Residents protest condo project, demand safety guarantees
Residents of Empire Residence in Damansara Perdana are seeking safety assurances regarding a proposed 21-storey condominium set to be built in the area.
PETALING JAYA : A residents group in Damansara Perdana have expressed concern over a proposed 21-storey condominium that is set to be built near their houses.
The group said with the condominium being constructed on a hillside, it had triggered memories of the 1993 Highland Towers tragedy, in which one of three blocks of apartments had collapsed due to a landslide.
'We're not anti-development. However, building a condominium on a steep slope? Do our lives have no value?' Simon Ng, an Empire Residence joint management body (JMB) committee member told FMT.
FMT was informed that residents had raised concerns about the condominium project with the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) during a briefing on another project on June 3.
Simon Ng.
Sinar Harian, which covered the meeting, reported that 'tensions flared' when more than 100 Empire Residence homeowners strongly objected to the proposed development of three apartment blocks planned for construction on a Class IV slope.
Another JMB committee member, Joshua Tan, said residents want all parties involved to conduct a more thorough study and provide safety guarantees.
He said he had observed landslides in the area during rainy weather and feared that the project could destabilise the ground's structure.
Joshua Tan.
'Can the politicians, developers, and relevant authorities provide us any guarantees?' he asked.
Meanwhile, Simon stated that the residents have sent over 130 protest letters to MBPJ opposing the condominium project.
He questioned how the project could be approved, claiming that the town and country planning department has classified the area as high-risk, with 23% of the land being Class IV slopes and 64.8% Class III slopes.
FMT is currently seeking responses from the area's state assemblyman and the developer listed on the project's signage.
When contacted, MBPJ councillor Suriase Gengiah said the June 3 briefing was only for a road project and did not cover other aspects of the proposed development.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Malay Mail
30 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Appeals court to decide Aug 19 on activist's challenge to online speech law under Communications and Multimedia Act 1998
PUTRAJAYA, June 11 — The Court of Appeal has fixed August 19 to deliver its decision in an appeal brought by an activist over the dismissal of her lawsuit that had challenged the validity of parts of a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that criminalises offensive online comments. A three-man bench consisting of Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng and Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah set the decision date after parties completed their submissions earlier today. Heidy Quah Gaik Li, the founder of Refuge for Refugees is claiming the use of the words 'offensive' and annoy' in Section 233 of the Act are invalid as it goes against two fundamental human rights protected by the Federal Constitution. Section 233(1)(a) states that it is an offence for a person to make, create or solicit, and initiate the transmission of any online comment which is 'obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive' with 'intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person. In September 2023, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed Quah's lawsuit, leading her to file an appeal in the Court of Appeal. The hearing today was a continuation of proceedings that had begun earlier. Justice Lee was serving as a Court of Appeal judge before being elevated to the Federal Court in May this year. During today's hearing, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin representing the Malaysian government submitted that speech involving expletives, profanity, crude references, hate speech or incitement to violence are not expressions protected under Article 10 (1) (a) of the Federal Constitution. He argued that the right to free speech should be used to disseminate truth, respect for human dignity and perform essential informing function. On the other hand, lawyer Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, representing Quah argued the words 'offensive' or annoy contained in Section 233 is inconsistent with Article 10 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, namely the right to equality and freedom of speech. He argued that the two words in Section 233 are not a 'permissible restriction' under public order as prescribed in the Federal Constitution. In July 2021, Quah, 31, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for allegedly making 'offensive' online comments in a Facebook post. In April the following year, the Sessions Court granted her a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) due to the charge under section 233(1)(a) being defective. — Bernama
Malay Mail
an hour ago
- Malay Mail
MARA, MOHE team up to monitor scholars in US amid new Trump-era policies, says Asyraf Wajdi
KUALA LUMPUR, June 11 — Majlis Amanah Rakyat (MARA) will work closely with the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) to closely monitor the situation involving its scholars in the United States following the introduction of new policies under President Donald Trump's administration. Its chairman, Datuk Dr Asyraf Wajdi Dusuki, said that so far, MOHE has assured that the impact on Malaysian students in the US remains minimal. 'We are working closely with the ministry because this is a government-to-government issue. We are concerned about our scholars in the US, as policies can change at any time, but the most important thing is to avoid exposing them to greater risks. 'Alhamdulillah, we hope there will be no adverse effects on our students. Let them complete their studies first. However, for new scholars, we have decided to put a hold on sending them there for now,' he told reporters after the MARA-Petronas Automotive Entrepreneur Development Programme (PUMP) here today. Asyraf said this when asked to comment on the potential impact of the new US tariffs and policies on Malaysian students pursuing education in the country. On June 1, Asyraf announced that MARA had decided to halt sending students to the US starting this year and had begun discussing with students at its preparatory colleges to explore alternative study destinations. This move comes in the wake of the Trump administration's directive to suspend visa processing for all foreign students and considerations to screen new applicants based on their social media activity. — Bernama
Free Malaysia Today
2 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Review policies surrounding wealth disparity, says academic
Tricia Yeoh of University of Nottingham Malaysia's School of Politics and International Relations urged policymakers to place affordability and accessibility at the heart of future housing and transportation reforms. (Facebook pic) PETALING JAYA : An academic has urged the government to review its policies on housing and vehicle affordability, arguing that Malaysia's growing household debt is symptomatic of a deeper systemic inequality. Tricia Yeoh of University of Nottingham Malaysia's School of Politics and International Relations said Malaysia's household debt to gross domestic product ratio stands at 69.3%, one of the highest in the Asia-Pacific region. She said more alarming is the composition of this debt. 'The bulk of it comes from loans such as housing and motor vehicle loans,' she said during a recording of BBC World Questions at the Petaling Jaya Performing Arts Centre yesterday. 'This should prompt us to relook government policy, especially since the price of vehicles in Malaysia is highly inflated.' She also highlighted a lack of affordable housing, especially in the Klang Valley, as a pressing issue for working-class Malaysians trapped in financial precarity. While cautioning against one-size-fits-all solutions, she said that any meaningful conversation about wealth inequality must address deeper structural problems, including stagnant wages and inadequate retirement savings. 'We're becoming an ageing society, yet about 70% of Malaysians can't even raise RM1,000 in an emergency. That's just US$200,' she said. 'These aren't just statistics. They speak to the very real insecurity Malaysians feel about their future.' Yeoh's comments reflect data showing that the richest 10% of the population take home nearly 40% of the country's income, while the poorest 10% survive on just 1.7%. Yeoh said that tackling this imbalance would require more than just tax tweaks or subsidy reforms. She urged policymakers to place affordability and accessibility at the heart of future housing and transportation reforms. 'We need to ask ourselves, why do Malaysians need to go into debt just to be mobile or have a roof over their heads?'
