn't simply a matter of condemnation through words. Now it has to be done with deeds. And in the cat-and-mouse of terror and insurgency, there is much that the people of Kashmir can do, and need to do. Their livelihoods are being paralysed by provocations that emanate from Pakistan. An entire spectrum of economic activity lies frozen by the actions of messianic mercenaries released by jihadi masterminds.
In a game where the initiative for action lies with terrorists plotting mayhem, remaining immobilised is no longer an option for the people of Kashmir. Their response will be the first message read by the manipulators of the terrorists themselves. Retributory actions have happened in the past, and may be repeated as and when appropriate decisions are taken.
Until then, vigilance and awareness are of utmost importance. Information is the key to success and the repository of that wealth is the people of Kashmir. For it is among them that the perpetrators and planners of such ghastly violence hide and take shelter.
Manvendra Singh is a BJP leader, Editor-in-Chief of Defence & Security Alert and Chairman, Soldier Welfare Advisory Committee, Rajasthan. He is writing a book on the IPKF. He tweets @ManvendraJasol. Views are personal.
(Edited by Asavari Singh)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
42 minutes ago
- First Post
New storm brewing in Asia? Thailand closes border to tourists amid clashes with Cambodia
Thailand on Saturday closes two of its key borders to tourists after clashes with Cambodia. Here's what both sides are saying about the situation. read more At least 28 people have been killed since 2008 during military skirmishes along the border. AFP On Saturday, Thailand shut down two of its border crossings for tourists as a safety measure amid brewing tensions with its neighbouring nation, Cambodia. The Thai authorities announced the move following the killing of a Cambodian soldier during a brief military clash on May 28 in an area known as the Emerald Triangle. What makes the region significant is that here is where the borders of Thailand, Cambodia and Laos meet. It is important to note that Thailand and Cambodia share an 817 kilometre (508 mile) border, first mapped by France in 1907 when Cambodia was its colony. For decades, the two Asian neighbours have disputed various undemarcated points along the frontier. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The full-scale fighting between the two nations first broke out in 2008. Interestingly, the fight was over an 11th-century Hindu temple, and the clashes ultimately led to sporadic violence over several years. In 2013, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that the disputed area belonged to Cambodia. However, Thailand says it does not accept the ICJ's jurisdiction and seeks a bilateral settlement. What is Thailand's take on the matter? In a statement on Saturday, authorities in the eastern province of Chanthaburi said that they had 'temporarily suspended' crossings by Thai and Cambodian tourists at two permanent border checkpoints. Soon after this, the Royal Thai Army cited a threat to Thailand's 'sovereignty and security' as the reason behind the move. The army made it clear that trade would be unaffected, and Cambodian workers could still be allowed to enter Thailand. Apart from this, six other border checkpoints tightened their opening hours and issued bans on six-wheeled vehicles. In a separate statement, Thai Defence Minister Phumtham Wechayachai said the army had reinforced its military presence at the border in light of increasing deployment on the other side of the border. 'There has been a reinforcement of military presence [by Cambodia], which has exacerbated tensions along the border,' Phumtham, who is also deputy prime minister, said in a statement. 'Consequently, the Royal Thai Government has deemed it necessary to implement additional measures and to reinforce our military posture accordingly,' he added. On Friday, Thailand's army made it clear that it is ready to launch a 'high-level operation' to counter any violation of Thailand's sovereignty. The Thai Foreign Ministry later said on Saturday that the country was committed to holding bilateral talks with Cambodia on June 14 to resolve the dispute. What has Cambodia said? Meanwhile, Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Manet said in an address on Saturday that his country's stance was 'not to initiate conflict, but to defend ourselves.' Earlier this week, Hun said that the kingdom would file a complaint with the International Court of Justice (ICJ) over the border dispute. As of now, the two neighbours had agreed to ease tensions following last month's killing, but Cambodia eventually said that it would keep its troops in the area, in defiance of a request by Bangkok. In light of this, the Southeast Asian regional bloc ASEAN and China have both made efforts to reduce tensions in recent days. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
