logo
The time The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints donated 7,000 Qurans to Muslims

The time The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints donated 7,000 Qurans to Muslims

Yahoo05-02-2025

Shaykh Hamza Yusuf grew up as a white Irish Catholic but converted to Islam, changed his name and co-founded Zaytuna College, the first accredited Muslim undergraduate college in the United States, where he serves as president.
Elder Ahmad S. Corbitt is a Black American with a Muslim first name who worked as a trial attorney and led corporate and government communications for a company on the Eastern Seaboard before he became a General Authority Seventy for The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
The two men found themselves on stage together Tuesday for a dialogue at IRF Summit 2025, a major international religious freedom conference.
'If we can start off with why we agreed to do this?' Elder Corbitt said with a smile, prompting laughter from Shaykh Yusuf and hundreds in the Washington Hilton ballroom near the national capital's famous Embassy Row.
The two religious leaders swiftly found common ground.
'I think getting to know one another is very important,' Shaykh Yusuf said to answer Elder Corbitt's question. 'I think America is uniquely positioned to teach a lot of places about civic society and religious freedom. We obviously have our failures, but we do have something extraordinary here.'
The hallmark of the possibility embodied by America is education, he said. 'I think the more educated people are, the easier it is to get along with people' because the more they know, the more they realize they know less.
'The Quran says, 'As of knowledge, you've been given a very small amount.' There's kind of a certitude that too many people have that creates a very ugly world,' he said.
They firmly agreed that conviction in faith in God is vital, but also offered moderating ideas.
Shaykh Yusuf suggested it is a mistake for believers to be certain about their understanding of their faiths and that it is problematic to not 'allow for the possibility that somebody else might have a more valid opinion.'
Elder Corbitt said there is something important 'about a humility in our conviction that affords someone else the same right. One of the Articles of Faith of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is that, 'We claim the privilege of worshiping Almighty God according to the dictates of our conscience and afford all people the same privilege, let them worship, how, where and what they may.' That's a fundamental tenet to us and to Islam.'
Shaykh Yusuf expressed concern that American education is in decline, in part because of digital devices and digital addictions.
'I think religious faith, more than anything, is going to be the most important element in being able to survive what's coming because things are getting really difficult for people out there,' he said.
Shaykh Yusuf also said it his belief that the light of God is refracted through the prism of the intellect.
'If it's not refracted through that prism, it blinds, it doesn't guide,' he said.
'That refraction,' Elder Corbitt said, 'is facilitated, in my opinion and experience, most powerfully and clearly and effectively through service, through actions.'
He said he was inspired to learn that after the 2004 tsunamis devastated South Asia before he was a church leader, the Church of Jesus Christ went into Aceh Province in Indonesia and asked what the people needed. The first, grim answer, he said, was thousands of body bags. The church also provided new fishing boats and mosques.
'But the thing that most moved me is that The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints donated 7,000 copies of the holy Quran to our Muslim brothers and sisters in the Aceh Province. That had nothing to do with proselytizing,' he said. 'It had to do with ...'
'An act of good will,' Shaykh Yusuf said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday
Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday

Trump's travel ban on 12 countries goes into effect early Monday Show Caption Hide Caption What we know now about President Trump's new travel ban taking effect How could President Trump's travel ban or restriction of nearly 20 countries impact you? Here is what we know now. WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump's order banning citizens of 12 countries from entering the United States goes into effect at 12:01 a.m. ET on June 9, a move the president promulgated to protect the country from "foreign terrorists." The countries affected by the latest travel ban are Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen. The entry of people from seven other countries — Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan, and Venezuela — will be partially restricted. Trump, a Republican, said the countries subject to the most severe restrictions were determined to harbor a "large-scale presence of terrorists," fail to cooperate on visa security, have an inability to verify travelers' identities, as well as inadequate record-keeping of criminal histories and high rates of visa overstays in the United States. He cited the June 1 incident in Boulder, Colorado, in which an Egyptian national tossed a gasoline bomb into a crowd of pro-Israel demonstrators as an example of why the new curbs are needed. But Egypt is not part of the travel ban. 'I caution them not to travel': Expert warns travelers from banned countries to stay home The travel ban forms part of Trump's policy to restrict immigration into the United States and is reminiscent of a similar move in his first term when he barred travelers from seven Muslim-majority nations. Officials and residents in countries whose citizens will soon be banned expressed dismay and disbelief. Chad President Mahamat Idriss Deby Itno said he had instructed his government to stop granting visas to U.S. citizens in response to Trump's action. "Chad has neither planes to offer nor billions of dollars to give, but Chad has its dignity and its pride," he said in a Facebook post, referring to countries such as Qatar, which gifted the United States a luxury airplane for Trump's use and promised to invest billions of dollars in the U.S. Afghans who worked for the United States or U.S.-funded projects and were hoping to resettle in the U.S. expressed fear that the travel ban would force them to return to their country, where they could face reprisal from the Taliban. Democratic U.S. lawmakers also voiced concern about the policies. "Trump's travel ban on citizens from over 12 countries is draconian and unconstitutional," said U.S. Representative Ro Khanna on social media on June 5. "People have a right to seek asylum." (Reporting by Trevor Hunnicutt; writing by Mary Milliken; editing by Sandra Maler)

