How to see Delta Aquariid meteor shower in UK this week
What is the Delta Aquariid meteor shower?
As explained by the National Space Centre (NSC) website, meteor showers are when the Earth passes through the debris of a comet.
"The dust and gas left behind by the comet burn up in the atmosphere causing a shooting star."
Must-See Sky Events in 2025
The Delta Aquariids marks the start of the summer meteor season in the Northern Hemisphere.
It is one of two meteor showers that converge in the summer, alongside the more famous Perseids, which is set to peak on August 12/13 in the UK.
The Delta Aquariids get their name from the constellation in the night sky that they appear to radiate from - the constellation of Aquarius, near the bright star Delta Aquarii.
How to see the Delta Aquariid meteor shower in the UK
Despite the Delta Aquariid meteor shower being more visible in the southern hemisphere, those in the northern hemisphere will still be able to catch a glimpse.
NSC says to face towards the south-east, with the meteors appearing to originate from near the star Delta Aquarii.
However, the meteors can appear all over the sky, and as RMG explains, meteors will appear longer the further away from the radiant you look.
What's visible in the night sky in the UK 2025
The meteor shower can be best viewed just after midnight, with RMG predicting a "steady stream of meteors" expected over several days.
While the shower doesn't have a noticeable peak, it's expected that it will reach its maximum rate on July 30.
Tips on how to best view the Delta Aquariid meteor shower
The Royal Museums Greenwich has provided its tips on viewing the meteor shower.
Its website says to ensure to check the weather forecast ahead of time, and if the forecast isn't favourable, find a different location to observe from or view the meteor shower on another day.
It adds that in 2025, the Delta Aquariid meteor shower's maximum occurs six days after New Moon, which took place on July 24, so observing conditions are "reasonably favourable".
Top tips on viewing the shower include:
Make sure that you are in a dark sky area and have an unobstructed view towards the south
Recommended Reading:
How can you take a photo of the Northern Lights? A guide for beginners
Why have Northern Lights sightings become more frequent in recent years?
How to take a photo of the Northern Lights? Tips shared
Lie down on a blanket or sit in a lawn chair to ensure that you have a wide view of the sky
Your naked eye is the best instrument to use to see meteors – don't use binoculars or a telescope as these have narrow fields of view
Allow your eyes to adapt to the dark and don't look at any lights, or at your phone, to maintain your dark adaptation
The Go Stargazing website also has some of the publicly accessible dark sky sites in the UK.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
40 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Beam me up, jellyfish: experts unveil spaceships to take us to the stars
Spaceships modelled on jellyfish, 3D-printed homes, polyamorous relationships and vegetarian diets are among the ways in which experts have envisaged making interstellar travel feasible. The ideas from scientists, engineers, architects and social theorists came in response to a global competition to develop plans for 'generation ships', self-sustaining crafts capable of supporting up to 1,500 people on a 250-year journey to a habitable planet. Entrants to the Project Hyperion design competition, launched last year, could only incorporate current technologies or those expected to emerge in the near future, such as nuclear fusion, into their proposals. An expert panel, including Nasa scientists, judged the viability of almost 100 submissions, assessing how their habitats, architecture and social structures would allow the crew to not only survive but flourish as a society across multiple generations of space flight. The winner was Chrysalis, a 58km cigar-shaped craft, designed around a series of concentric cylinders, each dedicated to a different function: 3D-printed living quarters; communal spaces, including parks, libraries and galleries; and farms and biomes of different Earth environments, such as tropical forests. As animals would be brought onboard only to maintain biodiversity, a vegetarian diet would be necessary. The design won praise for its detailed plans, particularly how the psychological resilience of the crew would be vetted by living in isolated Antarctic bases. The proposal also explained how family structures would change, with individuals' sense of belonging based more on being part of the starship community. Inhabitants would be allowed to have children but not necessarily with the same partners. The second place design was Hyperion, a spacecraft which resembles the space station from 2001: A Space Odyssey. The twin rings of this design are engineered to generate an Earth-like magnetic field, which would be essential for a successful pregnancy in deep space, without which the mission would be doomed. The proposal also includes designs for loose-fitting clothes with large sealable pockets to prevent items from falling out in low gravity. The mission would include three pairs of turtles, chosen for their longevity, relatively inactive, and resistance to disease. The third place design, Systema Stellare Proximum, is modelled after the shape of a jellyfish and uses a hollowed-out asteroid as a shield against impacts. It envisages a society guided by a non-human collective intelligence and human council, as well as the potential emergence of new religions, such as neopaganism that deifies 'nature and man, in all his forms'. Other notable entires included Endless Beyond the Stars, which includes floating light created from biogas, generated from the bodies of the dead. Dr Andreas Hein, the executive director of the Initiative for Interstellar Studies, which ran the competition, said it was 'part of a larger exercise to explore if humanity can travel to the stars' and how 'a civilisation might live, learn and evolve in a highly resource-constrained environment'. He added: 'We asked participants to integrate architecture, technology and social systems to conceptualise a functional society spanning centuries – and the outcome was beyond expectations.'
