
Orforglipron Lowers A1c, Weight in Early Type 2 Diabetes
CHICAGO — The investigational non-peptide small-molecule oral GLP-1 agonist orforglipron significantly reduced A1c over 40 weeks in adults with early type 2 diabetes, according to the results of ACHIEVE-1 sponsored by Eli Lilly.
In the trial, orforglipron reduced A1c to the 6.5% range and produced clinically meaningful weight loss with a safety profile similar to that of other GLP-1 drugs. ACHIEVE-1 is the first of seven phase 3 studies of the safety and efficacy of the drug in over 6000 patients with type 2 diabetes and obesity,
Orforglipron and other similar non-peptide small molecules "have the potential to be widely accepted as a much earlier therapy for type 2 diabetes," Julio Rosenstock, MD, senior scientific advisor for Velocity Clinical Research and clinical professor of medicine at the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, said at a press briefing here at the American Diabetes Association (ADA) 85th Scientific Sessions. The findings were simultaneously published in the New England Journal of Medicine .
Orforglipron is a once-daily non-peptide small molecule that can be taken any time of day without restrictions on meals or water intake. This contrasts with the currently approved oral GLP-1 receptor agonist semaglutide (Rybelsus, Novo Nordisk), a peptide that ideally should be taken while fasting and with no food or water for at least 30 minutes after ingestion to prevent degradation.
Lilly is the farthest along in the development of a small-molecule non-peptide GLP-1 agonist, but at least two others are in phase 3 trials, including CX11 (also known as VCT220) from Corxel Pharmaceuticals and HRS-7535 from Jiangsu Hengrui Pharmaceuticals and Kailera Therapeutics. Several more are in phase 2 trials.
As a class, the oral non-peptide small-molecule GLP-1 receptor agonists "have the potential to open the access for more people because they're easier to take, they're simpler to produce, and in theory, they should be less expensive. So you can see the potential for these drugs," Rosenstock said.
However, Amy E. Rothberg, MD, clinical professor of internal medicine and of nutritional sciences at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, told Medscape Medical News that she's concerned because, unlike injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists, "most oral medications are metabolized by the liver. The enzymes that metabolize them may be affected by people's weight. Therefore, if you have obesity, the distribution and the kinetics of the drug may be different than someone who is normal weight. Also, if someone loses weight from having a higher BMI to a lower weight, that may affect the drug distribution and the drug bioavailability."
She believes that "the companies need to look at drug exposure before and after weight loss because efficacy and safety could be affected by weight change."
First Phase 3 Orforglipron Data Meets Endpoints
In ACHEIVE-1, 559 participants with early (duration range, 4.0-5.1 years) type 2 diabetes with A1c levels of 7.0%-9.5% (mean 8.0%) using only diet and exercise and a BMI 23.0 kg/m2 or greater, were randomized equally to receive orforglipron 3 mg, 12 mg, or 36 mg, or placebo once daily for 40 weeks.
The primary endpoint, percentage-point change in A1c from baseline to week 40, showed reductions of 1.24, 1.47, 1.48 for the 3-mg, 12-mg, and 36-mg doses, respectively, compared with a 0.41 percentage-point reduction with placebo. All three orforglipron doses produced significant A1c reductions compared with placebo ( P < .001 for all comparisons). At week 40, the mean A1c level ranged from 6.5% to 6.7% with orforglipron, Rosenstock reported.
Percentage of body weight losses from baseline to week 40 were 4.5%, 5.8%, and 7.6% for the 3-mg, 12-mg, and 36-mg doses, respectively, versus 1.7% with placebo.
The most common adverse events were mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal events, most of which occurred during dose escalation. Gastrointestinal events leading to drug discontinuation occurred in 2.8%, 2.2%, and 5.7% of patients, respectively, for the three orforglipron doses, versus none with placebo.
This was similar to what has been observed with other oral and injected GLP-1 agonists, Rosenstock said. "We did not see any surprises. You're going to see the same ranges of nausea and vomiting as with semaglutide and tirzepatide."
There were no episodes of severe hypoglycemia. The overall proportions discontinuing permanently due to adverse events ranged from 4% to 8% with orforglipron versus 1% with placebo.
"A Remarkable Scientific Achievement"
Asked to comment, Simeon Taylor, MD, PhD, professor of medicine and director of the Institutional Research Training Program in Diabetes & Obesity at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, told Medscape Medical News : "This landmark scientific achievement ushers in a new chapter in the development of GLP-1 agonists."
Taylor pointed out that "orforglipron's glycemic efficacy is only slightly less than monotherapy with Ozempic" and that it "has somewhat more placebo-subtracted weight loss efficacy in people with type 2 diabetes" than Ozempic.
Overall, he said, "It is a remarkable scientific achievement to have developed a first-in-class orally bioavailable organic chemical entity with efficacy comparable to a third-generation injectable peptide drug. It is likely that many people with type 2 diabetes will be attracted to the option of an orally bioavailable drug."