ABC News Suspends Terry Moran Over 'Hater' Social Media Post
ABC News Suspends Terry Moran Over 'Hater' Social Media Post

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

ABC News Suspends Terry Moran Over 'Hater' Social Media Post

ABC News has suspended senior national correspondent Terry Moran after he referred to White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller as a 'world-class hater' in a social media post. 'ABC News stands for objectivity and impartiality in its news coverage and does not condone subjective personal attacks on others,' an ABC News spokesperson said in a comment to HuffPost. 'The post does not reflect the views of ABC News and violated our standards — as a result, Terry Moran has been suspended pending further evaluation.' In the social media post, Moran, who has worked as a senior national correspondent for ABC News since 2018, wrote that 'bile' is what's interesting about Miller. 'The thing about Stephen Miller is not that he is the brains behind Trumpism,' Moran wrote early Sunday morning in the since-deleted post. 'Yes, he is one of the people who conceptualizes the impulses of the Trumpist movement and translates them into policy. But that's not what's interesting about Miller. It's not brains. It's bile. Miller is a man who is richly endowed with the capacity for hatred. He's a world-class hater. You can see this just by looking at him because you can see that his hatreds are his spiritual nourishment. He eats his hate. Trump is a world-class hater. But his hatred only a means to an end, and that end his his own glorification. That's his spiritual nourishment.' Vice President JD Vance called the post an 'absolutely vile smear' of Miller. Miller said Moran 'pulled off his mask.' 'The most important fact about Terry's full public meltdown is what it shows about the corporate press in America,' Miller responded on social media. 'For decades, the privileged anchors and reporters narrating and gatekeeping our society have been radicals adopting a journalist's pose. Terry pulled off his mask.' It's unclear what led to Moran's post, but Miller has been credited with shaping President Donald Trump's immigration policies, including a zero-tolerance policy, which separated parents and children who illegally crossed the border. An outside White House adviser told Vanity Fair in 2018 that Miller likes seeing photos of families being separated at the southern border. 'Stephen actually enjoys seeing those pictures at the border,' an outside White House adviser told Vanity Fair. 'He's a twisted guy, the way he was raised and picked on. There's always been a way he's gone about this. He's Waffen-SS.' In April, during Moran's interview with Trump, Trump said Moran wasn't 'being very nice' after Moran pushed back on Trump's claim that Kilmar Abrego Garcia had a gang tattoo. Rep. Mary Miller Loses It Over 'A Muslim' Speaking In Congress National Guard Troops Arrive In Los Angeles On Trump's Orders To Quell Immigration Protests What To Know About Trump Deploying National Guard To L.A. Immigration Protests

Can we still be Britain without the British? We'd rather you didn't ask
Can we still be Britain without the British? We'd rather you didn't ask

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Can we still be Britain without the British? We'd rather you didn't ask