News18
an hour ago
- News18
NIA To Probe Murder Case Of Mangaluru Hindu Activist Suhas Shetty
Last Updated: The NIA will now probe Shetty's murder case after it received an order from the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). Suhas Shetty Murder: The National Investigation Agency (NIA) will probe the case of Hindu activist Suhas Shetty in Karnataka's Mangaluru, who was hacked to death by a group of assailants on May 1. The NIA will now probe Shetty's murder case after it received an order from the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). The probe agency will take police remand of all the eight arrested accused and question them in detail about the case. The development came after the BJP petitioned Governor Thaawarchand Gehlot seeking direction to the State government to transfer the case to NIA for probe last month. Accusing the Congress government of adopting a soft stance over such cases, the BJP had said only an NIA probe could provide justice. Earlier, Sulochana Shetty, mother of slain activist had also urged the state government to transfer the investigation of her son's murder case to the the probe agency. Sulochana had expressed concern about the state government's handling of her son's murder investigation, and had claimed that authorities were impeding a thorough inquiry into the case. 'We seek justice for Suhas. A group of over 50 individuals subjected my son to torture before taking his life. Both home minister G Parameshwara and district minister Dinesh Gundu Rao wrongly labelled my son Suhas as a rowdy.I clarify that Suhas was not a rowdy, but worked with Bajrang Dal. Only an NIA investigation can ensure we receive proper justice," she had said. Suhas Shetty Murder Suhas Shetty, a known rowdy sheeter and Hindutva activist, was murdered by an unidentified group on May 1 within the Bajpe police station limits in Mangaluru. He was attacked at around 8:30 pm while he was traveling with five of his associates when their vehicle was intercepted near Kinnipadavu Cross by the attackers. The attackers, around six people, were traveling in a Swift car and a pickup truck. They reportedly attacked Shetty and his group, assaulting him with deadly weapons causing serious injuries. Shetty was the main accused in the high-profile 2022 murder of Mohammed Fazil. Mohammed Fazil was killed by four masked men on July 28, 2022, with Shetty being the prime accused in the case. The then Basvraj Bommai-led BJP government had not granted any compensation to the deceased family. However, the Siddaramaiah-led Congress government had granted a compensation of Rs 25 lakh to Fazil's family in 2023, something that was also offered to three other families that saw members lose lives to communal murders. First Published: June 08, 2025, 17:07 IST
Hans India
an hour ago
- Hans India
India needs inclusive, resilient Viksit Bharat in the real sense of the term
It is difficult to say if today's India is aware of what celebrated economist Raj Krishna dubbed as 'Hindu rate of growth' in 1978 to describe the country's sluggish economic advancement, which averaged around 3.5 per cent per annum from 1950s to the 1980s. As a newly independent nation, India faced numerous challenges, the most pressing of which was the widespread socio-economic deprivation affecting a vast majority of its population. Land and education, two critical components for individual progress, were largely controlled by a privileged few. Deep-rooted issues such as untouchability, poverty, and caste and religion-based discrimination by the privileged against the underprivileged posed significant obstacles to the country's holistic development. It was our electoral democracy – government by the people, for the people, and of the people – which emerged as a beacon of hope for millions of men and women seeking dignity, equality, and opportunity in free India, for which we should be ever grateful to Bharat Ratna Dr B R Ambedkar. Though struggle continues even today, we have traversed a long distance in our collective pursuits to realize the goal of inclusive development. Unfortunately, income and wealth disparities among our people continue to widen. The task of equitable distribution of national resources, opportunities, facilities, privileges, and responsibilities among all in proportion to their population still remains colossal. Thanks to our affirmative measures such as reservation in government jobs and in admissions in public sector educational institutions, we have been able to add some critical value to the idea of unity and prosperity in diversity, the very foundation of our nation. It is, therefore, necessary to maintain the momentum of debate and discussion about wholesome inclusive development of India as we are moving towards celebrating the centenary of our Independence