The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
The all-female rescue mission to Mars: my opera about a toxic tech bro takeover of the red planet
Why write an opera about Mars? Because Mars isn't just a planet. It's a philosophy, an ideology. The way humans think about it changes over time, reflecting the unstable mix of assumptions, hopes, dreams and anxieties that define each historical moment. In 1965, Nasa's Mariner 4 probe flew past Mars and beamed the first closeup images of the red planet (or of any other planet) back to Earth. Prior to that flight, humans knew the planet only through telescopes, and it was thought that its surface would feature vegetation and that life may have evolved there. Mariner 4 revealed the truth: it was a rocky, cratered place seemingly devoid of life. President Lyndon B Johnson declared that 'it may just be that life as we know it, with its humanity, is more unique than many have thought, and we must remember this'. The New York Times went further: 'Mars, it now appears, is a desolate world.' If like me you were not then born, try to imagine what it would have been like to be alive in that summer of 1965. In June, Ed White became the first US astronaut to perform a spacewalk. (The Soviet cosmonaut Alexei Leonov had preceded him by just under three months.) White's experience of the spacewalk was so deeply transcendent that he described re-entering the capsule as 'the saddest moment of my life'. Life magazine devoted an issue to White's 'Glorious Walk in the Cosmos': millions pored over the images. Only a few weeks later, Mariner 4's images of Mars were broadcast on TV, showing its desolation. We started a summer floating in White's cosmic bliss, believing that we might not be alone in the universe, only to end it with those hopes quashed. In another summer, 60 years later, we are still immersed in news related to space and technology. Spring was already busy enough. April saw the launch of the first all-female spaceflight, led by Lauren Sánchez – the then fiancee, now wife, of billionaire Jeff Bezos – in a rocket made by Bezos's aerospace company Blue Origin. In May, Elon Musk, another billionaire with an aerospace company, stepped down from running Doge while wearing an 'Occupy Mars' T-shirt. In June, the billionaire venture capitalist, seasteading enthusiast and early Trump adopter Peter Thiel gave an interview to the New York Times in which he declared: 'Mars is supposed to be more than a science project. It's … a political project.' In July, scientists at the National Astronomy Meeting announced evidence of 10,000 miles of ancient riverbeds in a part of Mars not previously thought to have featured water. Then Sotheby's sold the largest Martian meteorite in existence to a private bidder for about $5.3m (nearly £4m) – and President Trump signed an executive order aimed at 'preventing woke AI in the federal government'. Why write an opera about Mars? Because when we talk about Mars we are talking about ourselves – about our ideas of the future, and about the operations of power in the present. So, then, how to write an opera about Mars? You begin by choosing a librettist. The writer Mark O'Connell was the obvious choice. We both share an interest in technology, AI, Silicon Valley and a bundle of ideologies that may or may not be on the average person's radar. These range from transhumanism and futurism through to pronatalism – a movement, increasingly popular in Silicon Valley, that advocates for improving fertility and increasing birthrates to address demographic decline in western countries. Our research was far-ranging, taking what might be termed a hard science-fiction approach. We started with mundane details. How do astronauts exercise? Eat? Shower? Poop? Is it possible for a pregnancy to be carried to term in zero gravity, or Martian gravity, which is 38% of Earth's? The answers range from the benign (using Ared, the advanced resistive exercise device) to the not so benign (one option is to strap the woman into a subterranean centrifuge throughout the pregnancy). The distance between Earth and Mars – approximately 140m miles – means that real-time communication is an impossibility. We wondered how human relationships would be conducted if conversations could only occur via voice note. Everything we researched led to more questions. How might our understanding of ourselves, and of the universe, be changed if we were to discover life on another planet? Would the legal framework outlined in the Outer Space Treaty of 1967 work? Would humans be doomed to repeat the horrific logic of colonisation, or is another way possible? Our opera centres on an all-female mission. Four astronauts – Svetlana, Sally, Judith and Valentina, named after the first