I couldn't care less about the burka debate. Not a tinker's. Why? Because it's a concession of defeat, a belated response by panicked politicians to a change that's already happened and that they largely encouraged. Last week, a meteor hit Britain with the publication of a demographic study by the queerly named Centre of Heterodox Social Science. By 2063, say the sociable hets, white Britons will be a minority; come the new century, almost one in five citizens will be Muslim. This forces us to consider a very politically incorrect question: will Britain still be Britain if it's no longer majority white British? The official answer is 'absolutely, yes'. Elite liberals believe nations are defined by values, and thus anyone, from anywhere in the world, can become British if they conform to them. It helps that these values are universal. Fairness, tolerance, kindness... this is a portable identity that is uncontroversial, because it demands nothing except to pay one's taxes and avoid murder. Keir Starmer warns that we are becoming an 'island of strangers', while promoting a vision of citizenship that is entirely passive. It's also based on a misreading of human nature. Liberals assume that values shape culture, such that we could pass a law – ban the burka, ban Islamophobia – and we'd become good neighbours overnight. But it's the other way around. Culture shapes values, and culture is the product of non-abstract, substantial qualities, such as climate, geography, religion, language and ethnicity. We can shorthand it as 'history'. Thus: we are democratic in Britain not because a committee decided it over one wild weekend, but following nearly a thousand years of revolution and reaction, baked into memory and expressed as temperament. Such a society is light-touch and self-governing, at least in theory, because we've been marinating in its ethics and customs since birth. The English, Welsh, Scots etc do exist as cultures – not superior to others, nor unaffected by migration, but really real – and if they undergo a profound change in composition, this is bound to change the nature of Britishness, too. Isn't that obvious? It's regarded as axiomatic elsewhere. We rush to recognise and cultivate the historical identity of First Nations people, just as we step back nervously from a Holy Land conflict shaped by competing ethnic claims over biblical territory. And even if you regard ethnic conflict as sinful, as I do, or based upon a category error, as academics insist, we have to accept that identity matters to a lot of people. In which case, I struggle to think of a society in history that has faced the scale of change happening to us without descending into violence or authoritarianism. Today, the liberal understanding of nationhood is already in retreat. Remigration is being trialled in the United States. Donald Trump is reducing inflows by banning travel from named countries, cutting asylum and militarising his border. He's also increasing outflows by expelling as many people as he can on any pretext he can find. For instance, when an Egyptian asylum-seeker assaulted protesters in Colorado, the administration not only arrested the attacker but detained and is seeking to deport his entire family – a 'sins of the father' policy that judges are resisting. Elsewhere, the BBC's Simon Reeve has caused a stir by highlighting the integrationist policies of Denmark, a country that offers people cash to go home and dismantles ghettos. That this is done by social democrats comes as no surprise. Scandinavia is historically conformist; a welfare state requires high levels of solidarity to function. Evidence of my 'history-shapes-identity' theory is offered by how countries respond to the immigration challenge in light of their own traditions. Here, when a Reform UK MP asked the PM for his views on the burka, the PM had no answer and his MPs sounded as shocked as a maiden aunt offered cocaine. Why doesn't Labour want to have this debate? A cynic will say: it offends their core constituency. A Tory will claim: they don't really care about immigration. And yet Labour's immigration White Paper looks tough, and it has already increased deportations compared with the last government. Historically, it was Labour that restricted Commonwealth immigration in the 1960s, and Boris Johnson, of Brexit fame, who threw the borders open. Boris, who liked to play both sides of the immigration game, infamously compared the burka to a letter box – yet did not wish to ban it. Do we not say 'an Englishman's home is his castle'? By extension, they are free to wear whatever they want in the street. The problem, reply nationalists, is that by clinging to a liberal vision, we open the door to illiberal attitudes that might, by strength of conviction, overwhelm us. If the culture goes, our old values will follow. We are not, however, as tolerant as many assume. It has been reported that Prevent now regards 'cultural nationalism' – the fear that society 'is under threat from mass migration and a lack of integration' – as a 'sub-category of extreme Right-wing terrorist ideologies', and thus worthy of referral to the authorities. GB News is up in arms – admittedly a permanent condition – but I've yet to hear a guest point out that white Christians are merely experiencing what the security services have done to Muslim Britons since 9/11: slander and harassment. Between 2016 and 2019, over 2,000 children under the age of nine were referred to Prevent, including a four-year-old Muslim boy who talked about a violent computer game at an after-school club. Right and Left are chasing a mirage of British liberalism that, in an age when you can get 31 months for a social-media post, no longer reflects reality. Immigration is ultimately a numbers game. A democratic society can get along fine with any minority, so long as it remains small in number. But when a government fails to police its borders, and thus loses control over numbers, it will feel obliged to police society to maintain harmony: monitoring, deporting, rewriting history, and indoctrinating us in a strange new variant on national character, a parody of kindness best described as 'sinister twee'. If you want a vision of the future, it is a Dawn French-shaped woman, with a midlife-crisis fringe, talking to you about diversity and inclusion as if you were a baby. Then, when you raise an objection, ending the discussion with a disturbingly final 'NO'. Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store