in 2047. One may not be sure if we become a $30 trillion economy by then but we must not be lacking in our honest efforts in this regard. In a policy paper of NITI Aayog (National Institution for Transforming India Aayog) brought out in May 2023, Dr Arvind Virmani, a celebrated economist, talked of 'Bharatiya Model of Inclusive Development - Sabka Saath, Sabka Vikas, Sabka Vishwas, Sabka Prayas.' According to him, 'the Indian model of inclusive growth, viewed from a development economics perspective, has three pillars - market economics, empowerment, and pragmatism.' He also briefly dwelt on 'market competition, oligopoly and monopoly, public and welfare economics' among other things. He also referred to 'the communist-socialist, command and control approach to economy, which many educated intellectuals and academics favoured for almost half a century after independence' and stated that 'individual initiative including involuntarily formed groups, are the drivers of economic growth and employment generation, not the government. Government can be the enabler and facilitator and must ensure equal opportunity for all.' Under the sub-head 'Antyodaya Welfarism,' Dr Virmani writes: 'Antyodaya empowerment is the Indian competitor to the European Welfare state. The Bharatiya Welfare State focuses on the lowest rungs of society, socio-economic development, and income levels, as Mahatma Gandhi said: 'Recall the face of the poorest and weakest man you have seen and ask yourself if this step you contemplate is going to be of any use to him.' This is something on which an overwhelming majority of the public, every community, socioeconomic group, and political party has agreed-on. The Bharatiya approach to social welfare is multi-faceted, including direct transfers to recipients and indirect subsidies through service providers, cash transfers and in-kind transfers such as free or below market price provision of goods and services such as scholarships and a broad range of basic needs.' Unfortunately, Dr Virmani did not even briefly talk about high level of health, wealth, education and justice deprivation among the country's major social groups such as SCs, STs, OBCs, and minorities even after so many decades of Independence, though they account for the country's not less than 85 per cent population. They continue to struggle with chronic problems such as malnutrition, poverty and lack of quality education. They are still not in a position to assert their social identity, and hence are forced to lead a life of anonymity in many cases. A large number of poor people from among them are languishing in jails for years for committing petty offences, an issue which President Droupadi Murmu herself flagged in her valedictory address at the Constitution Day celebrations organised by the Supreme Court of India in New Delhi on November 26, 2022. The Bharatiya development model focussed on 'sustained, fast, inclusive growth where inclusive means all round development of the society and empowerment of every citizen, to develop own capabilities and competence through application of mind and effort' won't be possible if the Central and state governments do not spend adequately on imparting quality and competitive education to children from weaker sections of society, right from schooling to higher education. At the moment, there is an abysmal level of gross enrolment ratio (GER) among them. Majority of them have degrees but not skills and vice versa. Thus, they are caught in such a vicious circle that they don't know how to get out of that. After all, they have to feed their families as well, and whatever little bit they have in the name of savings, that is spent on making a house and children's marriage. For education, they are solely dependent upon the facilities in the public sector, the condition of which is known to all. It is, therefore, necessary for all stakeholders including writers, public policy experts, economists, businessmen, corporate entities and the elite among us to come forward and contribute to building an inclusive and resilient Viksit Bharat in the real sense of the term. A special request for the private sector – they need to make affirmative policy an integral part of their recruitments. Today students from deprived social groups have limited access to well-paid jobs in the private sector, not because they are not lacking in merit and other wherewithal but because of the poor transparency in the recruitment processes. If I correctly remember, India Inc had agreed in principle to give preference to the candidates from socially and education backward classes while making recruitments when former Prime Minister Dr Manmohan Singh led UPA government wanted to introduce quotas in the private sector. Neither quota nor preferential treatment, the white collar jobs in the private sector remain the fiefdom of a few among us. Who cares! Perhaps, none!