The other four ACHIEVE trials, to be reported later in 2025, will examine orforglipron in combination with metformin versus dapagliflozin (ACHIEVE-2), in combination with metformin compared to oral semaglutide (ACHIEVE-3), combined with multiple therapies versus insulin glargine (ACHIEVE-4), and in combination with insulin versus placebo (ACHIEVE-5).
Another Lilly phase 3 trial, ATTAIN, is evaluating orforglipron for weight management. Results from ATTAIN-1 and ATTAIN-2 will also be presented later in 2025.
"Lilly remains on track to submit orforglipron for weight management to global regulatory agencies by the end of this year and for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in 2026," according to a company statement.
Rosenstock has reported receiving research/grant support from, serving on advisory boards for, and/or receiving consulting fees/honoraria from Applied Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Biomea Fusion, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corcept, Eli Lilly, Hanmi, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Oramed, Pfizer, Regeneron, Regor, Roche, Sanofi, Structure Therapeutics, and Terns. Taylor has reported receiving payments from the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases for an inventor's share of a patent covering metreleptin as a treatment for generalized lipodystrophy. He was employed by Eli Lilly in 2000-2002 and Bristol Myers Squibb in 2002-2013.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Quote of the Day: ‘I Feel Like I've Been Lied To': When a Measles Outbreak Hits Home
'It's still spreading. I'm starting to think this thing has come back to stay.' LYNN DOUGLAS, the nursing director of the Williston Basin School District in North Dakota, on an outbreak of measles, a disease that had not been present in the state in 14 years. Measles has also hit other parts of the U.S.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
U.S. Supreme Court orders review over religious challenge to New York abortion law
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday ordered a lower court in New York to reevaluate whether some religious organizations should be excluded from a state mandate that requires employers to provide employee health care plans that include abortion coverage. The ruling from the high court said the case, Diocese of Albany v. Harris, should be sent back to New York courts to be reviewed again in light of an earlier unanimous Wisconsin case related to the Catholic Church groups being denied state tax exemptions. The justices pointed to the Wisconsin case because the New York case poses similar issues about states exempting religious employers and faith-based groups, The Associated Press reported. The New York case stems from a 2017 state mandate that requires health insurance plans provided by employers to include abortion coverage for situations that include rape and incest. The state mandate includes a religious exemption for institutions, but not for religious-affiliated groups. It was challenged by Catholic and Anglican nuns, Catholic dioceses, Christian churches and other faith organizations. They argued the religious exemption is so narrow that it violates the freedom of religion protected under the First Amendment. The most recent order from the Supreme Court is the second time the case has reached the justices after being litigated for years. After the state adopted the mandate in 2017, religious groups challenged it in state court. The appeals court upheld the regulation and the state refused to exempt religious organizations. In 2021, the religious groups appealed the state's ruling to the U.S. Supreme Court. Justices asked New York to reconsider based on its ruling in another case involving religion, Fulton v. Philadelphia. State courts found the Fulton decision was inapplicable to the situation, prompting the groups to bring it to the Supreme Court again. The religious liberty law firm Becket noted in a release that New York's exemption doesn't currently apply to some organizations, including the Carmelite Sisters for the Aged and Infirm and the Teresian Nursing Home because they 'serve the elderly and dying regardless of religious affiliation.' 'New York wants to browbeat nuns into paying for abortions for the great crime of serving all those in need,' Becket Vice President and senior counsel Eric Baxter said in a statement.' Following the Supreme Court's Monday order, the case is headed back to the New York Court of Appeals.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wolfe Research Initiates Coverage of BridgeBio Pharma (BBIO) with ‘Outperform' Rating
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:BBIO) is one of the 10 biotech stocks screaming a buy. On June 17, Wolfe Research initiated coverage of the stock with an 'Outperform' rating and a $49 price target. The research firm reiterated the company's solid position amid the 'TTR craze' while also echoing its commercial execution strategy. A medical technician wearing a lab coat operating machinery in a biopharmaceutical laboratory. Consequently, Wolfe Research expects BridegBio's revenue to total $569 million in 2025 before rising to $3.4 billion by 2028. It should peak at $4.4 billion in 2034. For the upcoming second quarter, the research firm expects the company to deliver revenue of $106 million, slightly below market expectation of $111 million. While the stock has shown a remarkable return of 42% year to date, Wolfe Research insists it must navigate several challenges to maintain the positive momentum. It must navigate the potential Vyndaqel loss of exclusivity, achondroplasia data versus competition, and pipeline products. In addition, consistent revenue growth and expanding operating margins will be crucial to the company's long-term success. BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ:BBIO) is a biopharmaceutical company that develops and delivers transformative medicines for genetic diseases. Its pipeline includes a range of development programs, from early science to advanced clinical trials. While we acknowledge the potential of BBIO as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: 13 Best Software Stocks to Buy Now and 11 Must-Buy AI Stocks Analysts Are Betting On. Disclosure: None. Sign in to access your portfolio