Church of Scotland bosses under-fire over trans rules after girl, 11, ‘froze' after finding MAN in toilets
GENDER ROW Church of Scotland bosses under-fire over trans rules after girl, 11, 'froze' after finding MAN in toilets
Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window)
Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
CHURCH of Scotland bosses have been slammed after an 11-year-old girl "froze" when she found a man in the toilets of a community centre.
The organisation was found to have flouted the law on single-sex spaces following the landmark Supreme Court ruling in April, The Times reports.
Sign up for Scottish Sun
newsletter
Sign up
3
An 11-year-old girl froze after she found a man in the toilets (STOCK IMAGE)
Credit: Alamy
3
The incident happened after the landmark Supreme Court ruling on the definition of a woman
Credit: Alamy
The Supreme Court unanimously found 'sex' under the Equality Act referred to 'biological sex'.
It means guidance around toilets, changing rooms and other facilities will have to be changed to exclude trans people where single-sex services are provided.
But the Church of Scotland wrongly stated that biological men could still share female loos.
The girl's mum initially raised concerns over a man from an LBGT club using female facilities at a church-run community centre in Cupar, Fife.
Her 11-year-old daughter, who was attending a drama class, "froze" when she came face to face with the man in the toilets back in May.
She later spoke with the church minister, Rev Jeff Martin, who was initially supportive, she claimed.
But in an email last week, further advice from Church of Scotland HQ stated that "a trans woman's use of the women's toilet aligns with her gender identity, and this is lawful and consistent with best practice".
The church claimed its stance was based on the advice of "legal experts" like activist group Stonewall and the Good Law Project, which is looking to overturn the Supreme Court ruling.
The Church of Scotland admitted that its advice was wrong after being approached by the Times.
It said: "We support the right of women and girls to access single-sex spaces and the right of trans women and trans men to access gender-neutral spaces, so that trans people are not put in a position where there are no facilities for them to use."
NATS health secretary Neil Gray today failed to back nurse Sandie Peggie amid a row over single-sex space
Leading equalities law expert Dr Michael Foran said the Church of Scotland's initial advice "completely misstates the law".
Trina Budge, from For Women Scotland, was left "quite astonished" over the advice.
She added: "We are delighted and relieved that the church has reconsidered its position."
Every organisation in the UK was told to look over their equalities policies following the Supreme Court ruling.
And around 18 schools in Scotland are set to reintroduce single-sex facilities.
It comes after the Scottish Government said that local authorities have a statutory responsibility for the school estate, including the provision of toilets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
7 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Unspun: Scotland's Defence bill & the independence debate
Defence is one of the main issues at the heart of Scotland's constitutional debate and a row over the price tag attached to it has become a political battleground. For decades, warships built in Glasgow, nuclear weapons on the Clyde and RAF jets patrolling the skies have symbolised Scotland's significant role in UK defence. And as the 'UK's defence hub', Scotland has naturally seen the political discourse surrounding the topic play out vividly. The most recent Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (GERS) report, published last week, has reignited the debate. The Scottish Government says Scotland contributes £2.1 billion a year towards defence, based on its share of the UK population. Shona Robison argues that GERS allocates Scotland a 'population share' of reserved UK spending rather than accounting for real expenditure. Yet, the Secretary of State for Scotland, Labour's Ian Murray, describes the Scottish Government £2.1 billion figure as 'wholly misleading' and has said it 'fundamentally misrepresents how the defence of our nation works'. Westminster points to official GERS figures that allocate a much higher £5.1 billion when nuclear submarines, overseas operations, and procurement are included. Economists from the Fraser of Allander Institute suggest the Scottish Government £2.1 billion figure comes from a Ministry of Defence report which only covers transactions with UK-based companies, excluding overseas purchases or research and development that may benefit the sector. For the SNP, the lower figure helps bolster the case that Scotland could fund its own defence force while still investing more in areas such as health, education, and welfare. For Unionists, the £5.1bn estimate underlines the scale of protection provided by being part of the UK, and the challenge of replicating it in an independent state. As with so much in Scotland's constitutional debate, the fight is not really about statistics. It is about competing visions of sovereignty, security, and national priorities. The defence debate is also about livelihoods. Thousands of jobs are tied to the UK's nuclear deterrent at Faslane and Coulport and the MOD contracts sustain Scotland's naval construction industry. At RAF Lossiemouth, secure and well-paid employment supports many in a rural area. Then there's the planned £250 million redevelopment of Faslane which could create even more jobs. An independent Scotland could not guarantee the same scale of investment, at least in the short term. Supporters of independence argue jobs could be redirected into conventional defence forces and shipbuilding for Scotland's own navy. However, critics warn of potential economic shock if UK contracts were lost. READ MORE FROM UNSPUN: Opposition parties accuse the SNP of 'cooking the books,' using a narrow calculation to make independence look more affordable. The SNP counters that Westminster deliberately inflates costs to portray Scotland as dependent. Either way, the row highlights a recurring problem: independence cannot be debated without first agreeing on what the numbers actually mean. As long as two different sets of figures circulate, both sides can claim victory for their own arguments. Defence is about more than money. It is about identity, alliances, and Scotland's place in the world. Would Scots accept higher taxes to maintain a credible military? Could an independent Scotland sit in NATO while rejecting nuclear weapons? These are not abstract questions. They will shape the arguments going into the 2026 Holyrood election. And just as the independence referendum in 2014 was shaped by doubts over currency and oil, the next debate may well turn on the price tag of defence.
