
India, US discuss metals tariff objection
India is bilaterally discussing with the US its claim at the World Trade Organization (WTO) that there is no basis for New Delhi's proposal to retaliate against the American tariffs on steel and aluminium, said an official.
The issue will also be taken up in the India-US
bilateral trade agreement
(BTA) talks.
"The US has said our proposal to retaliate is baseless and we are bilaterally discussing with them at WTO. It's being discussed in the BTA talks also," said the official.
In early May, India proposed to levy retaliatory duties on 29 American products including apples, almonds, pears, anti-freezing preparations, boric acid and certain products made of iron and steel under the WTO to counter US tariffs on steel and aluminium. New Delhi told the WTO that these safeguard measures would affect $7.6 billion worth of imports into the US.
However, the US refused to discuss the Section 232 tariffs under the Agreement on Safeguards as it does not view the tariffs as a safeguard measure.
Section 232 authorises the US president to adjust imports of goods which can threaten to impair US national security.
"Given this rejection, India now faces several options including launching a formal WTO dispute under broader GATT rules, challenging the Section 232 tariffs as disguised protectionist actions, arguing that the US is abusing the national security exception," said a Delhi-based trade expert.
"This issue will be crucial in the India-US BTA trade talks," said the official.
A team of US officials is visiting India this week for discussions on the proposed interim
trade agreement
between the two countries.
The two aim to negotiate the first tranche or phase of a mutually beneficial, multi-sector BTA by fall this year and more than double the bilateral trade to $500 billion by 2030 from the current level of $191 billion.
The two sides are likely to agree on an interim trade agreement by the end of June, with New Delhi pushing for full exemption from the 26% reciprocal tariff on domestic goods.
On March 8, 2018, the US promulgated safeguard measures on certain steel and aluminium products by imposing 25% and 10% ad valorem tariffs respectively, effective March 23, 2018. On February 10, 2025, it revised the measures on imports of steel and aluminium articles, effective March 12.
India said the US failed to notify the WTO Committee on Safeguards on taking a decision to apply safeguard measures, and as an affected member with significant export interest, it has requested consultations with Washington.
(The correspondent is in Paris at the invitation of the commerce and industry ministry)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
14 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Harvard student fires back in exclusive interview as Trump goes to war on foreign students
An exclusive interview with Fangzhou Jiang, Forbes 30 Under 30 honoree and Harvard Kennedy School student, on the Trump administration's aggressive visa revocations for Chinese students. Hear firsthand about the anxiety and uncertainty among Chinese students at Harvard, the impact on academic freedom, and the broader implications for US-China relations. Jiang shares insights on national security, community support, and why he co-founded Crimson Education. Don't miss this insightful discussion on America's shifting immigration policies and the future of international students in the US.


Time of India
22 minutes ago
- Time of India
Harvard vs. Trump round two: US blocks foreign students over national security concerns
Trump blocks foreign students from entering Harvard over security concerns In a sweeping proclamation issued Wednesday evening, Trump barred the entry of foreign students under Harvard-hosted student and exchange visitor visas, citing national security concerns. The order, effective immediately, suspends new admissions under the F, M, and J visa categories, halting the arrival of students who were set to begin their academic journeys at Harvard. The proclamation also places current international students and researchers at the university under review, directing the U.S. Department of State to consider revoking existing visas on a case-by-case basis. The suspension is set to last for six months, with the possibility of an extension. The move comes on the heels of the Department of Homeland Security's earlier, failed attempt to decertify Harvard's ability to enrol international students — a decision that was blocked by a federal court after the university sued. Trump's proclamation appears to be a legal workaround, invoking presidential authority under Sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act — the same basis used for the travel bans upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court during his first term. A Policy with Far-Reaching Impact Harvard currently hosts more than 10,000 international students and scholars. The ban disrupts not just their mobility, but also their education, research, and career trajectories. While current students may remain temporarily, their visa status is now subject to review under the banner of "national interest." Unlike previous broad travel bans that targeted specific countries, this order is unique in singling out one academic institution. It accuses Harvard of failing to report disciplinary and criminal information regarding international students — despite the university stating that no such convictions exist for the past two years. The administration's rationale includes a mix of national security concerns, allegations of ties to the Chinese government, and