four women to go into space – are on their way to Mars aboard the spaceship Buckminster, with only Arabella, the onboard AI, for company. Their mission is to search for water to enable the development of the commune that has already been established there. The journey is long, and made more difficult by the fact that they only have Shrek the Third and a few seasons of The Real Housewives of Beverly Hills. As they prepare to land, they discover their mission has been the subject of a hostile takeover and that they now work for Shadowfax Ventures, a company helmed by libertarian billionaire Axel Parchment. They must now confront isolation, sinister ideologies, the prospect of alien life and a vibeshift toward corporate authoritarianism. As we staked out the plot, the next challenge for me was how to cover this broad territory sonically. I started by thinking about the actual sounds astronauts hear in the different environments they inhabit in space. The sonic overwhelm of a rocket launching; the whirr of fans inside the craft; the industrial clack and punch of machinery. I analysed recordings of the incredibly noisy ambient sounds of the different modules of the International Space Station (ISS), and figured out ways to orchestrate and re-create these sounds. I listened to hours and hours of space audio – whistles, auroral choruses, interstellar audio recordings made by Voyager 1, sonifications of the light curves of different exoplanets and Chris Hadfield's recordings of the toilet on the ISS. I haunted the Space Exploration Stack Exchange, where the community helped me with questions about how a double bass bow might behave in 38% gravity, how a trumpet or violin might degrade in a Martian habitat. Astronauts seem to have a thing for synth music. A look through Dutch astronaut's André Kuiper's ISS playlist shows an interest in Vangelis, Mike Oldfield and Brian Eno. I placed synthesisers within the orchestra and also in the spaceship itself. And for our villain, a character Mark described in musical terms as 'bad EDM', I turned to AI. It seemed apt to fight like with like, and I prompted the system with genre descriptions like 'bro step' and 'fashwave'. In the opera, the astronauts resist the hostile takeover of the future in their own way, no matter the risk. However dystopian the imaginings of Mark and myself, for our astronauts there is ultimately resistance and hope, defiance and even the possibility of joy – all realised through collective action. As our team worked over the summer, aware of the very real human challenges and horrors outside our rehearsal room – in a world that seems to be increasingly controlled by a small number of incredibly rich individuals imposing their will on the rest of us – I was insistently reminded of the fact that it is through coming together that we Earthlings have power and meaning. Mars is at Abbey theatre, Dublin, from 7 to 9 August
The Independent
12 hours ago
- The Independent
Astronomer reveals the three shortest days of this year
Earth will complete a rotation 1.33 milliseconds earlier than usual on Tuesday, August 5. That makes it one of the shortest days of 2025 at 86,399.99867 seconds long. How that happens, and how we can even measure it with such precision, might make your head spin faster, too. On average, Earth physically rotates in 23 hours, 56 minutes, 4 seconds and 90.5 milliseconds – this is called a sidereal day. It is Earth's 'true' rotation relative to distant objects in deep space, like stars. However, the kind of day most people go by is 24 hours long, and that is called a solar day – it's the time between two sunrises, or consecutive noons. The extra 4 minutes come from the fact that Earth has to rotate 1 more degree, to 361 degrees, for the Sun to appear in the same place again. Both kinds of day are slightly shorter on August 5 2025, largely due to what is happening with winds in Earth's atmosphere, fluid circulation in the ocean and magma – and even the Moon 's gravitational pull. Deviations from 24 hours have been accurately measured since the 1970s using atomic clocks and astronomy. Over the course of a year, these changes build up: in 1973, for example, the sum of deviations added up to +1,106 milliseconds, meaning that the Earth lagged behind in its rotation by just over a second. Leap seconds were introduced in the same year to correct for this, with one second added to the clock at the end of the day – 23:59:60. Absurd levels of accuracy are needed in time-keeping. Global positioning systems (more commonly called GPS) can pinpoint where you are in space, that's no problem. But if the planetary surface you are on has physically spun slightly faster or slower than expected that day, an uncorrected GPS won't know that, and your