Scottish Sun
37 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Nursery worker who attacked 21 tots is ‘best pals with babysitter killer in jail' as pair ‘act like they own the place'
Both women are said to have shown 'no remorse' for their sick crimes SICK PALS Nursery worker who attacked 21 tots is 'best pals with babysitter killer in jail' as pair 'act like they own the place' TWO of Britain's most notorious female prisoners have become "best pals" while in prison and "act like they own the place", insiders claim. Evil nursery worker Roksana Lecka, who attacked 21 toddlers, and notorious babysitter killer Sabrina Kouider are both locked up at HMP Bronzefield. 6 Roksana Lecka attacked 21 babies at a nursery Credit: Met police 6 Sabrina Kouider was sentenced to life for torturing and murdering nanny Sophie Lionnet Credit: Reuters Advertisement 6 The evil duo ohave been dubbed 'glam lags' and angered even hardened criminals Credit: Alamy The evil pair are said to have become "inseparable" in jail, according to sources. Despite the severity of their crimes, the pair have reportedly displayed more vanity than contrition and would dress up and cover themselves with fake eyelashes and make-up. Lecka and Kouider strut around" like they "own the place" fellow prisoners have claimed. Advertisement They sit around, hang out, and mock other prisoners at the all-female jail, and neither have shown "any remorse" for their sickening crimes, according to those who saw them on a daily basis. Their brazen behaviour and appearance has even earned them the title - "glam lags" and angered even hardened criminals. One former prisoner, who was serving a sentence for assault, said: 'Lecka would walk around like she had not done anything - she looks down on people. 'She is very good friends with Sabrina Kouider who killed her babysitter. Advertisement 'They are best pals. Sabrina is a narcissistic horrible person. They will chill together, sit up, talk about people, laugh at them, make fun of people. They are going on like they own the place. 'I would see them every day. I would not talk to Roksana as I couldn't stand what she had done. 'She was boastful and thinks so highly of herself. She was very vain - always dressed up with eyelashes and make-up on. 'They were more focused on their image than showing any remorse for what they did.' Lecka, 22, was found guilty of 21 counts of child cruelty in June after she abused multiple children in her care following a six week trial at Kingston Crown Court. Advertisement Mum of French nanny Sophie Lionnet brutally murdered by Sabrina Kouider and Ouissem Medouni says they should be 'burnt at the stake like Joan of Arc' She pinched several children dozens of times in the course of one day, causing them to cry and flinch away from her, the CPS said. On one occasion she kicked a little boy in the face several times. She was also seen to push babies head first over cots and cover a toddler's mouth when he started to cry. Lecka was brought to justice after a Met investigation found Lecka had abused children as young as ten months at two separate nurseries in Twickenham and Hounslow between October 2023 and June 2024. She reportedly became "inseperable" with Kouider, who once had a baby with a Boyzone member before murdering her babysitter. Advertisement The then 35-year-old was sentenced to life in prison in 2018 alongside her partner Ouissem Medouni, 40, after they tortured their French nanny Sophie Lionnet, 21, before killing her and throwing her body on a bonfire. They were found guilty of her murder in Wimbledon after a trial heard they had a deluded belief she was in league with Mark Walton, the ex-Boyzone band member turned music mogul, with whom Kouider once had a relationship. The fellow prisoner added: 'I was appalled and shocked by it. I was disgusted - the way she walked about like she had not done anything. 'I overheard conversations where she was boasting she was going to get off. 'After I got out, I saw on the news a few days ago the scale of what she had done. It was disgusting. I should have known, the fact she befriended Sabrina I should have known she was guilty. Advertisement 'Roksana seemed gleeful. She had no remorse whatsoever for what she did. 'She was boastful and just thinks so highly of herself.' The prison is run by Sodexo and a spokesperson for HMP Bronzefield spokesperson said: 'We don't comment on individuals.' 6 Kouider was obsessed with her Boyzone ex Mark Walton Credit: Enterprise News and Pictures 6 Lecka admitted seven counts of cruelty and was found guilty of another 14 Credit: Met police Advertisement
