Canada manufacturing PMI shows activity declining for sixth straight month in July
The S&P Global Canada Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) edged up to 46.1 in July from 45.6 in June but remained well below the 50 no-change threshold.
A level below 50 indicates contraction in the sector. The PMI has posted sub-50 readings since February.
'Canada's manufacturing sector continued to struggle in the face of tariffs during July, with output, new orders and buying activity all declining at noticeable rates – albeit to lesser degrees than seen in recent months," Paul Smith, economics director at S&P Global Market Intelligence, said in a statement.
"Unsurprisingly, it was again trade with the United States that remained especially challenging, with firms noting reduced demand and sales volumes from US-based clients."
The new orders index rose to 44.2 from 43.5 in June, while the measure of new export orders was at 41.9, up from 40.2.
The U.S. is set to increase tariffs on Canadian goods not covered by a continental trade pact to 35% if the two countries do not reach a trade agreement by August 1. Canada sends about 75% of its exports to the United States.
"For companies facing a hugely unpredictable business environment, it has become increasingly important to run operations as lean as possible,"
Smith said. "And such considerations inevitably led to further cuts to both employment and purchasing activity.'
The stocks of purchases index fell to 44.1 from 44.6 in June, posting its lowest level since May 2020, as firms sought to run down their inventory levels, while the employment index was at 46.2, down from 46.7.
One silver lining was reduced input cost inflation. The input price index fell to its lowest since November, at 57.0 from 61.4 in June.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Trump again threatens India with harsh tariffs over Russian oil purchases
WASHINGTON, Aug 4 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump again threatened on Monday to raise tariffs on goods from India over its Russian oil purchases, while New Delhi called his attack "unjustified" and vowed to protect its economic interests, deepening the trade rift between the two countries. In a social media post, Trump wrote, "India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine." "Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA," he added. A spokesperson for India's foreign ministry said in response that India will "take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security." "The targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable," the spokesperson added. Trump has said that from Friday he will impose new sanctions on Russia as well as on countries that buy its energy exports, unless Moscow takes steps to end its 3-1/2 year war with Ukraine, opens new tab. Russian President Vladimir Putin has shown no public sign of altering his stance despite the deadline. Over the weekend, two Indian government sources told Reuters that India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite Trump's threats. India has faced pressure from the West to distance itself from Moscow since Russia invaded Ukraine in early 2022. New Delhi has resisted, citing its longstanding ties with Russia and economic needs, opens new tab. Trump had already in July announced 25% tariffs on Indian imports, and U.S. officials have cited a range of geopolitical issues standing in the way of a U.S.-India trade accord. Trump has also cast the wider BRICS group of developing nations as hostile to the United States. Those nations have dismissed his accusation, saying the group promotes the interests of its members and of developing countries at large. India is the biggest buyer of seaborne crude from Russia, importing about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil from January to June this year, up 1% from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by trade sources. India began importing oil from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the Ukraine conflict, the Indian spokesperson said, calling it a "necessity compelled by global market situation." The spokesperson also noted the West's, particularly the European Union's, bilateral trade with Russia: "It is revealing that the very nations criticizing India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia." Despite the Indian government's defiance, the country's main refiners paused buying Russian oil last week, sources told Reuters. Discounts to other suppliers narrowed after Trump threatened hefty tariffs on countries that make any such purchases. Indian government officials denied any policy change. The country's largest refiner, Indian Oil Corp, has bought 7 million barrels of crude from the United States, Canada and the Middle East, four trade sources told Reuters on Monday. India also has been frustrated by Trump repeatedly taking credit for an India-Pakistan ceasefire that he announced on social media in May, which halted days of hostilities between the nuclear-armed neighbors. The unpredictability of the Trump administration creates a challenge for Delhi, said Richard Rossow, head of the India program at Washington's Center for Strategic and International Studies. "India's continued energy and defense purchases from Russia presents a larger challenge, where India does not feel it can predict how the Trump administration will approach Russia from month to month," he said.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Washington Post veteran says he left after 18 years over Bezos ‘unapologetically patriotic' content mandate
A veteran Washington Post columnist who quit the newspaper last month has spoken out against owner Jeff Bezos 's Trump-friendly transformation of the opinion pages. Jonathan Capehart, who joined the Post in 2007 and served on its editorial board until 2023, said on MSNBC on Friday that he had chosen to leave because the new demand for "unapologetically patriotic" articles left "[no] room for a voice like mine". He was among several high-profile journalists and editors who accepted a buyout offered by the Post 's new CEO William Lewis to any employees who "do not feel aligned" with Bezos's new order. The news comes after the Amazon founder and chairman decreed this February that the Post 's opinion pages would now pivot to supporting "personal liberties and free markets", while excluding any contrary views. Asked on air why he had chosen to leave, Capehart said that Bezos — who had a prominent seat at Donald Trump's inauguration and is currently the world's fourth richest person, according to Forbes — had the "right" to make those changes but that they left no space for his perspective. "It became clear, as time went along, and especially when he chose a new leader for the section, that there was just not going to be any room for a voice like mine, especially when we were told that we would have to be unapologetically patriotic in talking about the positive things happening in the country," Capehart said. "How can you talk about the positive things happening in the country when the rest of the house is engulfed in flames and the foundation is flooding?' he asked. "I wanted to go someplace where my voice would be heard." By "new leader", Capehart was referring to the paper's new opinion editor Adam O'Neal, who vowed in June to publish "unapologetically patriotic" articles "rooted in fundamental optimism about the future of this country". Capehart had previously quit the Post 's editorial board in 2023 after an editorial that he felt minimized systemic racism was published over his objections. At the time, he was the board's only Black member. When Bezos bought the 147-year-old newspaper in 2013, he promised that its "values... [did] not need changing" and that it would not be beholden "to the private interests of its owners". "I won't be leading The Washington Post day-to-day," he added. That all changed starting in October 2024, 11 days before election day, when Bezos reportedly intervened personally in order to block the editorial board's planned endorsement of Kamala Harris, breaking with decades of tradition. Since then there has been an exodus of longtime workers, with many complaining that they were subject to increased editorial meddling or even directly blocked from criticizing Bezos. "I believe we face a very real threat of autocracy in the candidacy of Donald Trump. I find it untenable and unconscionable that we have lost our voice at this perilous moment," wrote former editorial board member and Pulitzer Prize winner David Hoffman when he resigned last October.
Reuters
2 hours ago
- Reuters
Axon raises annual revenue forecast on strong security demand
Aug 4 (Reuters) - TASER maker Axon Enterprise (AXON.O), opens new tab raised its full-year revenue forecast on Monday, betting on continued demand for its software products and security devices. Shares of Axon were up 3.5% in aftermarket trading. The Arizona-based company — known for its law enforcement technology, including TASER energy weapons, body-worn cameras, and digital evidence management systems — has benefited from rising corporate spending on executive security and increased federal investment in immigration enforcement. Axon now expects 2025 revenue to be between $2.65 billion and $2.73 billion, up from its earlier forecast of $2.60 billion to $2.70 billion. Analysts on average expect $2.66 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG. For the quarter ended June 30, Axon reported adjusted earnings of $2.12 per share, well above analysts' average estimate of $1.46. Quarterly revenue came in at $668.54 million, compared with expectations of $631.56 million.