position won't match with your map. A 1.33 millisecond deviation translates to a position error of about 62 cm at the equator, so 1973's cumulative drift would have caused GPS errors of around half a kilometre if left uncorrected over the year. Why doesn't the Earth stay still? To find out how fast the Earth is spinning at all, you need to find a reference frame in which, ideally, nothing is moving. Everything in space moves relative to everything else, but the farther we look, the more still things seem; just as distant hills appear to move slower while you're on a train, and nearby farms rush by. Luckily, there are objects so magnificently bright that they outshine entire galaxies. These are quasars, and they are visible across the universe from billions of light-years away. Quasars are supermassive blackholes up to billions of times the mass of our Sun, which emit between 100 and 10,000 times more light than our entire galaxy, the Milky Way. Quasars are detectable from billions of light-years across the universe, where things are essentially stationary, so they act as cosmic beacons. Radio telescopes measure our position relative to these, yielding values of Earth's true rotation period to sub-millisecond accuracy. Those ultra‑precise observations are also the starting point for computer models which include movements of the atmosphere, oceans, celestial motions and more to predict the length of day. This is how we know, in advance, when a day is shorter, and how to correct GPS as a result. Winds in Earth's atmosphere are the biggest influence on the length of each day as a result of their collisions with the land surface, particularly when they hit mountain ranges. Incredible as it may sound, wind actually slows the spin of the Earth this way. Earth's prevailing winds are fastest in the northern hemisphere winter, but slowest from June to August, so the summer months always bring the shortest days of the year (even though we tend to say these are the 'longest' days in the northern hemisphere, because of their greater daylight duration). These daily and seasonal changes are just short‑lived blips atop broader slowdowns. Over decades, the melting of the polar ice caps has been slowing the Earth's rotation. To understand why, consider a spinning ballerina retracting their outstretched arms – they begin to spin much faster. A spinning ball, like Earth, is no different. Earth is oblate, meaning the surface at the equator is 21.5 km farther from the centre of the planet than the surface at the poles. As climate change melts the polar ice caps, meltwater moves from the poles to the equator via the ocean. Rising sea levels mean water is farther from the surface, and just like the ballerina moving their arms back out, it aids Earth's slowdown. Redistribution of Earth's mass changes our rotation in similar ways, including by earthquakes. The Moon, while beautiful, can be a huge drag over billions of years. Earth's oceans are raised by the Moon's gravity, but as the Earth rotates, the raised oceans are carried slightly ahead of the Moon in its orbit. But the Moon continues pulling on those oceans, dragging them backwards against the Earth's anticlockwise rotation, which slows us down. Earth's rotational energy isn't lost, it's transferred to the Moon, which gains orbital speed and causes it to escape Earth's gravity a little better – this is why it's moving away from us at 3.8 cm a year. Our length of day has increased from 17 hours 2.5 billion years ago largely due to the Moon sapping Earth's angular momentum over the eons. Earth's rotation has slowed every year from 1973 to 2020 (where precise measurements exist), with each year accumulating hundreds of milliseconds of lag, which has already been accounted for by adding 27 leap seconds. Things changed from 2020 – the Earth started spinning faster instead of slower every year, probably the result of angular momentum exchange between the Earth's core and mantle, but modulated by the numerous other motions we've explored. July 5, July 22 and August 5 were singled out as some of this year's fastest days far in advance, because on top of the Earth's internal motions and seasonal quirks in atmospheric winds, the Moon's position in orbit also slows the Earth twice per orbit (every two weeks). This is because when the Moon is directly above the equator, all of its tidal drag acts east to west, but on these dates, it is positioned farthest north and south, weakening that effect. You won't notice the sunrise arrive 1.33 milliseconds sooner, but to precision atomic clocks, quasar‐referenced astronomical measurements, it will be obvious. James O'Donoghue is a Research Associate Professor in Planetary Astronomy and Meteorology at the University of Reading.