Telegraph
38 minutes ago
- Telegraph
First trans judge appeals to ECHR over Supreme Court ruling
Britain's first transgender judge has lodged an appeal with the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) against the Supreme Court ruling on gender. In April, Supreme Court judges ruled the terms 'woman' and 'sex' in the Equality Act referred to biological sex and not to acquired gender in a legal action brought against the Scottish Government by For Women Scotland, a campaign group. Lawyers for Victoria McCloud told The Telegraph that she was seeking a re-hearing of the case, arguing the Supreme Court undermined her Article 6 rights to a fair trial after refusing to hear representation from her and evidence from any other transgender individuals or groups. But women's rights campaigners dismissed the case as 'fantasy' and say McCloud should exhaust 'all domestic legal remedies' before going to Strasbourg. In a statement on Monday morning, Ms McCloud said: 'There is no space for decision-making about us, without us. 'I intend to ensure that there will be no peace for the gender-critical ideological movement, the Labour Government appeasing it, or space in our schools, homes and workplaces for an ideology which causes harm, misery and oppression of a small and law-abiding minority in our formerly tolerant country.' Ms McCloud is being represented by Oscar Davies, the UK's first openly non-binary barrister, and Olivia Campbell-Cavendish, the founder and executive director of the Trans Legal Clinic and the first black trans lawyer in the UK. The Trans Legal Clinic has launched a legal fundraiser for £150,000 to raise funds to support the case, and it is the first one in British history to be brought by a trans-led legal team. But the challenge has provoked a backlash from women's rights groups. Maya Forstater, the chief executive of the women's human rights charity Sex Matters, told The Telegraph: 'What we are being told about this proposed case is incomprehensible. 'The European Court of Human Rights only hears cases that have exhausted all domestic legal remedies, and since McCloud wasn't a party to For Women Scotland in the Supreme Court, that's not the case here. 'It's a fantasy that someone can go straight to Strasbourg to complain that the Supreme Court in their own country didn't listen to them.' Ms Forstater said Ms McCloud's team should go to the UK High Court to 'seek a declaration of incompatibility with domestic human rights law'. Susan Smith, from For Women Scotland, said: 'As far as we understand it is the SC's prerogative whether to accept interventions or not. It obviously carefully considered McCloud's application and made a decision based on the value of its content. 'The court is solely concerned with statutory interpretation and does not hear personal testimony or take evidence, and rarely takes interventions from individuals. 'We will watch with interest whether McCloud's application is accepted by the ECHR or even if it comes within the deadline to proceed.' 'Public figure and a target' Ms McCloud quit the profession last year after claiming she could no longer do the job without politicising the judiciary. She transitioned in the 1990s, becoming the first transgender barrister and judge in the UK. She was the youngest person to become a King's Bench Master of the High Court at the age of 40 in 2010. In her resignation letter last year, she said the leaking of her formerly private transgender identity eight years ago 'came at a cost because I became a public figure and a target'. At the time of the case, the Supreme Court heard interventions from a number of gender-critical groups including Sex Matters, the LGB Alliance and The Lesbian Project. Earlier this month, The Times reported that Labour MPs were also pushing back against the Supreme Court ruling. Andrew Western, a work and pensions minister, told one of his constituents that he felt the case was 'completely unnecessary' and he appreciated 'the fear and distress that has resulted' from it. Josh Newbury, the MP for Cannock Chase, said that it was 'clear' to him 'that trans women are women and that trans men are men'.