accusations that Harvard has hosted individuals affiliated with the Chinese military. In a supporting fact sheet, the administration pointed to over $150 million in foreign funding since 2020, rising campus crime rates, and support for diversity and inclusion policies as further justification. Shifting Sentiments Among Global Students This proclamation has introduced fresh instability for students who once saw American education as a sure investment in their futures. Many who had secured admission to Harvard are now left in limbo, unable to enter the U.S. and uncertain whether they'll be able to pursue their degrees at all. The ban is likely to accelerate a trend already in motion — international students exploring alternative destinations such as Germany, Ireland, Australia, and Asian countries, where policies have remained relatively stable and welcoming. Institutions in those regions may now benefit from an outflow of highly qualified students deterred by U.S. restrictions. For generations, the United States has been the top destination for international students seeking academic excellence, innovation, and global opportunities. From Ivy League campuses to cutting-edge research labs, American institutions have drawn the best minds from across the world. But the latest move by the U.S. President Donald Trump has cast a shadow over that reputation. With rising visa restrictions and unpredictable policy shifts, many are questioning whether the U.S. remains a reliable choice for higher education. Beyond Harvard: A Larger Pattern? While the immediate order targets Harvard, it raises concerns that similar actions could extend to other American universities, especially those receiving significant foreign funding or engaged in global partnerships. The precedent set by targeting a specific institution based on political grievances introduces a degree of unpredictability previously unseen in U.S. higher education policy. International students — once seen as cultural ambassadors and economic contributors — now face a climate where geopolitical narratives can redefine their eligibility overnight. Even institutions with strong global reputations are no longer immune from federal scrutiny or political backlash. The Long-Term Cost to U.S. Education International students are integral to American universities, contributing billions of dollars annually to the economy, diversifying campuses, and driving innovation in STEM and business fields. Policies that restrict their participation may erode the global standing of U.S. education, damage institutional competitiveness, and discourage future applicants. As the world watches Harvard's next legal move — and the outcome of any new court challenges — many students are quietly shifting their aspirations elsewhere. In an increasingly uncertain environment, academic excellence alone may no longer be enough to outweigh the risks of studying in the United States. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!


United News of India
22 minutes ago
- United News of India
IIT Madras, GRID India join hands to strengthen Tanzania's electric infra
Chennai, June 5 (UNI) The Indian Institute of Technology-Madrs (IIT Madras) is collaborating with GRID-INDIA, a Central Public Sector Enterprise, to offer certification programs, conduct joint research, and deliver technical consultation projects to strengthen Tanzania's energy infrastructure. An MoU in this regard was inked recently IIT-Madras announced on Thursday. With an active presence in Africa through IITM Zanzibar, the institute is committed to building global partnerships for sustainable energy. GRID-INDIA, a Miniratna company under the Union Ministry of Power is the National system operator responsible for the reliable and secure management of India's electricity grid. The effort at IIT Madras will be led through the Energy Consortium, an industry-academia collaborative center of excellence focused on clean energy. Expanding horizons, this partnership creates new opportunities for cross-border knowledge exchange, applied research, and commercialisation of clean energy technologies. Prof Manu Santhanam, Dean (IC&SR), said 'IIT Madras Zanzibar was conceived to extend our academic and research excellence to international geographies with a focus on regional relevance. Our collaboration with GRID-INDIA allows us to leverage decades of experience in power systems research and industry engagement in India to deliver targeted capacity-building and applied technology programs for East Africa.' Emphasizing the significance of this MoU, Mr Paresh R. Ranpara, Director (HR), GRID-INDIA, said, 'We are looking forward to this collaboration with IIT Madras to catalyse and promote capacity building in Power Sector for Tanzanian and other east African professionals, with the Zanzibar campus as a focal point. This partnership demonstrates the shared vision of GRID-INDIA and IIT Madras Zanzibar for supporting resilient, future-ready energy systems across the globe.' It said this project encompasses strengthening the technical capabilities of Tanzanian power sector officials through Certification Program that aims to provide foundational knowledge for professionals in areas such as power systems, renewable energy, and energy management; Specialized Certification Programs with hands on trainings on topics such as power system protection and case studies; Joint Research Programs in areas such as microgrids, data analytics and AI and Consultation Projects to provide practical solutions and insights to address the evolving challenges in the Tanzanian power sector. UNI GV 1648